Topic: Did we actually really land on moon? - page 37. (Read 7467 times)

''Simply put, the Apollo program that took us to the moon in the 1970’s was part of a technological ecosystem that has become antiquated over time, and would no longer be suitable for a lunar mission.''

Of course idiots like you would misinterpret anything when you need to, by using that quote you are directly saying that we DID land on the moon since he said we don't have the technology 'anymore' like we did in the past, you are a moron and you don't even realize it haha.

Are you bald? If not, why don't you start to use your head for something more than a hair rack?

Yah I brought up a bunch but you failed to counter discuss any of them. Nice movie script you linked.

1) why was the moon rock fake they gave the Netherlands?
2) why did buzz say he did not go to the moon?
3) why did they destroy the tech to go to the moon?
4) why in the transcripts did you link does it say nothing about a retro reflector?
5) why is there footage of them filming it all on a movie set?
6) why is there bubbles in some of the footage?
7) why is there strings?
why is there multiple shadows on some of the footage?

What part?

Apollo launches through 8? 9? 10? 11?

Did the Saturn V exist?

Did the LEM exist?

What are the artifacts on the Moon at the exact locations of the Apollo landings?

+bonus: Fake Moon Landing | As Seen On TV | Movies & Television: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM7ebcR3-xE

So called "moon landing" was staged in a hollywood studio. It is a complete fraud. So if you believe it was "real" then you have been bamboozled.

The entire Moon has been imaged and digitized at < 1/2 meter per pixel.

The database includes all the Apollo landing sites, and they show up quite clearly.

This was done starting in 2009 with the polar orbiting LIDAR.

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/lunar_images/

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/exploration/moonVideo/index.shtml

A complete debunking of these idiotic Moon Conspiracy theories is as close as Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories

Isnt that astronomy gives us proof that theres some have been in the moon.
the astronomy landed in the moon.although theres no gravity in the moon so there are floating under the moon.
So amazing hopefuĺly someday they show as a more videos and proof that you can land and living for a while in the moon.

moon landing faked yes.
obama birth cert fake yes
entire usd money a scam yes
jfk killed by nixon and banker boys yes
mkultra yes
chemtrails yes
operation paperclip yes
flat earth no

A select few family's about to kill all of us, yes.

WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH) -- https://youtu.be/Z3FJ2dhr-aA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk3KRxTfkLM Sheriff Joe Arpaio Releases New Information on President Obama's Birth Certificate (FNN)

I'm not sure why you are pushing these lies and propaganda items. There were x number of layers in Obama's BC because that's the structure of the PDF file, nothing to do with the government.

It's interesting how truly dumb this discussion is. There was nothing like photoshop in the days of Apollo.

As for the Earthrise photos, you and whatever paid shill did that picture are truly idiots.

The Earth is in the same position in the Lunar sky, when viewed from the surface. This is because the Moon orbits the Earth with the same side facing the Earth always.

It does not "rise" like the Moon does on Earth. When photos are taken from a ship orbiting the Moon, then of course the Earth will at one point rise above the horizon.

yah was there not like 20 layers on Obama`s birth cert? released right from the government website.

^^^ So you agree that we actually landed on the moon! Thanks for the thumbs up.

Space may be the final frontier, BUT it is made in hellwood basement

I don`t think the computer was fake and I never suggested it was . I suggested the transcripts you gave me to be fake, which they are no proof at all and anyone could of written those at any time, it is like a movie script you gave me as proof. I guess I am suppose to believe in the Bible to and Quran/Tanakh because they were written on paper?

I think the moon mission was fake, why? because of these 3 (main reasons) not because of any computer.

Buzz Aldrin himself says he does not go https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsjWEDSkbUU
The moon rock turned out to be fake https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
We could not go back for a long time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y  I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit

Now have I have 10 other minor reasons, like the shadows, the gravity, the water bubbles and a bunch of other stuff (wind blowing on a flag) etc.

I am not a flat earther. I know the whole flat earth propaganda was to throw people off from the money. Which is the main thing everyone should be talking about.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/time-fiat-bitcoin-gold-5151153

---

I do think they went to the moon later (than they said) with robot/drones and put some metal thing there so they could say they put some metal plate in when we shine lasers to prove we were there, funny how that metal plate being put in is not in your transcripts, just another anti proof by nasa themselves.

Show me in the transcripts where you see "retroreflector" and think about that word they made, retro reflector.

---

"I met Buzz Aldrin and it did not seem like he went to the moon" -Theo Von 
He says it on JRE podcast at some point.

When you can run the Apollo Flight computer, or download the code, or buy a replica on Ebay, it's laughable you would suggest it was fake.

We can trace the development of computers prior to, and after the AFC. Parts of the OEM items are still available for examination.

therefore, we had a flight computer capable of the operations of the Apollo program. The Apollo astronauts used a sextant and a telescope to figure orbits. The design of each exists and that they worked and will work is a fact.

Hence, we do know how to get to the Moon and get back.

I think it is you who changed the subject from the moon landing to "flat Earth" and "firmament" providing some obscure source.  I just pointed out that your PDF source also discussed how to measure gravity using the pendulum method, completely invalidating your "flat Earth" model.
Thanks to gravity all objects in the known universe coalesce to form spherical objects where the distance to the center of mass is more less the same anywhere on the surface of the object.

You selectively filter information to fit your contrived delusion.

There's another thread in the off-topic section better suited for discussing the acceleration commonly referred to as gravity, since you feel the need to change the subject. An electrically active firmament when described by Coulombs Law explains how up & down works. The force pushing on objects (a seporate phenomenon from up & down) is pressure from both the air and the aether (a gaseous substance so fine it penetrates everything).

There's a mirrored dome (firmament) above us and the Moon is not a physical (solid) object; it's a 32 mile wide projected light. It's not possible to travel to the Moon, there's nothing to land on!

^^^ Maybe notbatman was the only one who landed on the moon, and that is why he knows the earth is flat.

And in the same document, the very next defended dissertation is on the measurement of gravity at sea using the pendulum method.

You conveniently skipped that one.  Why?