The plan is to crash Russia and then divide it into smaller and manageable units without any power and suitable for exploitation by the corporate owners of said maniacs. It´s understandable that morons here and there fall for such pipe dreams. How many lies can you allow yourself to believe before you belong to the lie...
And that plan was in place and hasn't really changed for centuries.
- Before the 1812 campaign against Russia, Napoleon was presented with plans on how to split up Russia, designed by Polish General Sokolnitskij.
- Before the 1941 campaign, Hitler was presented with the draft for plan
Barbarossa. (Interestingly, initially Poland aimed to be an ally of Germany and a beneficiary of the division of Russia, though it didn't work out for them again) There we can read:
http://warmech.ru/1941war/40a.htmlChief of Staff OKW operational management after the relevant changes returned the presented presented to him in December 18, 1940 by the Department of "Defense of the country," the draft of a document "Guidance on specific issues of directive number 21 (version of the plan "Barbarossa")," making a postscript that this project can be reported to Fuhrer after processing in accordance with the following of his position:
The next war will be not only an armed struggle, but at the same time a struggle between two worldviews. To win this war in an environment where the enemy has a vast territory, it is not enough to break the armed forces, the territory should be divided into several states, led by their own governments, with which we could conclude separate peace treaties.
The creation of such governments requires a great political skill and well-designed development of common principles.
Every revolution of large scale brings to life phenomena that can not simply be set aside. Socialist ideas in today's Russia are already impossible to eradicate. These ideas can serve as a basis for the political creation of new states and governments. Jewish-Bolshevik intelligentsia, representing the oppressors of the people, should be removed from the scene. Former bourgeois-aristocratic intelligentsia, even if it still exists, especially among immigrants, should also not be allowed to power. It is not accepted by the Russian people and, moreover, it is hostile towards the German nation. This is particularly noticeable in the former Baltic States. In addition, in no case should we allow the replacement of the Bolshevik state by a nationalistic Russia, which eventually (as evidenced by the history) will once again confront Germany.
Our task lies in the fact that as soon as possible and with the least expenditure of the military effort, we must create those dependent upon us socialist state.
This task is so difficult that it cannot be solved by army alone.
03/30/1941 of ... 11.00. Big meeting with the Fuehrer. An almost 2.5 hour-long speech...
The struggle between the two ideologies ... The great danger of communism for the future. We should proceed from the principle of soldier partnership. Communists have never been and will never be our friends. It's about the struggle until annihilation. If we do not look at it like that, even if we beat the enemy, after 30 years communist danger will arise again. We conduct this war, not in order to preserve his opponent.
The future political map of Russia: North Russia belongs to Finland, protectorates in the Baltic States to Ukraine and Belarus.
The fight against Russia: the destruction of Bolshevik commissars and the Communist intelligentsia. The new states must be socialist, but without its own intelligentsia. It should not be allowed to form a new intelligentsia. It will be enough here with only a primitive socialist intelligentsia. We should fight against the poison of demoralization. This is not a question of Military Justice. Commanders of units must know the purpose of this war. They need to lead in the fight... to keep troops permanently in their hands. He shall give his orders, taking into account the mood of the troops.
The war is sharply different from the war in the West. In the East cruelty it is good for the future. Commanders have to make sacrifices and to overcome their hesitation ...
We know how the above ended.
Interestingly, 1941 and "Barbarossa" was "only" a military continuation of an assault on Russia that was conducted during the colour revolution and the coup d'etat of 1917, when large parts of Russia were successfully split off. Russia cannot be conquered by the armed forces, but it can be severely wounded from within.
The other such strike happened in the Wild 90's by the hands of the US puppets Yeltsin and Gorby.
Now look at the proposition of division of Russia in the rhetoric of another Polish descendant, now serving US (instead of Napoleonic France) - Zbigniew Brzezinski. You'll see a lot of similarities... And Poland
again is used as a convenient launching pad... they never learn.
And something like this was planned with Khodorkovskij, only it didn't work out.
Now plans a'brewing for another attempt at colour revolution in Russia and removal of Putin. And, as US Secretary of Defence said so precisely, the sanctions against Russia will be there until Russian Federation is broken up into pieces:
Negotiations to remove Putin. Evgeny Fedorovhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCyUZjGV3ZgPS: An interesting twist regarding Crimea. Napoleon planned to turn it into "another Riviera". Hitler envisaged it as the prime resort for the heads of the "Third Reich". USA had designs for it as a large NATO military base in the Black Sea...
