Topic: Do I really have to pay taxes on crypto investments? - page 9. (Read 2483 times)
Petro’s idea is untenable because the state’s economy itself is in extremely poor shape. If the United States launched its own one and made it yield like treasury bonds, then we can confidently say many would like to use their crypto. It’s hard to imagine someone who could launch their crypto with worse results
Of their own free will, yes, people will not choose such currencies, but states have ways of pressure. If pensions, benefits, payments for state. the contracts will be in this centralized state cryptocurrency, many will simply be forced to start using it.
I don’t know why, but today I can imagine the launch of such cryptocurrencies. only in China of course. well, in extreme cases, in Korea.Of their own free will, yes, people will not choose such currencies, but states have ways of pressure. If pensions, benefits, payments for state. the contracts will be in this centralized state cryptocurrency, many will simply be forced to start using it.
I don’t know why, but today I can imagine the launch of such cryptocurrencies. only in China of course. well, in extreme cases, in Korea.Of their own free will, yes, people will not choose such currencies, but states have ways of pressure. If pensions, benefits, payments for state. the contracts will be in this centralized state cryptocurrency, many will simply be forced to start using it.
I don’t know why, but today I can imagine the launch of such cryptocurrencies. only in China of course. well, in extreme cases, in Korea.Of their own free will, yes, people will not choose such currencies, but states have ways of pressure. If pensions, benefits, payments for state. the contracts will be in this centralized state cryptocurrency, many will simply be forced to start using it.
I don’t know why, but today I can imagine the launch of such cryptocurrencies. only in China of course. well, in extreme cases, in Korea.
Of their own free will, yes, people will not choose such currencies, but states have ways of pressure. If pensions, benefits, payments for state. the contracts will be in this centralized state cryptocurrency, many will simply be forced to start using it.
In my opinion, not a single cryptocurrency backed by the government with the ability to return a perfect transaction, selective blocking of unusable addresses, the need to go through the KYC and AML procedures, will have such a widespread worldwide distribution as bitcoin.
we are talking about existing coins, for example, very closely associated with fiat currencies or those that are “secured” by fiat?
So what about them? Purely logical - where there is fiat, there is regulation.
we are talking about existing coins, for example, very closely associated with fiat currencies or those that are “secured” by fiat?
Do you think such centralized coins currently exist?
in China maybe.
Do you think such centralized coins currently exist?
Another question is whether it was laid down in the contract initially, because how to coordinate the work of the new coin with state regulators if there is no such “backdoor” there?
This is a purely terminological issue. I consider cryptocurrency to be any digital currency emitted using cryptographic means. Accordingly,for me a centralized coin can be a cryptocurrency. For those cryptocurrencies that rely on the original ideas of the cryptocurrency community, I prefer to use terms with refinements such as labor cryptocurrency or just crypto. But this is only a question of who uses what terms, it is not so significant. The main thing is a common understanding of the content side of the issue.Another question is whether it was laid down in the contract initially, because how to coordinate the work of the new coin with state regulators if there is no such “backdoor” there?
This is a purely terminological issue. I consider cryptocurrency to be any digital currency emitted using cryptographic means. Accordingly,for me a centralized coin can be a cryptocurrency. For those cryptocurrencies that rely on the original ideas of the cryptocurrency community, I prefer to use terms with refinements such as labor cryptocurrency or just crypto. But this is only a question of who uses what terms, it is not so significant. The main thing is a common understanding of the content side of the issue.
Another question is whether it was laid down in the contract initially, because how to coordinate the work of the new coin with state regulators if there is no such “backdoor” there?
Suppose developers have the right to "freeze" a transaction from any user. And also cancel or block the transaction, and this also applies to everyone. Is it possible to consider that such a coin will be a scam? And the second question - knowing such conditions - what are the risks of using such a coin?
Since such a coin cannot automatically be considered decentralized, the only way for it not to be considered a scam is to be under the tutelage of the sovereignty of one or another power with its judicial and legal system, which would regulate the measure of such actions. In this case, the risks would be commensurate with the traditional for the banking system. Suppose developers have the right to "freeze" a transaction from any user. And also cancel or block the transaction, and this also applies to everyone. Is it possible to consider that such a coin will be a scam? And the second question - knowing such conditions - what are the risks of using such a coin?
Since such a coin cannot automatically be considered decentralized, the only way for it not to be considered a scam is to be under the tutelage of the sovereignty of one or another power with its judicial and legal system, which would regulate the measure of such actions. In this case, the risks would be commensurate with the traditional for the banking system. Suppose developers have the right to "freeze" a transaction from any user. And also cancel or block the transaction, and this also applies to everyone. Is it possible to consider that such a coin will be a scam? And the second question - knowing such conditions - what are the risks of using such a coin?
Since such a coin cannot automatically be considered decentralized, the only way for it not to be considered a scam is to be under the tutelage of the sovereignty of one or another power with its judicial and legal system, which would regulate the measure of such actions. In this case, the risks would be commensurate with the traditional for the banking system. Suppose developers have the right to "freeze" a transaction from any user. And also cancel or block the transaction, and this also applies to everyone. Is it possible to consider that such a coin will be a scam? And the second question - knowing such conditions - what are the risks of using such a coin?
Since such a coin cannot automatically be considered decentralized, the only way for it not to be considered a scam is to be under the tutelage of the sovereignty of one or another power with its judicial and legal system, which would regulate the measure of such actions. In this case, the risks would be commensurate with the traditional for the banking system.
Suppose developers have the right to "freeze" a transaction from any user. And also cancel or block the transaction, and this also applies to everyone. Is it possible to consider that such a coin will be a scam? And the second question - knowing such conditions - what are the risks of using such a coin?
This is theoretically possible, but not every network with a similar situation will cope in the same way as Ether. It’s unrealistic to constantly roll back the entire network to change one record, no one will use such a network of their own free will. This is all in fact a variation of 51%.
I think it’s not quite right to compare with the 51% variety. In order to crank a 51%, it is enough to have mining capacities that seriously exceed the existing ones in this blockchain. It is not necessary to be the developer of the coin itself. Developers have much wider impact functionality. We have not yet seriously faced the fact that someone's wallet was cut out and forbidden to miners to process transfers coming from it. Jump to: