Pages:
Author

Topic: CryptoCoin Explorer - Coin Block Explorers. - page 18. (Read 30831 times)

legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
Yes I updated the daemon last night .....  Yet again!?!?!?... Roll Eyes




Code:
101642	2013-04-09 16:29:09	1	20	1.0	2032890	30.0376	165.304	64.2496%
101641 2013-04-09 16:25:09 1 20 1.0 2032870 30.0351 165.301 64.2517%
101640 2013-04-09 16:25:09 1 20 1.0 2032850 30.0354 165.301 64.2517%
101639 2013-04-09 16:23:09 1 20 1.0 2032830 30.0343 165.3 64.2528%
101638 2013-04-09 16:22:00 1 20 2.113 2032810 30.0338 165.299 64.2534%
101637 2013-04-09 16:22:00 1 20 8.452 2032790 30.0341 165.299 64.2534%
101636 2013-04-09 16:22:00 4 5343.18432958 33.809 2032770 30.0344 165.299 64.2534%
101635 2013-04-09 16:22:00 1 20 135.239 2032750 30.0397 165.299 64.2474%
101634 2013-04-09 16:01:04 1 20 1352.383 2032730 30.0255 165.285 64.2585%
101633 2013-04-09 15:40:30 1 20 13523.835 2032710 30.0115 165.27 64.2695%
101632 2013-04-09 15:20:17 1 20 135238.105 2032690 29.9977 165.256 64.2802%
101631 2013-04-09 15:00:00 1 20 135238.105 2032670 29.9839 165.242 64.291%
101630 2013-04-09 15:00:00 1 20 135238.105 2032650 29.9842 165.242 64.291%

It appears the actual drop started on block   101633. Depending on the alog it may have taken a couple of blocks for the difficulty to actually drop, even though the version cutoff may have been on 101631.

For example noted in the code:

Code:
If the new block's timestamp is more than 20 minutes
    // have to be greater than the max accepted time delta ; 15mins.
    // this way, if one would artificially increase block nTime to its max value,
    // we'd still take the 5mins periods without block before allowing a one-shot
    // diff decrase, later keeping the block time used for ema computation.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Bytecoin: 8VofSsbQvTd8YwAcxiCcxrqZ9MnGPjaAQm
Hey, dreamwatcher, have you updated to the new Terracoin emergency build from yesterday?  Block 101631 should be showing a difficulty drop (I think), and is not.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
Poll bump...... Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
So far so good, I have not had to unlock an explorer since the framework change. I only reset the web server once as I had forgotten to set the ppcexplore.org address in the server alias config.


I want to gauge the interest in seeing Novacoin and/or Bytecoin on CCE.

Both these coins already have at least one public explorer, so the decision to add them is going to be based mostly on the interest of CCE users through the poll.




legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
This evening I finished switching the entire CryptoCoinExplorer site to use the FastCGI server framework.

Since the sudden up shoot of Alt-coins this weekend, I felt I did not have the luxury of time to completely switch over to a Cherrypy framework.

Now it is observe and tweak as needed......and chase down bothersome IP's that just make it slower for everybody... Cheesy

legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
Just thought I would give an update as to what is going on with the explorer and related projects.

1. dermoths' ABE pull request that I applied to the TRC explorer does much in the way of reducing explorer lock up. However, it does not completely solve the issue and the TRC explorer has locked a couple of times, but that is a big improvement. Hopefully this is no longer an issue.

2. I have decided the only way to correctly fix the issue is to run the explorers with a different server framework. I have tried to get it to run on the FastCGI framework, but I cannot get it to work correctly and it is probably  an issue on my part. Moved to FastCGI.

3. I have been working hard on the new pool. I have gained enough experience with  Pushpool, to use it for all the alt-coins I plan to support. I have been looking at Eloipool and I should be able to adapt it relatively quickly once the alt-coins move to a 0.8 BTC daemon base. Eloipool is written in python which I find much easier to code with then C. After experimenting with integrating front end components into Pushpool, I have found I really dislike C vs Python. Cheesy

4. Through writing the front end of the pool from scratch, I have come to the decision to use Cherrypy as the server framework for the pool. I am currently working on the payout system, once that is finished I will most likely open the pool up with Bytecoin. This is not because of any kind of "coin loyalty" , but for the simple reason that it is probably the least mined of the current coins because of its newness. Besides, my "coin loyalty" lies mostly with PPC, as it was the first coin I started to do projects with.  Wink

TRC and FRC will be the second pools as they really needs some pool choices. PPC will come last only because of its popularity, I need to shake the bugs out and make sure of server capacity before opening.


5. My experience with Cherrypy has also led me to the decision to use it for the server framework replacement in the explorers. Moved to FastCGI instead

6. I apologize for the slow speed at which improvements and other projects are coming out. I am doing these projects alone, along with a wife, school and keeping enough cash flow through the business to keep everything going. I cannot remember ever pulling as many all nighters in my life as I have recently  Tongue



I am a bit sad to see doublec shutdown his projects in the alt-coin world. I can see where he is coming from as the production and upkeep of projects in this realm can be much more work then most people realize.

I wish him the best of luck in his future endeavors.

I will try and get as much done as I can this weekend, although I have some "Honeydo" projects around the house to get done.  Cheesy



legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
Everything is back up.

I will get the test net daemons up in a few.

legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
All the explorers and webpages are down.

It appears the issue is on the hosting end as I cannot SSH into either the Cryptocoinexplorer server or the new pool server I am developing.


I will post any updates here.    Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1205
Merit: 1010
Nice!
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
Finally some good news...It looks like  dermoths' commit is working well. i just noticed the first bout of connection resets and broken pipes, and ABE gracefully handled them without getting stuck or crashing.


Code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/wsgiref/handlers.py", line 86, in run
    self.finish_response()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/wsgiref/handlers.py", line 127, in finish_response
    self.write(data)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/wsgiref/handlers.py", line 210, in write
    self.send_headers()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/wsgiref/handlers.py", line 268, in send_headers
    self.send_preamble()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/wsgiref/handlers.py", line 189, in send_preamble
    self._write('HTTP/%s %s\r\n' % (self.http_version,self.status))
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/wsgiref/handlers.py", line 389, in _write
    self.stdout.write(data)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 324, in write
    self.flush()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 303, in flush
    self._sock.sendall(view[write_offset:write_offset+buffer_size])
error: [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer
----------------------------------------
Exception happened during processing of request from ('xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx', 52683)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 284, in _handle_request_noblock
    self.process_request(request, client_address)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 310, in process_request
    self.finish_request(request, client_address)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 323, in finish_request
    self.RequestHandlerClass(request, client_address, self)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 640, in __init__
    self.finish()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 693, in finish
    self.wfile.flush()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 303, in flush
    self._sock.sendall(view[write_offset:write_offset+buffer_size])
error: [Errno 32] Broken pipe
----------------------------------------
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [01/Apr/2013 01:37:55] "GET /logo32.png HTTP/1.1" 200 13245
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [01/Apr/2013 01:37:55] "GET /abe.css HTTP/1.1" 200 222
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx- - [01/Apr/2013 01:38:05] "GET /chain/Terracoin HTTP/1.1" 200 8023
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [01/Apr/2013 01:38:05] "GET /chain/Terracoin/q/getblockcount HTTP/1.0" 200 5
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [01/Apr/2013 01:38:05] "GET /chain/Terracoin/q/getdifficulty HTTP/1.0" 200 8
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [01/Apr/2013 01:38:05] "GET /chain/Terracoin/q/getblockcount HTTP/1.0" 200 5
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [01/Apr/2013 01:38:05] "GET /chain/Terracoin/q/getdifficulty HTTP/1.0" 200 8
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [01/Apr/2013 01:38:05] "GET /abe.css HTTP/1.1" 200 222
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [01/Apr/2013 01:38:05] "GET /logo32.png HTTP/1.1" 200 13245
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [01/Apr/2013 01:38:06] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 2492
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx- - [01/Apr/2013 01:38:07] "GET /abe.css HTTP/1.1" 200 222
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [01/Apr/2013 01:38:07] "GET /logo32.png HTTP/1.1" 200 13245
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [01/Apr/2013 01:38:07] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1" 200 20222
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [01/Apr/2013 01:38:07] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1" 200 20222

legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
Update:

Some may have noticed the explorers going up and down today, that was myself working to solve the major issues.

Some things behind the scenes have changed.

1. The database refresh is now completely separate from the explorers web serving.  I have set one instance of ABE for each coin to serve without updating (using the datadir = [] trick I read about in the ABE github. Thanks John Tobey).

2. I am using the blocknotify feature of the daemons to run a no server config of ABE to update the database whenever there is a new block on the network. The no server config exits once the database is refreshed.

3. I am now testing on the TRC explorer a pull request by dermoth for ABE, that allows ABE to recover gracefully from broken pipes. I had tried a variation of this pull request when I first put the explorers on github. Those changes are what caused the problems with generating a new database that I had to revert the first day. I am sure it was some change I did to dermoths' commit, so after some more testing on the live server, I will try the modified TRC explorer with creating a new database.

I am hoping by limiting the public facing explorers to reading the database, it will solve some of the deadlocking problems. I also believe by precisely updating the database only when the blocks actually change and then stopping the refresh process until the next block, will reduce the thread load and help keep things running smooth.

After more testing I will issue a commit on github with the changes and documentation to make it all work.


If these changes work out, the last major bug to squash is the TRC difficulty (0 nBits) bug. It appears that the difficulty issue is only a symptom and the real issue is ABE is putting a null block on the latest database block entry.

legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
I have seen a couple of posts and I have also had some issues with test nets on some of the alt-coins. I will put up some test net daemons on my sites as I see requests or as I see are needed.

The addnode command is flexible in the sense it will work for both live and test net. Addnode will attempt a connection and still try to find other nodes, unlike the "connection="  which is an explicit command to only connect to that address.


First up TRC:

I have started a test net daemon for TRC on the cryptocoinexplorer.com server.

add to your config file:

addnode=84.200.84.74

This will have your daemon automatically try the cryptocoin explorer server for a connection.I will keep the daemon up as long as it does not start to effect the explorer site itself.

You can also add:

addnode=84.200.84.76

That is the IP for my future alt-coin mining site (cryptocoinmine.com)I will run a TRC test net daemon as much as possible, at least until the mining site goes live.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
After some research I found that Chrome has a tendency to create a rather large amount of parallel connections and then proceeds to communicate on the second connection it created.

Well, that's pretty perverse, but all right, we should be multithreaded.

I will start working on using a different server mechanism for the explorers, possibly Twisted or Fastcgi.

If anybody has suggestions or would like to help, it would be greatly appreciated. The source for the PPC and FRC explorers are on github.

If you have any trouble with README-FASTCGI.txt, I'd like to know.

Easier, though not as well tested: define a server class in abe.py:

Code:
from wsgiref.simple_server import WSGIServer
import SocketServer
class HttpServer(SocketServer.ThreadingMixIn, WSGIServer):
    pass

Then add the text in bold: httpd = make_server(args.host, port, abe, server_class=HttpServer)

There is also SocketServer.ForkingMixIn in case ThreadingMixIn gives weird errors.


Thank you.

Hopefully I can get to it this weekend.

I have also been looking at cherry.py.
hero member
Activity: 481
Merit: 529
After some research I found that Chrome has a tendency to create a rather large amount of parallel connections and then proceeds to communicate on the second connection it created.

Well, that's pretty perverse, but all right, we should be multithreaded.

I will start working on using a different server mechanism for the explorers, possibly Twisted or Fastcgi.

If anybody has suggestions or would like to help, it would be greatly appreciated. The source for the PPC and FRC explorers are on github.

If you have any trouble with README-FASTCGI.txt, I'd like to know.

Easier, though not as well tested: define a server class in abe.py:

Code:
from wsgiref.simple_server import WSGIServer
import SocketServer
class HttpServer(SocketServer.ThreadingMixIn, WSGIServer):
    pass

Then add the text in bold: httpd = make_server(args.host, port, abe, server_class=HttpServer)

There is also SocketServer.ForkingMixIn in case ThreadingMixIn gives weird errors.
legendary
Activity: 1205
Merit: 1010
PPC explorer seems down to me.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
Just thought I would give an update on that is happening with the explorers.

I am no longer having issues with the databases, I believe I have narrowed down the major issues to an compatibility problem between Chrome and the web server built into python.

Over the last month or so, I noticed that requests from the same IP addresses or address pools, seemed to be crashing the explorers.

After some research I found that Chrome has a tendency to create a rather large amount of parallel connections and then proceeds to communicate on the second connection it created.

The python server gets stuck waiting for a response from the first connection, connections time out..pipes get broken...and so forth.

I will start working on using a different server mechanism for the explorers, possibly Twisted or Fastcgi.

If anybody has suggestions or would like to help, it would be greatly appreciated. The source for the PPC and FRC explorers are on github.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
Dammit,

Day ONE issue.  Shocked

I have released a commit on both PPC and FRC explorers addressing an issue I just learned about.

I have not had to create new databases in quite some time, so I did not realize there was a DDL implicit issue when creating new databases.

I discovered the issue when setting up a fresh TRC explorer on the test server to work on the current difficulty bug in the TRC explorer.

hero member
Activity: 481
Merit: 529
I was never fully happy with my changes.
I sympathize, but if complete satisfaction were a criterion, there would be no Abe.  See: Release Early, Release Often.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
I have decided to publish the source code to the explorers on Github. I do this in the spirit of open source and to encourage others to make suggestions and improve upon them.
Excellent, I was just about to request the same!

When I have time (if no one else does it first) I'd like to organize these source trees as clones or branches of jtobey/bitcoin-abe (or a new Abe repo under a shared account).  I think that will facilitate merging the code and relegating the differences to config options.

Thanks for all your work!


I was never fully happy with my changes. I always thought they could be cleaner, some minor bugs fixed or a feature added. I am still not completely satisfied with the coding, but I have delayed publishing long enough.

This is the reason I have not released the TRC explorer yet, one bug I still want to squash before I publish.  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 481
Merit: 529
I have decided to publish the source code to the explorers on Github. I do this in the spirit of open source and to encourage others to make suggestions and improve upon them.
Excellent, I was just about to request the same!

When I have time (if no one else does it first) I'd like to organize these source trees as clones or branches of jtobey/bitcoin-abe (or a new Abe repo under a shared account).  I think that will facilitate merging the code and relegating the differences to config options.

Thanks for all your work!
Pages:
Jump to: