Hi this is my first post, i've been watchin this forum for a while and started trading alts, mainly digibyte. I have a question i cant find an answer anywhere just hope someone can clear it up. Is the price of an altcoin affected by the price of bitcoin? Or is it like pegged to bitcoin?
yes 
Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 972. (Read 3058888 times)
February 23, 2015, 07:16:48 PM
February 23, 2015, 06:53:58 PM
Hi this is my first post, i've been watchin this forum for a while and started trading alts, mainly digibyte. I have a question i cant find an answer anywhere just hope someone can clear it up. Is the price of an altcoin affected by the price of bitcoin? Or is it like pegged to bitcoin?
February 23, 2015, 05:49:30 PM
Read my post above.
February 23, 2015, 05:34:36 PM
Thanks for testing! So we van say TBF works good 
Note that if you are NOT using a diff multiplier of 1, then your miner will think that some shares aren't good, and will discard them. This is probably the issue, and you'll get paid for only half your hashrate.
Is it --diff1 or -d 1 or ?
Not a clue. SGMiner has --difficulty-multiplier for that option.
Its an AMD pool.
This is really unfair - the ccminer devs remove a necessary feature, and the pool is the bad guy?
for theblocksfactory
Setting difficulty : connect to the stratum server with me.workername_diffxxx (xxx is the difficulty).[NO VARDIFF]
What is xxx is it .002 or 002 or 200 do u put diff.002 or diff002 or diff-.002 or diff2 ? ? ? 5hrs at this. for theblocksfactory
Which miner are you using? Has anyone tried the new Digi miner¿
February 23, 2015, 05:24:11 PM
Thanks mate, theres too many pages already
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/digibytedgb-core-v61651-digishield-digispeed-segwit-408268
February 23, 2015, 05:11:27 PM
Thanks mate, theres too many pages already
February 23, 2015, 05:08:13 PM
February 23, 2015, 05:07:52 PM
Thanks for testing! So we van say TBF works good
Note that if you are NOT using a diff multiplier of 1, then your miner will think that some shares aren't good, and will discard them. This is probably the issue, and you'll get paid for only half your hashrate.
Is it --diff1 or -d 1 or ?
Not a clue. SGMiner has --difficulty-multiplier for that option.
Its an AMD pool.
This is really unfair - the ccminer devs remove a necessary feature, and the pool is the bad guy?
for theblocksfactory
Setting difficulty : connect to the stratum server with me.workername_diffxxx (xxx is the difficulty).[NO VARDIFF]
What is xxx is it .002 or 002 or 200 do u put diff.002 or diff002 or diff-.002 or diff2 ? ? ? 5hrs at this. for theblocksfactory
Which miner are you using? Has anyone tried the new Digi miner¿
New Digi miner? Hashrate on Qubit?
I thought I was the one asking
February 23, 2015, 04:58:38 PM
Thanks for testing! So we van say TBF works good
Note that if you are NOT using a diff multiplier of 1, then your miner will think that some shares aren't good, and will discard them. This is probably the issue, and you'll get paid for only half your hashrate.
Is it --diff1 or -d 1 or ?
Not a clue. SGMiner has --difficulty-multiplier for that option.
Its an AMD pool.
This is really unfair - the ccminer devs remove a necessary feature, and the pool is the bad guy?
for theblocksfactory
Setting difficulty : connect to the stratum server with me.workername_diffxxx (xxx is the difficulty).[NO VARDIFF]
What is xxx is it .002 or 002 or 200 do u put diff.002 or diff002 or diff-.002 or diff2 ? ? ? 5hrs at this. for theblocksfactory
Which miner are you using? Has anyone tried the new Digi miner¿
February 23, 2015, 04:39:51 PM
Thanks for testing! So we van say TBF works good
Note that if you are NOT using a diff multiplier of 1, then your miner will think that some shares aren't good, and will discard them. This is probably the issue, and you'll get paid for only half your hashrate.
Is it --diff1 or -d 1 or ?
Not a clue. SGMiner has --difficulty-multiplier for that option.
Its an AMD pool.
This is really unfair - the ccminer devs remove a necessary feature, and the pool is the bad guy?
No...Im mining it right now ..doing good..but theblocksfactory has a must have command for difficulty that I cant understand. And my mistake ...I was using an older version ..Im using the new one now
for theblocksfactory
Setting difficulty : connect to the stratum server with me.workername_diffxxx (xxx is the difficulty).[NO VARDIFF]
What is xxx is it .002 or 002 or 200 do u put diff.002 or diff002 or diff-.002 or diff2 ? ? ? 5hrs at this. for theblocksfactory
February 23, 2015, 04:08:12 PM
Quote
Ok, devil's advocate here, it won't work. Paid email has been suggested and, in some cases, tried since the Internet was the ARPANET. One immediate problem is users. 25 years ago, there weren't many choices available to communicate online and maybe, just maybe you could have gotten away with it then but as the Internet has grown and communications technology in general has exploded, there are hundreds of ways to communicate for free, or for the illusion of free (texting from phones) that a paid email service would struggle to survive.
I see you all saying how you would welcome it but, think about the logistics involved. How would charges be collected? What email program is capable and what software companies are willing to take on the challange of adding the infrastructure to their software? What happens if Digibyte is used and it's value raises because of it? Competiton would be enormous at first but as soon as someone (Microsoft?) decides free email is better and offers a competing service, we are back to square one.
I run an IT division and we have several spam filters that do a great job of keeping the junk out. Now, consider this, of the 20,000 or so email they process daily, only about 300 to 500 are legitimate! Pretty sad huh? So when you base your argument that the system would help DBG is that really true? Spammers are not going to pay anything, they will find a new way or jump in some loop hole or another to get around it. A couple percent of todays Email worldwide is real, how much money will be changing hands? Factor into this the number of people who will no longer use Email and what do you have left? What kind of volume for the coin associated with it?
Also consider public computers, school computers etc. Are these institutions going to pay for others to use email on their systems? Not likely. Anyway, perhaps, just perhaps, a private email system that people could join MIGHT work but, is the value great enough to entice someone to pay for something that has, and for the most part, always will be free?
Arguments?
I see you all saying how you would welcome it but, think about the logistics involved. How would charges be collected? What email program is capable and what software companies are willing to take on the challange of adding the infrastructure to their software? What happens if Digibyte is used and it's value raises because of it? Competiton would be enormous at first but as soon as someone (Microsoft?) decides free email is better and offers a competing service, we are back to square one.
I run an IT division and we have several spam filters that do a great job of keeping the junk out. Now, consider this, of the 20,000 or so email they process daily, only about 300 to 500 are legitimate! Pretty sad huh? So when you base your argument that the system would help DBG is that really true? Spammers are not going to pay anything, they will find a new way or jump in some loop hole or another to get around it. A couple percent of todays Email worldwide is real, how much money will be changing hands? Factor into this the number of people who will no longer use Email and what do you have left? What kind of volume for the coin associated with it?
Also consider public computers, school computers etc. Are these institutions going to pay for others to use email on their systems? Not likely. Anyway, perhaps, just perhaps, a private email system that people could join MIGHT work but, is the value great enough to entice someone to pay for something that has, and for the most part, always will be free?
Arguments?
I don't think you understand the concept as your arguments seem to completely miss the point.
It would be a bespoke email client. Nobody is suggesting trying to retrofit this to gmail etc.
The people that understand and value such a service will pay. There is no guarantee it will be a success but it is a good idea. I would use it and suspect there are plenty of other people like me. It might not completely replace regular email but if enough people adopt it then it doesn't really matter.
It provides a solution to a problem and is a perfect use for a micro currency. BOTH things that are relevant to DGB.
Yes, I see your point now. I have seen so many of these "we need paid email" ideas I'm kinda blind to anything new. What you said makes sense but, I still think it should be researched before simply jumping in. As with all ideas such as this, there are up and down sides. As long as the "ups" outnumber the "down"s", have at it. I've been in the game since the '80s and every single "killer paid email solution" has failed miserably. Perhaps block chain technology can change that...
February 23, 2015, 03:22:49 PM
I tryed u_.02 but no good
the thing is what does xxx mean .002 or 002 or 100 or ?
the thing is what does xxx mean .002 or 002 or 100 or ?
February 23, 2015, 03:18:02 PM
Thanks for testing! So we van say TBF works good
Note that if you are NOT using a diff multiplier of 1, then your miner will think that some shares aren't good, and will discard them. This is probably the issue, and you'll get paid for only half your hashrate.
Is it --diff1 or -d 1 or ?
Not a clue. SGMiner has --difficulty-multiplier for that option.
PoolUserName.MinerName_diffxxxx - xxx being your difficulty - Works at TBF
You have to use the same technique for an S4 for SHA256 miners.
I believe you should see the actual command line in either pool stats or worker page.
February 23, 2015, 03:10:56 PM
Thanks for testing! So we van say TBF works good
Note that if you are NOT using a diff multiplier of 1, then your miner will think that some shares aren't good, and will discard them. This is probably the issue, and you'll get paid for only half your hashrate.
Is it --diff1 or -d 1 or ?
Not a clue. SGMiner has --difficulty-multiplier for that option.
PoolUserName.MinerName_diffxxxx - xxx being your difficulty - Works at TBF
You have to use the same technique for an S4 for SHA256 miners.
I believe you should see the actual command line in either pool stats or worker page.
February 23, 2015, 03:09:04 PM
Thanks for testing! So we van say TBF works good
Note that if you are NOT using a diff multiplier of 1, then your miner will think that some shares aren't good, and will discard them. This is probably the issue, and you'll get paid for only half your hashrate.
Is it --diff1 or -d 1 or ?
Not a clue. SGMiner has --difficulty-multiplier for that option.
Its an AMD pool.
February 23, 2015, 02:31:49 PM
I think DGB can fly to 1k SAT, if:
1) the news is major!
2) the main holders like myself (I know 6-7 of them holding an average of 100m DGB and more) holds their position.
See you there lol
I really think the main big community holders will hold there core investment for a long time. Even at 1000 sat. 2/3 of my investment will not move anywhere.1) the news is major!
2) the main holders like myself (I know 6-7 of them holding an average of 100m DGB and more) holds their position.
See you there lol
But i'm sure a stabil growth is the best so 1000 sat within a couple of months is not good.
I sort of agree. I don't have more than 100M DGB at the moment. I've been increasing my position. And, I'll keep increasing my position with both purchases, and with mining. I am hoping to be near 100M by the end of the year.
I agree that as the value moves upward, it's going to be important to have strong supporters who remain invested. I don't fully agree that establishing price stability at higher values is dependent only on a few people (whoever they are) holding their investments. At the current levels, 100M is around 2% of the total DGB available. There is always going to be more average liquidity of the market made up of smaller stakeholders than larger ones. I think there will be lots of temptation to take profits (at different levels of price) for many people. I wouldn't even fault them for it. I guess the question is more about how they go about it (an OTC sale wouldn't directly impact the exchange price - a giant market order would). I'll be honest, I have certain price levels that would trigger some profit taking. But, in each of these instances, my profit taking is pretty minimal compared to my total position because I'm still trying to increase the position. As an example, I'd really like to recoup the costs of my mining equipment (and have cash reserves to purchase new mining equipment sometime in the next 12 months).
More than just holding our positions, it's going to be important for all of us (who support DGB) to provide price support and liquidity to the market. The price is determined both by the market and the reserves. There will be multiple challenges that we face as the price increases. For instance, lots of the multi-pools will see people switch (or auto-switch) their mining to DGB. People who mine the most profitable coin - only to mine the most profitable coin - are going to sell as quickly as possible, so we need liquidity and price support to support their volumes. And, that's just one example.
I've considered taking a couple of million DGB and actively trading them to help support the price. Actively like on an almost daily basis. Support the price by placing both buy and sell orders near the market to provide liquidity on both sides. I don't do this at the moment, but it would help stabilize the price if there were high liquidity near the market. Even if we have strong price support, I'm sure there will be plenty of volatility for the foreseeable future.
DGB is working toward breaking the mold of the current conventional wisdom about alt-coins. As they continue to innovate and develop, I think we'll all see both new challenges and great rewards.
February 23, 2015, 02:24:46 PM
Thanks for testing! So we van say TBF works good
Note that if you are NOT using a diff multiplier of 1, then your miner will think that some shares aren't good, and will discard them. This is probably the issue, and you'll get paid for only half your hashrate.
Is it --diff1 or -d 1 or ?
Not a clue. SGMiner has --difficulty-multiplier for that option.
February 23, 2015, 02:11:46 PM
Anyone know the diff multiplier for ccminer plz
February 23, 2015, 02:09:08 PM
Maybe combine hashrates with others having problem?
Im not sure but https://www.miners-pool.eu/#!/pools/digibyte%20-%20qubit had no connect. blocks factory works but at have the hash rate.Hi,
no connection to stratum server ? If not, can you send me a PM with your IP address, I'll check log files.
Thanks
February 23, 2015, 02:03:31 PM
Maybe combine hashrates with others having problem?
Im not sure but https://www.miners-pool.eu/#!/pools/digibyte%20-%20qubit had no connect. blocks factory works but at have the hash rate.Hi,
no connection to stratum server ? If not, can you send me a PM with your IP address, I'll check log files.
Thanks
Jump to: