Pages:
Author

Topic: Cointerra Mining ASIC coming soon - page 14. (Read 35558 times)

hero member
Activity: 702
Merit: 500
August 05, 2013, 07:49:58 AM
This is the way that the 28nm asic companies have chosen to operate their businesses, starting with KnCMiner and now Hashfast and soon after, Cointerra.

The simple fact is that to enter production of a 28nm asic has high up front cost that must be financed somehow (investors or pre-orders).  Taking pre-orders is effectively crowd funding, and its very effective as everyone could potentially win (provided the company can be trusted to ship when they say they will).  Its a very similar risk to backing a Kickstarter campaign.   We (the miners) get to place our bets on which horse(s) to back. and the mining asic companies get to raise the production costs that they need to enter full scale production and deliver to their customers.  Im fine with this model and have previously ordered from KnC (and I intend to order from the other new guys too when they let me)

The older generation asic companies doing 55, 65, 110 or 130nm didn't have the same problem because the up front production costs were much lower... (NRE's in the thousands instead of millions!) and even then, some of those still pursued the pre-order strategy (and failed to deliver - yes, I am one of those still waiting for my BFL boxes, which I assume will not be delivered to me in a commercially useful time)

and as someone else said, if these companies raised their production costs some other way, and didn't need to take pre-orders to finance their production... then either their price of hardware would be much more expensive (to cover the investor's return) or, as was mentioned, they wouldn't need to sell any and would be mining themselves like asicminer and no doubt some others out there.

there are other models that might work too, for instance, building out a mine and selling terahashes on it (like what cloudhash and coinlab are doing).  but theyre still taking prepaid orders to fund their purchases of stock from all the usual suspects.

of course, you could always find someone wealthy to back you (like the insane rumour of joe lewis backing a bitcoin asic).. but the sums involved don't seem to make sense to the investors.. and if it were true, there is no chance that this asic would be offered for sale to miners like us.

I wouldn't be surprised if the mining asic companies that can raise their production costs without doing presales, probably wont sell their mining gear until after they've used it to mine some coins themselves and will sell it when it gets a bit longer in the tooth, while they move onto the next asic.

You say its insane to make preorders without any assurance.. but how do you get assurance other than the word of the company and presumably knowing who the principals of the company are, and whether they have backgrounds you believe in.  any order of anything in the bitcoin space has a level of risk attached to it that isn't present in the real world when you order a book from amazon.  Youre betting on the execution risk of a startup, and betting on bitcoin at the same time.  The only way you can decide whether its a good bet is to look closely at the people behind the company and decide if you think theyre up to the challenge.  Its exactly the same way that VCs make investment decisions in the real world.  Bet on the people behind the company.

...
The "We hate pre-orders" crowd isn't thinking clearly. They want massive profits with zero risk.  But chip makers have no reason to sell chips at anything less then what they think the chips would produce over the next 6, 12, months or whatever timeframe they have.

I don't know why people refuse to get this - if mining companies have chips on hand, and they don't have customer pre-orders to fill, then they are just going to mine with them, and will only sell at exorbitant prices!
...

The problems with your argument start with your premises.  In IRL pre-order, zero risks are implicit -- that's the standard.  IRL.

A pre-order purchase are not wagers on whether a company will deliver.  
It is not a wager on whether the company intends to deliver.  
It is not a wager on whether a company exists.  
It is a purchase -- like any other.  
It is also not an investment in a company -- those are called "investment," or, when little info is available, "gamble" or "foolishness."

Further, referring to Cointerra "mining company" is wholly unfounded.  By its own admission, Cointerra is presently doing no mining, owns no mining hardware, mining components or has any other tangible links to mining.  
If we chose to be loose & liberal with our terminology, we could call Cointerra "virtually a virtual mining company but not quite" or "possibly a fabless ASIC company with no ASICs to its name, but prob'ly just trolling."

Further still, claiming that a fully-funded ASIC manufacturer would simply mine with its own chips only exposes *another layer of absurdity,* a different topic i'd be happy to chat about later.  For now, suffice it to say it's one of the oddest justifications for giving money to strangers that i've ever heard.  Yes, buying mining gear may be a fool's errand, but buying it with no assurance the gear will ever materialize, or that you'll ever receive it?  Sillier still.

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
August 05, 2013, 07:18:16 AM
A simpler way to prove you are who you say you are would be to have everyone on your team at least mention cointerra on their linkedin profiles.
Will be rectified immediately.

Thanks. Already up here:

http://www.linkedin.com/in/ravidiyengar
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
August 05, 2013, 07:05:36 AM
...
The "We hate pre-orders" crowd isn't thinking clearly. They want massive profits with zero risk.  But chip makers have no reason to sell chips at anything less then what they think the chips would produce over the next 6, 12, months or whatever timeframe they have.

I don't know why people refuse to get this - if mining companies have chips on hand, and they don't have customer pre-orders to fill, then they are just going to mine with them, and will only sell at exorbitant prices!
...

The problems with your argument start with your premises.  In IRL pre-order, zero risks are implicit -- that's the standard.  IRL.

A pre-order purchase are not wagers on whether a company will deliver.  
It is not a wager on whether the company intends to deliver.  
It is not a wager on whether a company exists.  
It is a purchase -- like any other.  
It is also not an investment in a company -- those are called "investment," or, when little info is available, "gamble" or "foolishness."

Further, referring to Cointerra "mining company" is wholly unfounded.  By its own admission, Cointerra is presently doing no mining, owns no mining hardware, mining components or has any other tangible links to mining.  
If we chose to be loose & liberal with our terminology, we could call Cointerra "virtually a virtual mining company but not quite" or "possibly a fabless ASIC company with no ASICs to its name, but prob'ly just trolling."

Further still, claiming that a fully-funded ASIC manufacturer would simply mine with its own chips only exposes *another layer of absurdity,* a different topic i'd be happy to chat about later.  For now, suffice it to say it's one of the oddest justifications for giving money to strangers that i've ever heard.  Yes, buying mining gear may be a fool's errand, but buying it with no assurance the gear will ever materialize, or that you'll ever receive it?  Sillier still.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
August 05, 2013, 06:07:02 AM
A simpler way to prove you are who you say you are would be to have everyone on your team at least mention cointerra on their linkedin profiles.
Will be rectified immediately.

Thank you for addressing this. Hopefully this will get you back into the positives on dexX7's magical trust scale.   Wink

Admittedly anything that verifies helps, but they are who they say they are.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
August 05, 2013, 05:28:09 AM
A simpler way to prove you are who you say you are would be to have everyone on your team at least mention cointerra on their linkedin profiles.
Will be rectified immediately.

Thank you for addressing this. Hopefully this will get you back into the positives on dexX7's magical trust scale.   Wink
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
August 05, 2013, 04:40:19 AM
Will you guys be selling off any stocks, or are you completely self-funded?
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
August 05, 2013, 04:19:15 AM
A simpler way to prove you are who you say you are would be to have everyone on your team at least mention cointerra on their linkedin profiles.
Will be rectified immediately.
hero member
Activity: 493
Merit: 500
Hooray for non-equilibrium thermodynamics!
August 05, 2013, 02:51:39 AM
Silicon efficiency effects price, ultimately your ROI, it's probably more important than power efficiency as most ASiCs are not close to worrying about that yet.

Yup, smaller die = more dies per wafer = lower cost per chip.

[sarcasm] Guys we really need to think about our environmental impact too. I want to see a full life cycle assessment from all new ASIC manufacturers from now on. [/sarcasm]

Seriously though, power efficiency probably isn't a big deal in terms of cost, but it does have a big impact on how you deal with heat. It's a lot easier to get rid of 80W than it is to get rid of 800W and so on.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
August 05, 2013, 12:13:53 AM
A simpler way to prove you are who you say you are would be to have everyone on your team at least mention cointerra on their linkedin profiles.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
August 04, 2013, 11:58:32 PM
Hi cointerra,

to build trust, I request a very simple thing to begin with: provide a proof of identify. This could simply be done by taking a picture of yourself with a note and greeting to this forum.

The people listed on the website are more or less well known, but till now, I can't be sure, if you are, who you claim to be.

Even if I did that you could claim that I stole the picture from the web somewhere and posted here. We understand that until we start shipping hardware it will be hard to build complete trust. For those who have real interest in Cointerra either as retail customers, or bulk order customers or investors I request that they send an email to [email protected] with their interest and we can discuss more.

What do you need investors for if you have all the money you need? Will these investors be in position to destroy Bitcoin mining for the small guy if they have the money to buy potentially unlimited mining power? This is worrisome, and could sabotage Bitcoin entirely. I hope you opt to distribute power responsibly, if you truly have the means to create the fastest hardware. Responsibility is very important in this community, and those who violate it are never forgiven.
eve
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
August 04, 2013, 11:10:13 PM
Hi cointerra,

to build trust, I request a very simple thing to begin with: provide a proof of identify. This could simply be done by taking a picture of yourself with a note and greeting to this forum.

The people listed on the website are more or less well known, but till now, I can't be sure, if you are, who you claim to be.

Even if I did that you could claim that I stole the picture from the web somewhere and posted here. We understand that until we start shipping hardware it will be hard to build complete trust. For those who have real interest in Cointerra either as retail customers, or bulk order customers or investors I request that they send an email to [email protected] with their interest and we can discuss more.

They must have tons of their own money, so why would they tell you all the facts of their asic chip.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
August 04, 2013, 10:49:09 PM
Even if I did that you could claim that I stole the picture from the web somewhere and posted here. We understand that until we start shipping hardware it will be hard to build complete trust. For those who have real interest in Cointerra either as retail customers, or bulk order customers or investors I request that they send an email to [email protected] with their interest and we can discuss more.

I explain how I see this: You came here with a trust balance of 0 and I offered you a way to gain +1. Even if this is a small step on a larger trust scale, it is a start. Denying my request just moved your trust balance to -2. Digital pictures aren't tamper proofed, but I didn't ask for a random picture of one of the listed persons, but a personalized photo which would be harder to tamper. Like I said, step by step. Don't get me wrong, I had a neutral, non-biased position.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
August 04, 2013, 10:21:41 PM
I wonder if this announcement, as well as HashFast's are more about getting the attention of major investors, like the guy who just invested $200m into Avalon as opposed to us 'lil pre-order guys.
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
August 04, 2013, 10:05:29 PM
Hi cointerra,

to build trust, I request a very simple thing to begin with: provide a proof of identify. This could simply be done by taking a picture of yourself with a note and greeting to this forum.

The people listed on the website are more or less well known, but till now, I can't be sure, if you are, who you claim to be.

Even if I did that you could claim that I stole the picture from the web somewhere and posted here. We understand that until we start shipping hardware it will be hard to build complete trust. For those who have real interest in Cointerra either as retail customers, or bulk order customers or investors I request that they send an email to [email protected] with their interest and we can discuss more.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
August 04, 2013, 09:43:28 PM
Hi cointerra,

to build trust, I request a very simple thing to begin with: provide a proof of identify. This could simply be done by taking a picture of yourself with a note and greeting to this forum.

The people listed on the website are more or less well known, but till now, I can't be sure, if you are, who you claim to be.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1006
Bitcoin / Crypto mining Hardware.
August 04, 2013, 09:34:34 PM

If you're listing that link it's worth posting the following link as well to remind people why Bitcoin was created a year later and why an ex-senior government bond advisor who worked for Lehman Brothers and has a love for making money may be the last person you want involved in Bitcoin...

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bankruptcy_of_Lehman_Brothers

Edit: This has to be BS. Just google: Avalon 200 million



 Cheesy
http://openruby.com/bitcoin/pages/16096426-famed-trader-joe-lewis-backs-bitcoin
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1006
100 satoshis -> ISO code
August 04, 2013, 09:33:20 PM
This idea that chip companies are just going to mass produce mining chips, take on all the risk associated with chip failure and rising difficulty and then just sell their chips to other people to make a guaranteed profit is not going to happen.  It's a fantasy.

People are not going to assume all the risk and then give away most of the profits.

No surprise that many of the ASICminer customers will struggle to earn back the price they paid for their hardware.  AM does the maths with projected difficulty, and takes the lions share of any conceivable returns of what they sell.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
August 04, 2013, 08:51:30 PM
How many people make mining rigs from HD 7990 cards? They would be the most cutting edge design atm. Most mining rigs are HD7950 based for ROI reasons, as the cutting edge generally costs more. There is a sweet spot.

The 7990 isn't more "cutting edge", it's just two 7970s on the same circuit board. The market is gamers, not miners who obviously don't care about ROI.  The high price is likely due to low production volume, and the fact it's basically a totally necessary luxury item people buy for bragging rights.

I don't know why people refuse to get this - if mining companies have chips on hand, and they don't have customer pre-orders to fill, then they are just going to mine with them, and will only sell at exorbitant prices!
...
I don't believe that for a moment, as the sale revenue for a device that takes you most likely less than an hour to build, is way more than the weeks it would take to get the same money from it by using it to mine.

That's insane. No one would sell something for the amount of money they think they'd be able to make in a couple weeks

Unless they felt the only way they could stay in business was to immediately flip the money and buy an even larger quantity of chips in order to stay competitive. And in that case it would mean the difficulty was going up so quickly that after a couple weeks the units would barely make anything anyway.

This idea that chip companies are just going to mass produce mining chips, take on all the risk associated with chip failure and rising difficulty and then just sell their chips to other people to make a guaranteed profit is not going to happen.  It's a fantasy.

People are not going to assume all the risk and then give away most of the profits.
erk
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
August 04, 2013, 08:30:38 PM
I agree erk, that the scenario you lay out would be ideal.  I think, though, that it is likely the winning companies will be the ones to deliver the most current in chip technology.
Until now ASICs have not used the most cutting edge designs.  Catching up to the most current tech should slow this growth rate a little bit.  Rather than being locked to what is achievable by the bitcoin community, it will be limited by the main technology curve.

How many people make mining rigs from HD 7990 cards? They would be the most cutting edge design atm. Most mining rigs are HD7950 based for ROI reasons, as the cutting edge generally costs more. There is a sweet spot.

There is not much electronics in an ASIC miner when you pull them apart and have a look, compared to say a GPU card, so the margins on the components are really high atm. That will fall with 5 or more manufacturers fighting for market share over the next 6mths. the price wars are on, you already have this crazy phenomenon where people are cancelling their spot in one pre-order queue, just to get into yet another pre-order queue from a slightly cheaper vendor!




I don't know why people refuse to get this - if mining companies have chips on hand, and they don't have customer pre-orders to fill, then they are just going to mine with them, and will only sell at exorbitant prices!
...
I don't believe that for a moment, as the sale revenue for a device that takes you most likely less than an hour to build, is way more than the weeks it would take to get the same money from it by using it to mine.



full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
August 04, 2013, 08:18:14 PM
I think the winner will be the company that doesn't rely on pre-orders to fund development/production, and has stock on hand for new product launches. When an item runs out of stock, they stop taking money for it, and send you an email when it's back in stock so you can then place an order. That's how most other online electronics orders seem to work.

Possibly - but the problem is that they will also be able to charge a lot more money

The "We hate pre-orders" crowd isn't thinking clearly. They want massive profits with zero risk.  But chip makers have no reason to sell chips at anything less then what they think the chips would produce over the next 6, 12, months or whatever timeframe they have.

I don't know why people refuse to get this - if mining companies have chips on hand, and they don't have customer pre-orders to fill, then they are just going to mine with them, and will only sell at exorbitant prices!

At some point the market will be flooded and you'll be able to buy chips at close to their production cost.  But the difficulty will be so high it'll be hard to make more then your electrical costs.
___

Maybe in the future people will sell solar panels that will switch between bitcoin mining and selling electricity on the grid based on the current profitability...
Pages:
Jump to: