Topic: Did we actually really land on moon? - page 36. (Read 7467 times)

^^^ Such creative thinking! Lol.     

What if we are already on the moon? and the moon is the earth and the earth is the moon?

There will always be people who think like this. It feels good to be 'in the know', whether or not that's right or not doesn't matter to them.

The LEM and the fact that we landed on the moon has proved you wrong long ago.

Well at least we have something, you claim there are some huge projectors somewhere that are projecting the sun and moon and yet you have provided 0 evidence for it, where are they? I want to see them.

@nutildah, a cardboard box wrapped in aluminum foil and reinforced with roofing paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts is proof of a hoax.



Look at that piece of shit you fucking retards!!!

The Moon is not a solid object, prove me wrong.

Maybe its time to stop watching movies and youtube videos and actually do real research or study something before making idiotic claims.

^^^ I really feel for you. Your mommy and daddy are gone, and all you have left is your nursery rhymes.


And now NASA is trying to steal those from you, too, with moon landings that prove the cow can't jump that high.

 

But don't cry. You have all your buddies at the funny farm.

Capricorn One starring OJ Simpson, a movie where NASA fakes a Mars landing. I think OJ was innocent, I'm going to recommend this movie.

The alleged wikileaks video shows fake moon landing footage, show me real footage if it's real! Oh that's right you can't because they erased the tapes. -- https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/13/1359562_us-moon-landing-tapes-got-erased-nasa-admits-.html

The Eagle lander was a cardboard box wrapped in aluminum foil with roofing paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts. It's a structure a homeless methamphetamine addict builds to shelter himself from the elements.

Whether we land on the moon or not, it's one of those things where if we did, you're still going to have a bunch of people convinced that we didn't. Just because that's their personality.

''I just have a feeling the moon landing was fake because of the fact Buzz himself says they did not go to a little girl'' So let me ask you this, you believe Buzz now, right? Did you believe the moon landing was real before hearing him saying that? Did you believe the moon landing was real when he said he went there for decades?

Ok that video might be b.s. but so was the moon rock they gave Holland
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html

I just have a feeling the moon landing was fake because of the fact Buzz himself says they did not go to a little girl, Theo Von who has met Buzz said it did not really seem like he went to the moon. There is nothing about retro reflectors in the transcripts Nasa released and I seen many images where the shadows do not make any sense. That is enough for me to question it at least. -Notaflatearther

The Moon is not a solid object, prove me wrong!

Well then...
How did I guess that the FE batty and his twin nutjob sock xempy would  post their ridiculous garbage here ?
Small wonder, with a  thread title of "Did we actually really land on the moon" ...how could they not?

I've never even seen a logically consistent "didn't go moon" theory.

Like, okay. But did Apollo 8 go AROUND THE MOON? Did Grissom and the others die? Are there unmanned landers on the Moon? Where did our moon rocks come from if we didn't go there?

The rock issue is for me the big one, because one look at those rocks under a scope and if you have a slight understanding of geology, you know they didn't come from Earth. no way no how.

I wonder why conspiracy theorists love these kind of titles: WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH)

All the videos about flat earth and all that shit always have the same titles, it's like their brains are attracted by them, oh shit it says must watch and 100% true, let me watch that and believe it!!!

1) I don't care why some dead guy's estate donated a wrong rock to NASA 19 years later. Most likely because someone stole the (highly valuable) actual rock.

2) You've been corrected, live with it.

3) Yes, they used up the equipment in the production runs. For space flight projects. Wouldn't have done much good sitting around on the ground right?

4) Now you're really not thinking.

123:59:39 on the flight clock the LRRR were laid down

The laser ranging retro-reflector was deployed during the first extravehicular activity approximately 43 meters (140 feet) west-southwest of the Apollo lunar surface experiment package central station. Leveling and alignment were accomplished with no difficulty. The McDonald Observatory team initially acquired a return signal from the Apollo 15 instrument August 3, 1971, when atmospheric conditions first permitted ranging.

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/153

5,6,7,8) Those have been clearly debunked, don't double down on stupid.

But if you really want to, go for it!

So a few youtube idiots found out NASA faked the moon landing but the whole russian intelligence and others didn't? Yeah sounds totally logical, do you realize they were competing against each other at that point, you think Russia would just let them lie and not see the ''strings'' you claim appear in the video LOL.

ok this your defense.

1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock)
2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened.
3) you said they used up all the tech ( )
4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks)

5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.be

It was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images.

All of the original photography is available on the NASA archives. Do you know how to find it, or are you the moronic slave of your Youtube Overlords?

There's a story behind the moon rock fake, and you can easily look it up. But WTF? Let's do it for you, how is that?

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing. Drees had been out of office for 11 years, but was considered an elder statesman.

When Drees died in 1988, the rock was donated to the Rijksmuseum.

So 19 years after Astronaut gives the rock to X, X dies and rock goes to Museum. Who knows what happened in that time frame to the real rock? (And who cares?)

https://phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.html

You've believed a misquote from Buzz.

The child didn’t ask Buzz Aldrin if he ever went to the moon. Rather, she posted the question “Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?” to the astronaut. When Aldrin said in reply that “we didn’t go there” and “that’s the way it happened,” he was referring to the fact that the U.S. has sent no missions back to the moon since the final Apollo spaceflight took place in December 1972, not asserting that he had never been to the moon in the first place.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/buzz-aldrin-moon-admission/

The didn't DESTROY the tech, they used it all up. Like the remaining Saturn rockets were used for the Spacelab missions.

Transcripts say nothing about a retro reflector? Really? You will find them talking about placing the experiment package and deploying it. But you'd have to know the name of the package to understand that, right?

5,6,7 and 8 are garbage.