Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? (Read 6947 times)
As I see, this topic is hot. Why do people have different opinions , when it’s too simply to check the stats of those websites for the scammy ISO’s and understand - were they right or not. After the small research, I would defennately recommend you to avoid ico rating web sites.
A good ICO rating website can still provide us with a lot of useful information, but we can't fully believe them, we still need to collect more information to invest in the project!
The more the loyalty points the more I need to keep a tab on what is stored where! This looks like a solution, Have a look here - https://medium.com/@RajPhani/loyalty-programs-making-those-points-count-10212587f63c
I don't completely depend on those rating because people whoever shows interest will give positive rating about the project. So it is always good to research by ourselves to get updates from the team and what is their target for the future aspects of their blockchain.
Not really. Especially that most of the time I only go for Airdrops and Bounty. Right now, I think this ICO is interesting and they have an ongoing Airdrop campaign. You, guys might want to check them out.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10OlnEzIE6RG6ZNd82JmxEBP-UMJT1eVCwSt_8S8MUDw/viewform?edit_requested=true&utm_campaign=Airdrop&utm_medium=BTT&utm_source=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2868750.0
I tried to sign up to WOM's airdrop, but too bad it's already finished. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10OlnEzIE6RG6ZNd82JmxEBP-UMJT1eVCwSt_8S8MUDw/viewform?edit_requested=true&utm_campaign=Airdrop&utm_medium=BTT&utm_source=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2868750.0
I don't get why people based on websites that they don't even know who are the people who give these ratings. Those 'so-called experts' also don't have a lot of strong proof that they are best on what they do. Anyone can also give rating based on their opinion because that is how those rating sites does their thing.
Of course these are only opinions but they explain how they came to their opinion. You can factor them into your decision making but should not follow them blindly. The best advisor is still your own experience.
Example: I see you are promoting Gigtricks, I was also initially interested. On ICO Bench they get a very high overal rating. Then I read on a review from an expert who wondered why they need 35 million to build a platform for freelancers. Then my warning lamps went on...I had invested before in projects with a high hardcap and they collected far too much money. The problem is that the token is then overvalued from the start. So I stayed away. Not because of following ones opinion but to combine external indictions with my own personal experience. Not saying it will fail, but I passed on it.
I do not look or even bother to visit this rating sites, for me they can be manipulated, if you are going to invest or join an ICO bounty its preferable to set up some basic criteria that you yourself set up to avoid being misled
I only consider it as part of my assessment of the project. Do not believe in it completely. But it also appreciates a part of the project
Rating is just a parameter that you can see. I think you have to do analytics yourself if you want to invest to the ICO. With me, do analytics is better.
I don't get why people based on websites that they don't even know who are the people who give these ratings. Those 'so-called experts' also don't have a lot of strong proof that they are best on what they do. Anyone can also give rating based on their opinion because that is how those rating sites does their thing.
If it's a legit ICO rating site, there's a high chance that it is not fake. Some ICO ratings are fake and they pay people to rate positive feedbacks, they do this to encourage investors to join their ICO.
Not always the ratings can determine a good ICO, therefore it is necessary to conduct our own research. Although ICO ratings can be a really helpful and trustable sources sometimes.
I just believe in my own assessment of that project. If I see it grows well then I will join. Many of the wed sites rated are not standard because there are so many wrong judges
Yes i believe because sometime i base on their ICO rating in order for me to join that project. Its a good sign or a good thing to those ICO has high rating. High rating ICO can be successful due to some investor might interested because of their rating.
ICO rating is just an advertisement. Companies that are really good, I've never seen in ratings.This is not an indicator of success.
Yes i believe because sometime i base on their ICO rating in order for me to join that project. Its a good sign or a good thing to those ICO has high rating. High rating ICO can be successful due to some investor might interested because of their rating.
Although I don't fully believe in the ICO rating website, I will use some ratings as a reference for my investment. When I am very satisfied with the project, I will check its rating on the rating website!
No,I believe not in ICO Rating because none can know in advance about...
So far it is possible to know that it is scam...it is too late.
So far it is possible to know that it is scam...it is too late.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
For me I'm not an independent of an ICO ratings because theres a lot of an ICO project that they dont have listed in ICO bench but more legit and has a potential to grow. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
You should never believe in anything, not in the stuff you hear from friends, in forums, on ICO sites, etc. Rather use them as indicators to form your own opinion. If you just act like a sheep at some point a wolf will find you.
No, i don't trust them at all. I know that there is a good website with ICO list, but still there's too much garbage sites, and i don't have time to check them
Jump to: