Pages:
Author

Topic: Did we actually really land on moon? - page 36. (Read 7512 times)

member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
June 11, 2019, 09:37:00 AM
#87
What if we are already on the moon? and the moon is the earth and the earth is the moon?
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
June 11, 2019, 07:38:55 AM
#86
Whether we land on the moon or not, it's one of those things where if we did, you're still going to have a bunch of people convinced that we didn't. Just because that's their personality.

There will always be people who think like this. It feels good to be 'in the know', whether or not that's right or not doesn't matter to them.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
June 11, 2019, 07:36:51 AM
#85
@nutildah, a cardboard box wrapped in aluminum foil and reinforced with roofing paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts is proof of a hoax.

https://i.imgur.com/w59if2o.jpg

Look at that piece of shit you fucking retards!!!

The Moon is not a solid object, prove me wrong.

The LEM and the fact that we landed on the moon has proved you wrong long ago.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
June 11, 2019, 07:26:59 AM
#84
@nutildah, a cardboard box wrapped in aluminum foil and reinforced with roofing paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts is proof of a hoax.



Look at that piece of shit you fucking retards!!!

The Moon is not a solid object, prove me wrong.

Well at least we have something, you claim there are some huge projectors somewhere that are projecting the sun and moon and yet you have provided 0 evidence for it, where are they? I want to see them.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
June 11, 2019, 05:26:57 AM
#83
@nutildah, a cardboard box wrapped in aluminum foil and reinforced with roofing paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts is proof of a hoax.



Look at that piece of shit you fucking retards!!!

The Moon is not a solid object, prove me wrong.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
June 11, 2019, 01:58:21 AM
#82


WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH) -- https://youtu.be/Z3FJ2dhr-aA

Like everything else you've posted on this forum in the last 5 years, this is utter horseshit. Wikileaks didn't release this "found footage"; most of it is taken from "behind the scenes" footage of a film (fiction, Hollywood production) called Capricorn One. It was converted into black and white and interspersed with actual NASA footage and sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMPJwA_lNXQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z9yNHIolnM&feature=youtu.be&t=1164

Really I continue to be amazed by people who seem smart enough to understand at least some of what bitcoin is about but then slurp up utterly retarded nonsense like this video and believe it actually has ANYTHING to do with Wikileaks or the moon landing being a hoax.

Capricorn One starring OJ Simpson, a movie where NASA fakes a Mars landing. I think OJ was innocent, I'm going to recommend this movie.

The alleged wikileaks video shows fake moon landing footage, show me real footage if it's real! Oh that's right you can't because they erased the tapes. -- https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/13/1359562_us-moon-landing-tapes-got-erased-nasa-admits-.html

The Eagle lander was a cardboard box wrapped in aluminum foil with roofing paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts. It's a structure a homeless methamphetamine addict builds to shelter himself from the elements.

Maybe its time to stop watching movies and youtube videos and actually do real research or study something before making idiotic claims.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
June 10, 2019, 09:35:44 PM
#81
^^^ I really feel for you. Your mommy and daddy are gone, and all you have left is your nursery rhymes.

Hey diddle diddle,
The Cat and the fiddle,
The Cow jumped over the moon,
The little Dog laughed to see such sport,
And the Dish ran away with the Spoon.

And now NASA is trying to steal those from you, too, with moon landings that prove the cow can't jump that high.

 Cry

But don't cry. You have all your buddies at the funny farm.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
June 10, 2019, 08:41:45 PM
#80


WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH) -- https://youtu.be/Z3FJ2dhr-aA

Like everything else you've posted on this forum in the last 5 years, this is utter horseshit. Wikileaks didn't release this "found footage"; most of it is taken from "behind the scenes" footage of a film (fiction, Hollywood production) called Capricorn One. It was converted into black and white and interspersed with actual NASA footage and sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMPJwA_lNXQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z9yNHIolnM&feature=youtu.be&t=1164

Really I continue to be amazed by people who seem smart enough to understand at least some of what bitcoin is about but then slurp up utterly retarded nonsense like this video and believe it actually has ANYTHING to do with Wikileaks or the moon landing being a hoax.

Capricorn One starring OJ Simpson, a movie where NASA fakes a Mars landing. I think OJ was innocent, I'm going to recommend this movie.

The alleged wikileaks video shows fake moon landing footage, show me real footage if it's real! Oh that's right you can't because they erased the tapes. -- https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/13/1359562_us-moon-landing-tapes-got-erased-nasa-admits-.html

The Eagle lander was a cardboard box wrapped in aluminum foil with roofing paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts. It's a structure a homeless methamphetamine addict builds to shelter himself from the elements.
full member
Activity: 270
Merit: 103
June 10, 2019, 03:40:31 PM
#79
Whether we land on the moon or not, it's one of those things where if we did, you're still going to have a bunch of people convinced that we didn't. Just because that's their personality.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
June 10, 2019, 03:38:14 PM
#78


WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH) -- https://youtu.be/Z3FJ2dhr-aA

Like everything else you've posted on this forum in the last 5 years, this is utter horseshit. Wikileaks didn't release this "found footage"; most of it is taken from "behind the scenes" footage of a film (fiction, Hollywood production) called Capricorn One. It was converted into black and white and interspersed with actual NASA footage and sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMPJwA_lNXQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z9yNHIolnM&feature=youtu.be&t=1164

Really I continue to be amazed by people who seem smart enough to understand at least some of what bitcoin is about but then slurp up utterly retarded nonsense like this video and believe it actually has ANYTHING to do with Wikileaks or the moon landing being a hoax.

Ok that video might be b.s. but so was the moon rock they gave Holland
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html

I just have a feeling the moon landing was fake because of the fact Buzz himself says they did not go to a little girl, Theo Von who has met Buzz said it did not really seem like he went to the moon. There is nothing about retro reflectors in the transcripts Nasa released and I seen many images where the shadows do not make any sense. That is enough for me to question it at least. -Notaflatearther

''I just have a feeling the moon landing was fake because of the fact Buzz himself says they did not go to a little girl'' So let me ask you this, you believe Buzz now, right? Did you believe the moon landing was real before hearing him saying that? Did you believe the moon landing was real when he said he went there for decades?
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
June 10, 2019, 07:32:41 AM
#77


WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH) -- https://youtu.be/Z3FJ2dhr-aA

Like everything else you've posted on this forum in the last 5 years, this is utter horseshit. Wikileaks didn't release this "found footage"; most of it is taken from "behind the scenes" footage of a film (fiction, Hollywood production) called Capricorn One. It was converted into black and white and interspersed with actual NASA footage and sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMPJwA_lNXQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z9yNHIolnM&feature=youtu.be&t=1164

Really I continue to be amazed by people who seem smart enough to understand at least some of what bitcoin is about but then slurp up utterly retarded nonsense like this video and believe it actually has ANYTHING to do with Wikileaks or the moon landing being a hoax.

Ok that video might be b.s. but so was the moon rock they gave Holland
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html

I just have a feeling the moon landing was fake because of the fact Buzz himself says they did not go to a little girl, Theo Von who has met Buzz said it did not really seem like he went to the moon. There is nothing about retro reflectors in the transcripts Nasa released and I seen many images where the shadows do not make any sense. That is enough for me to question it at least. -Notaflatearther
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
June 10, 2019, 03:52:45 AM
#76
The Moon is not a solid object, prove me wrong!

legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
June 09, 2019, 07:38:16 PM
#75
~the usual drivel~
~load of bollocks~
~troll rubbish not worth quoting~
~same old same old....~
@Spendulus,

~childish memes... thinks he proves a point~
more of the same....


~ and of course this FE troll nutter chimes in wherever his buddy batty goes...~





Well then...
How did I guess that the FE batty and his twin nutjob sock xempy would  post their ridiculous garbage here ?
Small wonder, with a  thread title of "Did we actually really land on the moon" ...how could they not?




legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
June 09, 2019, 05:56:53 PM
#74
1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock)
2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened.
3) you said they used up all the tech ( Roll Eyes )
4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks)

5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.be

It was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images.

1) I don't care why some dead guy's estate donated a wrong rock to NASA 19 years later. Most likely because someone stole the (highly valuable) actual rock.

2) You've been corrected, live with it.

3) Yes, they used up the equipment in the production runs. For space flight projects. Wouldn't have done much good sitting around on the ground right?

4) Now you're really not thinking.

123:59:39 on the flight clock the LRRR were laid down

The laser ranging retro-reflector was deployed during the first extravehicular activity approximately 43 meters (140 feet) west-southwest of the Apollo lunar surface experiment package central station. Leveling and alignment were accomplished with no difficulty. The McDonald Observatory team initially acquired a return signal from the Apollo 15 instrument August 3, 1971, when atmospheric conditions first permitted ranging.


http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/153

5,6,7,8) Those have been clearly debunked, don't double down on stupid.

But if you really want to, go for it!



I wonder why conspiracy theorists love these kind of titles: WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH)

All the videos about flat earth and all that shit always have the same titles, it's like their brains are attracted by them, oh shit it says must watch and 100% true, let me watch that and believe it!!!

I've never even seen a logically consistent "didn't go moon" theory.

Like, okay. But did Apollo 8 go AROUND THE MOON? Did Grissom and the others die? Are there unmanned landers on the Moon? Where did our moon rocks come from if we didn't go there?

The rock issue is for me the big one, because one look at those rocks under a scope and if you have a slight understanding of geology, you know they didn't come from Earth. no way no how.

hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
June 09, 2019, 01:35:58 PM
#73
1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock)
2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened.
3) you said they used up all the tech ( Roll Eyes )
4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks)

5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.be

It was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images.

1) I don't care why some dead guy's estate donated a wrong rock to NASA 19 years later. Most likely because someone stole the (highly valuable) actual rock.

2) You've been corrected, live with it.

3) Yes, they used up the equipment in the production runs. For space flight projects. Wouldn't have done much good sitting around on the ground right?

4) Now you're really not thinking.

123:59:39 on the flight clock the LRRR were laid down

The laser ranging retro-reflector was deployed during the first extravehicular activity approximately 43 meters (140 feet) west-southwest of the Apollo lunar surface experiment package central station. Leveling and alignment were accomplished with no difficulty. The McDonald Observatory team initially acquired a return signal from the Apollo 15 instrument August 3, 1971, when atmospheric conditions first permitted ranging.


http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/153

5,6,7,8) Those have been clearly debunked, don't double down on stupid.

But if you really want to, go for it!



I wonder why conspiracy theorists love these kind of titles: WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH)

All the videos about flat earth and all that shit always have the same titles, it's like their brains are attracted by them, oh shit it says must watch and 100% true, let me watch that and believe it!!!
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
June 09, 2019, 07:57:23 AM
#72
1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock)
2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened.
3) you said they used up all the tech ( Roll Eyes )
4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks)

5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.be

It was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images.

1) I don't care why some dead guy's estate donated a wrong rock to NASA 19 years later. Most likely because someone stole the (highly valuable) actual rock.

2) You've been corrected, live with it.

3) Yes, they used up the equipment in the production runs. For space flight projects. Wouldn't have done much good sitting around on the ground right?

4) Now you're really not thinking.

123:59:39 on the flight clock the LRRR were laid down

The laser ranging retro-reflector was deployed during the first extravehicular activity approximately 43 meters (140 feet) west-southwest of the Apollo lunar surface experiment package central station. Leveling and alignment were accomplished with no difficulty. The McDonald Observatory team initially acquired a return signal from the Apollo 15 instrument August 3, 1971, when atmospheric conditions first permitted ranging.


http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/153

5,6,7,8) Those have been clearly debunked, don't double down on stupid.

But if you really want to, go for it!

hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
June 09, 2019, 05:11:51 AM
#71
.....
.....
this picture is pure gold.
No, your cartoons are not arguments.
Do you actually have any?

Yah I brought up a bunch but you failed to counter discuss any of them. Nice movie script you linked.

1) why was the moon rock fake they gave the Netherlands?
2) why did buzz say he did not go to the moon?
3) why did they destroy the tech to go to the moon?
4) why in the transcripts did you link does it say nothing about a retro reflector?
5) why is there footage of them filming it all on a movie set?
6) why is there bubbles in some of the footage?
7) why is there strings?
Cool why is there multiple shadows on some of the footage?

All of the original photography is available on the NASA archives. Do you know how to find it, or are you the moronic slave of your Youtube Overlords?

There's a story behind the moon rock fake, and you can easily look it up. But WTF? Let's do it for you, how is that?

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing. Drees had been out of office for 11 years, but was considered an elder statesman.

When Drees died in 1988, the rock was donated to the Rijksmuseum.

So 19 years after Astronaut gives the rock to X, X dies and rock goes to Museum. Who knows what happened in that time frame to the real rock? (And who cares?)

https://phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.html

You've believed a misquote from Buzz.

The child didn’t ask Buzz Aldrin if he ever went to the moon. Rather, she posted the question “Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?” to the astronaut. When Aldrin said in reply that “we didn’t go there” and “that’s the way it happened,” he was referring to the fact that the U.S. has sent no missions back to the moon since the final Apollo spaceflight took place in December 1972, not asserting that he had never been to the moon in the first place.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/buzz-aldrin-moon-admission/

The didn't DESTROY the tech, they used it all up. Like the remaining Saturn rockets were used for the Spacelab missions.

Transcripts say nothing about a retro reflector? Really? You will find them talking about placing the experiment package and deploying it. But you'd have to know the name of the package to understand that, right?

5,6,7 and 8 are garbage.



ok this your defense.

1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock)
2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened.
3) you said they used up all the tech ( Roll Eyes )
4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks)

5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.be

It was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images.

So a few youtube idiots found out NASA faked the moon landing but the whole russian intelligence and others didn't? Yeah sounds totally logical, do you realize they were competing against each other at that point, you think Russia would just let them lie and not see the ''strings'' you claim appear in the video LOL.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
June 08, 2019, 09:40:28 PM
#70
.....
.....
this picture is pure gold.
No, your cartoons are not arguments.
Do you actually have any?

Yah I brought up a bunch but you failed to counter discuss any of them. Nice movie script you linked.

1) why was the moon rock fake they gave the Netherlands?
2) why did buzz say he did not go to the moon?
3) why did they destroy the tech to go to the moon?
4) why in the transcripts did you link does it say nothing about a retro reflector?
5) why is there footage of them filming it all on a movie set?
6) why is there bubbles in some of the footage?
7) why is there strings?
Cool why is there multiple shadows on some of the footage?

All of the original photography is available on the NASA archives. Do you know how to find it, or are you the moronic slave of your Youtube Overlords?

There's a story behind the moon rock fake, and you can easily look it up. But WTF? Let's do it for you, how is that?

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing. Drees had been out of office for 11 years, but was considered an elder statesman.

When Drees died in 1988, the rock was donated to the Rijksmuseum.

So 19 years after Astronaut gives the rock to X, X dies and rock goes to Museum. Who knows what happened in that time frame to the real rock? (And who cares?)

https://phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.html

You've believed a misquote from Buzz.

The child didn’t ask Buzz Aldrin if he ever went to the moon. Rather, she posted the question “Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?” to the astronaut. When Aldrin said in reply that “we didn’t go there” and “that’s the way it happened,” he was referring to the fact that the U.S. has sent no missions back to the moon since the final Apollo spaceflight took place in December 1972, not asserting that he had never been to the moon in the first place.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/buzz-aldrin-moon-admission/

The didn't DESTROY the tech, they used it all up. Like the remaining Saturn rockets were used for the Spacelab missions.

Transcripts say nothing about a retro reflector? Really? You will find them talking about placing the experiment package and deploying it. But you'd have to know the name of the package to understand that, right?

5,6,7 and 8 are garbage.



ok this your defense.

1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock)
2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened.
3) you said they used up all the tech ( Roll Eyes )
4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks)

5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.be

It was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
June 08, 2019, 09:35:25 PM
#69
.....
.....
this picture is pure gold.
No, your cartoons are not arguments.
Do you actually have any?

Yah I brought up a bunch but you failed to counter discuss any of them. Nice movie script you linked.

1) why was the moon rock fake they gave the Netherlands?
2) why did buzz say he did not go to the moon?
3) why did they destroy the tech to go to the moon?
4) why in the transcripts did you link does it say nothing about a retro reflector?
5) why is there footage of them filming it all on a movie set?
6) why is there bubbles in some of the footage?
7) why is there strings?
Cool why is there multiple shadows on some of the footage?

All of the original photography is available on the NASA archives. Do you know how to find it, or are you the moronic slave of your Youtube Overlords?

There's a story behind the moon rock fake, and you can easily look it up. But WTF? Let's do it for you, how is that?

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing. Drees had been out of office for 11 years, but was considered an elder statesman.

When Drees died in 1988, the rock was donated to the Rijksmuseum.

So 19 years after Astronaut gives the rock to X, X dies and rock goes to Museum. Who knows what happened in that time frame to the real rock? (And who cares?)

https://phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.html

You've believed a misquote from Buzz.

The child didn’t ask Buzz Aldrin if he ever went to the moon. Rather, she posted the question “Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?” to the astronaut. When Aldrin said in reply that “we didn’t go there” and “that’s the way it happened,” he was referring to the fact that the U.S. has sent no missions back to the moon since the final Apollo spaceflight took place in December 1972, not asserting that he had never been to the moon in the first place.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/buzz-aldrin-moon-admission/

The didn't DESTROY the tech, they used it all up. Like the remaining Saturn rockets were used for the Spacelab missions.

Transcripts say nothing about a retro reflector? Really? You will find them talking about placing the experiment package and deploying it. But you'd have to know the name of the package to understand that, right?

5,6,7 and 8 are garbage.

hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
June 08, 2019, 11:43:36 AM
#68






+bonus: Fake Moon Landing | As Seen On TV | Movies & Television: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM7ebcR3-xE

So called "moon landing" was staged in a hollywood studio. It is a complete fraud. So if you believe it was "real" then you have been bamboozled.

''Simply put, the Apollo program that took us to the moon in the 1970’s was part of a technological ecosystem that has become antiquated over time, and would no longer be suitable for a lunar mission.''

Of course idiots like you would misinterpret anything when you need to, by using that quote you are directly saying that we DID land on the moon since he said we don't have the technology 'anymore' like we did in the past, you are a moron and you don't even realize it haha.
Pages:
Jump to: