Current ICO's rating systems. What do you think? - page 7.

Ahooleeman

full member

Activity: 476

Merit: 111

Quote from: Bumidinasty on July 12, 2018, 10:06:59 AM

I think it's good to add references to investors not to participate in scam projects, I appreciate what experts do in rating ico projects, they have tried to make the world cryptocurrency better.

As we all know experts are corrupted. How can you trust their opinion?

MortonAlden

newbie

Activity: 192

Merit: 0

Quote from: Ahooleeman on July 12, 2018, 05:43:52 AM

What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)

I would suggest not to go for rating sites, quick and easy money is not easy! You need to work hard on this in the beginning and develop a good understanding of crypto and blockchain first. Instead of investing Alts directly they should start with good ICOs and to find them they need to research and study, ICOs come up with a good amount of information on their product which can help them a lot. Go for Liven and Redcab, targeting real markets like food and travel, they are legit and reliable.

Vit83

full member

Activity: 644

Merit: 100

Imho we need some kind of service with KYC for ICO devs. You want my money pls show your faces and real lifes. Don't want - ok - next one. ICO's even with good ratings just disappears sometimes and this is bad.

Bumidinasty

member

Activity: 373

Merit: 13

I think it's good to add references to investors not to participate in scam projects, I appreciate what experts do in rating ico projects, they have tried to make the world cryptocurrency better.

Hamphser

sr. member

Activity: 2604

Merit: 338

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: Ahooleeman on July 12, 2018, 05:43:52 AM

What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)

First of all im well aware on those ico rating sites its good to check out some current ico's in the market but not totally using up to including them into my analysis or basing them out on how i gonna choose up the ico i would invest. Not totally entrusting them because some of them are being paid up and top rating ico wont really give you an assurance to be successful as an investor.
This is why it would still depend on your decision and your own analysis and research this is just good for add up preference.

basobulat

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

Quote from: Ahooleeman on July 12, 2018, 05:43:52 AM

What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)

According to you ?
I guess it depends on the concept and white paper on the ico. of course there is a difference in every judgment and in fact that is important even though there is always manupulation for it.

Fundalini

full member

Activity: 644

Merit: 103

I don't use these kind this ICO rating systems as some of them are payed by the project itself to deceive investors. I do my own research like scrutinizing the identity of the CEO and all other team member in the telegram.

Ahooleeman

full member

Activity: 476

Merit: 111

Quote from: batang_bitcoin on July 12, 2018, 07:10:56 AM

Majority of them are paid so expect that each ICOs they are rating will receive a very good review.

The rating is fine if the price is right.

So those ICO investors, make sure that you don't depend on these rating sites.

Do you think there is a way to avoid corrupted ratings? To make ICO's ecosystem prosper the trust should be created. There is no trust now that reflects in global downtrend. People are tired from scams/cheating/fraud etc. How can be trust created? - people should understand that information they receive is reliable. So the market needs a source of reliable info and on other hand the market should be cleaned from scams and combination of both will lead ICO's ecosystem to prosper and crypto market to growth.

ionix

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

As for investor, it is important for me to see what the project really is not relying on "experts" who sell their ratings (as it is on ICObench) or others "advisors" who promote projects for a share of revenue. We definitely need a system that can bring the real ratings.

alimarh

member

Activity: 238

Merit: 10

There are some few people in the industry i can trust a bit and there are some site i can trust their ratings a little bit but there are some people and site i cannot trust, they are financial induced to give those ratings.

Ahooleeman

full member

Activity: 476

Merit: 111

Do you guys think that we are at the point where market needs completely different rating system which can filter tons of scams finds gems and creates a real time interactive feedback between projects and community? The availability of such a dialog within community helps projects to get a feedback and improve their weaknesses. And from other hand it helps an individuals to find interesting projects and rate those ones with a score deserved. Any thoughts?

lasttime99

newbie

Activity: 210

Merit: 0

Quote from: Ahooleeman on July 12, 2018, 05:43:52 AM

What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)

Although there are now many ICOS rating systems, you need to find reputable organizations that have been successful in this area. Lucky !!!

Papcio77

sr. member

Activity: 841

Merit: 251

Do not base your decision in any rating site, it just simole rate and not mean the higher the rate the top ICO will success its token sales. There are allmost perfect rate buy scam or unsuccesdfull and there are below ratings hut gain much sales. Meaning good ICO is only can find through research by us. No website can tell it perfectly

VieleSind

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

There are so many ICO rating systems but not all of them are good. I only believe in ICObench cause IMO, I think it's the most truthworthy system although I know that ICObench also received money to promote for ICO project

. Of course ICO rating systems affect a lot to ICO project cause investors always focus on ICO projects which have highest rate only

.

paulscathedral

jr. member

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1

None of the ICO rating projects are not able to show us an indicator of greed or stupidity of the project developers. They can confirm the veracity of the presence of people in the team, to evaluate the idea of the project. But the most important elements for the success of ICO we do not see. Maybe we'll get lucky. Maybe not. It is still important.

CoinEraser

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1768

Quote from: Ahooleeman on July 12, 2018, 05:43:52 AM

What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)

I have given up listening to such a rating. Since I know that you can also buy these ratings as an ICO operator, I no longer regard these ratings as serious. Such a rating does not seem to reflect the reality and is therefore not reliable in my opinion. Therefore, you should not rely on just such a rating and rather do your own research on the ICO. Wink

haroldtee

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 299

The only thing I can say with rating system is that those ratings can guide you into picking a project you would likely want to do a research on. You will understand my point of view if you have to look at the number of ICOs popping up everyday and you may not have the time to start scrutinizing each one after the other.

However and just like you said, ratings are corrupt since these days, so called experts get paid for rating an ICO and it would be high level of carelessness for any investor to invest based on expert rating alone without doing further research. Nevertheless, it is good to have the rating system there than not having them at all.

fudster

sr. member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 255

It does help of course. Those who are not capable of reading what was being stated on the whitepaper and only relying to the replies in the blog post regarding the ICO. Some users in the forum aren't getting out of bitcointalk, they stay here and will only read the website of the project and if they find it not interesting, the project will be scratched out. No ratings for it at all. I don't see a website that lists highly rated ICO projects that turned scam yet maybe one of these days a fed up user will create one.

andor.gellenhidi

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 100

I believe that the evaluation of projects today is very expensive, because in most cases I believe that many projects are scam. This is a statistic that is working very seriously today and now very many people will have to say that I'm wrong, but many will support it.

StImelda

newbie

Activity: 154

Merit: 0

Rating are only a tip of the icebergs,and in my opinion most times are not a true reflection on the quality or integrity of the project.One still has to dig deeper to find good projects. ICOmarks is a good rating site in my opinion,they do their bit

Topic: Current ICO's rating systems. What do you think? - page 7. (Read 658 times)