Scamdemic defenders here must be feeling those side effects lol
Orrr they have been depopulated from this planet.
Topic: Coronavirus Outbreak - page 3. (Read 29973 times)
Sure was a battle, but the covid scam has run it's course.
CDC withholds data regarding boosters among 18-49 age demographic.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/20/health/covid-cdc-data.html
Non-pay wall'd: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10537161/CDC-refusing-publish-data-collected-booster-effectiveness-aged-18-49.html
Listen to the "experts" they say, who will hold hostage critical data regarding booster efficacy because they're afraid of the conclusions people might draw regarding their purpose. CDC director cites the reason as to withholding the data the fear that people might suggest the boosters weren't such a great idea after all. I'd advise anyone that is waiting on government bureaucracy to prescribe COVID policy review the data that is published already for Omicron on their own, particularly out of Israel. You will find study after study shows limited efficacy of the vaccines for Omicron, particularly among the <50 age group. That wouldn't be a bad thing, normally. Except for the fact that booster recommendations were given out before the efficacy data came in. They were recommending you get boosted before they even knew it was necessary or that it worked. This isn't part of a larger conspiracy, just more of the mass formation psychosis and group think that has plagued the medical community where politics are prioritized.
On another note - land of anti-vaxxers and conspiracy theorists, Sweden, advise against vaccination of 5-11 year olds: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/sweden-decides-against-recommending-covid-vaccines-kids-aged-5-12-2022-01-27/
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/20/health/covid-cdc-data.html
Non-pay wall'd: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10537161/CDC-refusing-publish-data-collected-booster-effectiveness-aged-18-49.html
Listen to the "experts" they say, who will hold hostage critical data regarding booster efficacy because they're afraid of the conclusions people might draw regarding their purpose. CDC director cites the reason as to withholding the data the fear that people might suggest the boosters weren't such a great idea after all. I'd advise anyone that is waiting on government bureaucracy to prescribe COVID policy review the data that is published already for Omicron on their own, particularly out of Israel. You will find study after study shows limited efficacy of the vaccines for Omicron, particularly among the <50 age group. That wouldn't be a bad thing, normally. Except for the fact that booster recommendations were given out before the efficacy data came in. They were recommending you get boosted before they even knew it was necessary or that it worked. This isn't part of a larger conspiracy, just more of the mass formation psychosis and group think that has plagued the medical community where politics are prioritized.
On another note - land of anti-vaxxers and conspiracy theorists, Sweden, advise against vaccination of 5-11 year olds: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/sweden-decides-against-recommending-covid-vaccines-kids-aged-5-12-2022-01-27/
It's all about the grift for the politicans but they are only puppets who come and go and will do as they are told not by the electorate but by those who place them in key positions of power. When they refuse to obey they get the thumb twisted and if that doesn't work they get the jackboot out the door.
Politicians are simply the management on the plantation. If the factory-farm owner says to cull 90% of the pigs, the manager tells his workers (bureaucrats) to cull 90% of the pigs. If he doesn't, he's replaced. It's not much more complicated than that.
It's all about the grift for the politicans but they are only puppets who come and go and will do as they are told not by the electorate but by those who place them in key positions of power. When they refuse to obey they get the thumb twisted and if that doesn't work they get the jackboot out the door.
John Hopkins meta analysis and review released on lockdowns - https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf
See p. 38, table 7.
Little to no effect on COVID mortality as a result of lockdowns overall. Slight benefit from locking down "non-essential" businesses, though that depends on what one might consider essential.
The cost benefit analysis also must be considered within the context of prevented deaths, meaning an analysis of the number of cancer screenings, drug OD's, depression rates, domestic abuse, etc. and seeing how they compare.
The lockdowns didn't work, and the benefit was not worth it.
See p. 38, table 7.
Little to no effect on COVID mortality as a result of lockdowns overall. Slight benefit from locking down "non-essential" businesses, though that depends on what one might consider essential.
The cost benefit analysis also must be considered within the context of prevented deaths, meaning an analysis of the number of cancer screenings, drug OD's, depression rates, domestic abuse, etc. and seeing how they compare.
The lockdowns didn't work, and the benefit was not worth it.
4 days ago I became a covid contact person and nobody seems to really care about it, even though I might be infected. There are queues for covid test right now and I will be checked the day after tomorrow. I've done quick tests, one showed that I am infected, other that I am not. Today the doctor called infected person that I've in contact and have told that in 7days period the person is free to do whatever he wants and can leave quarantine. Me, being a potentially dangerous person, can freely walk around, even my certificate is not put on pause. World gone stupid during covid, or not care about it anymore.
To bad for the people who went to war and got shot, lots will not life to a rife old age because of it.
The scamdemic nearing the end.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/sgp43n/regular_folks_are_tired_of_the_clown_world_and/
Trucking on, McCall (Convoy)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btkBLJqeEbY&t=11s
The corrupt sellout of a health minister can sign what ever he wants, it never be a legal signature.
The scamdemic nearing the end.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/sgp43n/regular_folks_are_tired_of_the_clown_world_and/
Trucking on, McCall (Convoy)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btkBLJqeEbY&t=11s
The corrupt sellout of a health minister can sign what ever he wants, it never be a legal signature.
...
so you have a great experience of integration of mRNA into genes (called also DNA)
may we get from you some bibliographical experience in peer reviewed published papers?
so you have a great experience of integration of mRNA into genes (called also DNA)
may we get from you some bibliographical experience in peer reviewed published papers?
So you are a bot written in two lines of shell script?
Interesting paper on the lipid nanoparticles/mRNA-LNP complex that the Pfizer/BioNTech & Moderna vaccines are comprised of: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004221014504
My understanding of the side effects were strictly from the side of spike protein creation induced by mRNA, but there are cytotoxic effects from the lipid nanoparticles that might explain the immediate side effects (pain/soreness at the injection site, some inflammation).
LNP's were the delivery vehicle for mRNA because mRNA is not very stable to begin with, so the notion that that the mRNA floats around unchecked is false. The LNP's seem to stick around though, and activate some inflammatory cellular pathways and induce proinflammatory signaling molecules (IL-1β and IL-6 according to the article).
My understanding of the side effects were strictly from the side of spike protein creation induced by mRNA, but there are cytotoxic effects from the lipid nanoparticles that might explain the immediate side effects (pain/soreness at the injection site, some inflammation).
LNP's were the delivery vehicle for mRNA because mRNA is not very stable to begin with, so the notion that that the mRNA floats around unchecked is false. The LNP's seem to stick around though, and activate some inflammatory cellular pathways and induce proinflammatory signaling molecules (IL-1β and IL-6 according to the article).
Good illustration of how the technocrats prey on the scientific illiteracy of the masses. Often by simply changing some words:
Bayer admits that 95% of people would never have agreed to GENTHERAPY without this "vaccine"...!!!!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1ub1EgzWFETW/
I've called it 'gene therapy' on this board for two years for the simple reason that that's what it is. Ironically in this case it's not even a 'vaccine' by any reasonable definition as it neither provides any immunity nor stops spread of the putative 'virus'. It's not looking like an anti-vaccine since it seems to foster both via a generalized degradation of the immune system as a whole.
so you have a great experience of integration of mRNA into genes (called also DNA)
may we get from you some bibliographical experience in peer reviewed published papers?
I call it 'gene therapy' because that is what the pharma companies called it up until less than two years ago when the marketing people said that referring to it as gene therapy would be bad marketing. And, of course, it is a therapeutic which works by inserting designer genetics into a person's cell such that the cells are re-programmed to create designer proteins.
If the building industry started calling reinforced concrete 'framing' and rejected the term 'reinforced concrete' for marketing reasons associated with 'climate change', I would continue to call it 'reinforced concrete' because that is what it is and what it's been called from the beginning. And no, I'm not an academic structural engineer with a bunch of 'peer reviewed papers' to my name. Just a person with some experience, knowledge, and common sense.
so you have a great experience of integration of mRNA into genes (called also DNA)
may we get from you some bibliographical experience in peer reviewed published papers?
This phase of the scamdemic is over. We need a new bogey man now.
Good illustration of how the technocrats prey on the scientific illiteracy of the masses. Often by simply changing some words:
Bayer admits that 95% of people would never have agreed to GENTHERAPY without this "vaccine"...!!!!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1ub1EgzWFETW/
I've called it 'gene therapy' on this board for two years for the simple reason that that's what it is. Ironically in this case it's not even a 'vaccine' by any reasonable definition as it neither provides any immunity nor stops spread of the putative 'virus'. It's not looking like an anti-vaccine since it seems to foster both via a generalized degradation of the immune system as a whole.
so you have a great experience of integration of mRNA into genes (called also DNA)
may we get from you some bibliographical experience in peer reviewed published papers?
I call it 'gene therapy' because that is what the pharma companies called it up until less than two years ago when the marketing people said that referring to it as gene therapy would be bad marketing. And, of course, it is a therapeutic which works by inserting designer genetics into a person's cell such that the cells are re-programmed to create designer proteins.
If the building industry started calling reinforced concrete 'framing' and rejected the term 'reinforced concrete' for marketing reasons associated with 'climate change', I would continue to call it 'reinforced concrete' because that is what it is and what it's been called from the beginning. And no, I'm not an academic structural engineer with a bunch of 'peer reviewed papers' to my name. Just a person with some experience, knowledge, and common sense.
Good illustration of how the technocrats prey on the scientific illiteracy of the masses. Often by simply changing some words:
Bayer admits that 95% of people would never have agreed to GENTHERAPY without this "vaccine"...!!!!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1ub1EgzWFETW/
I've called it 'gene therapy' on this board for two years for the simple reason that that's what it is. Ironically in this case it's not even a 'vaccine' by any reasonable definition as it neither provides any immunity nor stops spread of the putative 'virus'. It's not looking like an anti-vaccine since it seems to foster both via a generalized degradation of the immune system as a whole.
so you have a great experience of integration of mRNA into genes (called also DNA)
may we get from you some bibliographical experience in peer reviewed published papers?
As of now coronavirus is still become hazardous among children and senior citizens. So, they have to take care while going somewhere in crowd places. Wash your hands with soap will keep you safe from coronavirus.
Good illustration of how the technocrats prey on the scientific illiteracy of the masses. Often by simply changing some words:
Bayer admits that 95% of people would never have agreed to GENTHERAPY without this "vaccine"...!!!!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1ub1EgzWFETW/
I've called it 'gene therapy' on this board for two years for the simple reason that that's what it is. Ironically in this case it's not even a 'vaccine' by any reasonable definition as it neither provides any immunity nor stops spread of the putative 'virus'. It's not looking like an anti-vaccine since it seems to foster both via a generalized degradation of the immune system as a whole.
This meme is now mine. I will troll hard with this masterpiece
My attitude about childhood covaids gene therapies is evolving into a more sophisticated form as the years drift by and more and more kids are unlikely to be recoverable after the trauma and damage imparted upon them at the hands of the corp/gov state. The 'woke' then and now:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nltJ9Umurjvx/
In Cambodia (another experiment in 'greater good' communitarian methodology) they had children perform the capital punishment using ropes and machetes, and working in 'youth groups'. It's on my list of things to do to see what the recovery profile of children so trained turned out to be because it can help make better estimates about the likely rates of sociopathy going forward if/when we get out of the 'great reset'. The 'birth pangs' of it to use a term with some very strong religious connotations among the Abrahamic family of faiths/doctrines.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nltJ9Umurjvx/
In Cambodia (another experiment in 'greater good' communitarian methodology) they had children perform the capital punishment using ropes and machetes, and working in 'youth groups'. It's on my list of things to do to see what the recovery profile of children so trained turned out to be because it can help make better estimates about the likely rates of sociopathy going forward if/when we get out of the 'great reset'. The 'birth pangs' of it to use a term with some very strong religious connotations among the Abrahamic family of faiths/doctrines.
Jump to: