Sadly it looks like this is a dead end :/
The following is based on the assumption that 1Bbi8eJbabgpAQcaYpTowtL6dG28xjygn5 belongs to theymos/bitcointalk
I believe that the input from the transaction is from 1Fr5mvdScKGt3zaS3Ws8ijvbakvohB2cjE which leads back to Localbitcoin after ~22 hops.
I believe the change address is 1CkGGk7MDqytUviQkdQV6CDjUmudwjpqD which is part of wallet
8baffa0123. Initially I thought there might be something here, however I believe that wallet to have inputs from the following wallets:
- 604d02d2af - can be traced to LBC after 10 hops if following the largest inputs
- 044b5af06d - can be traced to LBC after 10 hops if following the largest inputs
- 52512044d8 - an be traced to LBC after 27 hops
As a result of the above, I believe that the input address belongs to LBC and the proxy fee was paid directly from someone's LBC account.
I still believe that
twipple was still involved, however at this point this is still speculation.
He had posted an address that was associated with ndnhc
here (which was deleted within ~45 minutes of creating
this thread - I was able to grab a
screenshot of it before it was deleted).
Also the thread that he created above (
here) has a writing/posting style that is very similar to ndnhc when he was
previously accused of being a scammer. It is also similar to when he
denied being a scammer this time around (both were similar because other threads were directly quoted). (note: to be clear, I am not accusing ndnhc being the same person as twipple, but rather twipple trying to impersonate ndnhc).
The above is what I believe to be two instances of twipple trying to make it look like he was ndnhc. The first was too subtle and it would not make sense for that address to be posted because an address was not required for that giveaway. The second was something that I retroactively noticed while reviewing previous threads.
Twipple also started
spamming the ndnhc thread that I opened with the above post several times accusing me of trying to frame ndnhc so he (twipple) would get a "permanent" negative rating.
It should be noted that the posting/writing style of twipple was different in other threads he created (
1,
2).
Also once twipple received his negative rating from me, almost all of his posts were in 'quickseller' threads, and the ones that were not in 'quickseller' threads was him discussing me in someway. With that being said, twipple even went as far as 'egging on' joca97
here when he was being blackmailed.
Most of this is circumstantial evidence against him, however it is a lot of such evidence.