Topic: Cricket match prediction discussions - page 138. (Read 598891 times)
The game played under the rain law is commonly called the DLS method. The DLS method has generated a lot of controversy at present. Many times it is seen that the laws of DLS make a very simple equation very difficult resulting in a candidate pressure among the players. I think it is necessary to make sure that the law is fair before playing in the rain Because if the decision is not in everyone's favor then cricket Cricket will lose its popularity so I must think again about the DLS method.
I remember that a few months back we had a discussion whether to keep this thread. There are separate threads for ODI, T20 and test formats and the question was whether we need a general thread or not. Back then I had supported keeping this one, because we need a place to discuss issues related to cricket in general, and not specifically related to any of the formats.
Agreed. It's a good thing that this thread didn't get locked. We need a general cricket discussion thread in order to randomly post about any particular format without searching for the specific thread related to it.Hopefully this love for cricket will be gone ahead by time despite any personal or national issues because sometimes I feel we have few members those go beyond limits which is good but still staying into better environment is good for all of us and this community.
Congrats Mates.
Many cricket enthusiasts focus way too much on the financial and political aspects of the game rather than focusing on the entertainment factor. Think people! Congrats Mates.
But with the change of time and the help of technology, poison cricket has improved a lot. Nowadays many new technologies have been added through which the game can be managed accurately on the field Earlier DRS preparation film in the game of cricket but nowadays DRS in cricket has become a very important technology. Because the wrong decision given by the umpire can be easily proven through DRS technology And wrong decisions lead to fresh opportunities to correct those mistakes which is very good for cricket
Yes,Technology has taken to another level for the purity of cricket. Where even if the umpires' decisions are wrong, the accuracy is checked with technology. A lot of technology in cricket has improved the quality of the game. Such as use of Spidercam, UltraEdge, cricketing decision review system. As of lately these issues are deeply related to cricket.
But with the change of time and the help of technology, poison cricket has improved a lot. Nowadays many new technologies have been added through which the game can be managed accurately on the field Earlier DRS preparation film in the game of cricket but nowadays DRS in cricket has become a very important technology. Because the wrong decision given by the umpire can be easily proven through DRS technology And wrong decisions lead to fresh opportunities to correct those mistakes which is very good for cricket
Yes,Technology has taken to another level for the purity of cricket. Where even if the umpires' decisions are wrong, the accuracy is checked with technology. A lot of technology in cricket has improved the quality of the game. Such as use of Spidercam, UltraEdge, cricketing decision review system. As of lately these issues are deeply related to cricket.
But with the change of time and the help of technology, poison cricket has improved a lot. Nowadays many new technologies have been added through which the game can be managed accurately on the field Earlier DRS preparation film in the game of cricket but nowadays DRS in cricket has become a very important technology. Because the wrong decision given by the umpire can be easily proven through DRS technology And wrong decisions lead to fresh opportunities to correct those mistakes which is very good for cricket
1000th page everyone. That is a big, big milestone. Wow! Surprised that nobody talked about this yet. This particular cricket discussion thread is easily one of the longest threads in the entire forum.
@fullypak who is basically a dim-witted account seller is the creator of this thread and has been inactive since 2019. I guess that's the only disappointing aspect of this thread.
WoW!!!@fullypak who is basically a dim-witted account seller is the creator of this thread and has been inactive since 2019. I guess that's the only disappointing aspect of this thread.
I remember that a few months back we had a discussion whether to keep this thread. There are separate threads for ODI, T20 and test formats and the question was whether we need a general thread or not. Back then I had supported keeping this one, because we need a place to discuss issues related to cricket in general, and not specifically related to any of the formats. Almost never noticed that this topic was created by an account seller. He probably got negative trust and created a fresh account here.
Hopefully this love for cricket will be gone ahead by time despite any personal or national issues because sometimes I feel we have few members those go beyond limits which is good but still staying into better environment is good for all of us and this community.
Congrats Mates.
I've no problem on BCCI getting backlash for right reasons but it shouldn't be one way street, which is the case right now especially from SENA media and Pundits ( Barring SA).
I won't single out him only, it's just whole ecosystem only look for their own interest and give virtue signals when it suits them
I won't single out him only, it's just whole ecosystem only look for their own interest and give virtue signals when it suits them
Barclay deserves whatever backlash that is directed against him. The only instance when we had a worse chairman for the ICC was when Sharad Pawar got in to that position. And interestingly, elections are due in a few months from now. Barclay says that he wants another term, which may not be acceptable for the BCCI. Sourav Ganguly has given hints that he is interested in this position. Kumar Sangakkara is another name that has surfaced recently. Either of these two will be a lot better for cricket when compared to Barclay.
Hehe Ikr tabhi toh bola BCCI should propose this bill in ICC meeting and see how ICC shit their bed. This will ensure that BCCI would not get unnecessary backlash of being greedy and killing the game, especially from English media.
According to recent news Indian broadcasters are not participating in the mock auction, unless ICC make the bidding process transparent. Let's see what happens next.
According to recent news Indian broadcasters are not participating in the mock auction, unless ICC make the bidding process transparent. Let's see what happens next.
BCCI is always blamed for being greedy, despite the fact that the ECB-CA-CNZ are the ones who harm the associate nations the most. The current chairman (Greg Barclay) tried to sabotage the Olympic inclusion of cricket several times, and only timely intervention of players and the IOC kept the chances for 2028 Games alive. As long as businessmen such as Barclay takes decisions, there will be allegations of corruption. I sincerely hope that the Indian and overseas media houses will refuse to take part in this scam auction.
I won't single out him only, it's just whole ecosystem only look for their own interest and give virtue signals when it suits them
1000th page everyone. That is a big, big milestone. Wow! Surprised that nobody talked about this yet. This particular cricket discussion thread is easily one of the longest threads in the entire forum.
@fullypak who is basically a dim-witted account seller is the creator of this thread and has been inactive since 2019. I guess that's the only disappointing aspect of this thread.
@fullypak who is basically a dim-witted account seller is the creator of this thread and has been inactive since 2019. I guess that's the only disappointing aspect of this thread.
WoW!!!
I remember that a few months back we had a discussion whether to keep this thread. There are separate threads for ODI, T20 and test formats and the question was whether we need a general thread or not. Back then I had supported keeping this one, because we need a place to discuss issues related to cricket in general, and not specifically related to any of the formats. Almost never noticed that this topic was created by an account seller. He probably got negative trust and created a fresh account here.
1000th page everyone. That is a big, big milestone. Wow! Surprised that nobody talked about this yet. This particular cricket discussion thread is easily one of the longest threads in the entire forum.
@fullypak who is basically a dim-witted account seller is the creator of this thread and has been inactive since 2019. I guess that's the only disappointing aspect of this thread.
@fullypak who is basically a dim-witted account seller is the creator of this thread and has been inactive since 2019. I guess that's the only disappointing aspect of this thread.
Hehe Ikr tabhi toh bola BCCI should propose this bill in ICC meeting and see how ICC shit their bed. This will ensure that BCCI would not get unnecessary backlash of being greedy and killing the game, especially from English media.
According to recent news Indian broadcasters are not participating in the mock auction, unless ICC make the bidding process transparent. Let's see what happens next.
BCCI is always blamed for being greedy, despite the fact that the ECB-CA-CNZ are the ones who harm the associate nations the most. The current chairman (Greg Barclay) tried to sabotage the Olympic inclusion of cricket several times, and only timely intervention of players and the IOC kept the chances for 2028 Games alive. As long as businessmen such as Barclay takes decisions, there will be allegations of corruption. I sincerely hope that the Indian and overseas media houses will refuse to take part in this scam auction. According to recent news Indian broadcasters are not participating in the mock auction, unless ICC make the bidding process transparent. Let's see what happens next.
I was feeling we need some system like UEFA but sadly recently we have some corruption charges against them also but still they are doing good for the sack of game and improving their system and quality which is the best part of their organization but sadly here no one is doing specially B-4 are trying their best for hurting associate countries which can do much good for this game in long run.
T20 format is revolutionary for all as this can bring good profit in short term for all countries and ICC, but for this they have to do some good work and better planning with the help of all stakeholders.
Hehe Ikr tabhi toh bola BCCI should propose this bill in ICC meeting and see how ICC shit their bed. This will ensure that BCCI would not get unnecessary backlash of being greedy and killing the game, especially from English media.
According to recent news Indian broadcasters are not participating in the mock auction, unless ICC make the bidding process transparent. Let's see what happens next.
According to recent news Indian broadcasters are not participating in the mock auction, unless ICC make the bidding process transparent. Let's see what happens next.
BCCI is always blamed for being greedy, despite the fact that the ECB-CA-CNZ are the ones who harm the associate nations the most. The current chairman (Greg Barclay) tried to sabotage the Olympic inclusion of cricket several times, and only timely intervention of players and the IOC kept the chances for 2028 Games alive. As long as businessmen such as Barclay takes decisions, there will be allegations of corruption. I sincerely hope that the Indian and overseas media houses will refuse to take part in this scam auction.
IPL is currently the most popular domestic league in cricket history. Currently this IPL is a world famous tournament One has to spend a lot of money on an ipl event The world's most famous cricketers want to see if their names appear in the IPL auction Undoubtedly, IPL is a very popular league. BCCI however operates very well under this name The number of teams in IPL has already increased compared to earlier. I think the popularity of IPL will increase with the change of time.
As for ICC, i would like to see BCCI to present -Same % of ICC revenue model- proposal for every member including associate members (despite BCCI generating lion share), given ICC is ready to introduce 30-40 team format in WC (T-20 and 50 overs). If not then they should shut up about everything.
LOL.. this will remain as a pipedream. In a few months, we will get to know about the revenue distribution for next cycle (2024-31). I am not expecting any drastic changes. And there is a real possibility that the share for associate members may go down even further. During the last cycle (2016-23), the allocation was reduced from $52.5 million per year to $20 million per year. That is around $200,000 per year to each of the associate nations. Ireland and Afghanistan may demand a greater share, since they are also full members. In that case, the allocation for the associate members may get reduced.
According to recent news Indian broadcasters are not participating in the mock auction, unless ICC make the bidding process transparent. Let's see what happens next.
As for ICC, i would like to see BCCI to present -Same % of ICC revenue model- proposal for every member including associate members (despite BCCI generating lion share), given ICC is ready to introduce 30-40 team format in WC (T-20 and 50 overs). If not then they should shut up about everything.
LOL.. this will remain as a pipedream. In a few months, we will get to know about the revenue distribution for next cycle (2024-31). I am not expecting any drastic changes. And there is a real possibility that the share for associate members may go down even further. During the last cycle (2016-23), the allocation was reduced from $52.5 million per year to $20 million per year. That is around $200,000 per year to each of the associate nations. Ireland and Afghanistan may demand a greater share, since they are also full members. In that case, the allocation for the associate members may get reduced.
Having said that if by any chance they are increasing teams to 12-14 then i don't mind 5 reserved spot for overseas players.
5 reserved spots for overseas players is a great idea, but I feel that 12-14 teams in the tournament is way too much and will just increase the number of matches played between them which would tire out viewers pretty quickly.They should stick to the current number itself and lower the number of matches played between them which would retain more viewers in my opinion.
Still, here we need some ICC involvement in this all because foremost they need to sit and talk with all big leagues about their schedule which is very important if they are able to settle and giving all fair chance then surely future is bright for them even window is just available for IPL and no other country eligible for this and can talk about this as well with ICC or other boards.
Having said that if by any chance they are increasing teams to 12-14 then i don't mind 5 reserved spot for overseas players.
5 reserved spots for overseas players is a great idea, but I feel that 12-14 teams in the tournament is way too much and will just increase the number of matches played between them which would tire out viewers pretty quickly.They should stick to the current number itself and lower the number of matches played between them which would retain more viewers in my opinion.
The current number of 10 looks OK to me. Almost all the regions are represented. If the size is increased to 12-14, then some of the franchises may be based out from tier-2 cities such as Indore or Patna, where there is not enough revenue potential. It will dilute the quality as well (if the requirement of 7 Indian players in the XI is maintained). And also, the IPL may get too lengthy and may stretch for 3 months or so. The ICC is already uneasy with the 2.5 months time window and they will definitely reject any further extensions.
If someone watching each n every game then ofc fatigue is natural but fans hardly do that.When any event goes for longer period of time then spectators become selective, they opt to watch only their fav players or their respective franchise fixture or interesting match-up. In next 5 years i do see tremendous possibility of IPL going into 12 team format or if BCCI get lucky then even 14.
As for ICC, i would like to see BCCI to present -Same % of ICC revenue model- proposal for every member including associate members (despite BCCI generating lion share), given ICC is ready to introduce 30-40 team format in WC (T-20 and 50 overs). If not then they should shut up about everything.
@hichamito37 pointed out correctly.
IPL did went into globalized mode but it's still very much domestic tournament IMO as vast majority of audience is local. I think this number game should depend on quality only, if quality is going down due to local players then increasing overseas slot makes a perfect sense but they are doing okay job so far and local talent is ready to get their hands dirty. In last IPL there were many instance when franchise fielded only 3 overseas players in the playing XI.
Having said that if by any chance they are increasing teams to 12-14 then i don't mind 5 reserved spot for overseas players.
IPL did went into globalized mode but it's still very much domestic tournament IMO as vast majority of audience is local. I think this number game should depend on quality only, if quality is going down due to local players then increasing overseas slot makes a perfect sense but they are doing okay job so far and local talent is ready to get their hands dirty. In last IPL there were many instance when franchise fielded only 3 overseas players in the playing XI.
Having said that if by any chance they are increasing teams to 12-14 then i don't mind 5 reserved spot for overseas players.
The current number of 10 looks OK to me. Almost all the regions are represented. If the size is increased to 12-14, then some of the franchises may be based out from tier-2 cities such as Indore or Patna, where there is not enough revenue potential. It will dilute the quality as well (if the requirement of 7 Indian players in the XI is maintained). And also, the IPL may get too lengthy and may stretch for 3 months or so. The ICC is already uneasy with the 2.5 months time window and they will definitely reject any further extensions.
UAE has no shortage of money. So they can host a tournament as big as possible. They have the money to do basically anything. But the problem is they themselves don't have enough skilled players. And probably that is the reason why they have decided that one team can have nine foreign players. in the national UAE team, we can see that most of the players are foreigners. so even though they are very enthusiastic about cricket that doesn't actually have players who can play cricket at the top level. But as I said they don't have any shortage of money so they are going to make this tournament very big.
I think if Arab Am Rat can make such a decision then many reputable companies will express interest in buying the team Because UAE is a perfect place to organize something. Although maybe initially they will not be as crowded as the IPL, but still it will cover the entire cricket world.I think such an initiative should be taken by United Arab Emirates. I think if they can take such initiatives then the popularity of cricket will increase in many areas. Because currently IPL is the most popular domestic cricket in the cricket world. The stadiums of UAE might not be crowded with cricket enthusiasts but there will be a lot of money entering and outgoing. And another reason why there might not be too many people in the stands of the stadium is because of the weather. If I am not wrong the weather in UAE is very hot during the day and very cold at night. Not many people are very accustomed to this type of weather. But UAE is rich. And I am quite sure that the organizers are going to give importance to different media platforms and social media platforms a lot more.
Having said that if by any chance they are increasing teams to 12-14 then i don't mind 5 reserved spot for overseas players.
5 reserved spots for overseas players is a great idea, but I feel that 12-14 teams in the tournament is way too much and will just increase the number of matches played between them which would tire out viewers pretty quickly.They should stick to the current number itself and lower the number of matches played between them which would retain more viewers in my opinion.
Jump to: