Topic: DO WE NEED TO REGULATE ICOs? - page 15. (Read 24801 times)
I think that it would be much better if ICO will get special license for their work. Also it shoud be a comission which will be control every tokensale. So there will be punishments for Scam organizers.
I am against ICO regulation. It seems to me that the government will kill this industry. In addition, this industry may become inaccessible to most people.
Yes indeed, I agree with you that there are many fraudulent projects on the market and at the moment a certain regulator is needed, but unfortunately it is not and it is necessary to think of some tools to implement this problem.
Crypto is like Wild West till nowadays. Regulation has two sides of the same coin. It may kill huge profits but make investing more safe at the same time.
No, today it is far from what can now be found on the market. Wild West has already left the current situation in the cryptocurrency market. I assure you today it is more beginning to look like an ordinary scam until there is no interference of regulators
Perhaps then, the market will not be so volatile and therefore not attractive for investors. In addition, tight control is possible not only for projects, but also for investors. I believe that ICO projects should be regulated. There should be one authority that will check projects for all criteria before launching it. That's when I think the ICO market will get better.
What kind of regulation are we talking about, I just can't understand? If you speak in general about regulation by the state, then I also think that something similar is needed, if only for the data of our personal information to be there, so I think that the situation as a whole is very squeaky.
I am 100% sure that we need some regulations and improvements for the ICOs. There are too many scams
I believe that ICO projects should be regulated. There should be one authority that will check projects for all criteria before launching it. That's when I think the ICO market will get better.
Crypto is like Wild West till nowadays. Regulation has two sides of the same coin. It may kill huge profits but make investing more safe at the same time.
No, today it is far from what can now be found on the market. Wild West has already left the current situation in the cryptocurrency market. I assure you today it is more beginning to look like an ordinary scam until there is no interference of regulators
Many people think that the regulation of this industry will make it better. But I think that this will not happen.
Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.
Regulation seems to have a positive effect on the development of the market. But it opposes the very idea of blockcain and BTC. They must be independent.
Regulation has both pros and cons in this industry. I doubt cryptocurrencies will develop better with regulation than without finger of government. Decentralization will provide better opportunities than traditional banking methods.
Regulation is good if it's not too much, they are just trying to prevent money laundering so that the project you invested to is legal.
The regulation of the crypto market is crucial to providing guarantees and protection to investors. Without it, the market will not attract big investors and will be at the mercy of speculation and scams projects.
YES. We should regulate ICO's. Maybe this will be the answer for those people who were using ICO to scam. There should also be a requirement to show the identity of those people who were planning to sell ICO so that when they plan to do something terrible, we can just file a lawsuit against them. If people are not getting caught doing something that is unacceptable, other people will think that is right and they will do it on their own.
Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.
Regulation seems to have a positive effect on the development of the market. But it opposes the very idea of blockcain and BTC. They must be independent.
Regulation has both pros and cons in this industry. I doubt cryptocurrencies will develop better with regulation than without finger of government. Decentralization will provide better opportunities than traditional banking methods.
Everything leads to the fact that soon will be regulated by the ICO. The cryptocurrency market also needs to be regulated, as now almost the entire market belongs to the whales.
Regulation to some extent will be cool but total regulation will lead to the break in principle of the whole crypto fraternity. I think some checks should be done to rule out the necessary areas that need regulation.
Crypto is like Wild West till nowadays. Regulation has two sides of the same coin. It may kill huge profits but make investing more safe at the same time.
Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.
Regulation seems to have a positive effect on the development of the market. But it opposes the very idea of blockcain and BTC. They must be independent.
It looks like the ICO has reached a level where investors have completely lost interest in investing. It is possible that the regulation will not be needed in the coming months.
This is a fact that most people recognize today. Surely, we can only say that today people would like to invest only they are simply afraid that something can happen. We are waiting for new events that will be able to change the market.It looks like the ICO has reached a level where investors have completely lost interest in investing. It is possible that the regulation will not be needed in the coming months.
This is a fact that most people recognize today. Surely, we can only say that today people would like to invest only they are simply afraid that something can happen. We are waiting for new events that will be able to change the market.
ICO exist freely and is widely abused to create ICO scam that many exist at this time. needed to regulate could make the ICO became more orderly and could produce a good product. many current ICO gives the chaos and certainly become regulate to address it in order not to become increasingly chaotic at times.
Jump to: