if bitcoin is adopted as the main payment system, this will mean that society is taking the path of self-government, the principle of decentralization is contrary to the formation of monopolies and concentration of financial capital in narrow circles, the state is slowly disappearing, and is dying off.
countries appeared before the advent of money; lowering the level of control over money does not cancel states. Bitcoin may just be a tool to improve the system.
Topic: Do I really have to pay taxes on crypto investments? - page 5. (Read 2483 times)
if bitcoin is adopted as the main payment system, this will mean that society is taking the path of self-government, the principle of decentralization is contrary to the formation of monopolies and concentration of financial capital in narrow circles, the state is slowly disappearing, and is dying off.
countries appeared before the advent of money; lowering the level of control over money does not cancel states. Bitcoin may just be a tool to improve the system.if bitcoin is adopted as the main payment system, this will mean that society is taking the path of self-government, the principle of decentralization is contrary to the formation of monopolies and concentration of financial capital in narrow circles, the state is slowly disappearing, and is dying off.
countries appeared before the advent of money; lowering the level of control over money does not cancel states. Bitcoin may just be a tool to improve the system.
if bitcoin is adopted as the main payment system, this will mean that society is taking the path of self-government, the principle of decentralization is contrary to the formation of monopolies and concentration of financial capital in narrow circles, the state is slowly disappearing, and is dying off.
the implementation of AI solutions at the level of low errors is quite acceptable and may even be desirable if AI shows better results than a person in terms of the number of errors made, if statistically and morally it turns out to be better. A good example is cryptocurrencies, where Bitcoin fully meets such criteria, and many altcoins using the same technology are created as bubble and do not meet such criteria.
Modern Bitcoin would hardly have appeared without blast furnaces, although then it was almost impossible to imagine. Therefore, refusal of control should not be allowed now, until the consequences are visible that may become obvious in the future.
What is the advantage of bitcoin? It is a voluntary choice of each and every user individually. And so it should remain in the future. Because, choosing a vector of development, not only we define what will happen tomorrow, but also what will happen in 100 years.
A great question to expand on. True, already said something like that, but I can once again reveal it. Both the blockchain in general and Bitcoin in particular at the current stage are completely controlled by a person. Updates and hard forks are an example of decentralized human control of the system, because by the decision of the majority the system can be replaced with any other one at all, and the blockchain can not oppose this, because it is just a banal tool for solving a specific problem.
well, as long as the tool works correctly, there is no need to do anything with it, let it work. A great question to expand on. True, already said something like that, but I can once again reveal it. Both the blockchain in general and Bitcoin in particular at the current stage are completely controlled by a person. Updates and hard forks are an example of decentralized human control of the system, because by the decision of the majority the system can be replaced with any other one at all, and the blockchain can not oppose this, because it is just a banal tool for solving a specific problem.
well, as long as the tool works correctly, there is no need to do anything with it, let it work. A great question to expand on. True, already said something like that, but I can once again reveal it. Both the blockchain in general and Bitcoin in particular at the current stage are completely controlled by a person. Updates and hard forks are an example of decentralized human control of the system, because by the decision of the majority the system can be replaced with any other one at all, and the blockchain can not oppose this, because it is just a banal tool for solving a specific problem.
well, as long as the tool works correctly, there is no need to do anything with it, let it work. A great question to expand on. True, already said something like that, but I can once again reveal it. Both the blockchain in general and Bitcoin in particular at the current stage are completely controlled by a person. Updates and hard forks are an example of decentralized human control of the system, because by the decision of the majority the system can be replaced with any other one at all, and the blockchain can not oppose this, because it is just a banal tool for solving a specific problem.
well, as long as the tool works correctly, there is no need to do anything with it, let it work. A great question to expand on. True, already said something like that, but I can once again reveal it. Both the blockchain in general and Bitcoin in particular at the current stage are completely controlled by a person. Updates and hard forks are an example of decentralized human control of the system, because by the decision of the majority the system can be replaced with any other one at all, and the blockchain can not oppose this, because it is just a banal tool for solving a specific problem.
well, as long as the tool works correctly, there is no need to do anything with it, let it work. A great question to expand on. True, already said something like that, but I can once again reveal it. Both the blockchain in general and Bitcoin in particular at the current stage are completely controlled by a person. Updates and hard forks are an example of decentralized human control of the system, because by the decision of the majority the system can be replaced with any other one at all, and the blockchain can not oppose this, because it is just a banal tool for solving a specific problem.
well, as long as the tool works correctly, there is no need to do anything with it, let it work.
A great question to expand on. True, already said something like that, but I can once again reveal it. Both the blockchain in general and Bitcoin in particular at the current stage are completely controlled by a person. Updates and hard forks are an example of decentralized human control of the system, because by the decision of the majority the system can be replaced with any other one at all, and the blockchain can not oppose this, because it is just a banal tool for solving a specific problem.
I have a question: where is the presence of a person in the blockchain and bitcoin? 
I understand that we are close to the introduction of systems based on Bitcoin and other blockchains to the dominance of machines, but it is important to understand where to go anyway, and I do not want to go to the dominance of machines. I would prefer to see representatives of my kind as continuers of our civilization.
we return to Murphy’s law: in the absence of concepts of ethics and using only concepts of efficiency, a situation is possible where, in an unforeseen way, machine logic is not considering a person to be a person and in the most effective way to achieve basic goals destroys him quickly and without alternative. No matter how small this probability is, it exists, and therefore it is unacceptable to contribute to a situation in which it can be implemented. Therefore, you can use Bitcoin as a tool, but you can not make a person a tool for an uncontrolled Bitcoin. You look at today's little bitcoin, I look at the possibility of developing AI as a whole in any foreseeable or boundless perspective.I understand that we are close to the introduction of systems based on Bitcoin and other blockchains to the dominance of machines, but it is important to understand where to go anyway, and I do not want to go to the dominance of machines. I would prefer to see representatives of my kind as continuers of our civilization.
we return to Murphy’s law: in the absence of concepts of ethics and using only concepts of efficiency, a situation is possible where, in an unforeseen way, machine logic is not considering a person to be a person and in the most effective way to achieve basic goals destroys him quickly and without alternative. No matter how small this probability is, it exists, and therefore it is unacceptable to contribute to a situation in which it can be implemented. Therefore, you can use Bitcoin as a tool, but you can not make a person a tool for an uncontrolled Bitcoin. You look at today's little bitcoin, I look at the possibility of developing AI as a whole in any foreseeable or boundless perspective.
I understand that we are close to the introduction of systems based on Bitcoin and other blockchains to the dominance of machines, but it is important to understand where to go anyway, and I do not want to go to the dominance of machines. I would prefer to see representatives of my kind as continuers of our civilization.
centralized control is where someone sits there and follows all your transactions and tax reports?
This is not necessary at all. A blockchain with an embedded data processing formula is quite capable of coping with this task. The control here is not over individual elements, but over the system as a whole, so that it does not fail.
centralized control is where someone sits there and follows all your transactions and tax reports?
Jump to: