Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 53. (Read 9148 times)
First I used to rely solely on ICO rating sites because almost everything to be considered is already graded by the expert. But now I am starting to doubt the ICO rating site after hearing news about a biased ICO rating site, because of the bad shade of this ICO rating site, all other honest sites are affected.
No,I do not trust ICO rating site. If you want to invest in ICO, the most important are check the Website, Team and Road-map of the project. After that you can investment it.
I'm using ratings. I do not advise to trust the ratings one hundred percent. But in order to roughly understand what kind of project.
make some ICO rating a supporting factor, don't make it the main factor that you make as a benchmark for using an ICO project
As for me it is not safe to trust in those types of sites. You can find there a good ICO. But anyway always need to do your own research.
I'm will pay attention on the ICO rating site but I not really trust too much on the ICO rating site. It is better to do more research own your own.
Not anymore. i used to believe in the analysis of several ICO Rating sites until recently i found out that some of them can even paid by project managers to give them high rating scores so that members of the crypto community can participate in their bounties and ICOs.
I believe that the ICO rating page is a good choice of investors. Because they are ICO assessors and they will test the quality of the project. The payment for a better assessment is reasonable
I don't trust all the sites but few give good review. I however, do not base on reviews from these sites to invest or buy my tokens. I prefer to do my personal research about any token that I wish to invest in. I think we can start to trust them more if they should make public the criteria they use to rate the projects.
Unfortunately, I don't know what to trust anymore. I have heard many different opinions and some people believe that the ratings are not all honest. This means that you can meet scammers anywhere. That's why I don't use ratings. I myself analyze projects is much more difficult than just to see the ratings.
The scoring system must be completely unreliable, some ICO ratings are indeed one of the references for investors in buying tokens. At the moment I still believe in some of the Raitng ICO websites because it is an option when I join ico
Fully you should not trust anyone. I always take into account the opinion of rating sites, but I think that 40% there is not quite true. Before you buy a coin, study it.
My opinion is that the ICO rating is not a good factor to determine.
I can not say that I trust these ratings in terms of my own investments. These ratings help me understand the mood of the general mass of people, because most of the crypto-currency investors are stupid and do not think with their heads.
I do not trust ICO rating sites because I read many news say that they can easily get high rating by paying money for experts.
I listen to their opinion, but still draw my conclusions about any projects in which I am going to participate
Usually I will use the ICO rating website as a reference and find the place for the ICO project. Although I don't fully believe it, it can give us some help!
I do not really believe the ICO rating currently available. Because there are some who have good ratings but in the end scam too. So don't rely too much on the results of the ICO rating, you have to use other indications to see whether the ICO is good or not and worth buying.
Certainly not. By the reviews on the charts are only basic criteria, it is impossible to evaluate the potential of the project. Sometimes, the assessment may not be centered due to some redemption factors. I suppose please consider adding many different aspects
yes, i believe but i only believe 50% and 50% from ICO itself (like roadmap, whitepaper, product from the project).
Jump to: