I tested this and here is what happens. You create Address 2. You send 1 DGB from Address 1 to Address 2 and then it says payment to yourself and the quantity is 0. Why would this occur?
Update: The confirmations are complete and it says Debit of 1 DGB and then Credit of 1 DGB. The net is 0. I suppose this is because it is within the wallet. Anyone clarify? Is there a way to look at each address in your wallet to identify the total amount in each?
YC
Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 917. (Read 3058888 times)
April 06, 2015, 08:08:31 AM
April 06, 2015, 08:05:29 AM
One further clarification. If the DGB are transferring within addresses on your wallet, you do not have to send them to an exchange first correct? Sorry for the silly questions. Bit of a noob. 
YC
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
Yes, exactly. Once a transaction made to an address, that address shows on the blockchain and in the rich list. Block chain does not care about if they are in the same wallet or not... The main thing is the address. So you can send DGBs to the same wallet with different addresses generated on the same wallet, and at the rich list people see them at different addresses, even though they are at the same wallet.
Sorry for the confusion YC, I totally misunderstood what you meant and lead to a slightly different topic, which is clarified above.
Best,
Halin
YC
H,
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
Yes, exactly. Once a transaction made to an address, that address shows on the blockchain and in the rich list. Block chain does not care about if they are in the same wallet or not... The main thing is the address. So you can send DGBs to the same wallet with different addresses generated on the same wallet, and at the rich list people see them at different addresses, even though they are at the same wallet.
Sorry for the confusion YC, I totally misunderstood what you meant and lead to a slightly different topic, which is clarified above.
Best,
Halin
Yes, because it is a network and each transaction counts differently regardless of the wallet, due to the block-chain nature.
April 06, 2015, 08:03:07 AM
I appreciate the list, but so much changes so frequently. Something perceived a top wallet may not be in a short period of time. Distribution is a bit skewed.
YC
YC
Ow enough to get in the list haha but i dont care..It's just a list. Thats it.
How so? You don't have a lot in there?
YC
YC
You are correct. I suppose folks are still interested in a distribution of the coin, but not sure it's a very accurate assessment anyways.
YC
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
Missing 1 of my wallets in the list. YC
H,
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
April 06, 2015, 08:01:46 AM
Ow enough to get in the list haha but i dont care..It's just a list. Thats it.
How so? You don't have a lot in there?
YC
YC
You are correct. I suppose folks are still interested in a distribution of the coin, but not sure it's a very accurate assessment anyways.
YC
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
Missing 1 of my wallets in the list. YC
H,
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
April 06, 2015, 07:58:57 AM
How so? You don't have a lot in there?
YC
YC
You are correct. I suppose folks are still interested in a distribution of the coin, but not sure it's a very accurate assessment anyways.
YC
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
Missing 1 of my wallets in the list. YC
H,
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
April 06, 2015, 07:57:57 AM
You are correct. I suppose folks are still interested in a distribution of the coin, but not sure it's a very accurate assessment anyways.
YC
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
Missing 1 of my wallets in the list. YC
H,
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
April 06, 2015, 07:56:47 AM
One further clarification. If the DGB are transferring within addresses on your wallet, you do not have to send them to an exchange first correct? Sorry for the silly questions. Bit of a noob.
YC
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
Yes, exactly. Once a transaction made to an address, that address shows on the blockchain and in the rich list. Block chain does not care about if they are in the same wallet or not... The main thing is the address. So you can send DGBs to the same wallet with different addresses generated on the same wallet, and at the rich list people see them at different addresses, even though they are at the same wallet.
Sorry for the confusion YC, I totally misunderstood what you meant and lead to a slightly different topic, which is clarified above.
Best,
Halin
YC
H,
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
Yes, exactly. Once a transaction made to an address, that address shows on the blockchain and in the rich list. Block chain does not care about if they are in the same wallet or not... The main thing is the address. So you can send DGBs to the same wallet with different addresses generated on the same wallet, and at the rich list people see them at different addresses, even though they are at the same wallet.
Sorry for the confusion YC, I totally misunderstood what you meant and lead to a slightly different topic, which is clarified above.
Best,
Halin
April 06, 2015, 07:54:10 AM
You are correct. I suppose folks are still interested in a distribution of the coin, but not sure it's a very accurate assessment anyways.
YC
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
YC
H,
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
April 06, 2015, 07:52:53 AM
H,
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
Yes, exactly. Once a transaction made to an address, that address shows on the blockchain and in the rich list. Block chain does not care about if they are in the same wallet or not... The main thing is the address. So you can send DGBs to the same wallet with different addresses generated on the same wallet, and at the rich list people see them at different addresses, even though they are at the same wallet.
Sorry for the confusion YC, I totally misunderstood what you meant and lead to a slightly different topic, which is clarified above.
Best,
Halin
April 06, 2015, 07:41:21 AM
H,
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
Multiple addresses in the same wallet will not show up all as one in the richlist. This is the main reason why a richlist is nothing more than a 'high score' list for bragging rights. (My wallet has multiple addresses that I've used for different mining pools so I can keep track of how much each pool has made.)
If you have multiple addresses in your wallet, you would need to send all of the coins in your wallet to one of your addresses, that way they would all show up in the richlist as one address.
April 06, 2015, 07:31:34 AM
@Jared there is a translatorhttps://bitcointalksearch.org/user/franckuestein-225121for spanish that contact you but you don't give them response can you check your pm?
Spanish section on the DigiByte website is kind of important in my opinion:)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/translation-service-englishespanolspanish-1009433
Spanish section on the DigiByte website is kind of important in my opinion:)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/translation-service-englishespanolspanish-1009433
April 06, 2015, 07:02:01 AM
Samos,
Thank you for the feedback. I will attempt to try this. Was not possible before as the wallet generated an error.
YC
Yes you can, I do it all the time with my mining wallet, only have small hash rate and otherwise too many inputs creates a hassle trying to send them elsewhere.
Thank you for the feedback. I will attempt to try this. Was not possible before as the wallet generated an error.
YC
It's definitely possible to create multiple addresses on one wallet, but once done, can you take DGB from Address 1 and send it to Address 2 within the same wallet?
YC
No, not with the recent wallets. But I keep them in different computers with different wallets, even with a virtual machine as well. I divided them into 4-5 and also a small amount at the exchanges. Even, I cannot know the full amount right now
I have always used the same one address in those different wallets. Someone else might help you.
Update: I have just successfully created multiple DGB addresses on one wallet of Ubuntu version.
YC
That seems to generate an error in the wallet. Have you been able to do that?
YC
I think, since the block chain is created over transactions, if you create a new address and send to it, then it must be recorded in the rich list with the new address, even though all DGBs you sent is in the same wallet. That is my plausible guess, anybody ?
YC
For you folks that are larger holders of DGB, how are you splitting it with multiple addresses? Does the wallet allow you to send DGB within addresses when they are already in your wallet? I thought that capability was not there.
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
I think, since the block chain is created over transactions, if you create a new address and send to it, then it must be recorded in the rich list with the new address, even though all DGBs you sent is in the same wallet. That is my plausible guess, anybody ?
No, not with the recent wallets. But I keep them in different computers with different wallets, even with a virtual machine as well. I divided them into 4-5 and also a small amount at the exchanges. Even, I cannot know the full amount right now
I have always used the same one address in those different wallets. Someone else might help you.Update: I have just successfully created multiple DGB addresses on one wallet of Ubuntu version.
Yes you can, I do it all the time with my mining wallet, only have small hash rate and otherwise too many inputs creates a hassle trying to send them elsewhere.
April 06, 2015, 06:14:40 AM
It's definitely possible to create multiple addresses on one wallet, but once done, can you take DGB from Address 1 and send it to Address 2 within the same wallet?
YC
No, not with the recent wallets. But I keep them in different computers with different wallets, even with a virtual machine as well. I divided them into 4-5 and also a small amount at the exchanges. Even, I cannot know the full amount right now I have always used the same one address in those different wallets. Someone else might help you.
Update: I have just successfully created multiple DGB addresses on one wallet of Ubuntu version.
YC
That seems to generate an error in the wallet. Have you been able to do that?
YC
I think, since the block chain is created over transactions, if you create a new address and send to it, then it must be recorded in the rich list with the new address, even though all DGBs you sent is in the same wallet. That is my plausible guess, anybody ?
YC
For you folks that are larger holders of DGB, how are you splitting it with multiple addresses? Does the wallet allow you to send DGB within addresses when they are already in your wallet? I thought that capability was not there.
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
I think, since the block chain is created over transactions, if you create a new address and send to it, then it must be recorded in the rich list with the new address, even though all DGBs you sent is in the same wallet. That is my plausible guess, anybody ?
No, not with the recent wallets. But I keep them in different computers with different wallets, even with a virtual machine as well. I divided them into 4-5 and also a small amount at the exchanges. Even, I cannot know the full amount right now
I have always used the same one address in those different wallets. Someone else might help you.Update: I have just successfully created multiple DGB addresses on one wallet of Ubuntu version.
April 06, 2015, 06:12:04 AM
H,
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
No, not with the recent wallets. But I keep them in different computers with different wallets, even with a virtual machine as well. I divided them into 4-5 and also a small amount at the exchanges. Even, I cannot know the full amount right now I have always used the same one address in those different wallets. Someone else might help you.
Update: I have just successfully created multiple DGB addresses on one wallet of Ubuntu version.
So let me understand something. If you have multiple addresses in one wallet, will it still look like 1 wallet? I thought that was the purpose of using multiple wallet addresses to make the amounts look spread out more efficiently.
A bit confused.
That seems to generate an error in the wallet. Have you been able to do that?
YC
I think, since the block chain is created over transactions, if you create a new address and send to it, then it must be recorded in the rich list with the new address, even though all DGBs you sent is in the same wallet. That is my plausible guess, anybody ?
YC
For you folks that are larger holders of DGB, how are you splitting it with multiple addresses? Does the wallet allow you to send DGB within addresses when they are already in your wallet? I thought that capability was not there.
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
I think, since the block chain is created over transactions, if you create a new address and send to it, then it must be recorded in the rich list with the new address, even though all DGBs you sent is in the same wallet. That is my plausible guess, anybody ?
No, not with the recent wallets. But I keep them in different computers with different wallets, even with a virtual machine as well. I divided them into 4-5 and also a small amount at the exchanges. Even, I cannot know the full amount right now
I have always used the same one address in those different wallets. Someone else might help you.Update: I have just successfully created multiple DGB addresses on one wallet of Ubuntu version.
April 06, 2015, 06:08:36 AM
That seems to generate an error in the wallet. Have you been able to do that?
YC
I think, since the block chain is created over transactions, if you create a new address and send to it, then it must be recorded in the rich list with the new address, even though all DGBs you sent is in the same wallet. That is my plausible guess, anybody ?
YC
For you folks that are larger holders of DGB, how are you splitting it with multiple addresses? Does the wallet allow you to send DGB within addresses when they are already in your wallet? I thought that capability was not there.
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
I think, since the block chain is created over transactions, if you create a new address and send to it, then it must be recorded in the rich list with the new address, even though all DGBs you sent is in the same wallet. That is my plausible guess, anybody ?
No, not with the recent wallets. But I keep them in different computers with different wallets, even with a virtual machine as well. I divided them into 4-5 and also a small amount at the exchanges. Even, I cannot know the full amount right now
I have always used the same one address in those different wallets. Someone else might help you.Update: I have just successfully created multiple DGB addresses on one wallet of Ubuntu version.
April 06, 2015, 06:04:57 AM
That seems to generate an error in the wallet. Have you been able to do that?
Thanks Halinyo! I have been watching from the sidelines. You guys are the smart ones so I just learn.
YC
I think, since the block chain is created over transactions, if you create a new address and send to it, then it must be recorded in the rich list with the new address, even though all DGBs you sent is in the same wallet. That is my plausible guess, anybody ?
Thanks Halinyo! I have been watching from the sidelines.
You guys are the smart ones so I just learn.YC
For you folks that are larger holders of DGB, how are you splitting it with multiple addresses? Does the wallet allow you to send DGB within addresses when they are already in your wallet? I thought that capability was not there.
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
I think, since the block chain is created over transactions, if you create a new address and send to it, then it must be recorded in the rich list with the new address, even though all DGBs you sent is in the same wallet. That is my plausible guess, anybody ?
April 06, 2015, 06:01:16 AM
For you folks that are larger holders of DGB, how are you splitting it with multiple addresses? Does the wallet allow you to send DGB within addresses when they are already in your wallet? I thought that capability was not there.
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
I think, since the block chain is created over transactions, if you create a new address and send to it, then it must be recorded in the rich list with that address, even though all DGBs you sent is in the same wallet. That is my plausible guess, anybody ?
PS: I was also thinking the same thing if you were around or not. Have been sometime.
April 06, 2015, 05:55:39 AM
For you folks that are larger holders of DGB, how are you splitting it with multiple addresses? Does the wallet allow you to send DGB within addresses when they are already in your wallet? I thought that capability was not there.
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
24, I am still alive! Thanks for checking up on me. I didn't forget you.
YC
April 06, 2015, 05:48:19 AM
Hello guys, first post after long time, I decide to come back in crypto and i am going to say that i am impressed at the marketing/communication of DigiByte, i can't understand why this coin is so low value, it's certainly one of the most professional alt - coins out there.
one question, does the https://digibytetip.com/ works ok? i did tweet for getting my first DGB and got a reply but i don't see any amount on my balance yet. I am exited just installing my wallet, imagine the excitement when getting some DGB there
Welcome back! To answer your Q. about the tip,Yes they are still updating. Wait a few days and please give a reminder. one question, does the https://digibytetip.com/ works ok? i did tweet for getting my first DGB and got a reply but i don't see any amount on my balance yet. I am exited just installing my wallet, imagine the excitement when getting some DGB there
April 06, 2015, 05:38:49 AM
is there like a pool which automatically converts what you mined to digibyte?
i only have 280x so i want to mine at x11 x13 or something that asics cant. is there also an algo for cpu?
there is a pool that i mine x11 coins. start uro and cannabis but the site automatically converts it to syscoin which has scrypt algo
i only have 280x so i want to mine at x11 x13 or something that asics cant. is there also an algo for cpu?
there is a pool that i mine x11 coins. start uro and cannabis but the site automatically converts it to syscoin which has scrypt algo
I think your profitability is highest mining DGB directly (even better than mining an x11 or x13 coin and then converting). I recommend the groestl algo. You can find pools on the OP and there's detailed info about setting up the best miner and configuration here and here. Give it a try and let us know.
Jump to: