Pages:
Author

Topic: [Closed] MineCo.in - page 11. (Read 41557 times)

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
June 28, 2011, 10:12:06 AM
Dear Wuked, how to conclude a block an extent 3 days - from you appeals it was not heard, and on a new block you call new. Do you consider that conclude large blocks those, whoever a money need? A policy for you is not correct

I'm sorry but I have trouble understanding what you are asking ?
lll
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
June 28, 2011, 05:07:43 AM
Dear Wuked, how to conclude a block an extent 3 days - from you appeals it was not heard, and on a new block you call new. Do you consider that conclude large blocks those, whoever a money need? A policy for you is not correct
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
June 28, 2011, 04:35:15 AM
New block just started if people are looking for a good time to get on board!
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
June 27, 2011, 05:24:53 AM
Plus is correct, this refers to the transaction fees associated with the block, which are distributed on mineco.in.

I thought "fees" were the site's fees (or cut of the block). That's how no percentage pools work(ed). 

Are the block fees (paid to the block finder/pool) always the same?
no, it depends on whether transactions are sent for free or with a fee
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
June 26, 2011, 02:03:34 PM
Plus is correct, this refers to the transaction fees associated with the block, which are distributed on mineco.in.

I thought "fees" were the site's fees (or cut of the block). That's how no percentage pools work(ed). 

Are the block fees (paid to the block finder/pool) always the same?
lll
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
June 26, 2011, 11:08:00 AM
as far as do we count a long block ? got tired
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
June 25, 2011, 06:24:37 PM
Angry What with a site?
Why it is not worked?


LuL.
lll
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
June 25, 2011, 05:00:53 PM
 Angry What with a site?
Why it is not worked?
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
June 25, 2011, 04:40:48 PM
I guess it's possible that we are running newer versions of pushpool and there could be an issue with some specific versions of software / pushpool ?
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
June 25, 2011, 02:12:25 PM
Quote
Your shares are failing with the error "unknown work" - I'm not 100% sure this means, but that's the error pushpool is giving

I just ran a much shorter test on another new pool (ArsBitcoin), with just 8 submitted shares, 3 where rejected.
It's strange that this doesn't happen on Deepbit but does on 2 new pools....
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
firstbits: 1kwc1p
June 25, 2011, 02:10:03 PM
I did some low hashrate testing of Mineco.in comparing it against Deepbit (with all things being equal except the pool).
These are the results in the order in which I tried running against both pools:

Deepbit: [50 Accepted] [0 Rejected]
Mineco.in: [27 Accepted] [13 Rejected]
Deepbit: [39 Accepted] [0 Rejected]
Mineco.in: [18 Accepted] [12 Rejected]
Deepbit: [13 Accepted] [0 Rejected]

Something is causing a very high number of rejects on Mineco.in.

On my two miners (Mineco.in) I'm currently at:

[286 Accepted] [1 Rejected]
[291 Accepted] [0 Rejected]

Using phoenix with phatk BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
firstbits: 1kwc1p
June 25, 2011, 02:01:46 PM
what is wrong with this formula?
BlockReward (50BTC+fees)) * (Shares found by you / total shares for this round)

Its syntax and "+" is wrong. But that's it.  Tongue

It should be: [added spaces for readability]

(50 BTC - fees) * (Your Shares / Total Shares Per Round)

Plus is correct, this refers to the transaction fees associated with the block, which are distributed on mineco.in.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
June 25, 2011, 01:58:35 PM
No I haven't tried another miner with your pool. I am past the stage of selecting a miner, phoenix worked best on my hardware (both my test miner and mining rig).

You should be able to see what happened on your side, I was mining with the same userid as here.

Here's the output of a new test run on Mineco:


Your shares are failing with the error "unknown work" - I'm not 100% sure this means, but that's the error pushpool is giving
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
June 25, 2011, 01:42:41 PM
I can confirm Diablo miner has a problem with the pool. Here's a part of the log to give an idea:
Quote
[6/25/11 7:07:00 PM] Accepted block 131 found on ATI RV730 (#1)             
[6/25/11 7:08:49 PM] Accepted block 132 found on ATI RV730 (#1)             
[6/25/11 7:09:55 PM] Accepted block 133 found on ATI RV730 (#1)             
[6/25/11 7:18:11 PM] Accepted block 134 found on ATI RV730 (#1)             
[6/25/11 7:19:49 PM] Rejected block 87 found on ATI RV730 (#1)               
[6/25/11 7:23:08 PM] Rejected block 88 found on ATI RV730 (#1)               
[6/25/11 7:31:47 PM] Rejected block 89 found on ATI RV730 (#1)               
[6/25/11 7:33:31 PM] Rejected block 90 found on ATI RV730 (#1)               
[6/25/11 7:37:07 PM] Rejected block 91 found on ATI RV730 (#1)               
[6/25/11 7:38:18 PM] Rejected block 92 found on ATI RV730 (#1)               
[6/25/11 7:38:45 PM] Rejected block 93 found on ATI RV730 (#1)               
[6/25/11 7:39:34 PM] Accepted block 135 found on ATI RV730 (#1)             
[6/25/11 7:45:34 PM] Accepted block 136 found on ATI RV730 (#1)             
[6/25/11 7:47:37 PM] Accepted block 137 found on ATI RV730 (#1)             
[6/25/11 7:49:01 PM] Rejected block 94 found on ATI RV730 (#1)               
[6/25/11 7:49:40 PM] Rejected block 95 found on ATI RV730 (#1)               
[6/25/11 8:05:10 PM] Rejected block 96 found on ATI RV730 (#1)
with the total stats:

mhash 30.1/30.3 | accept: 145 | reject: 108 | hw error: 0

Phoenix, poclbm and friends work good. Maybe it's Diablo software problem...
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
June 25, 2011, 12:52:29 PM
#99
Quote
Can I ask, did you try a different miner to see if there was a problem with them too ?

No I haven't tried another miner with your pool. I am past the stage of selecting a miner, phoenix worked best on my hardware (both my test miner and mining rig).

You should be able to see what happened on your side, I was mining with the same userid as here.

Here's the output of a new test run on Mineco:

Quote
[25/06/2011 19:55:32] Phoenix 1.50 starting...
[25/06/2011 19:55:32] Connected to server
[25/06/2011 19:57:02] Result: 62c6f925 accepted       
[25/06/2011 19:57:54] Result: 30684065 rejected       
[25/06/2011 19:58:24] Result: 13cdb784 accepted       
[25/06/2011 19:59:46] Result: 976a1610 accepted       
[25/06/2011 19:59:54] LP: New work pushed             
[25/06/2011 20:01:16] Result: 8689744b accepted       
[25/06/2011 20:01:27] LP: New work pushed             
[25/06/2011 20:02:41] Result: 5914ff59 rejected       
[25/06/2011 20:04:57] Result: cb3fea61 rejected       
[25/06/2011 20:05:12] Result: 164095d5 rejected       
[25/06/2011 20:05:51] Result: cd6abaae accepted       
[25/06/2011 20:07:35] Result: 198865d6 rejected       
[25/06/2011 20:08:24] LP: New work pushed             
[25/06/2011 20:09:07] Result: fb5b1a31 accepted       
[25/06/2011 20:09:33] Result: c39b0007 accepted       
[25/06/2011 20:10:19] Result: 2f02d9d0 accepted       
[25/06/2011 20:10:20] Result: e96fc0a6 accepted       
[25/06/2011 20:11:04] Result: 8d1a4382 accepted       
[25/06/2011 20:11:07] Result: eacb3665 accepted         
[25/06/2011 20:11:58] Result: 26954655 rejected         
[25/06/2011 20:12:27] Result: 30f374bd accepted         
[25/06/2011 20:14:07] Result: 4c8cd1b9 accepted         
[25/06/2011 20:17:02] Result: dac52cce rejected         
[25/06/2011 20:19:35] Result: 32c9f5b9 rejected         
[25/06/2011 20:20:01] Result: 2c64d9dc accepted         
[25/06/2011 20:20:29] LP: New work pushed               
[25/06/2011 20:21:40] Result: 1c17fbf1 accepted         
[25/06/2011 20:22:16] Result: 82f1de3f accepted         
[25/06/2011 20:23:15] Result: 0ed195e9 accepted         
[25/06/2011 20:24:32] LP: New work pushed               
[25/06/2011 20:25:00] Result: 1fbb1829 accepted         
[25/06/2011 20:26:51] Result: f752da45 rejected         
[25/06/2011 20:27:07] Result: d45f3c48 accepted         
[25/06/2011 20:27:57] Result: 91c5a84b rejected         
[25/06/2011 20:28:13] Result: 852d4ca6 rejected         
[25/06/2011 20:30:39] Result: 2ca456e2 rejected         
[25/06/2011 20:31:10] Result: 386dfe17 rejected         
[25/06/2011 20:33:22] LP: New work pushed               
[25/06/2011 20:33:48] Result: 621ffc6a accepted         
[25/06/2011 20:35:15] Result: cc6e21ac accepted         
[25/06/2011 20:35:35] Result: 7df9b8c8 rejected         
[25/06/2011 20:36:07] LP: New work pushed               
[25/06/2011 20:36:43] Result: dd6e14a7 accepted         
[56.47 Mhash/sec] [22 Accepted] [14 Rejected] [RPC (+LP)]
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
June 25, 2011, 10:37:24 AM
#98
what is wrong with this formula?
BlockReward (50BTC+fees)) * (Shares found by you / total shares for this round)

Its syntax and "+" is wrong. But that's it.  Tongue

It should be: [added spaces for readability]

(50 BTC - fees) * (Your Shares / Total Shares Per Round)
as I understand it, transaction fees are actually being distributed in this pool
when bitcoins will start being mined at 25, then 12.5, then 6.25 this will become even more important as they will be a larger percentage of the earnings of miners
and eventually, that's all that miners will be able to gain
legendary
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
June 25, 2011, 09:03:30 AM
#97
That count is your shares for this round only, not your total shares ever.

Since we found a block around 7 hours ago, your local count will contain shares from the old block as well as the new block, whereas the count on the site is only since 3:30am this morning!


Thanks, I did not realize this simple issue... time to take a sleep Smiley

spiccioli.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
June 25, 2011, 08:32:46 AM
#96
That count is your shares for this round only, not your total shares ever.

Since we found a block around 7 hours ago, your local count will contain shares from the old block as well as the new block, whereas the count on the site is only since 3:30am this morning!
legendary
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
June 25, 2011, 08:09:59 AM
#95
Wuked,

I'm testing mineco.in since last night, I have two miners on it, looking at my miners I have submitted more or less 3600 shares, but my account statistics show a lot less of them

# Current rate: 49 GH/s
# Time: 0 days 08:34:05
# Total Shares: 339234
# Difficulty: 1379192
# Server Load: Low
# Your Shares 2362 (0.6963 %)
# Your Reward: 0.34835371 BTC

I'm subtracting stale shares, of course.

Is this page updated seldomly or what?

Regards.

spiccioli.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
June 25, 2011, 06:50:57 AM
#94
Answers to your questions:

1. Estonia
2. 56 MH/s
3. Phoenix

Can I ask, did you try a different miner to see if there was a problem with them too ?
Pages:
Jump to: