Topic: Do you trust the co-vid19 vaccine ? - page 57. (Read 20577 times)

tash defends a retired man that tested a unauthorised vaccine on 60+ people

wait. wasnt tash earlier saying that testing unauthorised things on people was bad..
wait. wasnt tash earlier saying that 21000 test subjects is not enough to 'prove'
wait. wasnt tash earlier saying that 6-9months was not enough to 'prove'
..
so now tash wants to defend a retired guy that tested it without authorisation on 60+ people and call it science

dang tash is flip flopping more then badecker..

and then there is this
'i produced an antigen and then innoculated myself several times intramuscularly'

seems his treatment is not a 1 dose. not a 2 dose not a 3 dose but a several dose treatment
...
so why exactly is tash defending this guy??

so why is a guy that did not seek permission to use humans as guineapigs.. deemed a good guy?

One of the biggest reasons I don't trust the covid 'vaccination' is because of the kind of people involved at all levels of this thing.  Prince Philip finally dead. 

  https://newspunch.com/prince-philip-who-said-he-wanted-to-reincarnate-as-a-deadly-virus-has-died/

Mafia big pharma does not allow competition and no vaccines wirh undeadly sideeffects.
Prof. Winfried Stoecker, founder of "euroimmun" developed a vaccine with only good intentions...
74 year old Dr. Winfried Stöcker developed his own corona vaccine last year and has already tested it on himself and around 150 volunteers.
His opinion that the drug could end the corona pandemic in Germany in a short time is not shared by the responsible Federal Institute for Vaccines, Paul Ehrlich Institute, Instead of enthusiasm, criminal proceedings are now underway against him  for "not being allowed to do so", violations of the drugs act.

That's what the side effects say... "Vaccines good."

I don't trust astrazeneca in the first place. And this clearly shows it

But aside from astrazeneca, other vaccines is good, though side-effects may occur 

Any number of deaths presented is bogus because THERE IS NO "REACTION TO COVID-19 VACCINE" OPTION for cause of death when entering death reports. Way more deaths as reported.     Denmark already permanently discontinue astrazeneca vaccine gene manipulation/alterations.
A vaccine so safe and tested we don't even know how many doses needed...


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9469529/Mother-demands-answers-son-20-died-12-hours-receiving-Pfizer-jab.html
https://rightedition.com/2021/04/15/mississippi-man-described-as-young-and-healthy-suffers-debilitating-stroke-immediately-after-covid-vaccine/
https://local12.com/news/nation-world/father-of-7-suffers-stroke-family-blames-johnson-johnson-vaccine
Caught On Camera At A Moderna Covid Vaccine Site In Texas... and the head of Denmark's medicines agency, Tanja Erichsen, fainted during a press conference on the decision to stop using the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid vaccine.

^^^ The only difference between the people who died from the shot, and the people who didn't...

Perhaps long ago, the Russian word for "no" was "no." But then they found that when they said "no," things didn't always work out that way. So, now the Russian word is "nyet" (transliteration). In English, "nyet" is simply a contraction, and should be spelled "n'yet" for "not yet."

In other words, the people who got the vaccine, but didn't die from it, fall into the category of n'yet.

I have heard a lot of comments both negative and positive about the covid vaccine , and I don't even know what to believe again , I haven't gotten a shot and believe me I don't have plan to get one until the clearify the air about this present issue.

The so-called 'trials' were a sick joke to anyone with a vague understanding of medical science.  Not only because of the sample size, but also because of the definitions (of 'work'), the protocols, the transparency, conflicts of interest, etc.  Of course 'scientists' are not surprised that people are dropping like flies.

I'm semi-surprised that they don't just keep on jabbing with the thing anyway, but no terribly surprised because now they have a decent sample size (of brain-dead simpletons who were willing to roll up their sleeves for this charade...and take all the risk which they are normally compensated for as real drug trial test subjects.)

"J&J Vaccine Clot Issue Shows Limits of Clinical Trials, Scientists Say
Scientists aren’t surprised other side effects occurred as the Covid-19 shot was given to a much larger population than during trial"

https://www.wsj.com/articles/j-j-vaccine-clot-issue-shows-limits-of-clinical-trials-scientists-say-11618339352

Don't forget also that Jeffery Epstein had/has a fever dream about 'seeding future generation' with his own genetic material and gave a lot of money to the same research institutions who are front and center in this vaccine gene therapy push.  Pictures abound of Epstein chilling with Bill Gates, and even the now-science czar for Biden; Eric Lander.

I'd want to know a LOT more about the genetic material found in these gene therapies before getting them injected into myself or my family.  I want my family tree to be as far removed from that of Epstein and his friends as possible.

Red Cross does not take blood form vaccined people.

More importantly make sure who you date or plan to have kids with the offspring is a mongrel, when human and gene altered human have a kid.  
This subhuman can not reproduce (no grandchildren). Same as with mule or hinny, sterile.

You still don't know the long term side effects of these experimental medicine. Just because your parents didn't have any problems in the next day doesn't mean they won't in the next 10 years. Hopefully they will be healthy in the future but it is just I cannot trust them, yet.

On the other hand, if nobody tests these experimental stuff, we will never be able to know the side effects. So somebody has to take it... Btw, my parents too have gotten the so called vaccines. I'll probably skip it.

Two shots is start then endless refresh for new "strains" of the none exist virus. (Covid variant from South Africa was able to "break through" Pfizer vaccine gene therapy in Israeli study.)
Second no "vaccine" exists for covid, only gene therapy. What a vaccine is, is legally defined, and none of existing fit the criteria.

Producing childhood death..  A quick look at 'Progressive Eugenics' program and all be clear.
https://banthis.tv/watch?id=6071fe829ae3a816934d4efa

Good for your parents then, what are the ranges of your parents age? IIRC, all of those vaccines have two shots right? is it okay if you can ask them when will be their next vaccine shot for each of those vaccines?
How about you? you already got yours or not yet?

So far all my parents received the first injections of the corona vaccine. The funny thing is that everybody got a different type, my grandmother got biontech, my mother Moderna and my dad AstraZeneca. Noone of them had any side effects, no bad reactions or anything. I heard from a friend of my parents that she felt the injection needle for a day and was a bit tired the next day, but no physical complications. I think we can trust the vaccines.

Just remember this "Trans-gene" when you talk about the "Vaccine" experimental Gene therapy.

^^^ The CDC and Fauci tell us to use strict, REAL science, not anecdotal medicine or science. franky1 shows us that the only thing that the CDC and Fauci rely on is anecdotal medicine and techniques... simply by contradicting either himself, or else Fauci and the CDC (which, of course, contradict themselves and franky1 all over the place).

badecker say "under reporting by CDC/VAERS"

badecker does not realise that the patients and doctors do the reporting.
badecker does not know the difference between reporting. and report

..
now heres some stuff badecker does not know
Anaphylaxis comes in 2 varieties
anaphylactic shock and anaphylactoid

convulsions and swelling is a severe thing
things like 'rash at injection site' is a mild thing

there 2 different things.. of 2 different impact levels

the cdc was concontrating n the anaphylactic shock (the bad one).. not the cry baby 'mummy i got a rash'
hospital was reporting even the mild/minor stuff.. (cry baby stuff)
..
we all know by now badecker pretends to want to get sick from covid rather than have the vaccine.. so will badecker be the one that cries about having a rash at the back of his throat that makes him cough,.. will he seek to warn and tell everyone about his cough..
or would he be like most and not cry about it. but just deal with it

ICAN, through its attorneys, has once again written to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the new Director of the CDC, this time to demand an answer as to why the CDC's reporting of anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccination is not in line with a clinical study conducted which shows much higher rates following these vaccinations.
 
The CDC tells the public that "Anaphylaxis after COVID-19 vaccination is rare and occurred in approximately 2 to 5 people per million vaccinated in the United States based on events reported to VAERS." However, ICAN reviewed a recent study at Mass General Brigham that assessed anaphylaxis in a clinical setting after the administration of COVID-19 vaccines. This study, in stark contrast to the CDC's claim, found "severe reactions consistent with anaphylaxis occurred at a rate of 2.47 per 10,000 vaccinations." This is equivalent to 50 times to 120 times more cases than what VAERS and the CDC are reporting!
 
In a letter to Dr. Walensky, ICAN explained that this alarming underreporting of anaphylaxis by the CDC and VAERS is particularly troubling because it is mandatory for medical providers to report anaphylaxis after any COVID-19 vaccine to VAERS. In addition, the CDC reports that most of these reactions occur within 30 minutes of vaccination. The study reported that the mean time to reaction is 17 minutes post-vaccination. This means that vaccine administrators, then, should be aware of a majority, if not all, of these cases as vaccine recipients are supposed to be observed for 15 to 30-minute periods following vaccination at all vaccination sites.
 
Additionally, and specifically with regard to COVID-19 vaccines, there has actually been a push by health authorities to inform medical providers that they need to report anaphylaxis to VAERS. Despite this, the rate of reporting still appears to be only around 0.8 to 2 percent of all cases of anaphylaxis. (This is close to the Harvard Pilgrim study which found that approximately 1% of adverse events are reported to VAERS).
 
ICAN explained to Dr. Walensky that this raises serious concerns regarding (1) under-reporting of other serious adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, and (2) adverse events following other vaccines for which there has not been the same push to report adverse events. The anaphylaxis study highlights the urgency of the ongoing, well-known problem with adverse event reporting post-vaccination which ICAN has been pointing out for years.
 
Unless and until this is addressed, underreporting to VAERS, a passive signal detection system, will continue to blind health agencies, medical professionals, and patients from what is really occurring in the clinic and will render true informed consent impossible.
 
ICAN continues to ask the hard questions of Dr. Walensky and others. ICAN will closely review any response from Dr. Walensky and will continue to push for improved transparency regarding vaccines and their development, clinical trials, and safety surveillance.

https://thehighwire.com/

https://www.icandecide.org/