Of course need to regulate.
Every scam ico stole fund not only from investors, and also from crypto files in common.
This breaks developing
Topic: DO WE NEED TO REGULATE ICOs? - page 18. (Read 24761 times)
Lack of regulation is one of the major problem facing ICOs ,imagine if regulation come in place its scammers goodbye entirely but lately I'm looking forward to STO rather than ICO ,I'm feeling it will be the better for the best so ICO might be extinct in the near future
I think the ICO should be expelled from the market. STO should be trusted and used in many developing projects. It has many functions and rules to help preserve the investor's money. STO is a new solution for the crypto industry.
with the following terms of absence that we should work with out projects on ico scheme to gains of supports on funding with our reference of service for pupils of indonesia
that the name of service set with the domain of DOGEM.ID to offers tasks on online social dating
as rejecting ideas on foreign abroad distro with the non culture friendly customs as the delivery of offers for pupils of indonesia.
the service will be managed by caressen webworks of software development company from bandung of indonesia
as viva chesster plays of role as the hacker and coo for the company since 2011
supports us for investors from indonesia we needs of female investors with minimum investment spins of $1000 to gains total of $40000 to begins with the initiation of terms on early stages development.
that the name of service set with the domain of DOGEM.ID to offers tasks on online social dating
as rejecting ideas on foreign abroad distro with the non culture friendly customs as the delivery of offers for pupils of indonesia.
the service will be managed by caressen webworks of software development company from bandung of indonesia
as viva chesster plays of role as the hacker and coo for the company since 2011
supports us for investors from indonesia we needs of female investors with minimum investment spins of $1000 to gains total of $40000 to begins with the initiation of terms on early stages development.
If regulation of ICO would control the increasing fraud in the cryptospace then I think it will be worth trying. But I don't think that centralized regulations will be the best for this space. I think enforcement of decentralised autonomous organization model for all ICO projects will go a long way in checking fraud.
This maybe an unpopular answer but I don't agree that ICO's need to be regulated. No one is forced to participate in ICO's. It is purely voluntary. You participate because you think you will make money. If you got scammed it is largely down to your greed overcoming your caution. You should have done a better job checking out the project you invested in. The best thing about ICO's is that anyone with a good idea can easily connect with people that might want to invest in it. I would not want regulations getting in the way of that. Let the market find solutions for better information to make investment decisions.
Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.
Any self-regulation of ICO projects will not have the desired effect. Fraudsters will always ignore any established rules. Therefore, there is only one way out of this situation - government regulation of ICO activities. Of course, such regulation should not be complete, but it is necessary and possible to establish a specific procedure for conducting an ICO in order to fully identify each member of the ICO team and create such conditions to protect the rights of investors and other ICO campaigners. Very good and can be too tough with respect to the ICO team prepared such rules in Russia. With their introduction, fraudsters will have virtually no chance of so massively deceiving investors. Similar rules are being prepared by Japan, France, Germany, Australia and I am sure that there are many other states. Therefore, the establishment of order in the activities of the ICO will be soon. Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.
And Also, there is an increasing number of failing ICOS and considered to be SCAM ICOS, we need regulations that will surely inspect and test the ICO first before it will be on the market so many will benefit to it.
Regulations for ICOs are needed but I would not like it to be a centralized over regulated market.
Some kind of self regulations would be preferable. Regulations are needed as many investors are
not confident to invest as too much scam ICOs are in the space.
The crypto will become centralized, we need regulate ico but remember this should be to create a big wall to protect the investors and it's not about give all of control over the icos to the institutional. we need self regulation and this sounds to be the best solution. Some kind of self regulations would be preferable. Regulations are needed as many investors are
not confident to invest as too much scam ICOs are in the space.
I think regulatin ICO doesnt mean its make cryptocurrency centralized. Its just regulation to avoid from scam ICOs. 2018 is bad year for ICOs investor because many ICOs are scam and i think its give negative perspective for others people. I am believe regulation will eliminate scam ICOs and gain trust for investor
Regulations for ICOs are needed but I would not like it to be a centralized over regulated market.
Some kind of self regulations would be preferable. Regulations are needed as many investors are
not confident to invest as too much scam ICOs are in the space.
The crypto will become centralized, we need regulate ico but remember this should be to create a big wall to protect the investors and it's not about give all of control over the icos to the institutional. we need self regulation and this sounds to be the best solution. Some kind of self regulations would be preferable. Regulations are needed as many investors are
not confident to invest as too much scam ICOs are in the space.
I think there should be rules governing ICO's. It is high time, the cheating and scamming ends, people invest huge sums of money in ICOs and they end up being duped. With regulations to punish wrong doers, I think ICO's will become better.
Regulations for ICOs are needed but I would not like it to be a centralized over regulated market.
Some kind of self regulations would be preferable. Regulations are needed as many investors are
not confident to invest as too much scam ICOs are in the space.
Some kind of self regulations would be preferable. Regulations are needed as many investors are
not confident to invest as too much scam ICOs are in the space.
This year, investor confidence inico declined due to various factors, the decline in eth and bitcoin prices was the main factor.
ICO products are not going well to be another factor. I think the ico regulation is needed to prevent ico scam.
ICO products are not going well to be another factor. I think the ico regulation is needed to prevent ico scam.
ICO regulation might be the best thing to do to bring back the again the trust investors once given to ICOs. The importance of ICOs in this cryptocurrency space is huge. It plays a major role in producing great applications of the cryptocurrency. This is the reason why I want it to be regulated.
I think by regulating ICOs it will go a long way to ensure investors aren't investing in scam projects. ICOs can be seen as the new face of crowdfunding thus there is need to nurture and groom it so as to serve the true purpose.
ICO is one type of crowdfunding, thus it must be regulated to give investors a full knowledge of what they're entering to. I even like the proposal that ICO team should be required to submit a copy of their passport to avoid scammers. This is just one of the many parts of regulating ICOs. The purpose of regulation is clear, to avoid scammers and weak projects.
Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.
Yes we need them to be regulated. All of ICO around us seem to be a scam project and no one right now will hessitate to invest because they know that it is a trash for their portfolio once it hit on exchange. Maybe, when SEC regulates all of the existing ICO, all of investors will return their enthussiasm to invest and buy coins in ICO.
Aside from regulating the cryptocurrency exchanges, regulation of ICOs have been also proposed by some government officials involves in monitoring the cryptocurrency and blockchain companies. The aim is to identify the legitimate and quality ICOs from many scams that are now victimizing many unsuspecting investors. Scam ICOs is one of the reasons why some investors are losing their interest in investing again in many initial coin offerings even it is a legitimate one.
I think it's time to start regulating ICOs, many people or investors have been taken advantage of. In a bid to reduce scam, I think proper regulation will make it safer to participate in ICOs again.
Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.
I don't see anyhow a decentralized ICO regulation can work. How then will you prosecute offenders? It is best to have a central authority regulating every God damn ICO project before it even commence any stage of its marketing before the token sales.
of course we need!! after some of ico is scam many projects will sell the eth or coin fundraising, they don't think the price. This is also good sounds for bounty hunter 
Jump to: