At first, I thought it was a new thread that got some decent replies. But then I saw it was created back in 2017. Guess what? Six years running since the thread was created, and I can see only a few numbers of websites were verified by
https://cryptogambling.org/. I don't know why the numbers are not increasing after passing a few years. Only fourteen websites were verified by them, while a couple is under the same ownership. Stake and Primedice, Onehash and Cyberdice, Bitkong, Simpledice and LuckyDice under the same ownership. So, seven of them come from three owners. If I am not wrong, Onehash announced they wouldn't continue their service. After six years of creation, Only fourteen websites have been verified, which is somewhat scarry.
Yes, there is definitely something odd with the Crypto Gambling Foundation!
However, I was fallen into their trap!
Huh?
What trap are you talking about?
I believed their provably fair propaganda and lost 4,6% of the bets after 180,000 bets playing their in-house Black Jack while the advertised house edge is 0,5%!
I asked Stake to show me the license certificate for their in-house Black Jack and they do not show it!
I asked Stake to show me the license for their crypto currency online casino and they do not show it!
How can an illegal and criminal online crypto currency casino verify other casinos to be provably fair?
You're doing stupid math that doesn't make any sense. LIke almost nothing what you're saying makes sense. If you were playing perfect strategy you would lose ~49.1% of your hands and win ~42.4% and Push ~8.5%
But if you were a winning blackjack player you would already know that, and you obviously don't.
If a winning bj player player 180,000 hands, they would lose 88,380 and win 76,320
https://wizardofodds.com/games/blackjack/variance/This is because the average winning hand pays out slightly more than even money on your wager, in addition to the house edge.
Statistics
Bets: 180,904 | Wins: 78,285 | Losses: 86,612 = 8,327 more losses
180,904 bets x 0,5% house edge = 904 bets I should lose
8,327 more losses - 904 bets I should lose = 7,423 bets unjustifiably lost
8,327 more losses x 100 : 180,904 bets = 4,6%
I don't believe your stats are only from Black Jack. I think you've played some other lower variance games bc you have more wins, than you should. Not by much, if you were a perfect strategy player. But there's no way you know how to play perfect strategy since you're dumb as a rock.
Seriously stop trying to do math until you go take a basic math class or something.