Topic: ⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All - page 2. (Read 25567 times)

When the Curacao Gaming Control Board (GCB) accepts a license application by Medium Rare N.V. / stake.com while I inform them (with proof) since December 2023 about their provably rigged in-house Black Jack system and asked them to intervene, then yes, it looks like the GCB is member of a syndicate of criminals!

If the GCB will give a license to the proven criminal online casino operation Medium Rare N.V. / stake.com, then the GCB will be a proven member of a syndicate of criminals!

The GCB already gave a "Certificate of Operation" to Medium Rare N.V. / stake.com, means the GCB allows Medium Rare N.V. to operate stake.com during the license application process, while it did not issue a license yet!

Syndicate by criminals? Nice

The 2 RuneScape players and the chat moderator applied for a license from the Curacao Gaming Control Board (GCB) for the website stake.com

But as I inform (with proof) the GCB since December 2023 about their provably rigged in-house Black Jack system, the GCB is not allowed to give a license for the website stake.com, otherwise they would become partner in crime!

The 8048/JAZ license, the website stake.com claims to operate under, goes out of business on November 1st, 2024.

If you are a RuneScape player or a chat moderator, for which license would you apply and why?

You are really asking that Stake who runs a provably rigged in-house Black Jack system adds you to their fake "fair gambling" for all website?

The meanwhile defunct casinos are not removed, because the fake "fair gambling" website is not monitored since years!!!

You are right.

I don't think it's good to shill your own platform on another project thread regarding its problems, don't you think? 
As I've seen, you've got your own thread, so why you won't do it from the perspective of the user at least?
Not that I am complaining, but it just seems non-organic a bit.

I noticed that some sites featured on the Crypto Gambling Foundation homepage are no longer active:

• onehash.com
• luckydice.com
• bitkong.com
• simpledice.com
• cyberdice.net

In some cases, they went offline after debatable changes related to their token (KONG), officially due to "ownership transitions".

It might be a good time to update the homepage, and perhaps consider adding BCH.games.
We've maintained a perfect track record over the past four years (though I may be a bit biased!).

contact mail is not working i got scammed on Stake by Evolution.I need to contact with you.

Your calculations are worthless if you aren't going to consider the different possible payouts in blackjack and their frequency.   Blackjack pays out 2-1, player having the option to double and split, both raising the average amount of a player win.  You acting like every hsingle hand the player either wins 1 unit, loses one unit or pushes.  That's nonsense.

Since 21 months!!! I demand compensation for the unjustifiably lost 30,000 USD at Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system and all responsible parties like the alleged Stake "Legal Department", managing director Xecutive Corporate Management B.V., the 8048/JAZ license holder Antillephone N.V. and the Curacao Gaming Control Board ignore me!

Below is proof that the Stake in-house Black Jack system is rigged!

Info 1)

The advertised house edge for the Stake in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means longterm I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.

However, if you take a look at my statistics here https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR you can see the following total numbers:

Bets: 180,904

Wins: 78,285

Losses: 86,612

If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)

Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.

0,5% house edge out of 180,900 bets placed I should lose 900 bets + a possible small deviation.

8,327 bets lost - 900 bets I should lose = 7,427 bets too much lost.


Info 2)

Bets

After 180,900 bets, the technically maximal possible deviation is 0,4% from the expected outcome according to the law of large numbers (See Info 3).

180,000 bets x 0,4% = 720 bets I could maximal additionally lose on top of the 900 bets I will lose based on the 0,5% house edge.

7,427 bets too much lost minus 720 bets I can additional maximal lose = 6,707 bets = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!

House edge

0,5% house edge = 900 bets plus 720 bets I can maximal additionally lose = 80% additional maximal possible house edge.

0,5% house edge plus 80% = 0,4% additional maximal possible house edge = 0,9% maximal possible house edge!

Experienced house edge 4,6% minus 0,9% maximal possible house edge = 3,7% additional house edge!

3,7% additional house edge : 0,4% additional maximal possible house edge = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!

Stake's own statistics is 100% proof that their in-house Black Jack system is rigged!


Info 3)

When the house edge is 0,5% and you placed 180,900 bets, you will lose 900 bets and the remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips.

The remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips, because they are neutral and you will win 50% = 90,000 bets and lose 50% = 90,000 bets.


Now let's take a look at the technically maximal possible deviation for 180,000 coin flips:

A) Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (In 68% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0,12%)

B) 3 times standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 0,36% (In 99,7% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0.36%)
 
What does 99,7% mean?

When you make 333 times a serie of 180,900 bets, then 332 times the deviation from the expected outcome will be up to 0,36% and only one time the deviation will be higher than 0,36%.

I was not able to find how much the deviation could be in this one case where it is higher than 0,36%, but likely not more than 10% of the 0,36% = 0,4%.


Info 4)

The Stake bet transaction history only states 180,900 single bet events and no overview of my experienced house edge.

To get my experienced house edge from the bet transaction history, I would need to take a look at all 180,900 bets and calculate it manually!

If the cards were dealt fair and I lost only 0,5% of all bets placed while the statistics states that I lost 4,6%, then the Stake statistics is rigged!

In either case, the Stake in-house Black Jack system is provably rigged and Stake has to compensate at least the 30,000 USD I lost from my pocket.

I don't think they will not compensate the players who really deserve it. Also, if the accusations are true, a lot of players will not play anymore on this site. However, it is still one of the top casinos that you can rely on when it comes to crypto gaming. So he should re-visit his demand and see where it went wrong why he was not compensated.

That's because you weren't cheated.  You lost and then made up a bunch of nonsense to try and get your money back.

Stake celebrates the 7th anniversary of its provably rigged in-house Black Jack system and 19 months!!! after discovery and compensation demand I am still not compensated!

Is it because Stake is managed by two RuneScape players and a chat moderator?  

This would be true if instead of playing blackjack you were playing a game that paid double your bet 49.5% of the time.

But you were playing black jack, where sometimes the payout is more than double your bet, sometimes less, and sometimes you have the option to increase your bet after the initial deal, so...

no.

With perfect strategy playing blackjack, something I think it's highly unlikely you're capable of since basic math fundamentals are required, you have a ~42% chance of winning each deal and a ~49% chance of losing and pushing the rest. (give or take a bit depending on the rules). 

No

Discussion in this thread got derailed...  Going back to the topic - is this 'Foundation' still operational?

Wrong.  
A hand of black jack and a coinflip are not the same.

In blackjack, the dealer wins more hands than the player - but the player is able to win more than even money as well as increase their wager after knowing what their hand and the dealers up card is.  It's not possible to calculate the rtp in blackjack knowing only how many hands a player won and lost.  

You can't just pretend like blackjacks don't payout 2-1, and doubles and splits don't exist and expect anyone to take you're "proof" seriously.  



As soon as you provide actual proof that you were cheated you will be taken seriously.  Or you can keep posting nonsense.

I think that if you have anything in any platform as you said a stake, that you need a compensation and you have been telling stake to compensate you, I think that the best thing to do is to make sure that you have contact the live support and tell them your challenges and if your case is a genuine one I think support will help you to iron it out amicable, and if they continue to ignore you or block you, you can as well file them in scam accusations, or you take them to twitter or Instagram, so if they see your curiosity I think that the management will make sure they have sort out your issues with them.

Since 18 months!!! I demand compensation for the unjustifiably lost 30,000 USD at Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system and all responsible parties like the alleged Stake "Legal Department", managing director Xecutive Corporate Management B.V., the 8048/JAZ license holder Antillephone N.V. and the Curacao Gaming Control Board ignore me!

Below is proof that the Stake in-house Black Jack system is rigged!

Info 1)

The advertised house edge for the Stake in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means longterm I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.

However, if you take a look at my statistics here https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR you can see the following total numbers:

Bets: 180,904

Wins: 78,285

Losses: 86,612

If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)

Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.

0,5% house edge out of 180,900 bets placed I should lose 900 bets + a possible small deviation.

8,327 bets lost - 900 bets I should lose = 7,427 bets too much lost.


Info 2)

Bets

After 180,900 bets, the technically maximal possible deviation is 0,4% from the expected outcome according to the law of large numbers (See Info 3).

180,000 bets x 0,4% = 720 bets I could maximal additionally lose on top of the 900 bets I will lose based on the 0,5% house edge.

7,427 bets too much lost minus 720 bets I can additional maximal lose = 6,707 bets = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!

House edge

0,5% house edge = 900 bets plus 720 bets I can maximal additionally lose = 80% additional maximal possible house edge.

0,5% house edge plus 80% = 0,4% additional maximal possible house edge = 0,9% maximal possible house edge!

Experienced house edge 4,6% minus 0,9% maximal possible house edge = 3,7% additional house edge!

3,7% additional house edge : 0,4% additional maximal possible house edge = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!

Stake's own statistics is 100% proof that their in-house Black Jack system is rigged!


Info 3)

When the house edge is 0,5% and you placed 180,900 bets, you will lose 900 bets and the remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips.

The remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips, because they are neutral and you will win 50% = 90,000 bets and lose 50% = 90,000 bets.


Now let's take a look at the technically maximal possible deviation for 180,000 coin flips:

A) Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (In 68% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0,12%)

B) 3 times standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 0,36% (In 99,7% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0.36%)
 
What does 99,7% mean?

When you make 333 times a serie of 180,900 bets, then 332 times the deviation from the expected outcome will be up to 0,36% and only one time the deviation will be higher than 0,36%.

I was not able to find how much the deviation could be in this one case where it is higher than 0,36%, but likely not more than 10% of the 0,36% = 0,4%.


Info 4)

The Stake bet transaction history only states 180,900 single bet events and no overview of my experienced house edge.

To get my experienced house edge from the bet transaction history, I would need to take a look at all 180,900 bets and calculate it manually!

If the cards were dealt fair and I lost only 0,5% of all bets placed while the statistics states that I lost 4,6%, then the Stake statistics is rigged!

In either case, the Stake in-house Black Jack system is provably rigged and Stake has to compensate at least the 30,000 USD I lost from my pocket.