Topic: Current ICO's rating systems. What do you think? - page 8. (Read 672 times)
The ICO ratings will only help you evaluate these projects, but it is not a measurement of the success of the ICO as there are many factors that will contribute to its success. That is why self evaluation of the ICO project is still essential even if the ICO as a good rating from reputable websites such as ICObench, ICOmarks, trackICO and ICOholder.
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
I think that at the moment there is no independent evaluation system. ICO projects pay so that their rating is as high as possible. About experts, too. Most of them do not deny that they take money for advertising, how can you believe their words?
I believe that these people can definitely work with people, especially those who believe in these sites, if you believe rumors, many sites are bought or bought advisors that advertise and vouch for projects.
are there any ways to overcome these problems?
I believe that these people can definitely work with people, especially those who believe in these sites, if you believe rumors, many sites are bought or bought advisors that advertise and vouch for projects.
Majority of them are paid so expect that each ICOs they are rating will receive a very good review.
The rating is fine if the price is right.
So those ICO investors, make sure that you don't depend on these rating sites.
The rating is fine if the price is right.
So those ICO investors, make sure that you don't depend on these rating sites.
Do you think it is possible to make this market transparent and opened for a single standing investor?
They all seem absolutely terrible or atleast all the popular ones. They're all just in it for the money. But then most of us are doing bounties for the money too lol.
Do you think the community needs a trustful tool to define the real value of a project?
Some of this ratings are based on objective things such of number of followers and so on. But also the rating is included of biased components, like reviews, advisers. So there is too much room for fraud.
Majority of them are paid so expect that each ICOs they are rating will receive a very good review.
The rating is fine if the price is right.
So those ICO investors, make sure that you don't depend on these rating sites.
The rating is fine if the price is right.
So those ICO investors, make sure that you don't depend on these rating sites.
They all seem absolutely terrible or atleast all the popular ones. They're all just in it for the money. But then most of us are doing bounties for the money too lol.
What do you guys think of the current rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
Well In my mind you should have atleast make a point out of what? Is it an about ICO? an reaction and ratings where? The website the positive reviews of the token or the platform or an outcome of one results?
Clearly sometimes it depends all have positive results by giving good endorsement giving out the positive maybe they got paid for that ratings or comments. Still if you think its fake just report it but make research because truly your making that topic, I agreed with with the people who wants to know were did you get that idea? Or is ot just out of the bloom
I corrected the topic subject thank you. The question is definitely about current ICO's rating system.
What do you guys think of the current rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
Well In my mind you should have atleast make a point out of what? Is it an about ICO? an reaction and ratings where? The website the positive reviews of the token or the platform or an outcome of one results?
Clearly sometimes it depends all have positive results by giving good endorsement giving out the positive maybe they got paid for that ratings or comments. Still if you think its fake just report it but make research because truly your making that topic, I agreed with with the people who wants to know were did you get that idea? Or is ot just out of the bloom
It is also a way to help you evaluate it, but it is not comprehensive. To evaluate a project you must evaluate both the operator, the technology, and the idea of the project. The key is whether it will increase in the near future to take profit
Do you think there are resources where you can find the information that you can rely on? Most of the sites that depend on reviews, I wouldn't trust icobench because their ratings are pretty bad.
ICODROPS has an excellent rating, which is worth believing.
ICODROPS has an excellent rating, which is worth believing.
have you faced with corrupted experts ratings problem?
Most of the sites that depend on reviews, I wouldn't trust icobench because their ratings are pretty bad.
ICODROPS has an excellent rating, which is worth believing.
ICODROPS has an excellent rating, which is worth believing.
It is also a way to help you evaluate it, but it is not comprehensive. To evaluate a project you must evaluate both the operator, the technology, and the idea of the project. The key is whether it will increase in the near future to take profit
What do you guys think of the current ICO's rating system? Are you satisfied/happy? Do you think it reflects the real projects value? Does it help you to find right ICO's to invest to? What do you think about experts (even very well known ones) who provide corrupted ratings?
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
There are way too many questions. Let's discuss)
Jump to: