FACT FOCUS: Unfounded theory used to dismiss COVID measures
https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-science-health-joe-rogan-ap-fact-check-a87b1044c6256968dcc33886a36c949f
https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-science-health-joe-rogan-ap-fact-check-a87b1044c6256968dcc33886a36c949f
This is not a fact check, this is an editorialization, which further proves the point of mass formation psychosis for you to mindlessly link this and not even think twice.
Do you not find it suspect at all that such a "fact" check would come when people begin to question the Covid narrative?
Reuters, purported to be a "neutral" source of news just like the AP published a similar fact check on mass formation psychosis.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-psychology/fact-check-no-evidence-of-pandemic-mass-formation-psychosis-say-experts-speaking-to-reuters-idUSL1N2TN1RE
As expected, they arrive at the same conclusion the AP does.
Let me provide you an alternative fact check the AP/Reuters would never publish. An example that even you might understand. Recall when BLM terrorists are burning down American cities in 2020, violence you seem to condone as long as its social justice on the woke menu of the day. Do you remember the AP/Reuters ever publishing a fact check that only 13 unarmed black people were shot in 2019? That an unarmed black male has a greater chance of getting killed by the weather, perhaps a lightning strike, than being killed by police unarmed in the United States? That cancer, heart attacks, random gun violence by other black males themselves, are all causes of death which outrank police involved shooting deaths by a large margin? Would the MSM ever attempt to squash myths and irrational fears of being killed by police as a black man in America by publishing the true statistics of police involved deaths of African American men?
The answer is no.
In fact, if you do go against the giant media companies and the narrative they wish to pursue, you jeopardize your career: https://www.city-journal.org/black-lives-matter-thomson-reuters-and-the-price-of-dissent
Quote
But within a few months, this would all collapse. A chain of events—beginning with the death of George Floyd and culminating with a statistical analysis of Black Lives Matter’s claims—would turn the 44-year-old data scientist’s life upside-down. By June 2021, Kriegman would be locked out of Reuters’s servers, denounced by his colleagues, and fired by email. Kriegman had committed an unpardonable offense: he directly criticized the Black Lives Matter movement in the company’s internal communications forum, debunked Reuters’s own biased reporting, and violated a corporate taboo. Driven by what he called a “moral obligation” to speak out, Kriegman refused to celebrate unquestioningly the BLM narrative and his company’s “diversity and inclusion” programming; to the contrary, he argued that Reuters was exhibiting significant left-wing bias in the newsroom and that the ongoing BLM protests, riots, and calls to “defund the police” would wreak havoc on minority communities. Week after week, Kriegman felt increasingly disillusioned by the Thomson Reuters line. Finally, on the first Tuesday in May 2021, he posted a long, data-intensive critique of BLM’s and his company’s hypocrisy. He was sent to Human Resources and Diversity & Inclusion for the chance to reform his thoughts.
A blog post, not a factual article to be clear. But it describes a statistician that worked for Reuters, who objected to the BLM narrative put forth by Reuters, and was chastised and fired for daring to dissent.
The media have an agenda, and will refuse to touch anything politically unfeasible, whether it be systemic racism or Covid lock down restrictions. For the AP to go around hunting for the opinion of a few psychology professors, undoubtedly on the political left, and present their opinions as a "fact check" is by definition propaganda.
On Dr. Malone -- He is a medical doctor with an active medical license and training from Harvard medical school, with patents from the 1990's in mRNA technology. This isn't some quack with an online doctorate from Infowars. If you dispute what he says, don't attack his character, attack his arguments.
