Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 2. (Read 9106 times)
About me yes,I do trust in ICO rating sites.those site are..also very familiar to all member of crypto society.And most of them find the ICO from the ICO rating sites.whatever is it for investing or bounty.It happens sometimes the ratings gone wrong yes it could be. So i will say ICO Rating sites are good places to find a good ico and after that we have to observe it properly in social media and feedback about the project.
I don't believe it fully
Ico rating is only a comparison with my research if it is in accordance with my research. I will invest in their ico.
Ico rating is only a comparison with my research if it is in accordance with my research. I will invest in their ico.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
I am agree with you, last year I have participated in more than 100 ICO's, you will be amazed to read that those ICO's which gave me smart profit or earnings were those ICO's which do not have any ranking of ICO ranking websites (Like GBX), after that I have decided to check the profiles of team members, their social media links and activity. With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Of course not, these sites have lost all confidence, because of the decline in the ISO market, in order to earn money normally, they take money from scammers and put good ratings on them.
Not. I can view information about projects on these sites. But I myself study projects that interest me. I do not look at the assessment.
I knew about this for a long time. they also run bounty campaigns and then they just don't pay. you should always look for relevant information. conduct your own analysis of the team, technical document, product, different forums.
No! not every every ICO rating is valid some of the rating are biased, at the end of the some ICO you will find out that they are not up to their rating
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
I don't really know about the specific price they take for raging but I know the collecte fee for rating ico and I have participate in an ico where icosite rate high and they end up to be scam, so I don't tink icosite is the best way to know the legelity for a project. With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Not always since there have been some ratings which later turned out to be scam project, this makes me not to trust these rating sites. No one really knows how sincere they are with their jobs.
Frankly, I do not trust anyone in this market.
Of course, I listen to everyone's opinions, and if someone seems honest and expert, I listen to him more carefully.
But in the end I evaluate according to my parameters
Of course, I listen to everyone's opinions, and if someone seems honest and expert, I listen to him more carefully.
But in the end I evaluate according to my parameters
Actually no, sites like ICObench or icoreview have been shown to alter their results to suitability, in fact, they are quite clear that they receive money from ICOs to give a better score, they do that with all ICOs? the truth is that I don't know, but the simple suspicion is more than enough to be on the edge with those sites.
I see no reason to trust rating sites. Any ratings that are in the cryptocurrency market, as in real life - are sold. Want to be in first place? Pay a lot of money and everything will be fine.
I don't fully trust the ICO rating, I try to analyze the data that I can find and collect about the project itself, the team, advisors, and try to understand their idea and strategy. after that, it was decided to enter or not.
these sites are hard to trust. if you do the right thing you need to weigh the risks and study the market
The ICO rating site is very useful to know in full from the to project, but they only function as a reference assessment based on the quality of the project. If you want to see the ICO project you should judge whether the ICO is good or not and if you know what you choose, you can compare the choice of ICO rating website to determine the best. Maybe 60% you can give confidence in the ICO rating site in addition to assessing the ICO you will choose.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Only your own analysis of the project can lead you to success. It is better to study the project yourself and read the analytics in the network. Then you should make conclusions that will be as objective as possible. Do not believe an expert blindly.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
If you are referring to the reliability of the ICO rating platform, I guess you are right about the biased thing but we have to consider that not all rating sites can be bought. It is our duty to identify which is more reliable than the other. ICO ratings are some kind of publicity and exposure like reviews. Good or bad, still a publicity so we have to consider that investors look after for those ICO that are well-known and have the greater probability to be successful. With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
The ratings of ICO sites are very deceptive. Often they contradict each other and mislead investors. Of course you need to look at the ratings, but this is only an additional parameter when choosing a project. Take it as a basis is not exactly worth it.
No, I do not believe in a rating site. Because there are many sites that have a higher rating on bad projects for money. Because of which we have to be cheated.
I only trust myself when it comes to investing. The ICO rating site are just guides which you can choose the available projects to join with.
Jump to: