Topic: DO WE NEED TO REGULATE ICOs? - page 16. (Read 24783 times)
I don't think ICO needs to be regulated. The market should be handed over to the market for natural development. It should not be artificially controlled to the detriment of the cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin is always an anonymous currency. forever and always!
yes, I think we really need ico regulation, because with these regulations investors feel safer in using their money to fund a project
Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.
absolutely yes, nowadays more ico's really just want to hop in to the blockchain tech trend even if their company did not really need the tech. They just want to hop in to the trend to get the most money out of ico which will become more easy if they are blockchain base.
ICO must be regulated immediately, especially regarding team quality and potentially successful products
very much now that ICO only relies on makeshift teams, then launches ICO with products that can be said to be plagiarism over previous ICOs that are considered successful
actually it is very disturbing, where when the ICO has a specific goal, the community should support the running of the project, not divide into competitors
if the rules regarding ICO are implemented, I recommend that only the project with fresh and unique products and services, which can hold an ICO
plagiarism products = do not pass
very much now that ICO only relies on makeshift teams, then launches ICO with products that can be said to be plagiarism over previous ICOs that are considered successful
actually it is very disturbing, where when the ICO has a specific goal, the community should support the running of the project, not divide into competitors
if the rules regarding ICO are implemented, I recommend that only the project with fresh and unique products and services, which can hold an ICO
plagiarism products = do not pass
Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.
Somehow i think ICO need to be regulated in the cryptocurrency world to reduce the number of scam ICOs.
But the regulations should not limiting investors and ICO companies to expand their investment, it is to protect from the fraud and scam activities.
If there is something at stake for everyone that lunched a project in the crypto space, then they will not have the mind of scamming others. If if they plan to scam they will have to lose what they have stake.
The regulation needs to be done in a was that it will give every investor the confidence to invest their money into any project that has direct approval from the regulatory body.
I agree with you because if it is enforced then there will be a deterrent effect for scammer and they will also think for a long time before they decide to cheat, if there is no firm action then the scammer will become more and will make investors afraid to invest ICO is dead The regulation needs to be done in a was that it will give every investor the confidence to invest their money into any project that has direct approval from the regulatory body.
For sure we do need to regulate ICOs.
Point is that there is probability that regulated ICOs won't be so attractive as other instruments on a market and this sphere will die.
This is my opinion on ICOs regulation
Point is that there is probability that regulated ICOs won't be so attractive as other instruments on a market and this sphere will die.
This is my opinion on ICOs regulation
We do need regulations for ICOs, it is used to project investors and kill all scammers. ICOs with fully regulated will let investors from all countries to invest in ICO with cryptocurrency and fiat. It helps ICOs to have more investors, they will gain more funds to develop their products.
If all the conditions for the regulation of ICO are created, it is even difficult for me to imagine how many investors will join the investment.As soon as I learned about the ICO, I was simply delighted with this idea to attract capital for the development of business.Nowhere in the world has there ever been such an opportunity which is now available to almost everyone.But where there is a lot of money there will always be big scammers who create all the prerequisites for scaring investors.Once this ballast is destroyed, we will all be amazed at the capitalization of the cryptocurrency.Therefore, I believe that ICO regulation is a must.
Of course, otherwise we will get a huge number of scammers who will fraudulently collect money while no one will punish them
With the level fo abuse and scam in the space, regulations is overdue. For me for the ICO to still be attractive investment for people, they need to know they will be protected, alot of people have lost money this year because they were sold dreams and those dreams havee turned to nightmire now
Of course it is necessary, because so many frauds were divorced in the crypto industry. Government regulation is just necessary.
Yes, we should regulate all ICO's and this will benefit the investors and for them to get protected by scam projects. We need projects that are fully compliant and this will give the investors an assurance to their investment and this will also the key for the project and their ICO to be successful.
If there is something at stake for everyone that lunched a project in the crypto space, then they will not have the mind of scamming others. If if they plan to scam they will have to lose what they have stake.
The regulation needs to be done in a was that it will give every investor the confidence to invest their money into any project that has direct approval from the regulatory body.
The regulation needs to be done in a was that it will give every investor the confidence to invest their money into any project that has direct approval from the regulatory body.
For me, regulation is important, considering that so many projects have ended up being fraudulent. However, if there are other ways outside the regulations of the government, it is better. So that crypto identity, which is decentralization, can be maintained
Sata agreed, it seems that now is the time to make a regulation for ICO, so that people do not arbitrarily make an ICO, there must be a clear vision and mission, and of course there must also be legal protection.
so that frauds under the guise of ICO no longer occur, just imagine, how many people have been harmed.
so that frauds under the guise of ICO no longer occur, just imagine, how many people have been harmed.
It looks like the ICO has reached a level where investors have completely lost interest in investing. It is possible that the regulation will not be needed in the coming months.
This is a fact that most people recognize today. Surely, we can only say that today people would like to invest only they are simply afraid that something can happen. We are waiting for new events that will be able to change the market.It looks like the ICO has reached a level where investors have completely lost interest in investing. It is possible that the regulation will not be needed in the coming months.
This is a fact that most people recognize today. Surely, we can only say that today people would like to invest only they are simply afraid that something can happen. We are waiting for new events that will be able to change the market.Of course we need people or programs that will check the documents and the project itself that administrators provide to people , as I think all have a right to know the admins and their documents
I have always thought of independent organizations to test the quality of projects. Unlike current ICO rating sites, they give a very unjustified rating, as ICOrating is one of the worst websites to choose to consider a good project.
I can't imagine Cryptosphere accepting regulations... I think we have to imagine another way to make ICOs safer.
Maybe there a complete field to explore for ICO checker's teams.
Maybe there a complete field to explore for ICO checker's teams.
Ofcourse we need it, and we need it as fast as possible, because this sphere develops quickly. Prjoects should be responsible for their dids and for the investors money
Jump to: