Pages:
Author

Topic: Digitalcoin Dev ROBBED! - page 20. (Read 26031 times)

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
March 16, 2014, 02:06:51 PM
#67


There's no need for that, I think we all know how well any website will handle 200 gbps and it wouldn't be good.

Someone is attacking CryptoAve which is strange as it's a very new exchange with little volume and probably not many coins in there.

Why would someone do that I wonder ? It's not a high value target.




Hmm, I have to LOL at that pastebin chat log.

Baritus auditing his own code....that makes no sense.

If it's php I can assure you it has a security flaw.

There's a reason Realsolid in all his "assholiness" codes in C++

Maybe later today I will see if I can find the exploit
and unlike Baritus, I will publish all the public address I burn CryptoAve for!


~BCX~

Just fucking do it and stop bellowing out hot air from your hands to your keyboard.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
March 16, 2014, 01:51:39 PM
#66


There's no need for that, I think we all know how well any website will handle 200 gbps and it wouldn't be good.

Someone is attacking CryptoAve which is strange as it's a very new exchange with little volume and probably not many coins in there.

Why would someone do that I wonder ? It's not a high value target.




Hmm, I have to LOL at that pastebin chat log.

Baritus auditing his own code....that makes no sense.

If it's php I can assure you it has a security flaw.

There's a reason Realsolid in all his "assholiness" codes in C++

Maybe later today I will see if I can find the exploit
and unlike Baritus, I will publish all the public address I burn CryptoAve for!


~BCX~

Just fucking do it and stop bellowing out hot air from your hands to your keyboard.
legendary
Activity: 2097
Merit: 1070
March 16, 2014, 11:30:29 AM
#65
Actually it doesn't.

Self proclaimed crypto guru god elite can't secure his own wallet makes no sense at all.

Makes you wonder what things he may "inadvertently" over looked at Crypto Ave.


The only thing that makes sense is there is no legit reason he won't post the public address if this were a true story.


~BCX~


http://pastebin.com/DP6NTuvt



Any who might I ask are you ? A shill for BCX ?

I suspect someone in this conversation is actively attempting but failing to hack into the exchange.

BCX : You've bragged in the past about taking down exchanges, are you attacking CryptoAve now ?



No not me,

But if you like we could see how well it deals with about 200 gbs if you want?


~BCX~

There's no need for that, I think we all know how well any website will handle 200 gbps and it wouldn't be good.

Someone is attacking CryptoAve which is strange as it's a very new exchange with little volume and probably not many coins in there.

Why would someone do that I wonder ? It's not a high value target.

legendary
Activity: 2097
Merit: 1070
March 16, 2014, 11:13:33 AM
#64
He has given a perfectly logical explanation which makes alot more sense than the fairy tales some ppl seem to enjoy telling here.





Actually it doesn't.

Self proclaimed crypto guru god elite can't secure his own wallet makes no sense at all.

Makes you wonder what things he may "inadvertently" over looked at Crypto Ave.


The only thing that makes sense is there is no legit reason he won't post the public address if this were a true story.


~BCX~

http://pastebin.com/DP6NTuvt


Any who might I ask are you ? A shill for BCX ?

I suspect someone in this conversation is actively attempting but failing to hack into the exchange.

BCX : You've bragged in the past about taking down exchanges, are you attacking CryptoAve now ?
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!
March 16, 2014, 11:00:47 AM
#63
Not sure what went on here.
Another case of a 'privliged' individual personally benefiting from the rest of us.
Integrity and the ability to be 'smart' about things are must have traits for any coin developer.
When coins that are run honestly have low value at exchanges and questionable coins have high value it shows
right out in the open.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
March 16, 2014, 10:55:00 AM
#62
There is no motive. Any other month in 2013 would have made more sense. He would be insanely crazy to dump coins at such a low price when it was 30k satoshis only a few weeks earlier.

There's plenty of motives. Maybe he thought the coin was losing value and this was his chance. Maybe he'd been thinking about it for a while but didn't have a plausible cover story.

Saying he didn't have motive is a very weak defence.

Again, conjecture, but there are 101 reasons he might have decided to dump the coins.
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
March 16, 2014, 10:52:15 AM
#61
He has given a perfectly logical explanation which makes alot more sense than the fairy tales some ppl seem to enjoy telling here.





Actually it doesn't.

Self proclaimed crypto guru god elite can't secure his own wallet makes no sense at all.

Makes you wonder what things he may "inadvertently" over looked at Crypto Ave.


The only thing that makes sense is there is no legit reason he won't post the public address if this were a true story.


~BCX~

http://pastebin.com/DP6NTuvt
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001
March 16, 2014, 08:43:26 AM
#60
There is no motive. Any other month in 2013 would have made more sense. He would be insanely crazy to dump coins at such a low price when it was 30k satoshis only a few weeks earlier.

Exactly. Why would any sane person dump like that at current prices unless they stole the coins and didn't care about holding them. Baritus could have sold out ages ago especially when dgc hit 0.0009 BTC a few months ago and many times over if he wanted to anyway. Why would he even bother spending so much time on CryptoAve to then cut and run by dumping a whole heap of dgc now? Its just ridiculous speculation on the part of some. He has given a perfectly logical explanation which makes alot more sense than the fairy tales some ppl seem to enjoy telling here.
Omg, use your imagination. Not saying that any of this is true but these are all possible scenarios:
1. Market manipulation. Dump a large amount of coins, cause a crash and buy them back cheaper
2. He has personal troubles and desperately needs money
3. He lost interest in DGC, sick of waiting for DGC's rise
4. There is a new coin coming
...

1. Anyone but the dev is more likely to try market manipulation. It's way too risky for him. DGC was once down to 3000 satoshis and Baritus knows how hard it was to get the price back up to ten times as high.

2. Good point. Why not just sell 100-200k dgc in small amounts time after time. Noone minds if he needs to liquidate money. He could have just sold and that's his good right. But doing it this way harming your own currency (repeatedly) is a most idotic move.

3. Yeah, that's why he just spent months to code an entire exchange on his own.

4. He puts all his efforts into DGC for a year to drop it like a hot potato?

The only possible reason I see for not to give a transaction id is not wanting future coins and other addresses to be followed, hiding that he might have lots more coins than 500k (which isn't unlikely as price hit a bottom of 3k satoshis a few months back), or protecting his own identity.
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
March 16, 2014, 08:31:44 AM
#59
There is no motive. Any other month in 2013 would have made more sense. He would be insanely crazy to dump coins at such a low price when it was 30k satoshis only a few weeks earlier.

Exactly. Why would any sane person dump like that at current prices unless they stole the coins and didn't care about holding them. Baritus could have sold out ages ago especially when dgc hit 0.0009 BTC a few months ago and many times over if he wanted to anyway. Why would he even bother spending so much time on CryptoAve to then cut and run by dumping a whole heap of dgc now? Its just ridiculous speculation on the part of some. He has given a perfectly logical explanation which makes alot more sense than the fairy tales some ppl seem to enjoy telling here.
Omg, use your imagination. Not saying that any of this is true but these are all possible scenarios:
1. Market manipulation. Dump a large amount of coins, cause a crash and buy them back cheaper
2. He has personal troubles and desperately needs money
3. He lost interest in DGC, sick of waiting for DGC's rise
4. There is a new coin coming
...

5. He did not dump and is just trying to justify the crash.
6. Decided there was no hope for digitalcoin in the sea of altcoins.
hero member
Activity: 968
Merit: 515
March 16, 2014, 07:46:32 AM
#58
There is no motive. Any other month in 2013 would have made more sense. He would be insanely crazy to dump coins at such a low price when it was 30k satoshis only a few weeks earlier.

Exactly. Why would any sane person dump like that at current prices unless they stole the coins and didn't care about holding them. Baritus could have sold out ages ago especially when dgc hit 0.0009 BTC a few months ago and many times over if he wanted to anyway. Why would he even bother spending so much time on CryptoAve to then cut and run by dumping a whole heap of dgc now? Its just ridiculous speculation on the part of some. He has given a perfectly logical explanation which makes alot more sense than the fairy tales some ppl seem to enjoy telling here.
Omg, use your imagination. Not saying that any of this is true but these are all possible scenarios:
1. Market manipulation. Dump a large amount of coins, cause a crash and buy them back cheaper
2. He has personal troubles and desperately needs money
3. He lost interest in DGC, sick of waiting for DGC's rise
4. There is a new coin coming
...
hero member
Activity: 1361
Merit: 506
March 16, 2014, 07:16:55 AM
#57
There is no motive. Any other month in 2013 would have made more sense. He would be insanely crazy to dump coins at such a low price when it was 30k satoshis only a few weeks earlier.

Exactly. Why would any sane person dump like that at current prices unless they stole the coins and didn't care about holding them. Baritus could have sold out ages ago especially when dgc hit 0.0009 BTC a few months ago and many times over if he wanted to anyway. Why would he even bother spending so much time on CryptoAve to then cut and run by dumping a whole heap of dgc now? Its just ridiculous speculation on the part of some. He has given a perfectly logical explanation which makes alot more sense than the fairy tales some ppl seem to enjoy telling here.


member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
March 15, 2014, 10:29:28 PM
#56
Sorry to see both sides tossing insults around.  The question of the public address should be a no-brainer.  I'm a fan of CryptoAve but I would definitely like to see the address given out.  My question is why not?
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001
March 15, 2014, 10:28:52 PM
#55
There is no motive. Any other month in 2013 would have made more sense. He would be insanely crazy to dump coins at such a low price when it was 30k satoshis only a few weeks earlier.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
March 15, 2014, 09:05:36 PM
#54
Lol. Has anyone even asked him to post the address yet? What would it actually show? Someone who knew his private key sent them to another dgc address of his own, then dumping them on the market.

Yes numerous times in several threads and in PM to Batitus.

Posting the address will allow tracking of the coins now and at anytime in the future.

I can assure you, if I have the public address, the thief will not remain anonymous. Baritus knows this well.
He also knows if this is a bullshit story, the public address will also disclose that too really quickly.

I'm predicting since public pressure is mounting on Baritus, the thief is going to have a "sudden change of heart" and return the stolen coins.


~BCX~

Why would he ever reply to your PM?  Your mind is already made up...
well, now he doesn't have to reply to a PM. 
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
March 15, 2014, 09:02:48 PM
#53
Lol. Has anyone even asked him to post the address yet? What would it actually show? Someone who knew his private key sent them to another dgc address of his own, then dumping them on the market.

Yes numerous times in several threads and in PM to Batitus.

Posting the address will allow tracking of the coins now and at anytime in the future.

I can assure you, if I have the public address, the thief will not remain anonymous. Baritus knows this well.
He also knows if this is a bullshit story, the public address will also disclose that too really quickly.

I'm predicting since public pressure is mounting on Baritus, the thief is going to have a "sudden change of heart" and return the stolen coins.


~BCX~

Why would he ever reply to your PM?  Your mind is already made up...
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
March 15, 2014, 07:40:26 PM
#52
What has this guy got to gain by being public that he lost his own personal stash of digital coins?

legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001
March 15, 2014, 07:29:07 PM
#51
Lol. Has anyone even asked him to post the address yet? What would it actually show? Someone who knew his private key sent them to another dgc address of his own, then dumping them on the market.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
March 15, 2014, 07:22:02 PM
#50
Agree with the others, why flip it and attack BCX, when he is addressing legitimate and perfectly reasonable concerns.

As EdwardWitten eloquently put it, the Digitalcoin Dev has the burden of proof. It's up to him to prove the coins were stolen. He hasn't done that.

We're supposed to trust that he didn't dump them himself? Whether he did or didn't is besides the point. Taking someone at their word for that, on these forums?

I don't blame anyone for jumping to conclusions. I won't, for now, but sometimes the naivety on these forums makes me want to bang my head against walls. Tell me, would you trust another person you didn't know not to sell 50 BTC worth of altcoins? (I have no idea how much the DigitalCoins were worth, but just replace the amount of BTC with whatever you consider a large sum of money to be)

The Dev may very well be telling the truth, but you can't get defensive just because people on these forums refuse to take someone at their word alone.
yep, especially over something as simple as asking for the address. I told FreeTrade that exact thing about transparency with memorycoin, and look what happened with that.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
March 15, 2014, 07:04:04 PM
#49
Agree with the others, why flip it and attack BCX, when he is addressing legitimate and perfectly reasonable concerns.

As EdwardWitten eloquently put it, the Digitalcoin Dev has the burden of proof. It's up to him to prove the coins were stolen. He hasn't done that.

We're supposed to trust that he didn't dump them himself? Whether he did or didn't is besides the point. Taking someone at their word for that, on these forums?

I don't blame anyone for jumping to conclusions. I won't, for now, but sometimes the naivety on these forums makes me want to bang my head against walls. Tell me, would you trust another person you didn't know not to sell 50 BTC worth of altcoins? (I have no idea how much the DigitalCoins were worth, but just replace the amount of BTC with whatever you consider a large sum of money to be)

The Dev may very well be telling the truth, but you can't get defensive just because people on these forums refuse to take someone at their word alone.
sr. member
Activity: 265
Merit: 250
March 15, 2014, 06:56:57 PM
#48
Agree with the others, why flip it and attack BCX, when he is addressing legitimate and perfectly reasonable concerns.
Pages:
Jump to: