Like Syria?
Iran's Revolutionary Guards commander says its troops in Syria www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/16/us-iran-syria-presence-idUSBRE88F04C20120916
Topic: Count down to Iran invasion - page 9. (Read 41923 times)
IMO the USA interest and interference in the region was always about proxy war with china for not only Mideast and African resources but also to gain a strategic foothold for intervention in the greater Asian continent.
+1
also the war may have already started in iran depending on where you are.
IMO the USA interest and interference in the region was always about proxy war with China for not only Mideast and African resources but also to gain a strategic foothold for intervention in the greater Asian continent.
1984: West German intelligence sources say Iran’s production of a bomb “is entering its final stages.
http://antiwar.com/blog/2012/08/10/always-wrong-predicting-iranian-war-and-weapons/
Christ, I remember that.http://antiwar.com/blog/2012/08/10/always-wrong-predicting-iranian-war-and-weapons/
I love "countdown to Iran invasion" threads and people.
By my clock, we're only 25 years late on the invasions.
Here an interesting link from the CFR about nuclear in Iran.
http://www.cfr.org/iran/iaea-iran-report-decoded/p26451
http://www.cfr.org/iran/iaea-iran-report-decoded/p26451
my assumption is that there will not be an attack unless Iran completlycuts of supply to oils or other resources. Until they get tired of being pushed around by the US they will do the same thing as what is going on in syria economic terrorism the destruction of a nation from within making them kill them selves with starvation,poverty and then the inevitable reveloution
Quote
In 2010, Iran's nuclear facilities were infiltrated by Stuxnet, the centrifuge-wrecking malware allegedly cooked up by the US government. Now they seem to have been hit again by a bizarre attack forcing nuclear plant workstations to pump the song Thunderstruck by heavy metal band AC/DC through the speakers at full volume.
Quote
The Iranian scientist goes on to say that they believe the attackers used Metasploit, a common hacking tool which provides a variety of ways to penetrate supposedly secure networks. "There was also some music playing randomly on several of the workstations during the middle of the night with the volume maxed out," says the scientist. "I believe it was playing 'Thunderstruck' by AC/DC."
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2012/07/iranian-nuclear-facilities-thu.html
Does the list of assassinated Iranian scientists count as an attack? What about the magical exploding nuclear facilities? Exploding generals? When does this officially become an attack?
Ive been hearing about the impending attack on iran that is supposed to happen now, tommorow, a few weeks from now for so long, I actually wonder if it will ever happen...
they're already being attacked by sanctions and other "weapons of fincancial warfare"... what else is planned exactly, well, I don't know. I don't even know what exaclty the goal is (except maybe to ensure access to cheap oil for the US).
General Wesley Clark explains it all: http://pathtopersianow.ytmnd.com/
Because "they don't know what else to do"?
Boys and their toys...
Ive been hearing about the impending attack on iran that is supposed to happen now, tommorow, a few weeks from now for so long, I actually wonder if it will ever happen...
they're already being attacked by sanctions and other "weapons of fincancial warfare"... what else is planned exactly, well, I don't know. I don't even know what exaclty the goal is (except maybe to ensure access to cheap oil for the US).
General Wesley Clark explains it all: http://pathtopersianow.ytmnd.com/
Because "they don't know what else to do"?
Ive been hearing about the impending attack on iran that is supposed to happen now, tommorow, a few weeks from now for so long, I actually wonder if it will ever happen...
they're already being attacked by sanctions and other "weapons of fincancial warfare"... what else is planned exactly, well, I don't know. I don't even know what exaclty the goal is (except maybe to ensure access to cheap oil for the US).
General Wesley Clark explains it all: http://pathtopersianow.ytmnd.com/
We don't have to worry about an Iran invasion right now, Rick Santorum didn't get the nomination 
Ive been hearing about the impending attack on iran that is supposed to happen now, tommorow, a few weeks from now for so long, I actually wonder if it will ever happen...
they're already being attacked by sanctions and other "weapons of fincancial warfare"... what else is planned exactly, well, I don't know. I don't even know what exaclty the goal is (except maybe to ensure access to cheap oil for the US).
Ive been hearing about the impending attack on iran that is supposed to happen now, tommorow, a few weeks from now for so long, I actually wonder if it will ever happen...
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/20/world/europe/explosion-on-bulgaria-tour-bus-kills-at-least-five-israelis.html?pagewanted=all
Netanyahu blaims Hisbollah/Iran for the assault. Hisbollah says it wasn't them, they wouldn't target tourists. A small false flag?
Obama “pledged to stand with Israel in this difficult time, and provide whatever assistance is necessary to identify and bring to justice the perpetrators.”
Netanyahu blaims Hisbollah/Iran for the assault. Hisbollah says it wasn't them, they wouldn't target tourists. A small false flag?
Obama “pledged to stand with Israel in this difficult time, and provide whatever assistance is necessary to identify and bring to justice the perpetrators.”
I don't understand why Iran put their country so close to dozens of US military bases.
it's even funnier with the relevant image:
http://www.oneangryman.com/ken/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/military-spending.jpg
I don't understand why Iran put their country so close to dozens of US military bases.
Why will usa stop going over there? The Oil and the Heroin fields.
But someone was saying, that soldiers were saying if there was no taliban, there be no IED's then it would be boring and then the taliban says the same thing, if there would be no soldiers, there be no reason to put IED's and it would be boring. Ironic?
But someone was saying, that soldiers were saying if there was no taliban, there be no IED's then it would be boring and then the taliban says the same thing, if there would be no soldiers, there be no reason to put IED's and it would be boring. Ironic?
Why be at war with just Iran, when you can be at war with Pakistan too? Add in enough countries close by and you get efficiency through scale and location.
Syria is not at war with the US and is not likely to be. If Assad falls, the al Qa'ida backed opposition will take power and no American president would want to be associated with that.
What do you mean al qa'ida backed opposition? That is not true at all you must have a dodgy news source. The opposition have been backed and funded to an extent by GCC countries such as Saudi Arabia. The toppling of Assad would be in the presidents interest as it will destroy Irans strong hold on Syria therefore weakening them. Al-qaeda don't even come into this, the idea of al-qaeda being in Syria is apart of the propaganda unleashed by the assad regime.
Although as you said, I doubt any millitary intervention by the US will occur.
Jump to: