Pages:
Author

Topic: Do you trust the co-vid19 vaccine ? - page 59. (Read 20577 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
April 03, 2021, 07:50:53 AM
My grandmother got now the second injection and is totally fine. She had no side effects after the first and second vaccination. It took a while to get through the test center but everything was fine in the end. I think the vaccines are the real deal now and are our way to get through the pandemic. It is probably going to take another 6 months until I can get my vaccine but as I am eligible I will get it. The real question remains who many percentages of the population need to be vacccinated for all the lockdowns to stop? It would be nice if there is a fixed percentage of people who need to be vaccinated until everything can open up again. I haven't been on a proper vaccation since December 2019, can't wait for the world to go back to normal.

There is no single reason not to have normal in place now.

With guys like you around there is no back to normal. Your new normal is a new vaccination every 6 months for anyone participation.
Not everone taking the poision shot drops dead on the spot, some do. Taking aids "medication" most manage to hang around some years.


hero member
Activity: 1974
Merit: 534
April 03, 2021, 02:24:08 AM
My grandmother got now the second injection and is totally fine. She had no side effects after the first and second vaccination. It took a while to get through the test center but everything was fine in the end. I think the vaccines are the real deal now and are our way to get through the pandemic. It is probably going to take another 6 months until I can get my vaccine but as I am eligible I will get it. The real question remains who many percentages of the population need to be vacccinated for all the lockdowns to stop? It would be nice if there is a fixed percentage of people who need to be vaccinated until everything can open up again. I haven't been on a proper vaccation since December 2019, can't wait for the world to go back to normal.
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283
April 03, 2021, 01:20:46 AM
Quote

AstraZeneca didnt exist in 1991-1998

AstraZeneca plc is a British-Swedish multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology company.
The company was founded in 1999 through the merger of the Swedish Astra AB and the British Zeneca Group

 

Merging Feces and Urin is still Manure, and not suitable "shootup" material.


It's probably very good 'junk' for the 'useless eater' classes.

Oxford University has hundreds of years of 'enlightened' study and countless late-night rap sessions concerning how to deal with such problems this problem in particular.  There is also a fair bit of 'cross-pollination' in academia so 'good ideas' about how to resolve problems such as overpopulation and de-evolution can spread and metastasize.  Happily enough, these academic institutions tend to be hungry for money making it easy for TPTB to influence the trajectory of 'discovery.' 

sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
April 03, 2021, 12:50:27 AM
Quote
AstraZeneca didnt exist in 1991-1998


AstraZeneca plc is a British-Swedish multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology company.
The company was founded in 1999 through the merger of the Swedish Astra AB and the British Zeneca Group

Astra AB was a former international pharmaceutical company headquartered in Södertälje, Sweden and formed in 1913

Zeneca (officially Zeneca Group PLC) was a British multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in London.
It was formed in June 1993 by the demerger of the pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals businesses of Imperial Chemical Industries into a separate company listed on the London Stock Exchange.

Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI) was a British chemical company. It was, for much of its history, the largest manufacturer in Britain.
ICI made general chemicals, plastics, paints, pharmaceuticals and speciality products, including food ingredients, speciality polymers, electronic materials, fragrances and flavourings.
It was formed by the merger of four leading British chemical companies in 1926. (Brunner Mond, Nobel Explosives, the United Alkali Company, and British Dyestuffs Corporation)
During the Second World War, ICI was involved with the United Kingdom's nuclear weapons programme codenamed Tube Alloys.


Merging Feces and Urin is still Manure, and not suitable "shootup" material.

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 02, 2021, 04:29:36 PM

WHAT DID YOU SAY? whooooosh

I didn't know before that you needed to learn the English language better. But we both know it now.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
April 02, 2021, 12:38:34 PM
Bottom line is this  Emer Cooke was on big pharma payroll for over 30 year and began her mandate as Executive Director of EMA on 16 November 2020 making sure vaccines get approved, sold to unsuspecting customers. Stinks sky high


full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 158
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
April 02, 2021, 11:57:43 AM

Nothing to do with health, only money and control
Dr Emma Cooke was appointed Chairman of the EMA (European medicines authority) in mid-November 2020 (16 November).
From 1991-1998 President of the EFNIA Lobbying Organization for the largest pharmacompanies pfizer, Astrazenica, Novartis, J & J...

first its Emer Cooke
secondly she was appointed in june 2020
thirdly she was appointed as executive director of EMA not chairman
fourthly she is also chairman of ICMRA

AstraZeneca didnt exist in 1991-1998

she is a regulator. and has been for 20 years+. if a medical product doesnt meet certain standards she is the one that punishes the pharma company.

yep she never worked for the pharmaceutical companies. she has always been sitting on the side of government regulators

and now for the most funny part
the EC (european commission) does the 'money and control' stuff not the ema
yep the EMA does not do any money negotiations or any price fixing or any thing of the sort
their role is in the science and monitoring of safety and effectiveness

like i said she can say stop to any release of any treatment and take the pharma to court/sanction them. but she doesnt tell EU countries how much the EU should pay for treatments. the EU use the EC for that

she is a regulatory not a treasurer

Thank you for making Tash's point better than he did. All this time, and she still doesn't know what's going on... except if she is Emma Crook rather than Emma Cooke, that is.

Cool

WHAT DID YOU SAY? whooooosh
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 02, 2021, 09:09:39 AM

Nothing to do with health, only money and control
Dr Emma Cooke was appointed Chairman of the EMA (European medicines authority) in mid-November 2020 (16 November).
From 1991-1998 President of the EFNIA Lobbying Organization for the largest pharmacompanies pfizer, Astrazenica, Novartis, J & J...

first its Emer Cooke
secondly she was appointed in june 2020
thirdly she was appointed as executive director of EMA not chairman
fourthly she is also chairman of ICMRA

AstraZeneca didnt exist in 1991-1998

she is a regulator. and has been for 20 years+. if a medical product doesnt meet certain standards she is the one that punishes the pharma company.

yep she never worked for the pharmaceutical companies. she has always been sitting on the side of government regulators

and now for the most funny part
the EC (european commission) does the 'money and control' stuff not the ema
yep the EMA does not do any money negotiations or any price fixing or any thing of the sort
their role is in the science and monitoring of safety and effectiveness

like i said she can say stop to any release of any treatment and take the pharma to court/sanction them. but she doesnt tell EU countries how much the EU should pay for treatments. the EU use the EC for that

she is a regulatory not a treasurer

Thank you for making Tash's point better than he did. All this time, and she still doesn't know what's going on... except if she is Emma Crook rather than Emma Cooke, that is.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4788
April 02, 2021, 05:31:42 AM

Nothing to do with health, only money and control
Dr Emma Cooke was appointed Chairman of the EMA (European medicines authority) in mid-November 2020 (16 November).
From 1991-1998 President of the EFNIA Lobbying Organization for the largest pharmacompanies pfizer, Astrazenica, Novartis, J & J...

first its Emer Cooke
secondly she was appointed in june 2020
thirdly she was appointed as executive director of EMA not chairman
fourthly she is also chairman of ICMRA

AstraZeneca didnt exist in 1991-1998

she is a regulator. and has been for 20 years+. if a medical product doesnt meet certain standards she is the one that punishes the pharma company.

yep she never worked for the pharmaceutical companies. she has always been sitting on the side of government regulators

and now for the most funny part
the EC (european commission) does the 'money and control' stuff not the ema
yep the EMA does not do any money negotiations or any price fixing or any thing of the sort
their role is in the science and monitoring of safety and effectiveness

like i said she can say stop to any release of any treatment and take the pharma to court/sanction them. but she doesnt tell EU countries how much the EU should pay for treatments. the EU use the EC for that

she is a regulatory not a treasurer
hero member
Activity: 1459
Merit: 973
April 02, 2021, 04:37:44 AM

Nothing to do with health, only money and control
Dr Emma Cooke was appointed Chairman of the EMA (European medicines authority) in mid-November 2020 (16 November).
The European medicines agency is responsible for the approval of vaccines in Europe and aswith very powerful
Budget of the EMA is over 300 million Euro and 91% comes from Pharma Companies

Ms. Cooke was active in various positions in the pharma industry since 1985, a lifetime lobbist for the pharmaceutical industry
From 1991-1998 President of the EFNIA Lobbying Organization for the largest pharmacompanies pfizer, Astrazenica, Novartis, J & J...
Now she is responsive for admission, control, and effectiveness of vaccines

Insider trading, nepotism and corruption, nothing else to say about "vaccines"




The vaccine industry are like drug pushers.They give out the first dose free or with little margin but know the money is where the repeat bizness is.The drug dealers in this case are the pharma companies and their enforcers are the guberment.The enforcers will provide an endless market of cattle to be jabbed because if the cattle don't comply the enforcers "will make life difficult".No different to how the cartels work with corrupt officials.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
April 02, 2021, 01:46:52 AM

Nothing to do with health, only money and control
Dr Emma Cooke was appointed Chairman of the EMA (European medicines authority) in mid-November 2020 (16 November).
The European medicines agency is responsible for the approval of vaccines in Europe and aswith very powerful
Budget of the EMA is over 300 million Euro and 91% comes from Pharma Companies

Ms. Cooke was active in various positions in the pharma industry since 1985, a lifetime lobbist for the pharmaceutical industry
From 1991-1998 President of the EFNIA Lobbying Organization for the largest pharmacompanies pfizer, Astrazenica, Novartis, J & J...
Now she is responsive for admission, control, and effectiveness of vaccines

Insider trading, nepotism and corruption, nothing else to say about "vaccines"


legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283
April 02, 2021, 01:39:47 AM
https://twitter.com/GovPhilScott/status/1377605174320099335

Um, so yeah...this seems incredibly racist. If you told me decades ago that some moron politician would say something like this, I would call you a liar. But unfortunately times have changed so we've now prioritized medical care by race. So if you're white you can't sign up for a potentially life saving vaccine quite yet?

Or looked at another way, if you are a darkie some whites (and especially the chosen 'fellow whites' who seem to have a disproportionate hand in this operation) will get you the injections 'you need'.  For FREE!!!

To say the truth, it may turn out that these early phases it might be the right time to get the gene therapy.  Very soon it will be mandatory and the formulations can be tweaked with a lot more flexibility.  As a matter of fact, if I were hired to design this operation, I would 'prove safety' on the early adopters who are anyone stupid enough to line up for the thing in exchange for fee donuts.  These are a more ideal 'herd' in the long term 'world to come' from the perspective of TPTB.  Later, when vaccines are given at gunpoint, would be the time to give the 'real ones'.  In that case you need a certain percentage of the early adopter idiots to have their skin fall off just so when it happens to the real targets you have some time period to play it off as a 'known issue which just means that the vaccines are working'.

legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1515
April 02, 2021, 01:08:02 AM
https://twitter.com/GovPhilScott/status/1377605174320099335

Um, so yeah...this seems incredibly racist. If you told me decades ago that some moron politician would say something like this, I would call you a liar. But unfortunately times have changed so we've now prioritized medical care by race. So if you're white you can't sign up for a potentially life saving vaccine quite yet?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 01, 2021, 07:21:34 PM
its still far from a break through until it is considered to be totally safe. For me, in the face of all this chaos, the vaccine production team were more focused on the vaccine production and little attention to long time effect. Hence, the first set of persons to be vaccinated would be some sort of a test phase of which, I take no part in.

RNA treatments is not new to 2020
they know RNA does not survive like DNA does. so RNA is better at treatments where no long term adverse affects occur

also by removing things like t-rna and r-rna ensures that it cant replicate or repeat. meaning more resistance to long term effects
so m-rna is even safer then broad RNA and even more safer than DNA

so when a vaccine uses just m-rna. and also uses little to no preservatives. its far far safer by default.
this stuff has been known for the many years before 2020..  long before you think you still need to wait for. because rna research has been done for many years already

Thanks for explaining why vaccines don't work.     Cool
hero member
Activity: 1459
Merit: 973
April 01, 2021, 06:22:13 PM

legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4788
April 01, 2021, 10:32:16 AM
its still far from a break through until it is considered to be totally safe. For me, in the face of all this chaos, the vaccine production team were more focused on the vaccine production and little attention to long time effect. Hence, the first set of persons to be vaccinated would be some sort of a test phase of which, I take no part in.

RNA treatments is not new to 2020
they know RNA does not survive like DNA does. so RNA is better at treatments where no long term adverse affects occur

also by removing things like t-rna and r-rna ensures that it cant replicate or repeat. meaning more resistance to long term effects
so m-rna is even safer then broad RNA and even more safer than DNA

so when a vaccine uses just m-rna. and also uses little to no preservatives. its far far safer by default.
this stuff has been known for the many years before 2020..  long before you think you still need to wait for. because rna research has been done for many years already
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
April 01, 2021, 08:25:05 AM
I  ant trust the vaccine, not until after a few years when it has been able to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that its safe. Can't say they rushed over it because, it took over a year of continued research and compliants from the people before they arrived at this break through but, its still far from a break through until it is considered to be totally safe. For me, in the face of all this chaos, the vaccine production team were more focused on the vaccine production and little attention to long time effect. Hence, the first set of persons to be vaccinated would be some sort of a test phase of which, I take no part in.

You smart, wise person.

Too many people in the first-world countries have turned the medical industry into a cult for themselves, where they worship their doctor, and go to him/her for medicine for anything and everything.

And of course they will go to their doctor when they believe there is a plague around. If there is a plague, it certainly has come from their worship of the medical in the first place.

Such a cult... one of the biggest cults in the whole world... worship of the medical.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 674
April 01, 2021, 07:45:33 AM
I  ant trust the vaccine, not until after a few years when it has been able to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that its safe. Can't say they rushed over it because, it took over a year of continued research and compliants from the people before they arrived at this break through but, its still far from a break through until it is considered to be totally safe. For me, in the face of all this chaos, the vaccine production team were more focused on the vaccine production and little attention to long time effect. Hence, the first set of persons to be vaccinated would be some sort of a test phase of which, I take no part in.
copper member
Activity: 40
Merit: 19
April 01, 2021, 05:18:43 AM
Hard to tell without experiencing it first-hand. But disclosure: in our family, there are 4 doctors.

They've had it up to their ears about people and conspiracy theories.

As for the vaccines. It depends.

How long should a vaccine be tested before we can truly say that it is safe?

So my decision for myself and my family is this:

1. As long as its tolerable - we'll wait for a time until the long term effects are seen
2. If we can avoid government intervention, we will.
3. If it is safe - and proven according to time, we will eventually take it.
4. We know some people who already had it, so we'll be observing them.
5. If a certain period of time has passed, and if the said people are safe, then okay, we'll take it.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
April 01, 2021, 01:27:09 AM
No, no trust whatsoever



Necessary fashion attachment soon
Pages:
Jump to: