Topic: Do you trust the co-vid19 vaccine ? - page 57. (Read 20317 times)

Red Cross does not take blood form vaccined people.

More importantly make sure who you date or plan to have kids with the offspring is a mongrel, when human and gene altered human have a kid.  
This subhuman can not reproduce (no grandchildren). Same as with mule or hinny, sterile.

You still don't know the long term side effects of these experimental medicine. Just because your parents didn't have any problems in the next day doesn't mean they won't in the next 10 years. Hopefully they will be healthy in the future but it is just I cannot trust them, yet.

On the other hand, if nobody tests these experimental stuff, we will never be able to know the side effects. So somebody has to take it... Btw, my parents too have gotten the so called vaccines. I'll probably skip it.

Two shots is start then endless refresh for new "strains" of the none exist virus. (Covid variant from South Africa was able to "break through" Pfizer vaccine gene therapy in Israeli study.)
Second no "vaccine" exists for covid, only gene therapy. What a vaccine is, is legally defined, and none of existing fit the criteria.

Producing childhood death..  A quick look at 'Progressive Eugenics' program and all be clear.
https://banthis.tv/watch?id=6071fe829ae3a816934d4efa

Good for your parents then, what are the ranges of your parents age? IIRC, all of those vaccines have two shots right? is it okay if you can ask them when will be their next vaccine shot for each of those vaccines?
How about you? you already got yours or not yet?

So far all my parents received the first injections of the corona vaccine. The funny thing is that everybody got a different type, my grandmother got biontech, my mother Moderna and my dad AstraZeneca. Noone of them had any side effects, no bad reactions or anything. I heard from a friend of my parents that she felt the injection needle for a day and was a bit tired the next day, but no physical complications. I think we can trust the vaccines.

Just remember this "Trans-gene" when you talk about the "Vaccine" experimental Gene therapy.

^^^ The CDC and Fauci tell us to use strict, REAL science, not anecdotal medicine or science. franky1 shows us that the only thing that the CDC and Fauci rely on is anecdotal medicine and techniques... simply by contradicting either himself, or else Fauci and the CDC (which, of course, contradict themselves and franky1 all over the place).

badecker say "under reporting by CDC/VAERS"

badecker does not realise that the patients and doctors do the reporting.
badecker does not know the difference between reporting. and report

..
now heres some stuff badecker does not know
Anaphylaxis comes in 2 varieties
anaphylactic shock and anaphylactoid

convulsions and swelling is a severe thing
things like 'rash at injection site' is a mild thing

there 2 different things.. of 2 different impact levels

the cdc was concontrating n the anaphylactic shock (the bad one).. not the cry baby 'mummy i got a rash'
hospital was reporting even the mild/minor stuff.. (cry baby stuff)
..
we all know by now badecker pretends to want to get sick from covid rather than have the vaccine.. so will badecker be the one that cries about having a rash at the back of his throat that makes him cough,.. will he seek to warn and tell everyone about his cough..
or would he be like most and not cry about it. but just deal with it

ICAN, through its attorneys, has once again written to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the new Director of the CDC, this time to demand an answer as to why the CDC's reporting of anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccination is not in line with a clinical study conducted which shows much higher rates following these vaccinations.
 
The CDC tells the public that "Anaphylaxis after COVID-19 vaccination is rare and occurred in approximately 2 to 5 people per million vaccinated in the United States based on events reported to VAERS." However, ICAN reviewed a recent study at Mass General Brigham that assessed anaphylaxis in a clinical setting after the administration of COVID-19 vaccines. This study, in stark contrast to the CDC's claim, found "severe reactions consistent with anaphylaxis occurred at a rate of 2.47 per 10,000 vaccinations." This is equivalent to 50 times to 120 times more cases than what VAERS and the CDC are reporting!
 
In a letter to Dr. Walensky, ICAN explained that this alarming underreporting of anaphylaxis by the CDC and VAERS is particularly troubling because it is mandatory for medical providers to report anaphylaxis after any COVID-19 vaccine to VAERS. In addition, the CDC reports that most of these reactions occur within 30 minutes of vaccination. The study reported that the mean time to reaction is 17 minutes post-vaccination. This means that vaccine administrators, then, should be aware of a majority, if not all, of these cases as vaccine recipients are supposed to be observed for 15 to 30-minute periods following vaccination at all vaccination sites.
 
Additionally, and specifically with regard to COVID-19 vaccines, there has actually been a push by health authorities to inform medical providers that they need to report anaphylaxis to VAERS. Despite this, the rate of reporting still appears to be only around 0.8 to 2 percent of all cases of anaphylaxis. (This is close to the Harvard Pilgrim study which found that approximately 1% of adverse events are reported to VAERS).
 
ICAN explained to Dr. Walensky that this raises serious concerns regarding (1) under-reporting of other serious adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, and (2) adverse events following other vaccines for which there has not been the same push to report adverse events. The anaphylaxis study highlights the urgency of the ongoing, well-known problem with adverse event reporting post-vaccination which ICAN has been pointing out for years.
 
Unless and until this is addressed, underreporting to VAERS, a passive signal detection system, will continue to blind health agencies, medical professionals, and patients from what is really occurring in the clinic and will render true informed consent impossible.
 
ICAN continues to ask the hard questions of Dr. Walensky and others. ICAN will closely review any response from Dr. Walensky and will continue to push for improved transparency regarding vaccines and their development, clinical trials, and safety surveillance.

https://thehighwire.com/

https://www.icandecide.org/

tash is pretending that there are 100k+ cases of seizures brain damage strokes

funny part is only ~40,000 reports are made. whereby those reports include one OR MORE symptom
total symptoms were ~116k. not the 116k+337k 'symptoms' tash is suggesting


also they are not 100K in the category of nervous system reactions

infact only 30 cases of bloodclots have been found. meaning strokes is under 30
(22 reports of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST))

30 or less.. not 100k.. not 10k not 100... just 30
..
so here is some facts on fatality rate
covid: there are 4.3mill cases and 126800 deaths within 28 days of getting covid(2.9%)
vaccine: there are 37mill vaccines and 704 deaths within 28 days of getting vaccine(0.0019%)

so here is some facts on severe symptom
covid: there are 4.3mill cases and 457000 hospitalisations with covid (10.5%)
vaccine: there are 37mill vaccines and 11600 adverse reaction symptoms (0.31%)

so ask yourself. do you want a 10% chance of needing medical help. or 0.31%
do you want a 2.9% risk of death or a 0.0019%

what tash is misunderstanding or blatantly lying about. is there maybe hundreds of thousands of reports of cry baby stuff like those that feel the needle going in. or a rash/warmth/pain at the needle mark

but the actual rate of people having harmful/unfavourable level of symptoms(adverse) is far lower

the facts are that there is a 1500x benefit of having a vaccine compared to licking sick people to get covid.. based on fatality rates

the facts are that there is a 33x benefit of having a vaccine compared to licking sick people to get covid.. based on mild/severe symptom risk


..
take 2 populations of 100,000 each
                      covid pop                      vaccine pop
seek a doctor   10,500                          310
die                    2,900                          <2

which population group would you rather be in

The current rate of people suffering a serious adverse reaction after having one of the experimental Covid "vaccines" stands at 1 in every 166 people.
As of the 21st March in the UK, reported adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine is at 116,627 and 377,487 for the Oxford jab.
Reactions include 5230 Cardiac Disorders, 6324 Eye Disorders including blindness & an astounding 103,858 nervous system disorders including brain damage, paralysis, seizure & stroke.
But it’s important to remember that this rate only accounts for the adverse reactions that are actually reported, which is estimated to be around only 1%, meaning the actual rate of adverse reactions occurring is frighteningly higher.
Happy jabbing.

So, who was the militia?
- Elliot Ness and The Untouchables?, or
- Al Capone and the Mafia?

The people don't care. Both were bad. Ness was simply a bit more hidden in his badness. Loads of people hated prohibition. And for a long time Capone was adored as a good guy.

Capone died in prison, barely 48-y-o. Ness died 54-y-o, in poverty. Prohibition died, and the people probably didn;'t like Ness after they got him, because he enforced prohibition which they didn't like.

If the people had gotten together and formed a REAL militia, they might have been able to do what they wanted, better than Ness and The Untouchables.

So, what do we want? And how do we keep from getting what we don't want? A militia that is for the people? A militia that is controlled by government? Or a gang that calls itself a militia?

2nd Amendment - Ability for responsible people in communities to maintain a livable environment without the 'help' of the mask-nazi brown-shirts sent in by Big Brother.

Anthony Fauci: Key to Pandemic Prevention is Building Infrastructure, Capacity and Common Platforms

Fauci talks about preventing a pandemic in 2017.

@1:16,

"The Chinese knew back in 2003, that this respiratory infection was not influenza. However they didn't communicate. They've done much better since then but had we known that we were dealing with a brand new coronavirus infection, we may have been better prepared."

He talks like he planned this whole thing.

^^^ Actually, what the "can and can't do" thing is all about is contradictions. You are really being told, and have been told for a long time, that you can and can't do all the same things. The whole popular line contradicts itself over and over again. The point is, that in the States, you are not required. Why not? Below...

The Constitution doesn't give the authority to government to authorize against these following things. If they attempt to, they are breaking their oath of office.
1st Amendment - Right to Travel.
4th Amendment - Right to take your property with you when you travel.
9th Amendment - Right to make anything a right for yourself, as long as you do no harm.
(Use all the authorities and doctors from around the world and in the States who know there isn't any pandemic, to make those who tell you that there is to prove it.)

Almost all of the obedience to government mandates to do this or that, aren't really mandates. They are advisories. People obey out of ignorance that there isn't any pandemic, and that government has the authority.

If a cop arrests you, or even lays his hands on you, for not masking down, or for not social distancing, make him and his department pay with the proper kind of suit in court.

"What You Can and Can’t Do if You’ve Been Vaccinated: Travel, Gatherings, Risk Factors, What You Need to Know
Until we reach herd immunity, vaccinated people must navigate some complicated decision-making. Here’s how to assess the risks."


Mark the words "herd immunity"... and remember we are talking about 8 billion people...



https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-you-can-and-cant-do-if-youve-been-vaccinated-travel-gatherings-risk-factors-what-you-need-to-know-11614978343

It's not a vaccine. It's a form of gene manipulation, with a focus on greatly increasing mutated strains of Covid, with the potential for creating all kinds of new viruses. Who does the creating? The body of everyone who gets the injection.

The enemy is Big Pharma, not the disease.

Funny enough most of y’all commenting here if opportunities should meet you, you will gladly inject the vaccine 😂
I don’t see anything bad in vaccines 💉 the same way we take vaccines for polio and the rest that’s how we’re taking it for COVID-19.we all should restructure and rebrand our minds to this vaccine 💉. It’s not a death sentence. It’s no one agenda to wipe out the world 🌎 at large as assumed and rumored.
  Let me make this clear even the proposed world 🌎 leaders  we think 🤔 they turned down the vaccine 💉 has taken it in their closet without making it public. None of them would admit they have taken it to media, neither would they say so on their social media handles but discreetly they have succumbed to the vaccine 💉.

 So my answer to you the OP is absolutely YES I do trust the Covid-19 vaccine 💉 yes I said this mostly Africans wants to turn this vaccine 💉 to a death 💀 wish or suicidal thing. For crying out loud  erase those messages and thoughts 💭 from your mind there is nothing wrong with the vaccines. If at all there is it should be coming from the government of that particular country affected, probably they have adulterated it and made it look like the vaccine 💉 has been poisoned 🤢. Let’s all be guided😊 meanwhile from my little knowledge I think it hasn’t been made compulsory so far it’s still optional in most countries. Let’s all come together to heal the world 🌎.
 
I bow 🙇‍♂️ out.

My 'Liberal Democrat' family members have also become the biggest fans of corporations such as Pfizer, Inc., and will defend them to the death.  It's perfectly understandable to them why the corporations should want complete immunity and even have developing world nations put up their military bases as collateral against findings of criminal negligence by the nation's court system.

Same family has no interest whatsoever about the differences between the different 'platforms' that these 'vaccines' are built on.  They went with Moderna because it was the first one available.  If it would have been a DNA based 'platform' such as AstraZeneca or J&J, they would have gone with that.  As long as Biden is president, any 'vaccine' is a good vacccine and there are no possible differences.  The hear on NPR that 'experts say'(tm) the things are great, and that proves it.

Beyond that, it is a unshakable faith that every vial which says 'AstraZeneca' on it is exactly the same as any other no matter where it is is made and shipped to.  They hold the mutual belief that if there are a spat of adverse reactions in a locale, it is just a 'bad batch'.  Doublethink FTW!

I suspect that the recent name-change of 'AstraZeneca's offering and the goings on with the '15 million ruined doses' in Baltimore are part of a psyop associated with what the injection is going to do to some group of darkies in the 'developing world'.  I have no doubt that it will work like a champ and my family will retain the 100% confidence in the 'vaccine'.

Too opinionated and less substance