I say leave it. this happens every time the price drops, drives me insane, I usually avoid the forums during these times.
Currently you are rewarding early adopters and making a solid entry into the Digibyte market easily affordable.
We have changed the reward once, is it really going to achieve anything long term by cutting it again??
Looking forward to the news
For miners it's a paradise but in 5 years it will be investors paradise as much less coins produced. I mine with almost free electricity so I just keep all coins I make, so please keep rewards the same for early adopters who take the risk.
In 5 years' time it will be
investors profit takers' paradise.
It is investors paradise TODAY!!!
We need to get the word out by creating an investor's pack and posting it online
so that people can send it out to potential investors TODAY!
I'm tired of the naysayers. This is an absolute must if you really want to create buy support. Miners only mine, or, said slightly differently, they PRODUCE. Once a product is produced, it needs to be sold. We have a fantastic product that is continually being improved upon and that needs to be sold. I've always said that tipping campaigns only go so far. I was a big proponent long ago, last year, of targeting gamers, and that's being done. That is a huge niche we are going after. Unfortunately, it's oriented towards
mining and not purchasing, and that means that we are a little behind the curve as this would have been great 9 months ago, but now it's only going to add more short term sell pressure. Don't get me wrong, I do think it's still a good idea - the more widely distributed the miner base, the more secure the network, and we do need that of course - but, as with all endeavors, it's limited.
I was also an early proponent of the algo change as everyone here who's been around for a while can attest. I've usually been on the right side of "DigiByte History" and I can't be more direct than I'm being right now when I say that we need to focus our efforts on, and give our highest priority to, marketing DGB to investors of all types with a special emphasis given to high profile speculative investors, and that starts with an investor's information pack focusing on product > future plans and prospects > appreciation potential of DGB > long term INVESTMENT RETURN, and it needs to be PLACED IN CONTEXT as well (for ideas on that, please see this post:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11734428 - also quoted below for your convenience).
Yeah, it’s not direct investment in cryptos per se, but it is an investment in the underlying technology nonetheless, and the fact that they’re interested in the technology itself can only be a good sign since the vast majority will not be so keen on reinventing the wheel and most likely will directly invest in the best of existing cryptocurrencies.
It’s not a question of if, rather it is a question of when (and I believe it has already begun, albeit in trickle mode still).
In my opinion, there is huge investment potential in cryptocurrencies. To get an idea of what I’m talking about, take the over 10 trillion USD aggregate M2 money supply for the U.S. alone and use that as your comparative calculative base, and then, being conservative, give the top 50 cryptocurrencies an aggregate value of just half that: 5 trillion USD.
If we assign equal parts of that 5 trillion USD of equivalent value to each of the top 50 cryptocurrencies, each would have the equivalent market cap of 100 billion USD. That means that each BTC would be worth $4,761.91, each LTC $1,190.48, each WDC $376.77, each DGB $4.77, and each DOGE would be worth around 1 buck (with the removal of its original cap of 100,000,000,000, similar to the fiats, it should initially lose around 5% of that value yearly in the coming years due to its now inherent inflationary component).
Does this sound far fetched? Why should it? Why shouldn’t cryptocurrencies have a similar value to their fiat cousins? After all, wasn’t that the original intent behind cryptos to begin with?
What’s more, the combined USD equivalent money supply of the developed world easily exceeds 50 trillion USD, 5 times the U.S. and 10 times this imaginary cryptocurrency aggregate figure. Is it really that far fetched to imagine that the best cryptocurrencies could one day have an aggregate value equal to a very modest 1/10 that of the developed world's aggregate fiat money supply?
Considering that the appreciation potential is greater than 1000%, is there any wonder that big money is looking vivaciously at cryptos?
We've got to roll up our sleeves and do the necessary "work" to get the word out in a polished and professional manner.
Yes, it's absolutely got to look corporate and be up to the same standards as the promo video, no doubt about it!