Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 2. (Read 6947 times)
There are a lot of ICO rating websites, but I don't think they can be trusted, because I don't think any news or products that can be controlled by the team is worth believing!
Sometimes ico ratings is only a guide to a good investment but they do not recommend everyone to invest on the coins were they give they ratings, they still need to make their own research.
do not believe in absolute ICO rating pages only rated a small percentage. They rely on the team and the investor. white paper and roadmap. There is no guarantee that the project will scam
Someone wrote that these ratings are easy to buy and correct. Posklko rating consists of an assessment of experts, paying one expert can increase the rating of the project.
Unfortunately did not find the link where it was written.
This is a well-known fact. I also met an article about how a low-grade ICO got a high rating for a separate fee on one of the leading sites of ICOs trackers. It is better to do the analysis of projects. Unfortunately did not find the link where it was written.
Someone wrote that these ratings are easy to buy and correct. Posklko rating consists of an assessment of experts, paying one expert can increase the rating of the project.
Unfortunately did not find the link where it was written.
Unfortunately did not find the link where it was written.
I don't think they're completely transparent. I see sided ratings but generally it's one of the best ICO tracking sites
I usually base my bounty participation in high rating ICO. Because they tend to reach the quota thus it will give you a high bounty.
Not really. Especially that most of the time I only go for Airdrops and Bounty. Right now, I think this ICO is interesting and they have an ongoing Airdrop campaign. You, guys might want to check them out.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10OlnEzIE6RG6ZNd82JmxEBP-UMJT1eVCwSt_8S8MUDw/viewform?edit_requested=true&utm_campaign=Airdrop&utm_medium=BTT&utm_source=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2868750.0
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10OlnEzIE6RG6ZNd82JmxEBP-UMJT1eVCwSt_8S8MUDw/viewform?edit_requested=true&utm_campaign=Airdrop&utm_medium=BTT&utm_source=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2868750.0
Nope, because i think ICO ratings on some websites are really shady. I'm sure some of them (not all) get paid by the project to make the ratings good. I mean who are they, can make a rate on ICOs, are they professional on ICOs? haha. Also it's better to find out by yourself like check the information of the project on whitepaper, website etc.
Sometimes ico rating will not determine if the project will become successful. I have seen many icos where they get the highest points in every ico rating site but the project didnt even reach the soft cap.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I don’t believe in ICO ratings, I just believe in interest and if the project has got a working product and what it has to offer, then I can make my choice as whether to invest or not. Anyways you can check out my signature, you can get the latest updates on ICOS right on telegram from Investmentgists
There's many ICO Rating websites, and most give unbiased ratings and reviews. You should be able trust their rating score because at the end of the day you can review their rating by adding a post below the ICO they have rated
You should not trust any of their rating score because you said that they were biased . instead, you can just review again the ico and give your own honest feedback and you can compare your own feedback to other feedback to see if what is right or wrong .
In my case i do not easily believe any ico rating because i am alaready aware that majority of ico are verry unrealistic .
Ratings are nothing and wont make them look legit.
ico rating is just one of our reference factors.Ico rating is sometimes inaccurate, we can’t rely on it completely.we have many other factors such as team technical marketing, etc.
There's many ICO Rating websites, and most give unbiased ratings and reviews. You should be able trust their rating score because at the end of the day you can review their rating by adding a post below the ICO they have rated
I find ICO ratings rather dubious. In most cases it's not a real experts analysism but just someone's subjective judgement.
I think in part. These ratings can show the popularity of the project, which is an important factor when choosing a project for investment. But the main factors of choice are always the idea and the team!
Personally, I do not believe 100% in ico ratings because some of them end up being over rated. I use the rating as guide for choosing good projects and take time to do my own research about the project and be sure they are good before I invest in them.
I do partly, because I still have some doubts. These ratings do have some truth in them since I believe the raters do make their research on a particular ICO. But most of these ratings are paid for so they kinda become sort of an advertisement rather than a reference for investment.
I usually check the project quality through icobech. It is also quite accurate
While rating websites can help us analyze many ICO projects, I don't think they are worth believing because I think many projects have a lot of bubbles!
Jump to: