I just put ... and Martin Armstrong into
SCIgen and it produced for me a verbatim transcript of Anonymints posts as presented on Bitcointalk, postulating his Theory of Everything
.
Hey fool, Martin Armstrong is always correct.
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/03/02/the-cycles-of-war-model-why/A client has tweeted a picture of a slide from our 1998 World Economic Conference tour we did around the globe. In retrospect those forecasts were simply astonishing all based upon alignments with the ECM. I think if I had another whole lifetime, this whole thing would keep me occupied trying to figure out this amazing order masked by what people think is random chaos. The ECM is simply the frequency of life for everything seems to align with it no matter what the field. The mere fact there are the Four Blood Moons that line up to 2 days before the turning point 2015.75 when there was no input regarding planetary movement is just mind-bending.
This is not my theory – it was my discovery.
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/04/16/is-anything-really-random/ANSWER: It is impossible to create any system that is random. No matter what, in computing, a pattern will always emerge precisely as this pretend random image that quickly falls into a pattern. It is simply impossible to create a truly random number generator. In gambling, there are card counters that they make illegal. Look at a casino and you will notice that they rotate the dealers regularly moving them from table to table. WHY? Because they will end up in a pattern.
Armstrong is correct. The more scientific way of stating is that the entropy of the universe is not infinite, rather it trends to maximum. Thus Bitcoin's proof-of-work is more randomized than proof-of-stake, because the entropy of spontaneous outcomes includes every computer in the network trying to guess the mathematical solution (for the nonce of the hash) to the next block in the block chain.
How can you all continue to deny that NOTHING in the universe is random?
The Second Law of Thermodynamics (which even Einstein said was more fundamental than his relativity) says entropy trends to maximum, not is infinite. Infinite entropy would be required for a truly random universe.
If you want to explore more the meaning of infinity w.r.t. to our universe and the properties of our minds, see my two blog essays:
http://unheresy.com/The%20Universe.html#Matter_as_a_continuumhttp://unheresy.com/Information%20Is%20Alive.html#Algorithm_!=_Entropy
Rather the appearance of disorder (a.k.a. randomness) is an illusion of complexity of high entropy.
Maximum entropy is obtained with the maximum number of potential equiprobable outcomes, i.e. maximum degrees-of-freedom which is same as saying maximum potential energy. I explain that and give citations at following posts:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3804256https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4576810https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3852724