Topic: ⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All - page 6. (Read 25567 times)

lol


Where's the crypto license and the name of the owner on game-protect.com ?

You are lying again!

At the bottom of Stake.com is neither a crypto currency online casino license for the websites / domains Stake.ac , Stake.bet , Stake.bz , Stake.ceo , Staketr.com , Stake.games , Stake.jp , Stake.krd , Stake.mba and Stake.pink stated nor who owns and operates them.



One time you say the truth! Applaud, applaud!  



You are lying again!

Easygo does not have to enforce the Australian laws and regulations only if they have a valid crypto currency online casino license abroad for the websites / domains Stake.com , Stake.ac , Stake.bet , Stake.bz , Stake.ceo , Staketr.com , Stake.games , Stake.jp , Stake.krd , Stake.mba and Stake.pink



I have no knowledge at all that Curacao is in the process of creating a crypto specific license!

Who said that their current license covers crypto currencies?



I do not know who is the owner or operator of the name Stake, please show the brand name registrant?



I know that those are all stake.com website content mirrors, but they are not domain mirrors.

If you hold a mirror on Stake.com, the outcome is Stake.com and not Stake.ac , Stake.bet , Stake.bz , Stake.ceo , Staketr.com , Stake.games , Stake.jp , Stake.krd , Stake.mba or Stake.pink!

It's at the bottom of Stake.com, go look for yourself.

No, it's not a "crypto online casino license", and it doesn't have to be.  As you already know, curacao is in the process of creating a crypto specific license that's supposed to be roll out soon and they have explicitly said until then their current license covers crypto currencies.

And you already know the owner/operator of stake, you've literally mentioned them by name dozens of times already.

And you also already know those are all stake mirrors.  

So far the only thing you've convinced anyone of is what an idiot you are.  Seriously, has even a single person taken you seriously since you started spamming this thread?

I am not sure why this has not been known by many members yet? The thread has been opened since 2017 and yet it’s not much discussed. The articles and white paper are good man. The white paper is more or less technically related to how fairness works. I am more or less non technical so I’m just looking at your site as Casual surfer who would want to know which casino is best to choose right now.

I think you should also add up more casinos on your own? It seems there is membership submission for casinos?? Instead of that it should be self inclusion by Crypto Gambling Foundation with a section where they can mention it otherwise. Overall amazing Website.

If they do have licenses, show the licenses for the websites / domains Stake.ac , Stake.bet , Stake.bz , Stake.ceo , Staketr.com , Stake.games , Stake.jp , Stake.krd , Stake.mba and Stake.pink ?

Show me who is the owner and operator of the websites / domains Stake.ac , Stake.bet , Stake.bz , Stake.ceo , Staketr.com , Stake.games , Stake.jp , Stake.krd , Stake.mba and Stake.pink ?

You really need to look yourself in the mirror and accept responsibility for deciding to gamble away $30k.  It wasn't stolen from you.  It's not Eddie or Stunnas fault.  You weren't cheated and even if they didn't have a license (they do) it was still your decision to gamble with that money.  You can keep looking for some excuse to avoid this, but they will only make any sense in your own little fantasy world.  Accept you lost and quit acting like such a baby.

LOL, this is really funny!

So Bijan, Edward and Mladen publicly say they operate the crypto currency online casino websites / domains Stake.ac , Stake.bet , Stake.bz , Stake.ceo , Staketr.com , Stake.games , Stake.jp , Stake.krd , Stake.mba and Stake.pink, but they do not have a crypto currency online casino license for it!!!

LMAO  

Read the words.  Use your brain.  You figured out how to use the internet and find this forum so you can't be as stupid as you're acting.

What is the sense of posting a screenshot from the website / domain playstake.io while I said that at the bottom of the websites / domains Stake.ac , Stake.bet , Stake.bz , Stake.ceo , Staketr.com , Stake.games , Stake.jp , Stake.krd , Stake.mba and Stake.pink the owner and operator is not stated?

Unfortunately, a name can not be the operator of a website / domain, only companies or natural persons can.



No they do not!

At the bottom these websites state that the name Stake is owned and operated by Medium Rare N.V.

They do not state who owns and operates the website / domain.

Now you see what scam artists Bijan, Edward and Mladen are!

For example, I am logged in and deposited and play at stake.bet, but instead of stating who owns and operates the website / domain stake.bet, they state who owns and operates the name Stake.

mirror list: playstake.io


Yes they do. Scroll all the way to the bottom.

These websites neither state who owns them nor who operates them, how do you know that these websites are operated by the brand Stake?

Who is the operator of the brand Stake?

Those are all mirrors for stake.

So...
[email protected]


They will ignore you because your claims are nonsense though.

Does anyone know the email address of the Complaints Department for the websites Stake.ac , Stake.bet , Stake.bz , Stake.ceo , Staketr.com , Stake.games , Stake.jp , Stake.krd , Stake.mba and Stake.pink ?

Your issue is you convinced yourself that you found a way to beat the casino without understanding basic math.  Obviously your calculations were wrong then, just like most of the calculations you've made in this thread (which I've already explained in detail several times).

When you ended up losing money instead of winning the 180k you expected, you should have considered the possibility that you were mistaken when you determined that you would be able to beat online black jack with common rules and an infinite deck.  Instead, you concluded that the game must be rigged and you did a bunch of more convoluted calculations and convinced yourself that you'd proven something you didn't.

You'd be better off spending your time taking some online math classes than crying in this thread.  I'd recommend starting at grade 6 or 7 level at a site like khan academy.  Here: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/on-seventh-grade-math

The Stake in-house Black Jack system is provably rigged and not provably fair!


Info 1)

The advertised house edge for the Stake in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means longterm I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.

However, if you take a look at my statistics here https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR you can see the following total numbers:

Bets: 180,904

Wins: 78,285

Losses: 86,612

If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)

Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.

0,5% house edge out of 180,900 bets placed I should lose 900 bets + a possible small deviation.

8,327 bets lost - 900 bets I should lose = 7,427 bets too much lost.


Info 2)

Bets

After 180,900 bets, the technically maximal possible deviation is 0,4% from the expected outcome according to the law of large numbers (See Info 3).

180,000 bets x 0,4% = 720 bets I could maximal additionally lose on top of the 900 bets I will lose based on the 0,5% house edge.

7,427 bets too much lost minus 720 bets I can additional maximal lose = 6,707 bets = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!

House edge

0,5% house edge = 900 bets plus 720 bets I can maximal additionally lose = 80% additional maximal possible house edge.

0,5% house edge plus 80% = 0,4% additional maximal possible house edge = 0,9% maximal possible house edge!

Experienced house edge 4,6% minus 0,9% maximal possible house edge = 3,7% additional house edge!

3,7% additional house edge : 0,4% additional maximal possible house edge = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!

Stake's own statistics is 100% proof that their in-house Black Jack system is rigged!


Info 3)

When the house edge is 0,5% and you placed 180,900 bets, you will lose 900 bets and the remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips.

The remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips, because they are neutral and you will win 50% = 90,000 bets and lose 50% = 90,000 bets.


Now let's take a look at the technically maximal possible deviation for 180,000 coin flips:

A) Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (In 68% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0,12%)

B) 3 times standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 0,36% (In 99,7% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0.36%)
 
What does 99,7% mean?

When you make 333 times a serie of 180,900 bets, then 332 times the deviation from the expected outcome will be up to 0,36% and only one time the deviation will be higher than 0,36%.

I was not able to find how much the deviation could be in this one case where it is higher than 0,36%, but likely not more than 10% of the 0,36% = 0,4%.


Info 4)

The Stake bet transaction history only states 180,900 single bet events and no overview of my experienced house edge.

To get my experienced house edge from the bet transaction history, I would need to take a look at all 180,900 bets and calculate it manually!

If the cards were dealt fair and I lost only 0,5% of all bets placed while the statistics states that I lost 4,6%, then the Stake statistics is rigged!

In either case, the Stake in-house Black Jack system is provably rigged and Stake has to compensate at least the 30,000 USD I lost from my pocket.

hi
I don't want to duplicate text from my thread, but you can take a look and help resolve the issue on vave.com. They took my money.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5464326.new#new

I would like to inquire about the process on how to be a verified operator by your organization (cryptogambling.org).
 

Hey mental case. STFU.