Topic: Current ICO's rating systems. What do you think? - page 3. (Read 658 times)
I complete discern the ICO adjudjing audits as a action and psychoanalyze the course of action close to myself. I credit a becoming test should each the besides be finished since we are adorning money in the project.
I have an idea about rating systems too. Majority of them are paid for at good review. I know only couple of them that looks honest, but I am not sure - this is crypto. IcoDrops and icoanalytics right now looks legit. But the situation can be changed quickly. Maybe it will be nice to have ico rating system on blockchain. Any thoughts?
here at Foxico we implement completely different system where all ratings will be given by community members. If you are interested in testing you can leave your mail contacting @foxicoteam at Telegram and we will notify you as soon as it is released.
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
In my opinion these rating systems just making money for their creators and nothing more, because it can't ever say you correctly if the project will gather soft or hardcap, will it be succesful or scam and other things There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
At the moment I trust only ICE Drops. There is a really fair system of project evaluation and points paid places by the mark Sponsored.
I have an idea about rating systems too. Majority of them are paid for at good review. I know only couple of them that looks honest, but I am not sure - this is crypto. IcoDrops and icoanalytics right now looks legit. But the situation can be changed quickly. Maybe it will be nice to have ico rating system on blockchain. Any thoughts?
I also believe you HAVE to do your own research, but maybe a rating system with rough grades could help. THis way you dont have to waste your own research on a F-rated ICO....
Most of the sites that depend on reviews, I wouldn't trust icobench because their ratings are pretty bad.
ICODROPS has an excellent rating, which is worth believing.
Absolutely agree ICODROPS has an excellent rating, which is worth believing.
I think that these sites give good tips do not think that it completely frustrates a good project but suggests what you can listen to!
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
I don't believe much in ICO ratings. I still do my own research, ask a lot in the community telegram as well.
I don't confide in any of the more famous rating sites, it's been indicated over and over that you can fundamentally simply purchase a high appraising.
Don't trust ratings. Most are paid service where you get high ratings for paying bit low ratings if you don't pay them. Best ICO with potential for huge returns on investment is the Trufield project ICO. This exciting project will revolutionize healthcare for millions of people. Trufield will provide free health data management systems in developing countries. The Pre-ICO is live and open to all investors, so buy your tokens at 25% discount. Buy Trufield token and learn more about the project here at http://Trufield.com or http://Trufield.io.
if you mean the rating of websites like icobench, i can only say that i do not really trust them. on the internet you can write a lot when the day is long. thats why i never rely on a rating alone.
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
Add exact information for us to discuss this. Tell us which ratings and experts you mean. It's not easy to talk about the market and experts cause a lot of things happen each day.
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
rating is generally a good indicator, but it can play a cruel joke in terms of choosing a bounty campaign - there can be a lot of participants already
the question is not about bounty at all. Please do not comment if you have not read the subject
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
rating is generally a good indicator, but it can play a cruel joke in terms of choosing a bounty campaign - there can be a lot of participants already
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
For me, ICO analysis is a priority. Which requires a lot of effort. Of course, the rating is not the best for the market as a whole, but it is not critical either. For myself, I have mastered several criteria for a successful ICO. Namely: a plan for the future, expansion, partners, team, marketing, documentation, and customer base. It is precisely through this view of ICO that projects like Kelvin Blockchain will certainly become successful. And it's about quantum technology =)
I do not believe in ICO Ratings because these past months I have joined a campaign and their many ads on their website where they show that their ratings are high. But when the campaign was over and they were successful in their campaign did not pay and it became a scam.
can you name the project?
Can you name rating sites that were payed and promoted these projects? Live cases are always interesting to all of us
I do not believe in ICO Ratings because these past months I have joined a campaign and their many ads on their website where they show that their ratings are high. But when the campaign was over and they were successful in their campaign did not pay and it became a scam.
can you name the project?
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
They serve as a starting place for any investor, the problem is that people easily believe on things they see and didn't bother to do an extensive research and that's why they fail. All I know, rating sites are flawed, corrupted and should not be trusted. Anyway, have any of you came across with menlo.one? They plan to be a review platform with a guild community system.
I think Menlo One is one of the best ICOs this year. What I like about this project are their clean UI, decentralized system which stops corruption, and it also focuses on helping other legit projects that need funding. Future ICOs are very lucky that a project like Menlo has finally launched. Their whitepaper: https://www.menlo.one
For me the rating in the ICO line is not a project that guarantees a good one, some experts say if this ICO feels very good, actually ICO is very bad, sometimes experts, lie about the quality of ICOS, I still use ICO ranking site to observe and look for good ICOS,I do that just for reference and reinforce my decision to choose an ICO.
Jump to: