Pages:
Author

Topic: Coronavirus Outbreak - page 2. (Read 29937 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
June 16, 2022, 10:05:22 AM
People who do not or cannot get into a healthy lifestyle, will always be in danger of things like Covid. Since such people don't get into good nutrition, they will see the doctors who will make them sicker in the long run, if they even live.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1515
June 15, 2022, 05:12:47 PM
Dr. Fauci, greatest doctor alive I've been told, tests positive for coronavirus despite being quadruple vaccinated and double masked per his own advice: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/06/15/health/fauci-covid-positive/index.html

Maybe this will finally convince people to move on from the pandemic. Propensity of the hypochondriacs to associate callousness with anyone who tests positive with COVID might also stop. The biggest cheerleader for COVID safety is not above the virus, no one is.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
June 11, 2022, 06:06:44 PM
Will something like this be effective. Probably not. They are just doctors, and the attorneys obey the judges.


Doctors sue FDA for campaigning against use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19



Physicians filed a lawsuit against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for acting outside of its authority by directing the public not to use ivermectin.

The legal action filed on June 2 by Drs. Robert L. Apter, Mary Talley Bowden and Paul E. Marik indicated that the FDA launched a “crusade” against ivermectin as a treatment for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), “unlawfully interfered” with the doctors’ ability to practice medicine – even though the drug is fully approved by the agency for human use.

The suit filed in the District Court, Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division also included the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra and FDA Commissioner Robert Califf.

“The FDA generally cannot ban particular uses of human drugs once they are otherwise approved and admitted to the market, even if such use differs from the labeling – commonly referred to as ‘off-label’ use,” the complaint stated.

The lawsuit also added that the FDA cannot advise whether a patient should take an approved drug for a particular purpose as decisions like these are within the scope of the doctor-patient relationship.

The doctors specifically mentioned the FDA publication “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19” and tweets from the FDA official Twitter account – including one implying that ivermectin is intended only for animals.

“This lawsuit, brought by three eminently qualified physicians, is a welcome development,” said Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense president and general counsel.

She told the Defender that the doctors rightfully assert that the FDA, assisted by corporate media, has unlawfully interfered with the doctor-patient relationship and the appropriate treatment for individual patients. “Regulating the doctor-patient relationship is an area of the well-established state law – not federal law,” she added.

Plaintiffs are respected practitioners with high success rates in treating COVID patients

The plaintiffs are well-respected in their field and hold records of high success rates in treating COVID-19 patients with ivermectin.

...


Cool
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
newbie
Activity: 66
Merit: 0
May 09, 2022, 05:27:10 PM
Coronavirus is a really bad issue nowadays. Hope the situation will become better and better with each day.
Does not anyone know what documents regarding my helath should I have for traveling abroad?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
May 09, 2022, 11:03:06 AM
^^^ Shanghai...

If somebody sneaked in loads of vitamin D, the whole city would be cured.


Maybe, maybe not.  The Chinese peeps presumably got inactivated virus inject for the most part, but with China, nobody knows.  I have yet to see any detailed study of the differences between the 'vaccine' technologies, or any real comprehension that there might be any.  Even within the dedicated scientific community which surprises me. - Dr Andrew Kaufman says he has yet to find a study that shows that anybody has isolate a whole and complete virus out of a sample of snot or mucus, etc. He claims that all the studies do one of two things:
1. The basic studies have limiting words in them where they state that " we think that" or "It looks like" or "it must be," etc.;
2. Studies based on the studies in #1 might sound conclusive, but they can't be because #1 studies weren't conclusive.
Do you have any studies where viruses were isolated and say it conclusively? But if you can find any, can you find the actual paperwork that backs the study up... the actual method and the using of it, to make the study.


On factor about the mRNA technology is that the immune system is targeting free-floating spike protein.  Van den Bossche ascribes the over-production (and 'original antigenic sin' resulting in) non-neutralizing antibodies to some degree due to this state of the presented antigen.  These then assists the virus in the initial infection phase (explaining why the vaxxed are getting infected more than the pure-bloods) but does gum up the works in the lower respiratory tract when the virus would like to bind to virgin lung cells and infect them (causing acute disease.) - Without the extraction/isolation of the virus out of some tissue of the diseased person, nobody knows why any doctor or researcher made a connection between a sick person and a particular virus. Just because they can find snippet strands of all the materials of the virus, that they then puzzle-piece together to make a virus, doesn't necessarily mean those strands came from the virus in question. It's a guess. Or can you find an actual study that goes through the extraction isolation process for any virus?... not only saying that they did the isolation, but also showing the process in their notebook. I would think that with the severity of Covid, that there would be videos all over Youtube showing a researcher actually doing the work, and explaining what was being done as he was doing it.

Anyway, when the virus figures out how to use work around the non-neutralizing antibody shield, Van den Bossche is claiming that the vaxxed are going to drop like flies, and it will probably happen fairly soon due to artificially induced high infection rates complements of the retards who thought that vaccinating during a period of high infection made sense(*).  Probably no amount of vitamin D is going to help these people unless the inactivated virus technology didn't produce the same non-neutralizing antibody results.  In that case, the vaxxed Chinese are probably closer to pure-bloods in terms of their immunological response potential. - That's the thing. They didn't want to make a virus that was dangerous, because they didn't know if they would be caught or not, and executed. So, what they made is only a tiny bit stronger than the flu or pneumonia. This means that a healthy person is not affected by the virus, and a small additional amount of V-D will cure it.

* Dr. Fausti.  The guys is mainly a bureaucrat and there is no indication that he knows much about anything, but for sure his industry bosses and their techno-goons understand things pretty well.  Stretching so-called 'SARS-cov-2' into a three year + 'crisis' and turning the world's population into a bioweapons laboratory was, I feel, no accident.  It was deliberate and methodical and obviously (to me) well planned over at least a decade.  So, indeed, the strategy did 'make a lot of sense' after all. - Fausti is a liar who has tricked his brain and mind into believing his own lies completely. You can't convince him of the truth, because he has totally hypnotized himself into believing his own lies. The thing that has to be done, he simply has to be removed and imprisoned or executed.




Cool
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
May 09, 2022, 06:25:18 AM
^^^ Shanghai...

If somebody sneaked in loads of vitamin D, the whole city would be cured.


Maybe, maybe not.  The Chinese peeps presumably got inactivated virus inject for the most part, but with China, nobody knows.  I have yet to see any detailed study of the differences between the 'vaccine' technologies, or any real comprehension that there might be any.  Even within the dedicated scientific community which surprises me.

On factor about the mRNA technology is that the immune system is targeting free-floating spike protein.  Van den Bossche ascribes the over-production (and 'original antigenic sin' resulting in) non-neutralizing antibodies to some degree due to this state of the presented antigen.  These then assists the virus in the initial infection phase (explaining why the vaxxed are getting infected more than the pure-bloods) but does gum up the works in the lower respiratory tract when the virus would like to bind to virgin lung cells and infect them (causing acute disease.)

Anyway, when the virus figures out how to use work around the non-neutralizing antibody shield, Van den Bossche is claiming that the vaxxed are going to drop like flies, and it will probably happen fairly soon due to artificially induced high infection rates complements of the retards who thought that vaccinating during a period of high infection made sense(*).  Probably no amount of vitamin D is going to help these people unless the inactivated virus technology didn't produce the same non-neutralizing antibody results.  In that case, the vaxxed Chinese are probably closer to pure-bloods in terms of their immunological response potential.

* Dr. Fausti.  The guys is mainly a bureaucrat and there is no indication that he knows much about anything, but for sure his industry bosses and their techno-goons understand things pretty well.  Stretching so-called 'SARS-cov-2' into a three year + 'crisis' and turning the world's population into a bioweapons laboratory was, I feel, no accident.  It was deliberate and methodical and obviously (to me) well planned over at least a decade.  So, indeed, the strategy did 'make a lot of sense' after all.

sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
May 07, 2022, 11:37:36 AM
Can coronavirus be over already 😤
The pandemic has been affecting the entire food system and has laid bare its fragility.
Adhering to workplace safety and health practices and ensuring access to decent work and the protection of labour rights in all industries will be crucial in addressing the human dimension of the crisis. Immediate and purposeful action to save lives and livelihoods should include extending social protection towards universal health coverage and income support for those most affected.

However, BurgerKing, for example, isn't really food.

When people eat good food - and some of them who eat bad food - and then supplement on vitamin-C + zinc, and add vitamin-D (20,000 to 50,000 International Units per day)... almost 100% of these won't get sick, and many who already are sick will get well.

As it is, before the vaccine, in the US, as many as 96% of those who died from Covid, really died with Covid, but died of some other prevailing condition - cancer, heart disease, diabetes. The CDC essentially says so, even though they try to make their words sound like it was all the fault of Covid.

Improve your health. Find out what good food is all about, and eat it. Add C + zinc + D to your good-food diet, and you won't even get a cold or the flu. Note that there are exceptions to this. But generally speaking, this is all it takes.

Cool

EDIT: Don't believe me. It's easy to add C + zinc + D to your diet. It won't hurt you to do this simple thing. And get your sick friends and relatives to start doing this. It is easy and won't hurt.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
May 07, 2022, 11:02:00 AM
^^^ Shanghai...

If somebody sneaked in loads of vitamin D, the whole city would be cured.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
May 07, 2022, 04:30:47 AM
For those had like to and can get into the somewhat deeper areas of scientific nitty-gritty than is the norm:

  https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-vanden-bossche-warning/

Some might remember that when Dr. Van den Bossche first 'came out', it was at a time when it was 'obvious' that the so-called vaccine was going to create immunity, stop infection and transmission, and 'end the pandemic.'  He said it wasn't, and he said why, and he turned out to be stunningly correct.  Ergo, it's worth my time to intently focus on what he is saying (and I learned a fair bit that I didn't know by doing so.)

I cannot shake the fact that he used to work for Gates.  A LOT of these highly credible sources (Van den Bossche, Malone, Yeadon, etc) have some interesting hisorical(ish, maybe,) ties to some of the main perps in the scamdemic.  Enough to make me wonder about them.  Anyway, specific information can be researched, evaluated, and pattern-matched so I appreciate it no matter what it's source.

If Van den Bossche is right, we don't have to wait to much longer before the shit hits the fan making me wonder if what's going on in Shanghai is yet another test-run which will be seen in the rest of the world before too long.  Just as soon as the virus figures out how to cast off one of the protective sugars of the injected and become lethal again.  The world is basically a bioweapons lab working at full speed to make this happen thanks to the high 'vaccine' uptake rate.

Those of us who were expecting a slower die-off as VAIDS takes hold might want to re-evaluate the path that this thing might take and blow the dust of the idea of ADE (as happened in the animal testing for coronavirus vaccines back in the old days when the did animal testing on non-humans.)

full member
Activity: 840
Merit: 137
May 07, 2022, 03:36:09 AM
The corona virus thought us many lessons that one will hardly forget in ones history or memory.Many things happened during that time and many lost their lives and properties.There was food scarcity and schools were shutdown because of the pandemic.People that wants to learn definitely learnt from that outbreak of the virus known as covid19.Many engaged in individual trainings that helped them, while some persons were doing nothing,but every reasonable individual made good use of their time during that period.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
May 06, 2022, 11:07:11 PM
...

Rather a moot point. Of course thrombosis is rare. Thrombosis was an unforeseen consequence from the alleged Safe and Effective™ vaccine. FDA uses VAERS, something only the conspiratards used, to demonstrate negative health outcomes of a COVID-19 vaccine.

The vaccine clinical trials did not offer long term data; it was irresponsible to suggest every 5+ year old receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

By the way, therapeutics get pulled from the market all the time for causing severe negative health outcomes or death. You don't talk about mass vaccination and make the concession that some portion of the population will die as a result of the vaccine as a silver lining. That's insanity. When therapeutics are causing people to die, they get pulled from the market immediately. It's not a success story that *only* a small portion of the population died as a result of vaccination.

Mass vaccination was an experiment. No reason to get vaccinated if you've already had COVID. No reason for the young and healthy to get vaccinated. They knew that. Anyone who had seen the data was fully aware.

Hopefully you're wrong and the overwhelming consensus among the most qualified doctors/scientists/public health experts  in the world are right.
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1515
May 06, 2022, 01:49:36 AM
...

Rather a moot point. Of course thrombosis is rare. Thrombosis was an unforeseen consequence from the alleged Safe and Effective™ vaccine. FDA uses VAERS, something only the conspiratards used, to demonstrate negative health outcomes of a COVID-19 vaccine.

The vaccine clinical trials did not offer long term data; it was irresponsible to suggest every 5+ year old receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

By the way, therapeutics get pulled from the market all the time for causing severe negative health outcomes or death. You don't talk about mass vaccination and make the concession that some portion of the population will die as a result of the vaccine as a silver lining. That's insanity. When therapeutics are causing people to die, they get pulled from the market immediately. It's not a success story that *only* a small portion of the population died as a result of vaccination.

Mass vaccination was an experiment. No reason to get vaccinated if you've already had COVID. No reason for the young and healthy to get vaccinated. They knew that. Anyone who had seen the data was fully aware.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
May 05, 2022, 10:01:03 PM
Breaking: FDA limits EUA on J&J vaccine citing blood clot concerns.

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-limits-use-janssen-covid-19-vaccine-certain-individuals

Not shocking at all, FDA cites VAERS (the so called unreliable self reporting system) as their evidence for increased thrombosis risk according to their fact sheet: https://www.fda.gov/media/146304/download

"Safe and effective," the experts alleged, without long term safety data or any analysis of the relative risk of COVID-19 for the young and healthy versus the relative risk of potential side effects.

I'm sure anti vaxxers will jump all over this.  And also skip this part:

"The FDA has determined that the reporting rate of TTS is 3.23 per million doses of vaccine administered and the reporting rate of TTS deaths is 0.48 per million doses of vaccine administered."

(There have been about 3,000 deaths per million in the US)

legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1515
May 05, 2022, 07:53:41 PM
Breaking: FDA limits EUA on J&J vaccine citing blood clot concerns.

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-limits-use-janssen-covid-19-vaccine-certain-individuals

Not shocking at all, FDA cites VAERS (the so called unreliable self reporting system) as their evidence for increased thrombosis risk according to their fact sheet: https://www.fda.gov/media/146304/download

"Safe and effective," the experts alleged, without long term safety data or any analysis of the relative risk of COVID-19 for the young and healthy versus the relative risk of potential side effects.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
April 30, 2022, 02:52:36 AM
Informative video exposing the devastating effects of the C19 injections, including death.
https://rumble.com/v12ujz3-laura-lynne-the-vaccine-war-continues-a-conversation-with-dr.-peter-mccullo.html

Medic says vaccinated patients in cardiac arrest "coughing up fountains of blood" during cpr.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BiK5ix3ZBp0A/?list=subscriptions

Meanwhile virus still not found, reward still stands. €1.5 Million on offer
https://samueleckert.net/isolate-truth-fund/




'Italian court rules that mandatory vaccination is unconstitutional
To many die form the toxic shot
https://www.bitchute.com/video/a3r6KSRN2pYb/?list=subscriptions
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1215
April 29, 2022, 01:39:51 AM
Finally someone pays attention to covid on this forum, rather then on military operation on Ukraine.

Coronavirus problem somehow disappeared from mass media radars, which makes me search case and death results, while these numbers were always on first lines. In my country, numbers are close to situation in October-Noverber 2021. Right now we dont have any covid limitations, and are not forces to wear masks everywhere, nor forced to make a vaccine to be able to work. If the situation is identical, doesnt it mean that I could have skipped 3 vaccine shots I've made? All the anti-vaxxers are celebrating now...
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1515
April 28, 2022, 08:17:01 PM
Moderna seeks emergency use authorization for COVID-19 vaccine in children ages 6 months - 5 years: https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/28/health/moderna-vaccine-eua-young-children/index.html

Dosing at 25 micrograms produces a similar immune response to a 100 microgram dose in adults and according to Moderna. Only 37 percent vaccine efficacy in the vaccinated cohort in children aged 2-5.

FDA could grant them EUA for such nonsensical testing and data analysis, out of their own hypochondria.

According to the CDC, <400 deaths associated with COVID-19 in ~2.5 years: https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Provisional-COVID-19-Deaths-Focus-on-Ages-0-18-Yea/nr4s-juj3 This data does not differentiate between deaths *due* to COVID or *with* COVID.

Does this sound like something that needs EUA?
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
Pages:
Jump to: