Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.
we absolutely need a regulation in the ico market, otherwise icos will die out next year. currently the market is dominated by scam ico and that is bad. so i really hope that this will change in 2019. 
Topic: DO WE NEED TO REGULATE ICOs? - page 20. (Read 24801 times)
If ICO has been regulated we can make assurance that the ICO will never turn on our back and steal our money, because they are regulated by the government. It will put a fear for those teams that are still intending to scam other people.
I am totally in favor of regulating ICOs, as this action would have the power to inhibit the fake and scam projects and also bring protection to investors. It is absurd the amount of scam projects that flood the crypto market.
At this point we need some form of cleasing in the crypto space as it is no longer funny. Investors are begining to take backward steps and somehow affecting mass adoption. Regulations are highly needed
Already some countries have restriction and regulations to join in bounty investments but still people find the wat to invest on it some way if they want so I don't think this will prevent getting scammed.So only way is to teach them about cryptos,blockchain and ICO then they will identify which one is fake and legit.
Yes, I agree the market of ICOs is really needed in regulations. There are a lot of scam projects. But I don't agree with your idea with masternodes. It would be better if some comissions will deal with these problems ].
I think i will have to stand with you, it would be really nice to regulate not just ICO's but the coins that enter into the market, most of these coins are fork project and the aim is to enrich themselves
There should be regulation on ICO.
2018 is not a good year for many ICO especially to investors as there are so many SCAM and FAILED projects.
ICO must be regulated and must be permitted before offering token sales to prevent scam in the market.
i hope 2019 will be better that what we had this year.
2018 is not a good year for many ICO especially to investors as there are so many SCAM and FAILED projects.
ICO must be regulated and must be permitted before offering token sales to prevent scam in the market.
i hope 2019 will be better that what we had this year.
Hey I'll agree Ico's need to be regulated for the safety of investors, sec is working on a framework to regulate Ico's. In my personal opinion Ico's regulation shall increase investors confidence, and will bring more funds to the crypto world. I am hoping to see some solid framework in 2019, to stop the malpractices of Ico's as this has severely effected investors who trusted the Ico's with their money.
Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.
I think it's also a good thing, an ICO that really wants to have a goal and contribute to the blockchain must be registered and have a graduation certificate that they have legitimacy about it. That way if there are things that are not desirable happen with the project then there is a legal process in it
There should be regulation on ICO.
2018 is not a good year for many ICO especially to investors as there are so many SCAM and FAILED projects.
ICO must be regulated and must be permitted before offering token sales to prevent scam in the market.
i hope 2019 will be better that what we had this year.
2018 is not a good year for many ICO especially to investors as there are so many SCAM and FAILED projects.
ICO must be regulated and must be permitted before offering token sales to prevent scam in the market.
i hope 2019 will be better that what we had this year.
Yes.If there is actually a way to do that. It would not only save investors from jumping into scam ICos projects , but boosts confidence of investors.
You can imagine a situation where so many ico projects are being brought into the already unstable market daily, with most of the projects trying to solve the blockchain challenge already been handle by another ico projects.
We just need order in this market.
You can imagine a situation where so many ico projects are being brought into the already unstable market daily, with most of the projects trying to solve the blockchain challenge already been handle by another ico projects.
We just need order in this market.
for now as needed. because to maintain investor confidence. ico has not been like before, many people began to doubt it. so a regulation is needed to make investors interested again. regulations also aim to protect investor money.
I personally think enough work are not been done to santize the ICO space, masternode kind of oversight is very apt and can be explore to create a decentralized oversight standard to monitor and recorgnize quality ICO away from Scam ICO!
ICO regulation is a problem that has already taken place over the past two years, but during this time nothing has happened that could be called a successful attempt in this direction. The only project that I know of and which can be called a successful attempt is the ICOVO project.
It is certainly necessary to regulate the ICO, since the creation of such a large number of unnecessary and simply fraudulent projects will not lead to anything good. The crypto-currency market is already weak in itself, and the creation of such a large number of such projects drowns it even more. Regulation of this issue is necessary, but it really can be done with the help of laws.
Their is a much need for the reguation of icos they are 100s of icos coming out daily out of them 90 of them are scams. This icos making the new users to think the crypto market is a scam .
while this market was too hard to be regulated.
then ICO market was even harder!
I don't think your idea is possible. but still good to have.
then ICO market was even harder!
I don't think your idea is possible. but still good to have.
I believe that if we want the ICOs to be mainstream, we have to see the regulations as something necessary, many people move away from this field of investment because of the insecurity they have entering this field, not only is it necessary to fight against volatility also against the fraudsters, maybe it's too much.
Investors no longer want to invest in projects in an environment where their interests are not legally protected. This situation encourages the use of fraudulent schemes. Regulators will be able to create conditions under which projects will be checked before the start of their ICO. Perhaps even from the projects will require some kind of guarantee.
I think that the existence of many icons should definitely be terminated with regulation. so many scam projects that they do not create anything other than pollution, frankly. I think it should be limited in some way with minor criteria.
Jump to: