Only available in countries beginning with A apparently. https://www.goabra.com/home.html#get_abra
It's an interesting model, I guess. Tailored to the 'transitional market' and tied to the dollar.
Not doing anything better than DGB community could if we wanted with DigiByte.
Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 929. (Read 3058816 times)
March 30, 2015, 07:03:38 PM
March 30, 2015, 06:26:53 PM
Is anyone using the Linux wallet, specifically on Ubuntu? It takes forever to sync for the first time? There is no bootstrap.dat file for Linux? There are still shared library issues, and it can only be run from the command line prompt?
Your help and feedback will be much appreciated.
BTW, someone, thank you for "scanning and tipping". Great fun, isn't it?
March 30, 2015, 05:30:41 PM
Seems like the inflation is becoming a bit of problem again. Any thoughts on that?
If the inflation rate does not match along with the development rate, that is becoming a bit of problem.
Not too bad though, just starting a debate to learn something from you all. Cheers.
If the inflation rate does not match along with the development rate, that is becoming a bit of problem.
Not too bad though, just starting a debate to learn something from you all. Cheers.
March 30, 2015, 04:05:55 PM
March 30, 2015, 12:58:29 PM
I have completed my research from page 1 to page 771 of this thread. After reading from other sources, I will then begin the first draft of the book. I feel very proud of the work I have already done 
Really looking forward reading this book!One question, Did you buy Digibyte after reading all these pages?
March 30, 2015, 08:25:47 AM
Quote
Be careful with Cryptsy. Cryptsy, although being 'headquartered' in Florida, is not a U.S. based company. It is based in Belize. I know I have highly recommended Cryptsy in the past, but I was missing this "small" detail. I still recommend Cryptsy, but I use Bittrex indistinctly and can say that the product and service are certainly on par. Either way, as I've always said, be very careful with any funds you have in the hands of third parties online.
You are missing one critical piece of information I'm afraid but not so evident.
Belize is a tax haven for many Americans and companies... so I wouldn't jump to that conclusion yet.
They also aren't bound to bend over for American laws since it's a foreign corporation.
Many companies put their assets under tax havens like Panama but in thsi case, Cryptsy would Incorporate in Belize to evade the Patriot Act also.
March 30, 2015, 07:15:46 AM
I have completed my research from page 1 to page 771 of this thread. After reading from other sources, I will then begin the first draft of the book. I feel very proud of the work I have already done
March 30, 2015, 03:25:45 AM
I always tried to stay away from coins I do not know the source and it has always worked out for me, but yes I got lucky in a few of them.
However, I have to say it, Bittrex is such an exchange I will never trust... Actually, most of them have similar attitude...
Listing a coin and delisting them after a short period of time.... That is questionable... I have doubts on those owners..
My suggestion is that never leave any of your long term coins over this exchange...
My suggestion is to use cryptsy, coz if they add a coin, they delist it if the coin really has a corrupted wallet and no more interest at all...
I think it should be the way it is, and this way is more sincere... It is not like Bittrex, saying lets move forward we made enough money, lets delete them...
So be careful... you are warned. Most of you already know it, but for those of you dont know about it, now you know it...
I also believe Bittrex is not long term, it will be gone sometime, only dont know when, with their current operating strategy...
However, I have to say it, Bittrex is such an exchange I will never trust... Actually, most of them have similar attitude...
Listing a coin and delisting them after a short period of time.... That is questionable... I have doubts on those owners..
My suggestion is that never leave any of your long term coins over this exchange...
My suggestion is to use cryptsy, coz if they add a coin, they delist it if the coin really has a corrupted wallet and no more interest at all...
I think it should be the way it is, and this way is more sincere... It is not like Bittrex, saying lets move forward we made enough money, lets delete them...
So be careful... you are warned. Most of you already know it, but for those of you dont know about it, now you know it...
I also believe Bittrex is not long term, it will be gone sometime, only dont know when, with their current operating strategy...
Although I agree with your driving points -- that there are some exchanges that appear to be arbitrary and unreasonable about their coin listing policy, I also think the position without direct contact with the exchange in question is prejudicial, arbitrary, and irresponsible especially when you are recommending that they not be used.
Remember, for the most part, it is the coin community that is driving the motion to be listed at the exchange, they are essentially petitioning the exchange to list their coin because they want to trade there; or that is the face of the argument. But in reality for most CC communities they primarily want to be listed because it often has a positive effect on the value of the coin. Sometimes, many flock to a recently added exchanges to give the impression of great excitement for the coin only for that excitement to wane to unsustainable levels on the exchange even if there were no other CC communities banging down the exchange's doors begging for inclusion and promising that their community would be far more appreciative and supportive of inclusion.
The bottom-line is neither side is perfect, however both sides could be reasonable, but for that to happen there should be dialogue. This is a reason for coin foundations and community leadership to speak the will of the people with a single voice.
As for Cryptsy, I used to love to trade there even when their rate was .25%, while poloniex was .2%, and mintpal (when it was owned by the good guys) was only .15%. I used Cryptsy because they appeared to have the most selection, and the best net deals. I say 'net deals' because I factor in the higher exchange rate, higher withdrawal fees, and the cost of my time to babysit transactions. However, when Cryptsy instituted their sliding scale that turned me away. If the fee is higher than .25 I don't trade regardless of the net deal. I discussed this problem with both sides (Cryptsy and CC community) but the community didn't substantially increase volume to warrant lower fees in Cryptsy's eyes and Cryptsy wasn't willing to grant an exception to policy waiver; as a result overall trade volume of the subject coin there has decreased dramatically.
Before you make rash decisions try to create win-win deals in this way everyone is happy or at least satisfied.
I used to get pissed at what I thought was unfair delisting practices until I reached out to the exchanges and asking why?
Cryptsy's fees are .25% for DGB trades? And, 1 DGB for withdrawals? If you have a verified account, and you place a "maker" order, you don't pay fees for that trade. I'm not sure if I misinterpreted your argument, or if we're just not on the same page here?
I don't follow CEX.io. So, I can't be 100% sure about the fact that Cryptsy has the absolute highest volume of DGB trade ... but, I'm pretty sure they do. Generally, the daily DGB volume at Cryptsy is several times the volume at other exchanges. That's a benefit to traders (buyers and sellers). Markets are - by definition - the places that put buyers and sellers together. The more buyers or sellers, the more opportunity (liquidity) for exchange. There aren't many examples of brokerage firms in digital currency (shapeshift is a good example - but there aren't many others). Most of us trade on open exchanges. Because all the exchanges have the same order precedence rules, the only issues are fees, security, and liquidity (and obviously individual bias). If a trader is churning (lots of small ping-pong bot trades), then they might strongly prefer an exchange with lower fees. But, in the end, opportunity and risk are cousins with trading and exchanges. We always pay for both. I do not like Cryptsy. That's silly. And, I don't dislike Cryptsy. That's silly too ... There's nothing to like or dislike. it's a marketplace ... it's numbers, and orders, and opportunity, and risk. I trade where I have the lowest opportunity costs and the least risk.
Eventually, I think the digital currency markets will probably have to consolidate a bit. There will be lots of pressure on U.S. exchanges (i.e. Cryptsy) in the coming year as major brokerage firms (Wall Street) come online. I think it's likely that over the next 5 years we'll see many exchanges transform into brokerage companies and large exchanges emerge (likely based on geography/national currency to deal with minor differences in regulation and currency exchange). It's easier for people in China to trade with a Chinese exchange, that's why we have different stock markets in different countries. I understand your points about using exchanges as marketing ... for the past couple of years, people have associated more exchanges with broader adoption and short term news-related price increases. But, more exchanges technically doesn't provide more liquidity or opportunity, it just fragments the marketplace. In my opinion, the best thing for DGB would be strong consolidated volumes in several national markets (euro, GBP, Yuan, USD, etc.). Regardless of where or how you trade, I hope all of you have success with your DGB trading. I'm really looking forward to the DGB exchange; I think that will have some really great opportunities associated with it.
I wouldn't be too worried about Bittrex. CryptoRaver did well to advise us of the delistings, but those delistings don't suggest any potential problem with Bittrex, at least not in my view. If anything, those delistings should reflect positively on Bittrex since the delisting of shit coins can only help to make Bittrex look even more serious.
Be careful with Cryptsy. Cryptsy, although being 'headquartered' in Florida, is not a U.S. based company. It is based in Belize. I know I have highly recommended Cryptsy in the past, but I was missing this "small" detail. I still recommend Cryptsy, but I use Bittrex indistinctly and can say that the product and service are certainly on par. Either way, as I've always said, be very careful with any funds you have in the hands of third parties online.
http://asistec-ti.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=20&p=122#p122
March 30, 2015, 03:24:33 AM
i installed the android wallet to store mined coins from ispace pool. i transfered the coins to the wallet and they never showed up.
is the android wallet bad?
is the android wallet bad?
Please post transaction details.
its not the wallet. after further looking it is the pool. official pool paid in fine
March 30, 2015, 03:00:48 AM
i installed the android wallet to store mined coins from ispace pool. i transfered the coins to the wallet and they never showed up.
is the android wallet bad?
is the android wallet bad?
Please post transaction details.
March 30, 2015, 02:10:46 AM
i installed the android wallet to store mined coins from ispace pool. i transfered the coins to the wallet and they never showed up.
is the android wallet bad?
is the android wallet bad?
March 29, 2015, 11:19:25 PM
I always tried to stay away from coins I do not know the source and it has always worked out for me, but yes I got lucky in a few of them.
However, I have to say it, Bittrex is such an exchange I will never trust... Actually, most of them have similar attitude...
Listing a coin and delisting them after a short period of time.... That is questionable... I have doubts on those owners..
My suggestion is that never leave any of your long term coins over this exchange...
My suggestion is to use cryptsy, coz if they add a coin, they delist it if the coin really has a corrupted wallet and no more interest at all...
I think it should be the way it is, and this way is more sincere... It is not like Bittrex, saying lets move forward we made enough money, lets delete them...
So be careful... you are warned. Most of you already know it, but for those of you dont know about it, now you know it...
I also believe Bittrex is not long term, it will be gone sometime, only dont know when, with their current operating strategy...
However, I have to say it, Bittrex is such an exchange I will never trust... Actually, most of them have similar attitude...
Listing a coin and delisting them after a short period of time.... That is questionable... I have doubts on those owners..
My suggestion is that never leave any of your long term coins over this exchange...
My suggestion is to use cryptsy, coz if they add a coin, they delist it if the coin really has a corrupted wallet and no more interest at all...
I think it should be the way it is, and this way is more sincere... It is not like Bittrex, saying lets move forward we made enough money, lets delete them...
So be careful... you are warned. Most of you already know it, but for those of you dont know about it, now you know it...
I also believe Bittrex is not long term, it will be gone sometime, only dont know when, with their current operating strategy...
Although I agree with your driving points -- that there are some exchanges that appear to be arbitrary and unreasonable about their coin listing policy, I also think the position without direct contact with the exchange in question is prejudicial, arbitrary, and irresponsible especially when you are recommending that they not be used.
Remember, for the most part, it is the coin community that is driving the motion to be listed at the exchange, they are essentially petitioning the exchange to list their coin because they want to trade there; or that is the face of the argument. But in reality for most CC communities they primarily want to be listed because it often has a positive effect on the value of the coin. Sometimes, many flock to a recently added exchanges to give the impression of great excitement for the coin only for that excitement to wane to unsustainable levels on the exchange even if there were no other CC communities banging down the exchange's doors begging for inclusion and promising that their community would be far more appreciative and supportive of inclusion.
The bottom-line is neither side is perfect, however both sides could be reasonable, but for that to happen there should be dialogue. This is a reason for coin foundations and community leadership to speak the will of the people with a single voice.
As for Cryptsy, I used to love to trade there even when their rate was .25%, while poloniex was .2%, and mintpal (when it was owned by the good guys) was only .15%. I used Cryptsy because they appeared to have the most selection, and the best net deals. I say 'net deals' because I factor in the higher exchange rate, higher withdrawal fees, and the cost of my time to babysit transactions. However, when Cryptsy instituted their sliding scale that turned me away. If the fee is higher than .25 I don't trade regardless of the net deal. I discussed this problem with both sides (Cryptsy and CC community) but the community didn't substantially increase volume to warrant lower fees in Cryptsy's eyes and Cryptsy wasn't willing to grant an exception to policy waiver; as a result overall trade volume of the subject coin there has decreased dramatically.
Before you make rash decisions try to create win-win deals in this way everyone is happy or at least satisfied.
I used to get pissed at what I thought was unfair delisting practices until I reached out to the exchanges and asking why?
Cryptsy's fees are .25% for DGB trades? And, 1 DGB for withdrawals? If you have a verified account, and you place a "maker" order, you don't pay fees for that trade. I'm not sure if I misinterpreted your argument, or if we're just not on the same page here?
I don't follow CEX.io. So, I can't be 100% sure about the fact that Cryptsy has the absolute highest volume of DGB trade ... but, I'm pretty sure they do. Generally, the daily DGB volume at Cryptsy is several times the volume at other exchanges. That's a benefit to traders (buyers and sellers). Markets are - by definition - the places that put buyers and sellers together. The more buyers or sellers, the more opportunity (liquidity) for exchange. There aren't many examples of brokerage firms in digital currency (shapeshift is a good example - but there aren't many others). Most of us trade on open exchanges. Because all the exchanges have the same order precedence rules, the only issues are fees, security, and liquidity (and obviously individual bias). If a trader is churning (lots of small ping-pong bot trades), then they might strongly prefer an exchange with lower fees. But, in the end, opportunity and risk are cousins with trading and exchanges. We always pay for both. I do not like Cryptsy. That's silly. And, I don't dislike Cryptsy. That's silly too ... There's nothing to like or dislike. it's a marketplace ... it's numbers, and orders, and opportunity, and risk. I trade where I have the lowest opportunity costs and the least risk.
Eventually, I think the digital currency markets will probably have to consolidate a bit. There will be lots of pressure on U.S. exchanges (i.e. Cryptsy) in the coming year as major brokerage firms (Wall Street) come online. I think it's likely that over the next 5 years we'll see many exchanges transform into brokerage companies and large exchanges emerge (likely based on geography/national currency to deal with minor differences in regulation and currency exchange). It's easier for people in China to trade with a Chinese exchange, that's why we have different stock markets in different countries. I understand your points about using exchanges as marketing ... for the past couple of years, people have associated more exchanges with broader adoption and short term news-related price increases. But, more exchanges technically doesn't provide more liquidity or opportunity, it just fragments the marketplace. In my opinion, the best thing for DGB would be strong consolidated volumes in several national markets (euro, GBP, Yuan, USD, etc.). Regardless of where or how you trade, I hope all of you have success with your DGB trading. I'm really looking forward to the DGB exchange; I think that will have some really great opportunities associated with it.
March 29, 2015, 04:18:08 PM
Scan this!
How about this for an avatar?
March 29, 2015, 11:53:20 AM
Anybody would like to buy DigiByte in Bulk (over 20m at least), please pm.
Unfortunately, I have to sell some but do not want to sell over exchanges...
Thanks.
Unfortunately, I have to sell some but do not want to sell over exchanges...
Thanks.
March 29, 2015, 11:48:46 AM
BITTREX Coin Removal Announcement
Thank you for using bittrex.com.
We will be removing the following wallets on April 1st, 2015. Once removed, we will not be able to retrieve your funds.
Please remove all coins ASAP. Note, that some of these coins have broken blockchains where we will not be able to send coins.
We have flagged and warned on these wallets for at least 30 days and no exceptions will be made once the wallets are removed.
Symbol
Coin Name
CETI Cetuscoin
XPC PorkCoin
XSP PoolStamp
2015 Twenty15
SBIT SquareBit
GMC GamerCoin
DS DarkSwift
MEWN MewnCoin
MOB MobCoin
DP DigitalPrice
ETD EthereumDark
ONE 1Coin
DANK DarkKush
WSTL WhistleCoin
GHOST GhostCoin
XCLD XCloudCoin
MLS MozzShare
XCASH XCash
RIPO RipoffCoin
JUDGE JudgeCoin
XXX XXXCoin
ISR IsraelCoin
If you have coins in these wallets, please remove them by that date. Coin retreival after the removal date will not be possible.
Thank you for your time and for trading at bittrex.com!
Best regards,
Bittrex Team
Thank you for using bittrex.com.
We will be removing the following wallets on April 1st, 2015. Once removed, we will not be able to retrieve your funds.
Please remove all coins ASAP. Note, that some of these coins have broken blockchains where we will not be able to send coins.
We have flagged and warned on these wallets for at least 30 days and no exceptions will be made once the wallets are removed.
Symbol
Coin Name
CETI Cetuscoin
XPC PorkCoin
XSP PoolStamp
2015 Twenty15
SBIT SquareBit
GMC GamerCoin
DS DarkSwift
MEWN MewnCoin
MOB MobCoin
DP DigitalPrice
ETD EthereumDark
ONE 1Coin
DANK DarkKush
WSTL WhistleCoin
GHOST GhostCoin
XCLD XCloudCoin
MLS MozzShare
XCASH XCash
RIPO RipoffCoin
JUDGE JudgeCoin
XXX XXXCoin
ISR IsraelCoin
If you have coins in these wallets, please remove them by that date. Coin retreival after the removal date will not be possible.
Thank you for your time and for trading at bittrex.com!
Best regards,
Bittrex Team
I always tried to stay away from coins I do not know the source and it has always worked out for me, but yes I got lucky in a few of them.
However, I have to say it, Bittrex is such an exchange I will never trust... Actually, most of them have similar attitude...
Listing a coin and delisting them after a short period of time.... That is questionable... I have doubts on those owners..
My suggestion is that never leave any of your long term coins over this exchange...
My suggestion is to use cryptsy, coz if they add a coin, they delist it if the coin really has a corrupted wallet and no more interest at all...
I think it should be the way it is, and this way is more sincere... It is not like Bittrex, saying lets move forward we made enough money, lets delete them...
So be careful... you are warned. Most of you already know it, but for those of you dont know about it, now you know it...
I also believe Bittrex is not long term, it will be gone sometime, only dont know when, with their current operating strategy...
March 29, 2015, 09:11:03 AM
The Japanese in this (last line) is incorrect. It should read:
ここで受け取ります
I think having international ones is good, but perhaps they could be made separate so that merchants can choose the one for the country in which they are selling. Paypal does the same kind of customization for what credit cards are accepted on their logo images.
Are you Japanese?
You are not wrong, but it seems like your suggestion is a full sentence and it means like "receive" more than accept. I think the one in the Logo is already good enough for Japanese...
The one in the logo is informal Japanese and the suggestion if more formal Japanese. It has been a long time since I lived in Japan. I don't know how put off Japanese would be by having something informal written on a sign like that.
sorry for the late reply, not sure if this is even an issue anymore, but in any case the original is missing ”る” at the end. Without that it sounds rather rude to be honest. If the target is mainstream adoption, polite is always the way to go in Japan...this is a message for a store's customers remember.
I'm not Japanese national but I've lived here for 15 years
March 29, 2015, 08:17:36 AM
I have now only got December 2014 and the beginning of January 2015 to read through (pages 703-774). Before I read through December on this thread, please could people write down their Top 5 events in December 2014.
December 10th, 2014: MultiShield hardfork at block 400,000. DigiByte deploys & executes its third hard fork to improve network performance alongside a reward reduction to extend DigiByte production to 21 years.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9746630
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9798549
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9816577
Yes
I have noted down those events today. On page 726 at the moment. March 29, 2015, 07:11:53 AM
BITTREX Coin Removal Announcement
Thank you for using bittrex.com.
We will be removing the following wallets on April 1st, 2015. Once removed, we will not be able to retrieve your funds.
Please remove all coins ASAP. Note, that some of these coins have broken blockchains where we will not be able to send coins.
We have flagged and warned on these wallets for at least 30 days and no exceptions will be made once the wallets are removed.
Symbol
Coin Name
CETI Cetuscoin
XPC PorkCoin
XSP PoolStamp
2015 Twenty15
SBIT SquareBit
GMC GamerCoin
DS DarkSwift
MEWN MewnCoin
MOB MobCoin
DP DigitalPrice
ETD EthereumDark
ONE 1Coin
DANK DarkKush
WSTL WhistleCoin
GHOST GhostCoin
XCLD XCloudCoin
MLS MozzShare
XCASH XCash
RIPO RipoffCoin
JUDGE JudgeCoin
XXX XXXCoin
ISR IsraelCoin
If you have coins in these wallets, please remove them by that date. Coin retreival after the removal date will not be possible.
Thank you for your time and for trading at bittrex.com!
Best regards,
Bittrex Team
Thank you for using bittrex.com.
We will be removing the following wallets on April 1st, 2015. Once removed, we will not be able to retrieve your funds.
Please remove all coins ASAP. Note, that some of these coins have broken blockchains where we will not be able to send coins.
We have flagged and warned on these wallets for at least 30 days and no exceptions will be made once the wallets are removed.
Symbol
Coin Name
CETI Cetuscoin
XPC PorkCoin
XSP PoolStamp
2015 Twenty15
SBIT SquareBit
GMC GamerCoin
DS DarkSwift
MEWN MewnCoin
MOB MobCoin
DP DigitalPrice
ETD EthereumDark
ONE 1Coin
DANK DarkKush
WSTL WhistleCoin
GHOST GhostCoin
XCLD XCloudCoin
MLS MozzShare
XCASH XCash
RIPO RipoffCoin
JUDGE JudgeCoin
XXX XXXCoin
ISR IsraelCoin
If you have coins in these wallets, please remove them by that date. Coin retreival after the removal date will not be possible.
Thank you for your time and for trading at bittrex.com!
Best regards,
Bittrex Team
March 29, 2015, 04:32:19 AM
official pool down.
fallen over? Jump to: