delete - page 135. | Bitcointalksearch.org

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: tacotime on September 20, 2014, 04:34:51 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 20, 2014, 04:32:00 PM

Please enlighten me. Has BCX promised this? If yes, why? Is it because of that one cocky idiot in this thread?

Or is it because of my actions?

I can tell you how to protect your private keys if you stop being arseholes to me. Is that not helping?

I'm a little perplexed by what BCX is saying... I'm not sure how timewarp bugs are relevant to the attacks we're talking about at all.

I better tell that only to smooth over secure channel, then you ask him.

Kuriso

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Proof of identity for Poloniex chat

~BCX~

Good enough for you irmeli?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/delete-789978

It was him

rdnkjdi

legendary

Activity: 1256

Merit: 1009

Quote

I can tell you how to protect your private keys if you stop being arseholes to me. Is that not helping?

I think the people being rude to you and BCX aren't really XMR supporters FWIW

papa_lazzarou

hero member

Activity: 649

Merit: 500

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 20, 2014, 04:32:00 PM

Quote from: blaaaaacksuit on September 20, 2014, 04:26:47 PM

Quote from: Kuriso on September 20, 2014, 04:25:14 PM

"BitcoinEXpress: In 72 hours I will launch out a full blown XMR coin killing attack. I suggest they have it fixed by then"

Will the devs be ready?

I liked how he chose the trollbox on the largest XMR exchange to announce this publicly.

Please enlighten me. Has BCX promised this? If yes, why? Is it because of that one cocky idiot in this thread?

Or is it because of my actions?

I can tell you how to protect your private keys if you stop being arseholes to me. Is that not helping?

Yes he did. Don't know why.

tacotime

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1005

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 20, 2014, 04:32:00 PM

Please enlighten me. Has BCX promised this? If yes, why? Is it because of that one cocky idiot in this thread?

Or is it because of my actions?

I can tell you how to protect your private keys if you stop being arseholes to me. Is that not helping?

I'm a little perplexed by what BCX is saying... I'm not sure how timewarp bugs are relevant to the attacks we're talking about at all.

rdnkjdi

legendary

Activity: 1256

Merit: 1009

Quote

BitcoinEXpress: If you are holding XMR post 72 hours and lose, you have been warned. Later guys BCX

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: blaaaaacksuit on September 20, 2014, 04:26:47 PM

Quote from: Kuriso on September 20, 2014, 04:25:14 PM

"BitcoinEXpress: In 72 hours I will launch out a full blown XMR coin killing attack. I suggest they have it fixed by then"

Will the devs be ready?

I liked how he chose the trollbox on the largest XMR exchange to announce this publicly.

Please enlighten me. Has BCX promised this? If yes, why? Is it because of that one cocky idiot in this thread?

Or is it because of my actions?

I can tell you how to protect your private keys if you stop being arseholes to me. Is that not helping?

I stand only to win 10 BTC at most.

Kuriso

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

BitcoinEXpress: I propose that rpietilla and I each move 500 BTC into a trusted escrow, winner take all. If I successfully deploy the attack I win, if I do not, XMT gets 500 BT
BitcoinEXpress: 500 BTC

Risto, will you take him up on the offer?

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

First rough draft attempt at a simple amplification algorithm has been sent to smooth. I am awaiting him to return. He stepped out for a short while.

blaaaaacksuit

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Who cares?

Quote from: Kuriso on September 20, 2014, 04:25:14 PM

"BitcoinEXpress: In 72 hours I will launch out a full blown XMR coin killing attack. I suggest they have it fixed by then"

Will the devs be ready?

I liked how he chose the trollbox on the largest XMR exchange to announce this publicly.

Kuriso

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

"BitcoinEXpress: In 72 hours I will launch out a full blown XMR coin killing attack. I suggest they have it fixed by then"

Will the devs be ready?

AdamWhite

hero member

Activity: 605

Merit: 500

Quote from: smooth on September 20, 2014, 04:09:06 PM

Quote from: AdamWhite on September 20, 2014, 04:08:16 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 20, 2014, 03:19:48 PM

Geez I was so worried about how I would be anonymous in the future and it seems I have the opposite problem and can't even convince people who I am. Perfect. Kiss

I am 60% sure I have an amplification to their paper which makes the attack much more plausible and pervasive.

I need to go eat, then I need to write some code for an algorithm for smooth to document more precisely what I mean by the amplification.

Might as well post under the AnonyMint account and put the issue to rest.

He closed it. Give it rest already, its the same guy.

Not trying to be disrespectful, since i've clearly missed something somewhere please enlighten me

rdnkjdi

legendary

Activity: 1256

Merit: 1009

Quote from: 5w00p on September 20, 2014, 04:18:20 PM

Quote from: papa_lazzarou on September 20, 2014, 04:12:50 PM

Quote from: 5w00p on September 20, 2014, 03:58:26 PM

Wow.

Shouldn't you log off here and get busy on your exploit?

The guy is helping. Stop it.

Really, is he?

Because all I read is that he is trying to profit from a supposed exploit. I don't believe him. I do not think he is helping anyone or anything.
My prerogative.

so you'd rather leave it vulnerable ... he's doing a helluva a lot more than you o.O

sugarboy321

sr. member

Activity: 361

Merit: 250

Quote from: CoinHoarder on September 20, 2014, 12:19:35 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

FWIW, I am pretty entertained. Grin

Good quote, I imagine the arena full of altcoins. And we are the plebs on the stadium watching, looking for any kind of weakness.

5w00p

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 502

Quote from: papa_lazzarou on September 20, 2014, 04:12:50 PM

Quote from: 5w00p on September 20, 2014, 03:58:26 PM

Wow.

Shouldn't you log off here and get busy on your exploit?

The guy is helping. Stop it.

Really, is he?

Because all I read is that he is trying to profit from a supposed exploit. I don't believe him. I do not think he is helping anyone or anything.
My prerogative.

papa_lazzarou

hero member

Activity: 649

Merit: 500

Quote from: 5w00p on September 20, 2014, 03:58:26 PM

Wow.

Shouldn't you log off here and get busy on your exploit?

The guy is helping. Stop it.

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: AdamWhite on September 20, 2014, 04:08:16 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 20, 2014, 03:19:48 PM

Geez I was so worried about how I would be anonymous in the future and it seems I have the opposite problem and can't even convince people who I am. Perfect. Kiss

I am 60% sure I have an amplification to their paper which makes the attack much more plausible and pervasive.

I need to go eat, then I need to write some code for an algorithm for smooth to document more precisely what I mean by the amplification.

Might as well post under the AnonyMint account and put the issue to rest.

He closed it. Give it rest already, its the same guy.

AdamWhite

hero member

Activity: 605

Merit: 500

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 20, 2014, 03:19:48 PM

Geez I was so worried about how I would be anonymous in the future and it seems I have the opposite problem and can't even convince people who I am. Perfect. Kiss

I am 60% sure I have an amplification to their paper which makes the attack much more plausible and pervasive.

I need to go eat, then I need to write some code for an algorithm for smooth to document more precisely what I mean by the amplification.

Might as well post under the AnonyMint account and put the issue to rest.

5w00p

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 502

Wow.

Shouldn't you log off here and get busy on your exploit?

You are the one that types of amplification. I'm not saying it has anything to do with the price of rice in China. I'm just saying you better get amplifying soon, because you type of amplification.

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: 5w00p on September 20, 2014, 03:51:32 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 20, 2014, 03:42:35 PM

Quote from: tacotime on September 20, 2014, 03:27:48 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 20, 2014, 03:19:48 PM

Geez I was so worried about how I would be anonymous in the future and it seems I have the opposite problem and can't even convince people who I am. Perfect. Kiss

I am 60% sure I have an amplification to their paper which makes the attack much more plausible and pervasive.

I need to go eat, then I need to write some code for an algorithm for smooth to document more precisely what I mean by the amplification.

Okay. My guess though is that you'll came to the same conclusions we did independently too -- assuming that Hp is a cryptographically secure hash function that acts as a random oracle perfectly and that q values are generated totally randomly, that recovery of x (private key) is impossible so long as your PRNG isn't compromised. And, if your PRNG is, then you can't even generate non-ring signatures securely.

Let's get to that point (of whether the private keys can be discovered...which I also have my doubts but do note you have two modular equations P = xG and I = xH(P) once you know i == s when the anonymity is broken) after establishing whether or not my amplification concept radically reduces the anonymity as compared to the calculations in your paper. I am not sure yet, because takes some time to digest your paper. First I will write some code for an algorithm for my amplification idea. Doing that now. Will send via secure channel to smooth.

You do that, Boss.

Here is my public XMR addy so that you can test it and take all my XMR when you get it amplified.
47EApNcKagpN29JgcHh8RgV9odHzzdwMTYuwiE9kPxD7cPy4LWAMCTyhrRXKYxphGaaXSaqfmpZKPgH R3W9xn5HCLPgJb3b

I'm real worried. Shocked

Cocky please note that discrete log factorization of two simultaneous equations may be subexponentional. I am not well versed on the literature though.

The fact that you don't realize the amplification has nothing to with whether the private keys can be factored isn't helping your bravado.

Topic: delete - page 135. (Read 165547 times)