Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 7. (Read 9148 times)
the site presents a lot of false assessment rating. instead, intend to disfigure, but many found the assessment does not correspond to the real state of ICO. relying on the rating site such as it will only lead to results that can not even be expected. It is better to try to analyze it yourself because it will make learning also to slowly analyze.
Well I can't really so much on that but many are paid for to rate them not by what the project is or what the team can do or may have done before cause I can't really see what they use to rate them , if it is the team profile or the project it self , so that can only show what they actually look out for, it may be the way people talk about them or investors participate in it are the reason but I don't depend on most .
I don't really know how much my thought about any ICO rating site is genuine for the fact that no regulation is guiding them. Automatically, they would only rate base on their own understanding about any project they are rating. Likewise, they may rate base on their own personal interest if they are the type who compromised.
I remember how today, what top rated ico become scam.
I dont now who and why invented this sites
I dont now who and why invented this sites
there are many ico rating sites in the market among which i trust only one website which i feel genuine that website is icorating.com
I don't believe in any ICO rating sites because I think there are problems with most of the popular ICO projects they publish, and they haven't even been reviewed! Because they have collected the money!
Yes, there are very helpful. If you want to get great info about any ICO project and to see its rating among all other project, rating sites are for you. They are also listing a lot of bounty campaigns if the project has one.
They only help but never guarantee that ICOs who have a high rating can be successful, there are many ICOs that I follow and have a high rating, but they can't reach the softcap so I have to wait for a refund and get a transaction fee.
NO, because most of them have sold their values for money. They are helpful don't get me right but to base my decisions to invest in a project on ICOrating sites is like someone headin for disaster. There are some obvious scam projects still being promoted by these websites and is becoming a very serious issue because they need to promote investors by doing their due delligence and vetting the team and idea
The ICO rating site are professional enough to come up with the result of their different analysis of various project in cryptocurrency, whether their analysis will stay the same for a project is another matter entirely!
I think the ICO rating site really helps us in determining the project. But we also have to be careful with these sites, not all sites are correct. When you search for projects on the ICO rating site and you choose projects that score high. You also need to check it again, to make sure that the project is not a scam.
I only believe some sites that do report kyc like icobench, but there are also some review sites that I am irrelevant, especially in giving project ratings and reviews even though they look strange
something interesting here,,
so, KYC is needed for a project if they want to be at ICObench ?
seems good enough if thats true
because personally i don't believe with any ico rating sites,, i will do my own research before invest in any project of cryptocurrencies
Such a website is a good place to discover ICO, but you must not look at the rating, because I have found through my judgment that a good project must not be a perfect score of 5.0. ICO projects that usually trade with rating sites can become 5.0 or maybe they give advertising fees. But there is nothing wrong with charging advertising fees.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
That is true, I stop investing in ICO when I found out that some rating site just accepting payments from ICOs to have 5 quality ratings, it's a another way to scam their investors. With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
It depends on the reviews, if the reviews are in line with my own reviews I will agree with it but if it's not, I won't trust it. I believe everyone has different opinions when it comes to ico and investing. So I always form my own decision.
I don’t trust them to the maximum even though I rely on them to join projects. They at least give me the list of ongoing and upcoming ICOs so get to know what is at the market at which time and for how long. For their ratings, I don’t have a problem and I don’t depend solely on that for my participation. I. General, ICO rating sites will get 7/10 of my trust.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
I do believe on ICO rating sites. Although it is just a rating site, it shows the idea of the majority and it simply means that coins at the top are the ones which are having high demand. Therefore, there is a huge chance for the coin that is having high rating, to be successful due to the demand that it is having from the majority. With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
I only believe some sites that do report kyc like icobench, but there are also some review sites that I am irrelevant, especially in giving project ratings and reviews even though they look strange
Yeah, so that we need to evaluate an ICO once again even though the rating is good. Me, I believe in my own research more than numbers that given free by rating sites. Because those who feel the results are us, not the site. 
I often see Iico with a good rating, but it is not like the fact that mean they have failed in the ICO and means that not all ico who have good ratings will achieve hardcap, and from there I never believe in ICO ratings
I agree with you today that many projects pay a lot of money for good reviews and ratings on well-known sites, so I try not to pay attention to it and do my own analysis. There are many promising projects in which there is a very experienced team. Here is an example of #swachhcoin projects. The project will pay people for their trash. At the moment the bonus is 25%, you can buy coins until mid-December. I advise you to see the project.
I do not fully believe, as i know the ICO Rating website only helps in providing information, it does not come from institutions or official sources that overshadow all ICOs in crypto.Some projects may pay the parties for good marks.
Isn't that certain from the beginning they are making their ico rating website not for charity they want money and that's why they are making the website in the first place.there might be some pretty decent ico review websites but majority of them can be paid to say good things anyway just avoid that when you really trying to find a good ones.
Jump to: