Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 48. (Read 9148 times)
ICO Rating is only as a medium used to help alleviate the public in seeking information, but not as a reference or an official website that can be trusted. The whole decision is in your hands. The ICO is only a site that works according to their abilities and is not completely complete. Develop skills and abilities so that you can filter information from the ICO Rating properly.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Yes but not all the time, As bounty hunters we still need to review and verify if the ICOs project is legitimate so our time and effort during participation will not turn into waste.
Yes this is true all of bounty hunters and investors will always review a site or ico to begin in working and investors and not will turn into wasting our time but i believe ico rating sites is legit if you review it surely.
Yes, I still trust ICO Bench and ICO drops
well as far as rating rating sites is concerned some says its good some are not, some are favorable to some are not, they still cannot fully trusted, you have to have your own consensus on it, you've got to have inner feeling of connectivity on these and at the same time proper knowledge on the ico whom you choose to invest.
To be honest, ICO rating websites are more or less beneficial to investors. But sometimes the ICO rating pages are made by bad motives, because of the money ... So for me it's only reference .
Indeed most of the beginners will trust the ICO rating and then they ask, enter the ICO rating but scam ...
This is what beginners begin to think and find out or ask about potential ICOs.
The ICO rating does not guarantee the success of the project, don't just believe it and keep investigating to get the real answer.
This is what beginners begin to think and find out or ask about potential ICOs.
The ICO rating does not guarantee the success of the project, don't just believe it and keep investigating to get the real answer.
Actually, the rating isn't the only one factor to identify a project as a good or bad project. Yet, the rating is one of many factors to find a good one.
We need to look at various things of a project like product, team, roadmap, marketing, etc before going to invest in a project.
We need to look at various things of a project like product, team, roadmap, marketing, etc before going to invest in a project.
In my opinion, do not trust ratings. Especially sites on the similarity of icobench. Better either teach yourself to analyze yourself, or look for people who earn money by investing in ico.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
I also do not trust the ICO ratings. I have seen a lot of evidence that they lie and take money for valuations.
Yes, support mazesta, ICO rating is only one factor. In any case, you need to look at the whole picture.
no
the best way to check a ico is the team and the whitepaper
the best way to check a ico is the team and the whitepaper
As with any source of information online - don't just take it for granted. Try multiple sources, discussions, forums, and of course figure out their business plan and whitepaper to see for yourself whether you think they actually have a chance, or if they just have a nice and flashy website...
Yes i do trust them because this is where some of my information on my research and i came up if the ICO is a scam or not because i know that those who run ICO rating is a very good when giving a opinion on a ICO
I think the ICO rating cannot affect investors to join a project, investors are more observant and careful in investing. ICO ratings don't all work well but many make it less satisfied in their performance. Paying is not a good start, sometimes it becomes disastrous for the next.
why do you mention that ICO Rating will not affect investors in investing? some investors become ICO Rating as a reference for investing in a project
no
the best way to check a ico is the team and the whitepaper
the best way to check a ico is the team and the whitepaper
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Exactly, looking for those sites we all know that there are some manipulation of the ratings ofcourse for those who pay will recieve a higher one. If you really a good researcher then those ratings is not reliable.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
if the project can manage to pay that certain amount, well they have the initial funds to start the project and it is an advantage for me. ico rating sites specially icobench are trusted sites that delivers good project. it does not smell fishy for me.
Rating are now available for money. Its not trust able.
People generally just finding the detail about the projec though, let alone that biased review of ICO that most of them are just simply advertised review.People are already smart enough to know that they cant fully trust those reviewers that's credibility can be doubted.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Yes it may be good help for the investors to find better ICO but always remember that we are the one who’s responsible for our own money,if we want to get involved in investing kjust make sure you will lookt it personally and never lies on the rating sites instead lets check each of every project that might get our attentions for the benefits of our hard earned money.i can share some thread that might help you out finding good one
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-we-need-to-check-before-investing-in-ico-2896030 Here how to find good ico
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/11-mistakes-you-should-never-do-in-crypto-trading-4475764 Heres how to prevent making mistakes
Hope this helps somebody to profit in right way
For ICO rating I don't believe completely. Because my experience was not so good when getting the project from that site. And for now the only rating as ICO consideration I to select the project. And before I determine project ICO I would certainly review the project. So that I can get a good project and not a scam.
I simply look at the ICO rating sites as a useful additional source of information to dig into when I am researching an ICO. I would never just follow the opinions of unknown people on there when I am choosing to make an investment, the rule I will always follow is Do Your Own Research.
Jump to: