Pages:
Author

Topic: Discussion about 10,000BTC Bet (Official) - page 2. (Read 104471 times)

full member
Activity: 187
Merit: 100
September 17, 2012, 05:13:14 AM

The fuck are the cops gonna do about it?

The fuck are you gonna do about it else?

Plead and whine at the scammer while assuring him you are not going to the authorities? Fail.

Another question: what harm will do cops do (assuming you aren't involved with this scam)?


Yeah, I must be involved with the scam... derp.  I was merely pointing out that since the entire 'investment' and bet with matthew were made using bitcoin and the US government does not regulate bitcoin, the cops aren't going to do a damn thing about it.  I imagine it would be much like some ten year old kid calling 911 saying that some guy on the internet just stole all his WoW gold, the cop laughing, and then returning to his dunkin's.  You might have luck in a civil lawsuit, but even that is unprecedented. I believe the first bitcoin lawsuit is in litigation atm, and that was for breach of contract. I don't know what the original contract terms were for btcst, if someone could link it that would be helpful.  It seems that I remember someone saying that there was a statement made about high risk, blah blah blah you might lose everything, etc. so I don't think there are grounds for breach of contract.  Please disregard this if there is some glaring error in logic, but it seems air-tight to me.

The glaring errors:

Many things are not regulated, yet theft or fraud involving them is criminal. If someone steals apples worth 100000$, there does not need to be a law regulating the apples.

There have been convictions about game money already.

And last: I never accused you specifically of being involved, I just limited my statement of no harm done to the victims. Curious about how many people claim to be victims, but seem to fear the authorities.

I guess the breach of contract in the btcst cause is about lying about how profits were made, or rather not made, ponzi style.


The difference between apples and currency is that apples are a much less universal representation of value.
Hence you can yield currency in much more powerfull ways than apples and with that power comes a whole lot of new responsibilities.
But when you understand human nature you can understand that most people are not very proficient at using such power responsibly.
Before you know it regulation will seem the only sane way to have a currency system at all.


Granted, apples are a different value store, BUT:

Off topic and strawmen argument. Does not explain at all why bitcoin should be exempt from criminal law regarding theft and fraud.


Asserting bitcoins are a law free zone is really harmful to the bitcoin community. It fosters an environment which invites scammers, and makes life hard for honest competition. So my stance is, everyone rejecting any involvement of authorities under all circumstances is harming the project as much as the scammers do.

 
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
September 16, 2012, 07:35:03 AM

The fuck are the cops gonna do about it?

The fuck are you gonna do about it else?

Plead and whine at the scammer while assuring him you are not going to the authorities? Fail.

Another question: what harm will do cops do (assuming you aren't involved with this scam)?


Yeah, I must be involved with the scam... derp.  I was merely pointing out that since the entire 'investment' and bet with matthew were made using bitcoin and the US government does not regulate bitcoin, the cops aren't going to do a damn thing about it.  I imagine it would be much like some ten year old kid calling 911 saying that some guy on the internet just stole all his WoW gold, the cop laughing, and then returning to his dunkin's.  You might have luck in a civil lawsuit, but even that is unprecedented. I believe the first bitcoin lawsuit is in litigation atm, and that was for breach of contract. I don't know what the original contract terms were for btcst, if someone could link it that would be helpful.  It seems that I remember someone saying that there was a statement made about high risk, blah blah blah you might lose everything, etc. so I don't think there are grounds for breach of contract.  Please disregard this if there is some glaring error in logic, but it seems air-tight to me.

The glaring errors:

Many things are not regulated, yet theft or fraud involving them is criminal. If someone steals apples worth 100000$, there does not need to be a law regulating the apples.

There have been convictions about game money already.

And last: I never accused you specifically of being involved, I just limited my statement of no harm done to the victims. Curious about how many people claim to be victims, but seem to fear the authorities.

I guess the breach of contract in the btcst cause is about lying about how profits were made, or rather not made, ponzi style.


The difference between apples and currency is that apples are a much less universal representation of value.
Hence you can yield currency in much more powerfull ways than apples and with that power comes a whole lot of new responsibilities.
But when you understand human nature you can understand that most people are not very proficient at using such power responsibly.
Before you know it regulation will seem the only sane way to have a currency system at all.
full member
Activity: 187
Merit: 100
September 16, 2012, 07:24:11 AM

The fuck are the cops gonna do about it?

The fuck are you gonna do about it else?

Plead and whine at the scammer while assuring him you are not going to the authorities? Fail.

Another question: what harm will do cops do (assuming you aren't involved with this scam)?


Yeah, I must be involved with the scam... derp.  I was merely pointing out that since the entire 'investment' and bet with matthew were made using bitcoin and the US government does not regulate bitcoin, the cops aren't going to do a damn thing about it.  I imagine it would be much like some ten year old kid calling 911 saying that some guy on the internet just stole all his WoW gold, the cop laughing, and then returning to his dunkin's.  You might have luck in a civil lawsuit, but even that is unprecedented. I believe the first bitcoin lawsuit is in litigation atm, and that was for breach of contract. I don't know what the original contract terms were for btcst, if someone could link it that would be helpful.  It seems that I remember someone saying that there was a statement made about high risk, blah blah blah you might lose everything, etc. so I don't think there are grounds for breach of contract.  Please disregard this if there is some glaring error in logic, but it seems air-tight to me.

The glaring errors:

Many things are not regulated, yet theft or fraud involving them is criminal. If someone steals apples worth 100000$, there does not need to be a law regulating the apples.

There have been convictions about game money already.

And last: I never accused you specifically of being involved, I just limited my statement of no harm done to the victims. Curious about how many people claim to be victims, but seem to fear the authorities.

I guess the breach of contract in the btcst cause is about lying about how profits were made, or rather not made, ponzi style.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035
September 14, 2012, 04:33:33 PM
Honestly, I'm not on that bandwagon.  I have cashed out lots and lots of btc for Amazon Payments, traded with them, and sold some for paypal gifts, etc. so I know that bitcoins have value.  I have 3.3ghash/sec mining away, so I personally know the value of btc and enjoy using and generating the currency.  I was pointing out that it's a very big hurdle to 1)explain to the authorities just exactly what the fuck a bitcoin is and 2) get them to care. Furthermore, I wish you would read the intent of the post instead of pointing out the "it's not real money, no one will care" part.  Nobody gave any guarantees of any return on paper, nobody has any signed contracts from pirate that I know of, and that makes it a sketchy item to prosecute.

Understood. My apologies, and you are right.
full member
Activity: 812
Merit: 108
September 14, 2012, 03:08:30 PM
Now throw into the mix a cryptocurrency that is pseudo-anonymous, unregulated, and not legal tender, and your good luck just flew out the window.  Once again, "waaahhh, the internet guy stole my WoW gold!"

You really need to get off the "it's not real money, so no one will care" bandwagon. Pirate allegedly did something illegal because he claimed a legitimate business, and claimed legitimate investments, while possibly doing something that wasn't legal or legitimate. It really doesn't matter if the investment was made using USD, BTC, or manure. Bottom line is that something of value was taken from others by illegitimate means. That's all the law cares about.

Honestly, I'm not on that bandwagon.  I have cashed out lots and lots of btc for Amazon Payments, traded with them, and sold some for paypal gifts, etc. so I know that bitcoins have value.  I have 3.3ghash/sec mining away, so I personally know the value of btc and enjoy using and generating the currency.  I was pointing out that it's a very big hurdle to 1)explain to the authorities just exactly what the fuck a bitcoin is and 2) get them to care. Furthermore, I wish you would read the intent of the post instead of pointing out the "it's not real money, no one will care" part.  Nobody gave any guarantees of any return on paper, nobody has any signed contracts from pirate that I know of, and that makes it a sketchy item to prosecute.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
September 14, 2012, 02:15:21 PM
Now throw into the mix a cryptocurrency that is pseudo-anonymous, unregulated, and not legal tender, and your good luck just flew out the window.  Once again, "waaahhh, the internet guy stole my WoW gold!"

You really need to get off the "it's not real money, so no one will care" bandwagon. Your SA id is really showing.
+1.  If it has value, then the police and FBI WILL care.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035
September 14, 2012, 02:14:21 PM
Now throw into the mix a cryptocurrency that is pseudo-anonymous, unregulated, and not legal tender, and your good luck just flew out the window.  Once again, "waaahhh, the internet guy stole my WoW gold!"

You really need to get off the "it's not real money, so no one will care" bandwagon. Pirate allegedly did something illegal because he claimed a legitimate business, and claimed legitimate investments, while possibly doing something that wasn't legal or legitimate. It really doesn't matter if the investment was made using USD, BTC, or manure. Bottom line is that something of value was taken from others by illegitimate means. That's all the law cares about.
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
September 14, 2012, 01:26:08 PM
Do you have a receipt for your bitcoin?  Cheesy

Do you have a receipt for your manure? Perhaps you could get the cow to sign an affidavit?
full member
Activity: 812
Merit: 108
September 14, 2012, 01:11:12 PM
Do you have a receipt for your bitcoin?  Cheesy
+1
sr. member
Activity: 272
Merit: 250
Cryptopreneur
September 14, 2012, 01:09:57 PM
Do you have a receipt for your bitcoin?  Cheesy
full member
Activity: 812
Merit: 108
September 14, 2012, 01:08:49 PM
I was merely pointing out that since the entire 'investment' and bet with matthew were made using bitcoin and the US government does not regulate bitcoin, the cops aren't going to do a damn thing about it. 

This has been pointed out many many times before, but you must have missed it:
Are bricks considered money? Does government regulate bricks? If someone happened to steal $5,000,000 worth of bricks, do you think the government would just laugh it off, because it's not money and is not regulated, and will ignore the theft?
Do you think that for anything to be considered legal theft, the item stolen must have government regulations?

And if I 'invest' a million dollars worth of manure or bricks or another analog of your choice into a high risk scheme not knowing how the interest is paid or where the extra manure comes from, do you think the government will do ANYTHING when the shit hits the fan and the person on the receiving end of the deposit goes dark?  The point was this: If someone actually stole money, you could call the cops.  They would do an investigation, and you may or may not get your money back.  If you invest the same money into a legitimate company and they go belly up, you're fucked.  You can call the cops, but they aren't going to be able to get your money back.  If you signed a contract stating that you are knowingly investing in a high risk scheme and that you acknowledge the risk, you're double fucked.  If you hand that same money to a guy on the street who tells you that he will come right back with your original money plus 7 percent a week, but he can't tell you where the 7 percent is coming from or prove to you who he is or where he is located or what business he is in or any number of other questions a prudent investor should ask, then calling the cops when he doesn't come back is going to be, well, good luck with that.  Now throw into the mix a cryptocurrency that is pseudo-anonymous, unregulated, and not legal tender, and your good luck just flew out the window.  Once again, "waaahhh, the internet guy stole my WoW gold!"
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 502
September 14, 2012, 12:50:50 PM
I think this threads got mixed up between the bet and pirate, people are arguing over different things!
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035
September 14, 2012, 12:46:13 PM
I was merely pointing out that since the entire 'investment' and bet with matthew were made using bitcoin and the US government does not regulate bitcoin, the cops aren't going to do a damn thing about it. 

This has been pointed out many many times before, but you must have missed it:
Are bricks considered money? Does government regulate bricks? If someone happened to steal $5,000,000 worth of bricks, do you think the government would just laugh it off, because it's not money and is not regulated, and will ignore the theft?
Do you think that for anything to be considered legal theft, the item stolen must have government regulations?
full member
Activity: 812
Merit: 108
September 14, 2012, 11:42:04 AM

The fuck are the cops gonna do about it?

The fuck are you gonna do about it else?

Plead and whine at the scammer while assuring him you are not going to the authorities? Fail.

Another question: what harm will do cops do (assuming you aren't involved with this scam)?

[/quote]

Yeah, I must be involved with the scam... derp.  I was merely pointing out that since the entire 'investment' and bet with matthew were made using bitcoin and the US government does not regulate bitcoin, the cops aren't going to do a damn thing about it.  I imagine it would be much like some ten year old kid calling 911 saying that some guy on the internet just stole all his WoW gold, the cop laughing, and then returning to his dunkin's.  You might have luck in a civil lawsuit, but even that is unprecedented. I believe the first bitcoin lawsuit is in litigation atm, and that was for breach of contract. I don't know what the original contract terms were for btcst, if someone could link it that would be helpful.  It seems that I remember someone saying that there was a statement made about high risk, blah blah blah you might lose everything, etc. so I don't think there are grounds for breach of contract.  Please disregard this if there is some glaring error in logic, but it seems air-tight to me.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
daytrader/superhero
September 14, 2012, 09:32:36 AM

The fuck are the cops gonna do about it?

The fuck are you gonna do about it else?

Plead and whine at the scammer while assuring him you are not going to the authorities? Fail.

Another question: what harm will do cops do (assuming you aren't involved with this scam)?



First of all, Why did you quote me as saying that?

Secondly, What in the fuck are you talking about?

Either way, pretty sure the cops aren't going to care about a stupid bet made by a bunch of anonymous people online. They have real criminals to chase.


full member
Activity: 187
Merit: 100
September 14, 2012, 08:35:02 AM

The fuck are the cops gonna do about it?

The fuck are you gonna do about it else?

Plead and whine at the scammer while assuring him you are not going to the authorities? Fail.

Another question: what harm will do cops do (assuming you aren't involved with this scam)?

[/quote]
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
September 13, 2012, 11:49:59 PM
Criminal Charges should be a last resort, as that leaves the least chance of getting any money back.

Civil Cases should be tried first and if all else fails and it's clear that we will not see anything back, then we feed him to the Government Agencies.

This won't help. No matter what *you* promise, someone else *will* instigate criminal charges later because it's easy to do. Hence the promise of letting him off easy if he pays back does not work.

A criminal case on the other hand may strengthen it because it basically is free investigation (and maybe intimidation).

Avoiding a criminal case now is a delaying tactic. Is that your agenda?


The fuck are the cops gonna do about it?






good news is since last weeks blackmailer of Mitt Romney demanded to be paid in bitcoins
i think every coffee drinkin do-nut consuming knucklehead on the force will have heard of
BTC by now
Next cop I see, I'm going to ask if he's heard of Bitcoins before.   Wink


hel probably ask you if youve heard of pepper spray before ? Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
September 13, 2012, 11:15:38 PM
Criminal Charges should be a last resort, as that leaves the least chance of getting any money back.

Civil Cases should be tried first and if all else fails and it's clear that we will not see anything back, then we feed him to the Government Agencies.

This won't help. No matter what *you* promise, someone else *will* instigate criminal charges later because it's easy to do. Hence the promise of letting him off easy if he pays back does not work.

A criminal case on the other hand may strengthen it because it basically is free investigation (and maybe intimidation).

Avoiding a criminal case now is a delaying tactic. Is that your agenda?


The fuck are the cops gonna do about it?






good news is since last weeks blackmailer of Mitt Romney demanded to be paid in bitcoins
i think every coffee drinkin do-nut consuming knucklehead on the force will have heard of
BTC by now
Next cop I see, I'm going to ask if he's heard of Bitcoins before.   Wink
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
September 13, 2012, 09:15:40 PM
Criminal Charges should be a last resort, as that leaves the least chance of getting any money back.

Civil Cases should be tried first and if all else fails and it's clear that we will not see anything back, then we feed him to the Government Agencies.

This won't help. No matter what *you* promise, someone else *will* instigate criminal charges later because it's easy to do. Hence the promise of letting him off easy if he pays back does not work.

A criminal case on the other hand may strengthen it because it basically is free investigation (and maybe intimidation).

Avoiding a criminal case now is a delaying tactic. Is that your agenda?


The fuck are the cops gonna do about it?






good news is since last weeks blackmailer of Mitt Romney demanded to be paid in bitcoins
i think every coffee drinkin do-nut consuming knucklehead on the force will have heard of
BTC by now

hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
daytrader/superhero
September 13, 2012, 09:11:16 PM
Criminal Charges should be a last resort, as that leaves the least chance of getting any money back.

Civil Cases should be tried first and if all else fails and it's clear that we will not see anything back, then we feed him to the Government Agencies.

This won't help. No matter what *you* promise, someone else *will* instigate criminal charges later because it's easy to do. Hence the promise of letting him off easy if he pays back does not work.

A criminal case on the other hand may strengthen it because it basically is free investigation (and maybe intimidation).

Avoiding a criminal case now is a delaying tactic. Is that your agenda?


The fuck are the cops gonna do about it?




Pages:
Jump to: