Topic: Do you think "iamnotback" really has the" Bitcoin killer"? - page 35. (Read 79952 times)

I hope that the recovery is a success and so is the coin. Im sick of not being rich, my head hurts all day, and one of my eyes is always a bit blurry, I also have eye floaters on this same eye. I cannot focus on doing any job that requires starting into a computer, and im not even high IQ so im not bright enough to code anything remarkable, so all I can do is browse all day and read about investing opportunities so I can at least make enough money to live off passive income. I only need another property so I don't need to work. I don't even want a lambo lifestyle, just be able to not worry about paying bills (even tho the lambo would be cool im not going to lie)

So I browse all day looking for opportunities. Byteball looks good, but im worried that since they are giving away basically free GBYTE, investors will dump.

Pascalcoin already peaked in a pretty big pump, I may consider entering once it finally stabilizes. I think it's starting to look like a good entry point for the next pump:

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/pascal-coin/

of course there is always the possibility of continued stagnation tho...

anyway I hope you can eventually deliver something gamechanging and hopefully the market will respond accordingly (making rich the early investors). I will never rest until I somehow make it and I hope this is the one.

Spoetnik you are describing the fact that the lack of top-down order is a power vacuum due to Coasian costs. I agree, but I want you to read the thread from the following quote forward to the third quote, because Coasian costs become compatible with higher levels of entropy as mankind progresses (credit @CoinCube with that conceptual discovery) and we are leaving the Stage #4 Industrial Age:

---

Well I am not sure if I don't have some unique memory capabilities. For example, I do seem to code in my head while sleeping and for example I fell asleep for 4 hours this afternoon (effects of the strong antibiotics) then woke up and was reciting everything I had written in my head earlier in the day, while laying in bed and realized I wanted to go to the computer to make the following edit:


Also I remember once (in my late 30s) I had written several hundred lines of code and lost it due to power outage or somehow mismanaging the backups or something, and I was able to rewrite the code nearly verbatim from memory as if I had a photographic memory (I could literally still see the code if I closed my eyes). But I think I remembered it because I remembered everything the code was doing conceptually.

I know I am not good at quickly memorizing sequential tones (there was a game Simon that other kids used to be better at than me). My memory seems to excel at remembering details in a conceptual context, e.g. the tones of Simon had no relevance for me to memorize them with.  That is why my reading comprehension tested very high (above 99th percentile), but the other aspects of my verbal abilities such as vocabulary was only in the high 80s to low 90s percentile.

I am an abstract concepts sponge. As I had described recently somewhere (see perhaps the first thread that was quoted), as a very young child I always wanted to understand how everything worked conceptually.

Note during the TB illness (and even now while under treatment) I have been so low on energy at times which causes discombobulated delirium thought processes (as if the signals in my brain are crossed and short-circuited and all I get out is noise and words and sentence fragments reverberate and get all mixed up), such that my intellect (and emotional state) has been severely hampered and perturbed. I am very interested to see if it all comes back as I complete the treatment.

---

Hey alkan, thanks for trying to update me on your progress but my (detailed technical) cognitive energy is very limited right now and my priorities are now on implementation and so I don't have time to go digging in long documents to understand every person's conceptual ideas. Any tl;dr? Preferably a long technical document should start with a short abstract summarizing the conceptual contents.

---

No ETA for anything yet, as I am still trying to determine when I will be back up to full speed cognitively. I am still climbing out of a hole and am not yet juggling all the balls.

I am not against decentralization ..i am against people faking it.
I am not for laws but on the other hand society would collapse if it wasn't there.

You can't have some laws that benefit you and cast away the rest.
The financial regulations are there for a reason.
They funded the Multi-Trillion dollar US military force and paved roads.

Take away the laws and there will be garbage piled 100 feet high in the streets.
AKA: Marshall law.

The economy would have ALREADY collapsed had the US govt not put out bail-out packages etc years ago.
Which was CAUSED by a lack of regulations which was admitted by Greenspan.

That evil NWO you are talking about is the very reason you have a roof over your head and you are not flying the North Korean flag guys.

---

EDIT:

@Shelby
Here is a mind fuck for you
What is NWO ?
Why did Trump get elected ?
Because he was not one of "them" the old evil politicians ?
So he's trying to implement a NEW WORLD ORDER ?
And you ..wouldn't know it ?
uhhh ohhh 

I've recently published an article about decentralization and would love to hear your opinion on it:
https://hackernoon.com/decentralized-objective-consensus-without-proof-of-work-a983a0489f0a#.4w7fb6ona

When will your coin be released?

I want to reiterate again how critically important our work on decentralization technology is:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17900578

Eventually I will publish a well defined technological plan...

I can only applaud the clarity of that vision.


I'm not sure about whether Bitcoin was created by the deep state, but in any case, the one who did so, probably did them a service, but also opened pandora's box.  So whether or not it was someone on the payroll of deep state, doesn't, in the end, matter.

The fact that one cannot find who is Satoshi, talks for your hypothesis.  On the other hand, it could indeed be a very careful individual.  In the end, it doesn't matter.


Amen.

I should thank Spoetnik for raising some points that give me an opportunity to clarify some issues. But  I hope we don't get in any lengthy cat fights, because it distracts from real work.

Our work on altcoins is critically important for our survival as a human species. <--- PLEASE CLICK THAT LINK!!


Open source is the solution. Given enough contributors, all complexity is shallow. The free market works it out.

For example, anything I might bring to the ecosystem, is my contribution to the ecosystem. The crypto ecosystem will digest it and decide whether my particular fork of the action is worthy of a leadership role, yet in either case my contribution will be absorbed into the collective knowledge of the ecosystem.


We need many focused experiments to end up with those which end up being useful.


My stance on Bitcoin is more nuanced than that.

It is very likely that Bitcoin was created by the DEEP STATE (the same one that is pulling the strings with Wikileaks that got Trump elected on purpose in order to blame the global collapse on the free market proponents) in order to force the destruction of the existing nation-state paper currencies in order to usher in a cashless society and their aims for a NWO.

They (Satoshi) clearly understood that the mining would become centralized and thus they would have complete control over the protocol.

However, I also believe that the scientists working for Rothschild et al, outsmarted their bosses. And I believe similar what the DARPA engineers did in the case of the WWW (see quote below) knew damn well that they were launching a decentralized experiment which would spawn better technologies which would displace Bitcoin and defeat the NWO plan.


Extensive thought. This will be revealed soon.

I am still trying to get back up to speed. My energy level is about at 50% of normal (which means I am too sleepy 50% of the normal waking hours) and my mind has finally started (as of last night) to start programming in my sleep again. I had lost this cognitive function over the past couple of years. And during the first 2 - 3 weeks of my anti-TB treatment, my energy levels was at about 5 - 10% and I could barely do anything but eat and sleep (and no thinking in my sleep).

Yesterday was the first day that I did technical work since before I started treatment on Jan. 21. Yesterday I read 6 chapters of a math and programming book in about 2 hours. And did extensive technical reading and research on comparing Go and JavaScript (especially the concurrency model).


I agree there is a lot more hype than actual adoption (especially non-speculative adoption) of the altcoins.

Some level of hype is necessary to get some interest. I have a plan to achieve real adoption. Readers will just have to evaluate it when I reveal it. We can't discuss vaporware. And I will not try to refute your skepticism. You have every right to be skeptical and you might even end up being correct in the end in my case as well. All I can say, is I will be straight forward with the information at the appropriate time.

Note there is no ICO, there is nothing right now. So please hold your criticism until there is something to actually critique. Because bogging me down in cat fights won't help us get to the point where you can actually critique something that is announced.


I agree with that! I am not even 100% healthy yet. I have 27 more days of the intensive 4-drug antibiotics. Then after that 16 weeks of 2-drug regimen. But my energy level and digestion is gradually coming back towards normal now. And beyond the health, there are huge mountains to climb. Please don't add to my stress by reminding me. I just have to keep focus on climbing.

You seem to once again give me the impression you don't get it.
Coding complexity ?

Yup.. it's pretty much paramount.

BUT !

There is far more to making and getting a currency used then the coder with his head buried in the screen.
You seem to have tunnel vision on that one single aspect alone.

And many creations were simply an accident.. like recorded audio.

Shelby you are indeed smart and an asset to crypto i think but i wish you would pull out and see the bigger picture more and with less controversial conspiracy theories.

Like you think bitcoin itself is a conspiracy.
And i get the feeling you want to make a Bitcoin Killer to right this wrong and defeat the conspirators.
Have you given much thought to getting the new currency used ?
There seems to be one thing we are lacking in crypto.. adoption.
And that is not because of a lack of good code.
I would wager that would be because you have coders selling the product.
Or maybe assuming the product will sell itself.

Which goes hand in hand with the negatives.
Such as Anon shit, dark markets, ICO's etc.
Do you think the average person out there likes that crap ? If they did we'd know

I think you have a huge uphill climb and it's not your health or even coding the coin.. it's ADOPTION.
Or are you not interested in average users ?

It's clearly not that hard to whip up a convoluted tech scheme here for profits if that is your goal.
And i will repeat the entire point is INITIAL Distribution.
So you can't launch an ICO or *partial ICO then claim to have created something better than Bitcoin.
I will NEVER work !

Far more to it than mathematical elliptical curves & shit man

I was back to work yesterday. I will write more about that later.

Here is the big picture of why what we are doing is important and destined for great wealth...


And incorporate the creative destruction aspect of Stage #5.

So clearly we see what is being created is the antithesis of the NWO, i.e. the decentralized society that is rising to become Stage #6.

This is why the goldbugs are entirely wrong. The NWO is going to take Universal Surveillance control over the tangible economy and destroy it. All tangible stores of wealth will die, and only the new decentralized forms of capital in the Knowledge Age will survive.

And unlike the Fall of the Western Roman Empire, this NWO will be geographically global. The frontier this time will not be geographical (i.e. no Byzantine Eastern Empire), but rather the decentrzalized online economy will be the release value and frontier that provides the way out of the creative destruction.

This is absolutely crucial to understand. And I as @AnonyMint have been explaining this since 2012 with my seminal essay in the Economic Devastation thread and then the various quotes since such as in 2014.


The actual source is the power vacuum created by the natural requirement to concentrate fixed capital in the Industrial Age. The banksters just stepped into that natural power vacuum.

If we raise some money, I know who I'd want to try to hire on a flexible hours work schedule (and know damn well he is conscientious and would provide extreme value for the money spent):

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=7348

It is not every day that a 160 IQ genius who invented the term "open source" is in the job market and is currently earning less than $60K per year.

Eric is a person with an extremely high reputation and who eats programming complexity like a cake walk.

(I am trying to get my energy up and rid myself of this persistent nausea, but so far haven't found the combination of eating habits and daily pattern to make it so...36 more days of the 4-drug therapy...)

Your sig quote, is absolutely perfect, in this particular context. 

"We" as a whole. Sometimes sarcasm is hard to get across via print. I totally agree with you. "Invest in something good that can make you rich".

This is only the current state. Things will change once the RChain co-op releases the open source code to have an attention economy. This is what'll bring in real money and not scammy pnd money. RChain sounds to be an all in 1 solution for app devs. It'll have smart contracts, content delivery and 100% premined proof-of-stake mined networks. That's the holy grail right there. A decentralized world that scales will be able to exist with the RChain open source decentralized network code.

I disagree, i dont know who you mean by "we", but I dont like scammy shitcoins. I think there was decent promising projects, people would naturally invest on those. Yes we like getting rich and to speculate, but why not invest in something that can make you rich because it's something good and not by pure luck?

If a project has some good foundations it is also more likely to make you rich than a random low volume p'n'd.

lol i love that quote so much

There will be a new platform that is different than bitcoin and in most ways better. Bitcoin will not die though. RChain will be the platform of the future. It's based on math and advanced functions programming.

Seems to be http://www.who.int/tb/challenges/ltbi/en/ which does not kill Bitcoin, but could kill a developer!

Wishing a swift recovery from that. Antibiotics should work against bacteriae