Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 13. (Read 6947 times)
ICO ratings by rating site can help in making decisions on ICO'S, however I think people should not totally depend on such ratings. Personal/individual research is preferable.
I always do research before investing in ICO, I do not just trust a website that highlights some ICO, if you want to earn money in this sector, it's always about your own research and information that you collect.
You're right some ICO pays a rating website for the exchange of higher rate so we must do research before investing on that project.
I always do research before investing in ICO, I do not just trust a website that highlights some ICO, if you want to earn money in this sector, it's always about your own research and information that you collect.
I'm thinking, ICO Ratings help us make the right choice, but we do not need to rely on them completely, because it is only an auxiliary tool that allows us to narrow the range of search.
Some ICO rating could still believe in me and never get a good project and corresponds to the value in the ICO rating. But I think too much of the site is a scam because it does not correspond to the values in the publish on ICO's rating. And now for the ICO directly I better do some checking on my own.
I do not really trust the ICO. Although many have good ratings but not on their sales. So it's just an additional course if for me. The product and the research team will determine whether the ICO can be unsuccessful and, if what is done and the result is good, by all means, the ICO will be successful and have a lot of money.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I prefer reading their platform which is written in their white paper rather than just believing on the ratings because they can still become a scam.
Yes I truly believe on their ratings because it's their opinion on the projects they have been encountering and I think sometimes they having a mistake also just like us. Even if the concept of coin is unique and good but if the community is not strong it will definitely fail or will not reach their main goal in a fund raising.
The ICO rankings are a basis for me to study and review the market. I do not believe in it completely. To make a final decision, I also base on many other factors such as: objectives, road map, team, total funding, the value of the token, community response to that project ...
I am inclined to the opinion that now everyone needs money, and many rating companies are ready to make money on the ICO, I will not approve, but there is an opinion that there is bribery of these rating companies, it is better to conduct a strict analysis of projects.
I do not deny myself. Before choosing a company for work, you can use different services. Since this reduces the time costs. And the example sites. They fulfill their duties pre-orderly.
Its help me a bit. For me ICO Ratings is a good guide that we can check if an ICO is good to invest or not, its still best to make our own research and dig more deeper with the project and team before we invest because no matter how big the ratings are if they want to scam us we can't do anything about it.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Most often I would use a rating site if I would make a research already and then the writing would be or confirmation of my positive thoughts or an opposite confirmation of my negative. Otherwise it can be harmful. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
These rankings do not occupy a big place for me
During the ICO assessment
White paper, team, roadmap and other factors
Far more important than these classifications
During the ICO assessment
White paper, team, roadmap and other factors
Far more important than these classifications
I think it is the best course of action to do own researching about a project. I don't think these crypto project evaluation websites don't act with an honest working principle.
I dont totally believe in their rating. I just use them as a guide when i want to search for an ico to invest in.They help filter out some of the scam icos and low quality icos so i dont have to bother my self too much. They make work easier
Truly, I have confidence in ICO rating since this is the measly one of the references in picking a decent undertaking by its prevalence on media. Be that as it may, never simply do some expectation by simply checking forever their rating you can do your own particular research obviously. Others are not dependable sources but rather to guarantee the right data you are the one do that.
Not much , Sure ,I always take a look at them when I want to invest some money in ICO or when I want to join a bounty campaign but I know that devs pay some money to get high rating ,this is how it normally works.
These ratings help weed out a large number of bad projects. But still the final decision should be yours.
ico ranking is not a good guarantee in ico success because it all depends on investor interest and nowadays lots of have very good ico rating but sale is very slow
Jump to: