I doubt anyone posting in this thread is an expert - all we can do is look at the qualifications of whomever is making the claim and go from there.
Supposedly about half of the doctors and nurses in continental Europe are saying "Not no but FUCK NO!" to genetic reprogramming (not) 'vaccines'. Are those people 'expert' enough for you, or are they automatically non-expert because they don't agree with the corp/gov 'experts' in the bureaucratic maze and multinational corporate pharma companies?
Are you saying that half the doctors and nurses in Europe are anti vaxxers? lol
Don't know how they feel about vaccines. It's irrelevant anyway since, given the this mRNA GMO technology doesn't stop one from becoming infected with SARS-cov-2 or passing it to others, it's not a 'vaccine' by any stretch. At least it wasn't tested for doing so and it's not a requirement to be 'effective'. To be defined as 'effective' they simply need to reduce the apparent severity of 'covid-19 disease'. If you have a two day headache (assuming it is not within a few weeks of the injection) instead of a three day headache, the injection is define as 'effective'.
They do know that it is an experimental therapy and are saying no 'Fuck NO' to being test subjects is all I'm saying. That's what I've heard anyway, and I have no reason to dis-believe it.
Again, are you going to classify these medical professionals as 'not experts' because of their position on getting things injected into their OWN bodies?
The preexisting condition/but they were old anyway argument is quite the stretch, but it's the closest thing to a good faith argument covid deniers make. It's not like it's a rare thing to have some sort of health condition and they're already on their death bead and all covid did was put them out of their misery. Something like 25-30% of the US population has a preexisting condition. So what's your point? Even if zero people died that were 100% healthy...so what? You can have a pre existing condition your entire life and die of old age.
Old and sick people need support from others in the economy. Shutting down the economy and putting workers out of work is not likely to be of long term benefit to them. You probably are of the opinion that 'the government' will step in to take care of them so ultimately this will work out to be a 'good thing'. If so, I suggest that you are not very good with history or with system analysis. The corp/gov technocracy considers them an inefficient and relatively useless burden...once their savings are gone and assets stripped. I hope you are not on-board with the most logical method of improving efficiency here, but I don't rule it out.