[Donated $2k+ To Charity] Clean Water Coin: A Crypto Charity (Pure PoS) - page 103.

First2fight

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

Quote from: xen0s on April 07, 2014, 12:28:44 PM

http://water.suchpool.pw/

768mh, all net 1.05gh

***
We are investingating issues in the backend. Your shares and hashrate are safe and we will fix things ASAP.

Payouts disabled, you will not receive any coins to your offline wallet for the time being
***

game over

Your notion of game overs is very special indeed.
We are waiting for the dev's decision here. All statements have been made by the stakeholders. Tekkerr did us all a favor by closing that part of the story from the bright side. Depressed ones can always go out & pick some girls instead of spreading FUD. That's all for now IMHO.

WALKEN-COIN

sr. member

Activity: 269

Merit: 250

Parsec Frontiers Pre-Sale 24.01.2018

Quote from: xen0s on April 07, 2014, 12:28:44 PM

http://water.suchpool.pw/

768mh, all net 1.05gh

***
We are investingating issues in the backend. Your shares and hashrate are safe and we will fix things ASAP.

Payouts disabled, you will not receive any coins to your offline wallet for the time being
***

game over

We should have reached block 8000 by now? I am seeing super cheap coins @ Bittrex still. So now, mining goes back to normal, things get fixed/cleaned up and calm down, and we see price start to rise as things swing back in to gear.

That is my prediction, anyway. If, I am wrong, I KNOW there will be someone there to let me know. Wink

Look at some of the coins on Market watch sites. They have >1 Billion coins, and have HUGE price values. Do you REALLY think these coins will forever stay at 4-5 sat? Get real.

I am transferring BTC and getting some more, and the only reason I am writing this, is I think you should too, because if you are reading this, you are right now considered an "early investor" if you buy cheap coins. It's kinda like an unexpected chance at IPO.

Hopefully, some of this huge pile of new coins will be directed toward the CHARITY wallet before they are sold in to other's hands. Opinions on a "post-fork charity drive" to turn this in to something positive all around?

Zoom out, and you can see the mountain in front of you is actually just a mole-hill.

xen0s

member

Activity: 93

Merit: 10

http://water.suchpool.pw/

768mh, all net 1.05gh

***
We are investingating issues in the backend. Your shares and hashrate are safe and we will fix things ASAP.

Payouts disabled, you will not receive any coins to your offline wallet for the time being
***

game over

ekoice

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: YouIsPeng on April 07, 2014, 12:03:12 PM

Quote from: MineP.it on April 07, 2014, 08:39:33 AM

We have updated to the new wallet

MineP.it WATER Pool

Register now, if you haven't already done so, and ~~prepare your workers~~ get mining.

Stratum connection example:
stratum+tcp://water.minep.it:3349 -u MinepitUsername.anything -p anything

MinePit Pools

One registration to access all our pools
Auto payouts every minute
Super fast, powerful, scale-able servers
Unbeatable DDOS protection
Unique, custom interface and back-end infrastructure
Super fast compile times - we aim to be one of the first pools running at every launch

Register Now!

What new wallet?? Mine still isn't syncing, can anyone post a link to this new wallet?

same

post the link of the syncing wallet...

endchat

sr. member

Activity: 269

Merit: 250

Whats happening at hashing.at?

I have coins there not confirming since late last night and everything seems stuck and going nowhere.

Huh

YouIsPeng

full member

Activity: 175

Merit: 100

Quote from: MineP.it on April 07, 2014, 08:39:33 AM

We have updated to the new wallet

MineP.it WATER Pool

Register now, if you haven't already done so, and ~~prepare your workers~~ get mining.

Stratum connection example:
stratum+tcp://water.minep.it:3349 -u MinepitUsername.anything -p anything

MinePit Pools

One registration to access all our pools
Auto payouts every minute
Super fast, powerful, scale-able servers
Unbeatable DDOS protection
Unique, custom interface and back-end infrastructure
Super fast compile times - we aim to be one of the first pools running at every launch

Register Now!

What new wallet?? Mine still isn't syncing, can anyone post a link to this new wallet?

ekoice

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

still cant sync my wallet, anybody can share their .conf file? please ?

Tekkerr

member

Activity: 82

Merit: 10

Quote from: iiikkkxj on April 07, 2014, 11:40:54 AM

Quote from: jeffminer on April 07, 2014, 11:31:51 AM

Quote from: Water_kel on April 07, 2014, 11:26:04 AM

Quote from: iiikkkxj on April 07, 2014, 11:21:19 AM

Quote from: illiki23 on April 07, 2014, 11:12:18 AM

Quote from: Tekkerr on April 07, 2014, 10:47:47 AM

Quote from: zhouhuiyan520 on April 07, 2014, 10:33:47 AM

I agree with you. I am not an IT guys, but I guess they could shut down all the nodes, release a new client with reversed blockchain, new nodes and reforked to 7000 block. If the argument against it is 60% of people will have to accept the change, then I am pretty sure all the Clean Water Coin supporters will do that and we will operate on the right fork, while the second one with 450.000.000 coins (1/2 cap value) will die eventually.
Honestly, if they fork at 8000 leaving all those mined coins, I'm out. This is the worst thing they could do for CWC.

What about the coins, people bought between those 7000-8000 on an exchange, they will vanish, those are hard Bitcoins worth you are trying to delete ... I don't know but it's not that simple as just reverting a blockchain.

+
I don't think we should just delete the coins. We should not punish people who saw a good deal and bought them on the market.
If this happens without somehow compensating people who would end up losing bitocin, then "I'm out" as well.

as you said, what about the IPO investors ? 26 IPO BTC=10 million coins , now it is about 0.3BTC=10million coins .
IPO fund supports server, and other hard cost. the donated $2,ooo was also from IPO .
how can dev team treat their investors like this ? it's caused by dev's stupid mistake. right ?

+1
iiikkkxj I stand your point.

IPO investors know what they are getting into that's why its the highest risk / reward...keeping the market happy is better than people who risked funds before the project was even launched....

but it's caused by dev's stupid mistake, not market choice. there are still 24BTCs in the IPO fund , send back to investers ? dev let their Shareholders down!

It's all true, but I would take it calm, there is no real decision yet, and here 2 months later we will have a laugh about it. "Do you remember how bad the Dev's screwed up 2 months ago" - Dev's answer: "Oooo shut up alright"

iiikkkxj

member

Activity: 86

Merit: 10

Quote from: jeffminer on April 07, 2014, 11:31:51 AM

Quote from: Water_kel on April 07, 2014, 11:26:04 AM

Quote from: iiikkkxj on April 07, 2014, 11:21:19 AM

Quote from: illiki23 on April 07, 2014, 11:12:18 AM

Quote from: Tekkerr on April 07, 2014, 10:47:47 AM

Quote from: zhouhuiyan520 on April 07, 2014, 10:33:47 AM

I agree with you. I am not an IT guys, but I guess they could shut down all the nodes, release a new client with reversed blockchain, new nodes and reforked to 7000 block. If the argument against it is 60% of people will have to accept the change, then I am pretty sure all the Clean Water Coin supporters will do that and we will operate on the right fork, while the second one with 450.000.000 coins (1/2 cap value) will die eventually.
Honestly, if they fork at 8000 leaving all those mined coins, I'm out. This is the worst thing they could do for CWC.

What about the coins, people bought between those 7000-8000 on an exchange, they will vanish, those are hard Bitcoins worth you are trying to delete ... I don't know but it's not that simple as just reverting a blockchain.

+
I don't think we should just delete the coins. We should not punish people who saw a good deal and bought them on the market.
If this happens without somehow compensating people who would end up losing bitocin, then "I'm out" as well.

as you said, what about the IPO investors ? 26 IPO BTC=10 million coins , now it is about 0.3BTC=10million coins .
IPO fund supports server, and other hard cost. the donated $2,ooo was also from IPO .
how can dev team treat their investors like this ? it's caused by dev's stupid mistake. right ?

+1
iiikkkxj I stand your point.

IPO investors know what they are getting into that's why its the highest risk / reward...keeping the market happy is better than people who risked funds before the project was even launched....

but it's caused by dev's stupid mistake, not market choice. there are still 24BTCs in the IPO fund , send back to investers ? dev let their Shareholders down!

illiki23

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 295

Hail Eris!

Quote from: iiikkkxj on April 07, 2014, 11:21:19 AM

Quote from: illiki23 on April 07, 2014, 11:12:18 AM

Quote from: Tekkerr on April 07, 2014, 10:47:47 AM

Quote from: zhouhuiyan520 on April 07, 2014, 10:33:47 AM

I agree with you. I am not an IT guys, but I guess they could shut down all the nodes, release a new client with reversed blockchain, new nodes and reforked to 7000 block. If the argument against it is 60% of people will have to accept the change, then I am pretty sure all the Clean Water Coin supporters will do that and we will operate on the right fork, while the second one with 450.000.000 coins (1/2 cap value) will die eventually.

Honestly, if they fork at 8000 leaving all those mined coins, I'm out. This is the worst thing they could do for CWC.

What about the coins, people bought between those 7000-8000 on an exchange, they will vanish, those are hard Bitcoins worth you are trying to delete ... I don't know but it's not that simple as just reverting a blockchain.

+
I don't think we should just delete the coins. We should not punish people who saw a good deal and bought them on the market.
If this happens without somehow compensating people who would end up losing bitocin, then "I'm out" as well.

as you said, what about the IPO investors ? 26 IPO BTC=10 million coins , now it is about 0.3BTC=10million coins .
IPO fund supports server, and other hard cost. the donated $2,ooo was also from IPO .
how can dev team treat their investors like this ? it's caused by dev's stupid mistake. right ?

The best solution would be to delete those extra coins and compensate anyone who lost money with something reasonable.

For example if they spent 0.3 bitcoin buying up cheap Water coins, then they should at least receive 0.3 bitcoin worth of Water coins at the standard price after their cheap coins are destroyed.

Otherwise, one way or another you are screwing over one of the parties involved. And in this case no-one did anything wrong except maybe the devs by allowing mining to go on for so long.

jeffminer

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Water_kel on April 07, 2014, 11:26:04 AM

Quote from: iiikkkxj on April 07, 2014, 11:21:19 AM

Quote from: illiki23 on April 07, 2014, 11:12:18 AM

Quote from: Tekkerr on April 07, 2014, 10:47:47 AM

Quote from: zhouhuiyan520 on April 07, 2014, 10:33:47 AM

I agree with you. I am not an IT guys, but I guess they could shut down all the nodes, release a new client with reversed blockchain, new nodes and reforked to 7000 block. If the argument against it is 60% of people will have to accept the change, then I am pretty sure all the Clean Water Coin supporters will do that and we will operate on the right fork, while the second one with 450.000.000 coins (1/2 cap value) will die eventually.

Honestly, if they fork at 8000 leaving all those mined coins, I'm out. This is the worst thing they could do for CWC.

What about the coins, people bought between those 7000-8000 on an exchange, they will vanish, those are hard Bitcoins worth you are trying to delete ... I don't know but it's not that simple as just reverting a blockchain.

+
I don't think we should just delete the coins. We should not punish people who saw a good deal and bought them on the market.
If this happens without somehow compensating people who would end up losing bitocin, then "I'm out" as well.

as you said, what about the IPO investors ? 26 IPO BTC=10 million coins , now it is about 0.3BTC=10million coins .
IPO fund supports server, and other hard cost. the donated $2,ooo was also from IPO .
how can dev team treat their investors like this ? it's caused by dev's stupid mistake. right ?

+1
iiikkkxj I stand your point.

IPO investors know what they are getting into that's why its the highest risk / reward...keeping the market happy is better than people who risked funds before the project was even launched....

Water_kel

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: iiikkkxj on April 07, 2014, 11:21:19 AM

Quote from: illiki23 on April 07, 2014, 11:12:18 AM

Quote from: Tekkerr on April 07, 2014, 10:47:47 AM

Quote from: zhouhuiyan520 on April 07, 2014, 10:33:47 AM

I agree with you. I am not an IT guys, but I guess they could shut down all the nodes, release a new client with reversed blockchain, new nodes and reforked to 7000 block. If the argument against it is 60% of people will have to accept the change, then I am pretty sure all the Clean Water Coin supporters will do that and we will operate on the right fork, while the second one with 450.000.000 coins (1/2 cap value) will die eventually.

Honestly, if they fork at 8000 leaving all those mined coins, I'm out. This is the worst thing they could do for CWC.

What about the coins, people bought between those 7000-8000 on an exchange, they will vanish, those are hard Bitcoins worth you are trying to delete ... I don't know but it's not that simple as just reverting a blockchain.

+
I don't think we should just delete the coins. We should not punish people who saw a good deal and bought them on the market.
If this happens without somehow compensating people who would end up losing bitocin, then "I'm out" as well.

as you said, what about the IPO investors ? 26 IPO BTC=10 million coins , now it is about 0.3BTC=10million coins .
IPO fund supports server, and other hard cost. the donated $2,ooo was also from IPO .
how can dev team treat their investors like this ? it's caused by dev's stupid mistake. right ?

+1
iiikkkxj I stand your point.

iiikkkxj

member

Activity: 86

Merit: 10

Quote from: illiki23 on April 07, 2014, 11:12:18 AM

Quote from: Tekkerr on April 07, 2014, 10:47:47 AM

Quote from: zhouhuiyan520 on April 07, 2014, 10:33:47 AM

I agree with you. I am not an IT guys, but I guess they could shut down all the nodes, release a new client with reversed blockchain, new nodes and reforked to 7000 block. If the argument against it is 60% of people will have to accept the change, then I am pretty sure all the Clean Water Coin supporters will do that and we will operate on the right fork, while the second one with 450.000.000 coins (1/2 cap value) will die eventually.

Honestly, if they fork at 8000 leaving all those mined coins, I'm out. This is the worst thing they could do for CWC.

What about the coins, people bought between those 7000-8000 on an exchange, they will vanish, those are hard Bitcoins worth you are trying to delete ... I don't know but it's not that simple as just reverting a blockchain.

+
I don't think we should just delete the coins. We should not punish people who saw a good deal and bought them on the market.
If this happens without somehow compensating people who would end up losing bitocin, then "I'm out" as well.

as you said, what about the IPO investors ? 26 IPO BTC=10 million coins , now it is about 0.3BTC=10million coins .
IPO fund supports server, and other hard cost. the donated $2,ooo was also from IPO .
how can dev team treat their investors like this ? it's caused by dev's stupid mistake. right ?

illiki23

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 295

Hail Eris!

Quote from: Tekkerr on April 07, 2014, 10:47:47 AM

Quote from: zhouhuiyan520 on April 07, 2014, 10:33:47 AM

I agree with you. I am not an IT guys, but I guess they could shut down all the nodes, release a new client with reversed blockchain, new nodes and reforked to 7000 block. If the argument against it is 60% of people will have to accept the change, then I am pretty sure all the Clean Water Coin supporters will do that and we will operate on the right fork, while the second one with 450.000.000 coins (1/2 cap value) will die eventually.

Honestly, if they fork at 8000 leaving all those mined coins, I'm out. This is the worst thing they could do for CWC.

What about the coins, people bought between those 7000-8000 on an exchange, they will vanish, those are hard Bitcoins worth you are trying to delete ... I don't know but it's not that simple as just reverting a blockchain.

+

I don't think we should just delete the coins. We should not punish people who saw a good deal and bought them on the market.

If this happens without somehow compensating people who would end up losing bitocin, then "I'm out" as well.

iiikkkxj

member

Activity: 86

Merit: 10

Quote from: Water_kel on April 07, 2014, 11:05:58 AM

Quote from: stan4 on April 07, 2014, 11:02:07 AM

Quote from: ficklepickle on April 07, 2014, 12:05:11 AM

this is turning into a coin of tears, not clean water.

indeed

+1
Is the tear clean Huh

no, give back my IPO.

Water_kel

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: stan4 on April 07, 2014, 11:02:07 AM

Quote from: ficklepickle on April 07, 2014, 12:05:11 AM

this is turning into a coin of tears, not clean water.

indeed

+1
Is the tear clean Huh

stan4

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Quote from: ficklepickle on April 07, 2014, 12:05:11 AM

this is turning into a coin of tears, not clean water.

indeed

jeffminer

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Aur3 on April 07, 2014, 10:51:32 AM

Quote from: Tekkerr on April 07, 2014, 10:47:47 AM

Quote from: zhouhuiyan520 on April 07, 2014, 10:33:47 AM

I agree with you. I am not an IT guys, but I guess they could shut down all the nodes, release a new client with reversed blockchain, new nodes and reforked to 7000 block. If the argument against it is 60% of people will have to accept the change, then I am pretty sure all the Clean Water Coin supporters will do that and we will operate on the right fork, while the second one with 450.000.000 coins (1/2 cap value) will die eventually.

Honestly, if they fork at 8000 leaving all those mined coins, I'm out. This is the worst thing they could do for CWC.

What about the coins, people bought between those 7000-8000 on an exchange, they will vanish, those are hard Bitcoins worth you are trying to delete ... I don't know but it's not that simple as just reverting a blockchain.

That would be stupid, it's like 5BTC++ we are talkin about.

+1

anonymousxx1503

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Quote from: Palaxidon on April 07, 2014, 10:27:21 AM

Quote from: ibfragalot on April 07, 2014, 06:30:52 AM

I'm not sure why some people complaining so much? I had never heard of this coin until today when I saw it on top of the topics. Now I'm mining as it seems like a good time to jump in, and I've voted for WATER at MintPal.

I only have a tiny rig so can't get massive profits but still I'm not jealous of those with farms who would have got lots of coins during the issue. Is it just jealousy some people were lucky?

Or is it another coin (h20) doing some FUD and trying to steal users?

In any case I think the attention this coin has now got far outweighs the issue with a few hours of big rewards.

I cant agree more with you! +10000

How can you agree with that? I mean, yes people make mistakes but the reality is that this was a pretty big one and it created massive whales who will dump at every rise in value. The coin is stuck at low prices for a long long time, basically making sure it dies slowly. I'm not from H20 coin btw, I think having 2 water coins is pretty retarded.

ficklepickle

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: Aur3 on April 07, 2014, 10:51:32 AM

Quote from: Tekkerr on April 07, 2014, 10:47:47 AM

Quote from: zhouhuiyan520 on April 07, 2014, 10:33:47 AM

I agree with you. I am not an IT guys, but I guess they could shut down all the nodes, release a new client with reversed blockchain, new nodes and reforked to 7000 block. If the argument against it is 60% of people will have to accept the change, then I am pretty sure all the Clean Water Coin supporters will do that and we will operate on the right fork, while the second one with 450.000.000 coins (1/2 cap value) will die eventually.

Honestly, if they fork at 8000 leaving all those mined coins, I'm out. This is the worst thing they could do for CWC.

What about the coins, people bought between those 7000-8000 on an exchange, they will vanish, those are hard Bitcoins worth you are trying to delete ... I don't know but it's not that simple as just reverting a blockchain.

That would be stupid, it's like 5BTC++ we are talkin about.

Is Bitrex alright? I've been converting Doge to BTC to Cleanwatercoins there since this launched. Should I keep buying?

Topic: [Donated $2k+ To Charity] Clean Water Coin: A Crypto Charity (Pure PoS) - page 103. (Read 195729 times)