Topic: 🎲 DiceSites.com - List of dice sites w/ statistics, graphs & verifiers - page 18. (Read 42116 times)

API is enough, just need total bets, total wagered and max profit or payout. All stats should be only from dice.

Note: before I would add your site, stats must be thousands of wagered and ideally like tens of btc wagered every day. To be honest, I don't think your site is very popular in the dice community right now (since you just added it) - even if it's a popular sportsbook - so I highly doubt I would add your site at this moment. Also I much rather see a bit more transparency like a public bet list (which all other sites that I list do have.) Just saying so you don't make the API only to be disappointed hehe Still I would personally keep track of your site so I can always consider it.

I soon hope to have some filters including "Popular", "New", "Inactive".. with only "Popular" activated by default. So that would solve this as it would be hidden by default. PS, still "Inactive" and "New" would be fairly limited, not all sites.


DiceSites currently is supposed to list only the most popular dice sites. In general I only add sites who have been around 6+ months and have thousands of BTC wagered.


I am still not sure where I can see the total wagered stats of Bitsler, could you link me to that?


I think you don't have public stats or even public bets.. is that correct? I cannot add any site without this information.

I think you can finally remove dicenow.com, cause practically nobody plays there for months

Can add Luckybox.cc to the list. They just opened and it is active. Opened less than 12 hours now and Already bet of 0.126btc done.

Hello,

Can you add us too please : Bitsler.com 

btc thread : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/sportbook-and-casino-bitsler-12500-daily-wagering-contest-1268718

Thanks

William

Hello.

Just to inform that we also have a provably fair Bitcoin Dice.
www.betbtc.co/casino/dice

We use the same verification method as primedice.

- Added Nitrogen Dice @ https://dicesites.com

Nico, thanks for the quick reply.

I have a question regarding the Moneypot network.

Their app listed on the site BetterBets.io is provably fair. Does that mean the rest of their apps are also provably fair?

Thanks.

The Profit number displayed for each site is yearly or lifetime?

Also, is there another purpose for the Profit/Ev % stat other than knowing which dice sites have ran/poorly well to date.

@lottery248:

- lottery248.github.io, for now this site is not popular enough (needs at least couple thousand wagered and some constant activity.) In addition I am a bit hesitant to add those "default open-source dice script" sites to my site. But if one of those really becomes 1 of the most popular ones, I probably would.


@safi71:

- fastdice, I am monitoring those newer sites, but I think they don't show statistics of total wagered amount?


@dodgecharger:

- dustdice, technically they are on my site on: https://dicesites.com/moneypot I get the stats from all MP apps already and add those who are really most popular. I like the concept of dustdice, but they aren't really one of most popular dice sites. Will monitor in future.
- betcoin.tm, they have a shady reputation and therefor it's tough to trust their statistics.
- betcoin.ag, they don't seem to show statistics, so I cannot add them.


@BitBatFan:

- dicecoin.io, they had an issue once where they couldn't pay a "big winner" (was like 86 coins.) They offered to pay 2 coins a day (while offering like 5 max profit bets?), that's already unacceptable IMO. Then they made a "deal" to only pay less than half (40 coins.) See reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10350215 Even if the player agreed to that "deal", I think that's some serious wrongdoing by dicecoin.io. It makes it very questionable if they can afford to payout winners. Therefor I won't add them to my site.
- crypto-games.net, see last page. Honestly if they weren't an investor-based site, I would probably add them. But being investor-based, I take issues like the prior discussed one very seriously. I will still consider in the future though.
- pocketdice.io, I don't think they solved this provably fair issue: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/questionopinions-on-pocketdices-claim-of-provably-fair-1077905 Ideally they can solve that, because right now they are technically not provably fair.
- peerbet.org, I agree. When I made the site, I added some dice sites and included peerbet since they are one of the oldest dice site (my site says 2013, but it's actually 2012 - probably current dice game was added in 2013 or something ?) However, even with their limited bankroll, they should definitely add public cold wallet. I asked them once, but just after that, they tried to sell peerbet, so I figured I would ask the next owners again. But yeh, I will ask them again to show some public cold wallet and definitely consider to remove them if not.



@MICRO: I tried to fix it, but seems pretty strange issue tbh Will try some more.

@auswalk: great suggestion. I plan to make a separate page for gamblers/players "soon". I will probably add that information too

Hi NLNico
Just letting you know that we are currently getting your requirements to get added. Bitbidder (bitcointalk) or Diablo (Fastdice.com admin) either has or will be incontact with you soon.
Im pretty sure he is 90% complete and ill get a update soon.
We are about to complete our 840,000,000 roll at 29th Feb and have players that can roll up to 300 rolls a sec.
Looking forward to working with you and seeing us on your site...
Thanks safi71 for the mention!!!



@all others who like my site, thanks