Topic: 🎲 DiceSites.com - List of dice sites w/ statistics, graphs & verifiers - page 16. (Read 42103 times)
July 26, 2016, 06:16:38 PM
Anyone knows what happened to dicenow.com ?!?
July 16, 2016, 06:43:22 AM
We are using your site as 3rd party verifier to our rolls. At the moment we are linking to Primedice since we use exactly the same generation process, but it would be cool if you could create a page (even if not visible from the homepage or any other section) for this purpose.
(Pop-up "Provably Fair" then "Verify Genuinity of my previous Rolls" on https://www.betbtc.co/casino/dice)
(Pop-up "Provably Fair" then "Verify Genuinity of my previous Rolls" on https://www.betbtc.co/casino/dice)
@NLNico any comment regarding this?
July 13, 2016, 02:48:50 PM
Basically to make verification easier by user and also save resources and improve speed from server-side. Why would you want to generate new server-seed each roll when you can just increase roll nonce to get a new 100% random and provably fair number?
Yeah, I sort of figured it was based on ease for the user and performance. In that case, I suppose securing the server seed is key.
July 13, 2016, 08:10:54 AM
only difference:
Primedice:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
BetBTC:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
Primedice:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
BetBTC:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters
Can you give an example? If the hash was FFEEDDCCBBAA99, and the first 5 characters, FFEED comes out too high, then which 5 characters do you use next?
Is this sjess all over again?
General question on provably fair... Why not generate a new server seed for every roll? Is it to make consecutive verifications easier on the player or is there another reason?
Basically to make verification easier by user and also save resources and improve speed from server-side. Why would you want to generate new server-seed each roll when you can just increase roll nonce to get a new 100% random and provably fair number?
July 13, 2016, 08:07:54 AM
only difference:
Primedice:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
BetBTC:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
Primedice:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
BetBTC:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters
Can you give an example? If the hash was FFEEDDCCBBAA99, and the first 5 characters, FFEED comes out too high, then which 5 characters do you use next?
Is this sjess all over again?
General question on provably fair... Why not generate a new server seed for every roll? Is it to make consecutive verifications easier on the player or is there another reason?
July 09, 2016, 01:20:58 AM
Hey NLNico.
I just noticed the solvency stats are broken for Just-Dice on your site.
The address changed a while back. The coins are now stored in xJDCLAMZ3Y7L5XQBfW85dY8SoKWLgovNtZ (usually about 20k) and xJDCLAMZreM6ZzJJ28kh5uYnT7ToCPGywr (about 1.4 million). These links should show you the current balances.
Signatures proving ownership:
Thanks, updated. I just noticed the solvency stats are broken for Just-Dice on your site.
The address changed a while back. The coins are now stored in xJDCLAMZ3Y7L5XQBfW85dY8SoKWLgovNtZ (usually about 20k) and xJDCLAMZreM6ZzJJ28kh5uYnT7ToCPGywr (about 1.4 million). These links should show you the current balances.
Signatures proving ownership:
Quote
$ clamd verifymessage xJDCLAMZ3Y7L5XQBfW85dY8SoKWLgovNtZ \
INJ85wFtlka0FPKe+j1lHeseFlnsSRUr3RBPN33aOgjgxVQsQtz042L+E2UtnI1twkC773DS8H6G6Vj+BnSrcBE= \
"This address is owned by Just-Dice.com"
> > true
$ clamd verifymessage xJDCLAMZreM6ZzJJ28kh5uYnT7ToCPGywr \
IFbr9rQCDrQR3Vy9oXP4w23BBudeRB7LTBKbkxiQpyFgsTwZ6cLwL7M02jMwmgg9B3CIm8FqCUr0HKB faytxA9c= \
"This address is owned by Just-Dice.com"
> > true
INJ85wFtlka0FPKe+j1lHeseFlnsSRUr3RBPN33aOgjgxVQsQtz042L+E2UtnI1twkC773DS8H6G6Vj+BnSrcBE= \
"This address is owned by Just-Dice.com"
> > true
$ clamd verifymessage xJDCLAMZreM6ZzJJ28kh5uYnT7ToCPGywr \
IFbr9rQCDrQR3Vy9oXP4w23BBudeRB7LTBKbkxiQpyFgsTwZ6cLwL7M02jMwmgg9B3CIm8FqCUr0HKB faytxA9c= \
"This address is owned by Just-Dice.com"
> > true
July 07, 2016, 01:40:24 AM
our new dice site with btc and +40 altcoins begins on July 11, we hope to be on the dicesites.com list some day! 
www.cryptosdice.com
www.cryptosdice.comtake it easy of your spam, you site have 1 coin type, mabey your plan its 40+ but right now its just have 1 so take its easy one more time!
July 06, 2016, 06:02:44 PM
our new dice site with btc and +40 altcoins begins on July 11, we hope to be on the dicesites.com list some day! www.cryptosdice.com
www.cryptosdice.com July 05, 2016, 04:37:50 AM
only difference:
Primedice:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
BetBTC:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
Primedice:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
BetBTC:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters
Can you give an example? If the hash was FFEEDDCCBBAA99, and the first 5 characters, FFEED comes out too high, then which 5 characters do you use next?
Is this sjess all over again?
Wow, absolutely right.
An update was promptly deployed and new rolls will use the rule of skipping the previous set.
Some Notes:
- Every user that took advantage of this exploit was / will be paid regularly, no funds will be voided or confiscated.
- Rules were updated to the new version - https://betbtc.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/208027769
Kind regards and thank you for keeping us updated
July 04, 2016, 11:11:39 PM
only difference:
Primedice:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
BetBTC:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
Primedice:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
BetBTC:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters
Can you give an example? If the hash was FFEEDDCCBBAA99, and the first 5 characters, FFEED comes out too high, then which 5 characters do you use next?
Is this sjess all over again?
July 04, 2016, 08:41:49 PM
only difference:
Primedice:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
BetBTC:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
Primedice:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters skipping the previous set
BetBTC:
If the roll number is over 999,999, the proccess is repeated with the next five characters
July 04, 2016, 08:04:11 PM
We are using your site as 3rd party verifier to our rolls. At the moment we are linking to Primedice since we use exactly the same generation process, but it would be cool if you could create a page (even if not visible from the homepage or any other section) for this purpose.
(Pop-up "Provably Fair" then "Verify Genuinity of my previous Rolls" on https://www.betbtc.co/casino/dice)
(Pop-up "Provably Fair" then "Verify Genuinity of my previous Rolls" on https://www.betbtc.co/casino/dice)
July 04, 2016, 12:42:51 PM
Hey NLNico.
I just noticed the solvency stats are broken for Just-Dice on your site.
The address changed a while back. The coins are now stored in xJDCLAMZ3Y7L5XQBfW85dY8SoKWLgovNtZ (usually about 20k) and xJDCLAMZreM6ZzJJ28kh5uYnT7ToCPGywr (about 1.4 million). These links should show you the current balances.
Signatures proving ownership:
I just noticed the solvency stats are broken for Just-Dice on your site.
The address changed a while back. The coins are now stored in xJDCLAMZ3Y7L5XQBfW85dY8SoKWLgovNtZ (usually about 20k) and xJDCLAMZreM6ZzJJ28kh5uYnT7ToCPGywr (about 1.4 million). These links should show you the current balances.
Signatures proving ownership:
Quote
$ clamd verifymessage xJDCLAMZ3Y7L5XQBfW85dY8SoKWLgovNtZ \
INJ85wFtlka0FPKe+j1lHeseFlnsSRUr3RBPN33aOgjgxVQsQtz042L+E2UtnI1twkC773DS8H6G6Vj+BnSrcBE= \
"This address is owned by Just-Dice.com"
> > true
$ clamd verifymessage xJDCLAMZreM6ZzJJ28kh5uYnT7ToCPGywr \
IFbr9rQCDrQR3Vy9oXP4w23BBudeRB7LTBKbkxiQpyFgsTwZ6cLwL7M02jMwmgg9B3CIm8FqCUr0HKB faytxA9c= \
"This address is owned by Just-Dice.com"
> > true
INJ85wFtlka0FPKe+j1lHeseFlnsSRUr3RBPN33aOgjgxVQsQtz042L+E2UtnI1twkC773DS8H6G6Vj+BnSrcBE= \
"This address is owned by Just-Dice.com"
> > true
$ clamd verifymessage xJDCLAMZreM6ZzJJ28kh5uYnT7ToCPGywr \
IFbr9rQCDrQR3Vy9oXP4w23BBudeRB7LTBKbkxiQpyFgsTwZ6cLwL7M02jMwmgg9B3CIm8FqCUr0HKB faytxA9c= \
"This address is owned by Just-Dice.com"
> > true
July 03, 2016, 12:25:05 PM
Nice job mate, could be improved.
Cheers!
Cheers!
How could it be improved ? There is nothing wrong with it. Has everything you need and looks nice. What would you like to have been added ?
July 03, 2016, 01:08:31 AM
I like to introduce my website https://dicesites.com
On DiceSites.com there is:
- an overview of dice sites
- statistics of these websites (updated automatically every 15 mins)
- graphs to compare the websites
- provably fair verifiers for most popular dice sites
- more features later
Basically it should give you a way to compare dice sites without reading subjective reviews. And just checking out the activity of several dice sites.
Any feature requests or feedback is welcome. I personally still have a lot of ideas/plans too.
https://dicesites.com
On DiceSites.com there is:
- an overview of dice sites
- statistics of these websites (updated automatically every 15 mins)
- graphs to compare the websites
- provably fair verifiers for most popular dice sites
- more features later
Basically it should give you a way to compare dice sites without reading subjective reviews. And just checking out the activity of several dice sites.
Any feature requests or feedback is welcome. I personally still have a lot of ideas/plans too.
https://dicesites.com
Just went through your site and I have to say it is awesome!
Actual information I need (was looking at all sites that have investment options) and super easy to navigate - great stuff!
June 29, 2016, 05:33:12 PM
Oh, I see it now. That leads me to a couple questions about your betterbets and moneypot info.
Does the daily profit that you post match betterbets or moneypots profit? I see that it's broken down when you look at the moneypot app stats. It looks like your tracking the moneypot bankroll and calling it the betterbets bankroll. That's why I'm asking.
Does the daily profit that you post match betterbets or moneypots profit? I see that it's broken down when you look at the moneypot app stats. It looks like your tracking the moneypot bankroll and calling it the betterbets bankroll. That's why I'm asking.
BetterBets' bankroll is the MoneyPot bankroll, since BetterBets uses MoneyPot. BetterBets also gets tracked separately because it is the most popular app on MoneyPot and is typically a top 2-5 dice site by volume in any given week.
^That is just my assumption on why Nico does it btw.
June 29, 2016, 01:45:09 PM
Oh, I see it now. That leads me to a couple questions about your betterbets and moneypot info.
Does the daily profit that you post match betterbets or moneypots profit? I see that it's broken down when you look at the moneypot app stats. It looks like your tracking the moneypot bankroll and calling it the betterbets bankroll. That's why I'm asking.
Does the daily profit that you post match betterbets or moneypots profit? I see that it's broken down when you look at the moneypot app stats. It looks like your tracking the moneypot bankroll and calling it the betterbets bankroll. That's why I'm asking.
June 29, 2016, 01:24:09 PM
Pretty sure they are on the list at https://dicesites.com/moneypot ?
June 29, 2016, 01:20:10 PM
You might want to look at adding Bitcoin Dice (https://bitcoin-dice.github.io/) to the moneypot data. Had a huge loss the last 24 hours hours. Looks like the site has only been around a month, but it has cut into investor profits big time.
June 29, 2016, 12:45:38 PM
Thanks for that info. I will check those sites out.
Jump to: