Topic: Do you think advisors help new projects? - page 11. (Read 1804 times)
Even the best of the best have some advisors..it is better to learn of someones mistakes
We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.
I think it really depends on the project. Some projects just pay money to advisers for posting them on the team page. Some projects do care about their product and hire advisors who can help with improving product/marketing/vision. Anyway, ICO is a scam. Any.
Since blockchain technology is relatively new, there are very few experts that are well informed on the nitty gritty of blockchain, hence the majority of self acclaimed blockchain advisors brings little or no success to any particular blockchain projects.
The need to involve advisors in any project is dependent on the team and based on the qualifications/level of expertise amongst team members to handling task.
The need to involve advisors in any project is dependent on the team and based on the qualifications/level of expertise amongst team members to handling task.
I followed a project trip since last year, and I think advisors cannot be a benchmark that projects that have the best advisers will be successful. Because I see for myself, there are still many projects without successful advisors. It all depends on how their team works, if their team is very good and experienced, I don't think advisor is needed here, but with the advisor there must be added value by the investors.
Do you mean advisors add value to the token or coin itself even there is no action from advisors?
If a project is good enough. It would require no advisers. It's just the newbie projects or the fancy ones that requires advisers.
Most of the so called advisers shown on whitepaper of most ICOs are self proclaimed ICO experts. They just let their photo get published for a low fee.
While some are genuinely helping the project with their experience.
Most of the so called advisers shown on whitepaper of most ICOs are self proclaimed ICO experts. They just let their photo get published for a low fee.
While some are genuinely helping the project with their experience.
I think that is not enough to help, good projects must be audited and have permits that apply in every country, and adjust them to the regulations in force in the country, those conditions must be met
New ICO projects rose because of advisors that already advised many projects from the past. Especially those advisors that are truly crypto enthusiasts. Just so you know, having a known personality in cryptocurrency could lead to the success of your project 
. Like hire Roger Ver as an example. And having a known personality advising the project will lead to many investors.
. Like hire Roger Ver as an example. And having a known personality advising the project will lead to many investors. 
I followed a project trip since last year, and I think advisors cannot be a benchmark that projects that have the best advisers will be successful. Because I see for myself, there are still many projects without successful advisors. It all depends on how their team works, if their team is very good and experienced, I don't think advisor is needed here, but with the advisor there must be added value by the investors.
yes. advisors will still have a role in finding or giving direction in advancing a particular project. because with the job advisor the project team will be well directed. besides that the advisor will also provide strategy advice. so for me the advisor is still needed in the success of the new project.
Yes f course! As a pro and sometimes, pioneer of this industry we can help new projects to succeed. A lot of investors are depending with advisors. What do I say? We invest sometimes because there are good advisors. So, probably in terms of exposure the new projects, advisors will help them to launch successfully. And if they help new projects they freely promote also your projects. In short, mutualism.
We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
what is the policy of the advisory person. if indeed the advisor has the responsibility to be willing to help the project, maybe there won't be a scam coin and the coin will go according to the target. Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.
I think advisors are not very helpful because there are many projects that have advisors, but these advisors don't have any expertise in the blockchain field, I'm sure that problem is only the project team that has a very important role and not the advisor
The Advisor topic was something that guys like McAfee and R. Ver used to earn money and create hype for the project. But people realized early that this consultation wasn't that important. There is no importance anymore.
It can help provided the advisor is a respected member of the community like Buterin, because no person of good standing will accept as an advisor if the project will not do well in the market, the advisor should have the technical knowledge and really is an expert in his field I have seen people employing advisors which we do not know or if the resume is real.
Advisers are of two types.
One that advises about technical aspects of project, design, marketing, blockchain, smart contracts, economics etc. There types of advisers are useful for project especially when the team lacks expert of respective fields.
Another type of advisers are those who just gives advertisement and buzz on media. They do create some interest but are not worth the cost they come with.
One that advises about technical aspects of project, design, marketing, blockchain, smart contracts, economics etc. There types of advisers are useful for project especially when the team lacks expert of respective fields.
Another type of advisers are those who just gives advertisement and buzz on media. They do create some interest but are not worth the cost they come with.
We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
Advisor has no impact to the project itself and it's only give a small increase on its popularity but not for a platform which already created a partnership with the advisor to create a new protocol.Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.
Casper lab has so many advisors and the team is also working with the advisor at the same team and that's the different case
We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
You even mentioned that lot of projects succeed without advisors and lot of them turned into scams with them so they are nit take place much on the success of the projects so you don't have to decide the quality of the project based on their availability. Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.
We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.
Since every project has a team of advisors, it wont be bad if their attention is called to issues that requires better understanding from. It is true that there are so many experts on cryptocurrency but in my opinion, I think there is no end to learning. We learn everyday unless we choose not to
Advisors are just a name to legitimize a project
the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
no because first of all those that create an ICO aren't looking for success of their project. there is no project really. their only goal is to make a lot of money quickly by raising it from people who are buying a virtual number on their computers that has no other value other than on exchanges where they dump.
secondly because we don't have any advisors in this space. we only have newbies and experts. experts don't waste their time on ICO projects with that goal and newbies who do, are doing it to scam others.
Jump to: