Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp86-00513r001343720008-3
Topic: Did we actually really land on moon? - page 38. (Read 7467 times)
Google made me complete captchas for 30 mins straight for this post.
Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp86-00513r001343720008-3
Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp86-00513r001343720008-3
I don't think so many people would participate on a farce like that. You say technology on that time didn't look sufficient to take men to the moon, but governments always have access to more advanced technology than civilians: there are technologies governments are using now that we, common citizens, will access only in 10 years or even more.
Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.
This is actually the correct answer and what has actually happened. Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsjWEDSkbUU "Buzz Aldrin - Never went to the moon"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit
I mean what else do you need bud? There is double shadows all over the shit and everything.
Bah.
Flight transcript of Apollo 11.
https://historycollection.jsc.nasa.gov/JSCHistoryPortal/history/mission_trans/apollo11.htm
Online virtual copy of the Apollo Flight Computer.
You can program it yourself and see what it did. It was really the first personal computer. The first PC.
http://svtsim.com/moonjs/agc.html
Bah Bah black sheep have you any wool?
nice more forgery, sick movie script.
Btw why is all that stuff classified for years before it is released, the tax payers should know what is going on, they fund the shit.
why is stuff like this censored? https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp79b00752a000300070001-8 "SANITIZED COPY" like it is a book for ffs and you remove 200 pages of the 250
I don't think so many people would participate on a farce like that. You say technology on that time didn't look sufficient to take men to the moon, but governments always have access to more advanced technology than civilians: there are technologies governments are using now that we, common citizens, will access only in 10 years or even more.
Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.
This is actually the correct answer and what has actually happened. Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsjWEDSkbUU "Buzz Aldrin - Never went to the moon"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit
I mean what else do you need bud? There is double shadows all over the shit and everything.
Bah.
Flight transcript of Apollo 11.
https://historycollection.jsc.nasa.gov/JSCHistoryPortal/history/mission_trans/apollo11.htm
Online virtual copy of the Apollo Flight Computer.
You can program it yourself and see what it did. It was really the first personal computer. The first PC.
http://svtsim.com/moonjs/agc.html
I don't think so many people would participate on a farce like that. You say technology on that time didn't look sufficient to take men to the moon, but governments always have access to more advanced technology than civilians: there are technologies governments are using now that we, common citizens, will access only in 10 years or even more.
Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.
This is actually the correct answer and what has actually happened. Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsjWEDSkbUU "Buzz Aldrin - Never went to the moon"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit
I mean what else do you need bud? There is double shadows all over the shit, water bubbles and a bunch of stuff that makes no sense.
look I don`t think the earth is flat, but I think the space mission was b.s., and I think the bankers killed JFK.
I don't think so many people would participate on a farce like that. You say technology on that time didn't look sufficient to take men to the moon, but governments always have access to more advanced technology than civilians: there are technologies governments are using now that we, common citizens, will access only in 10 years or even more.
Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.
This is actually the correct answer and what has actually happened. Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.
The "photographs" NASA provides shows they landed a tinfoil wrapped cardboard box with a facade of tar paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts on a Los Vegas movie set.
@scopatumana, so you believe that men rode on top of rockets and went to the Moon?
@scopatumana, so you believe that men rode on top of rockets and went to the Moon?
Dey did but dey wan out of deditated wam to wun the pc`s and it is a painfullly proceessor to make it again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y
... not caused by a giant heavy ball in the sky blocking the Sun.
The "photographs" NASA provides shows they landed a tinfoil wrapped cardboard box with a facade of tar paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts on a Los Vegas movie set.....
And eclipses are ...
^^^ That's easy. They could have done this: To the stars by atom bomb: The incredible tale of the top secret Orion Project - https://newatlas.com/orion-project-atom-bomb-spaceship/49454/
The "photographs" NASA provides shows they landed a tinfoil wrapped cardboard box with a facade of tar paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts on a Los Vegas movie set.
@scopatumana, so you believe that men rode on top of rockets and went to the Moon?
@scopatumana, so you believe that men rode on top of rockets and went to the Moon?
Well, I guess so far as there hasn't been any solid evidence to debunk that claim, it still holds. My conviction is also that, if there were rockets that could go to the moon then it is possible they might have actually landed on the moon.
^^^ Combining trig with the balloon photos shows that there is a horizon with a space backdrop. The trig shows the distance to the moon along with its size. It isn't what you say. But, it's nice to know where you are... in those pictures.
USSR used to tell that tale for decades, I'm not buying it.
@Spendulus,
Fuck your strawman fallacy, that's proof you're a goof, a liar or both. The distances involved and the curved geometry of a giant concave mirror above us render your argument moot; you're not looking at a flat mirror 3' from your nose.
If you've got any scientific proof the Moon is a solid heavy ball that goes down below our feet every day, and that it reflects sunlight and pulls the ocean up you should post it. What about scientific proof of the Moon's size and distance?
If you want to claim the Moon is anything other than a light in the sky, well fucking prove it! Because the clown on TV, or in the public school or in the comic textbook says so and, because you feel the need to fit in is not scientific fucking proof.
Fuck your strawman fallacy, that's proof you're a goof, a liar or both. The distances involved and the curved geometry of a giant concave mirror above us render your argument moot; you're not looking at a flat mirror 3' from your nose.
If you've got any scientific proof the Moon is a solid heavy ball that goes down below our feet every day, and that it reflects sunlight and pulls the ocean up you should post it. What about scientific proof of the Moon's size and distance?
If you want to claim the Moon is anything other than a light in the sky, well fucking prove it! Because the clown on TV, or in the public school or in the comic textbook says so and, because you feel the need to fit in is not scientific fucking proof.
^^^ Yeah, but, but, but. What about the projectors? 
Now I'm a bit confused.
What is considered conspiracy theory on this case, that men landed on moon or that men didn't land on moon?
What is considered conspiracy theory on this case, that men landed on moon or that men didn't land on moon?
1. Have people believe the Moon is a giant heavy ball in the sky to support the false Copernican model of the universe.
2. Manufacture evidence of men landing on the Moon.
3. Profit.
Conspiracy theory is a term coin by the CIA to label anybody who is critical or might bring light to their clandestine and often illegal or immoral activities.
Aw come on!
You know as well as I that we live on a Flat Moon, and the big mirror in the sky just reflects it and that's why we see the Moon up there.
Enough of this nonsense about living on a Flat Earth. If we did then we'd see the Earth on that big sky mirror and we don't!
And that proves it! There is No Flat Earth!
Now I'm a bit confused.
What is considered conspiracy theory on this case, that men landed on moon or that men didn't land on moon?
What is considered conspiracy theory on this case, that men landed on moon or that men didn't land on moon?
1. Have people believe the Moon is a giant heavy ball in the sky to support the false Copernican model of the universe.
2. Manufacture evidence of men landing on the Moon.
3. Profit.
Conspiracy theory is a term coined by the CIA to label anybody who is critical or might bring light to their clandestine and often illegal or immoral activities.
Now I'm a bit confused.
What is considered conspiracy theory on this case, that men landed on moon or that men didn't land on moon?
What is considered conspiracy theory on this case, that men landed on moon or that men didn't land on moon?
The Moon landing hoax is a communist (atheist) conspiracy. The Moon is not a physical object, prove me wrong!
You are doing a superb job of that, I would certainly not want to interrupt.
^^^ It's always so difficult determining if you haven't taken your meds today, or if you have taken too much.
Jump to: