Topic: Don't bet against the public? - page 17. (Read 3723 times)
Of course you can bet against the public that is the fan favorites. I think the playing conditions, stadium, and weather matter a lot, along with the players playing. If it’s cricket, then the type of pitch, the wind direction, and the playing squad depend a lot on the match outcomes. Not every time the star player can score goals or score runs. Hence, it’s ideal to wait and observe, or if possible, do some ground-level research and place the bets. After all, it’s your hard-earned money that will be put on stake. Hence, think wisely before betting for the fan favorites.
Betting against the public can indeed be an effective strategy and even it is very necessary to at least get a bigger return or win, but I think we also have to be realistic and not always have to go against the public if the odds of winning actually look more inclined to the public choice, so I think we have to analyze and take an informed and planned approach so that we can Deciding the decision that we will take is to fight or join the public, going against the public will of course be easier but we don't have to fight ourselves because it will usually cause turmoil of doubt in making the right decision and ultimately tend to make us pessimistic about the bets we make.
Bet with the public if you think the team the public chose has greater capacity to win, and bet against the public when you've analyzed it and seen that the opposite team could win. It's your money, so don't bet just because you see people doing it.It might seem like a strategy to dictate the team that will probably win or see if you'll win your bet, but many people betting on a particular team or outcome doesn't confirm or guarantee they will win. The game is a future event; they haven't taken to the field, and anything can happen.
The public's team can lose, so it's not just about betting against the public. It's about knowing your game and following your plans. If the public aligns with you, fine. If not, bet solo.
The public here mainly consists of bettors who tend to bet on the favorites, whether it’s point spread or moneyline. Most suggestions we see online emphasize that to be considered a smart bettor, you should bet against the public. But what if we don’t bet against ourselves? Can we still find success in sports betting?
When we talk about success, it should be viewed as a long-term process. Some of us may not see ourselves betting long-term, which makes it hard for them to relate to this concept. If someone is just betting for fun, they likely won’t be well-versed in the terminology of sports betting, as their interest is quite limited. In contrast, those who genuinely want to win will study the sports betting market and seek ways to succeed, even if the chances are slim.
In as much as we may be concerned about the long term effects of sport bets on our gambling budgets, this makes us to be concerned with some numbers and records and in this case the record will be, your winning rate vs you loses a d how much bankroll you start up betting with and how much is remaining ASA cash reserves or profits, when you have that statistics done and you come out with a figure which can be repeated on a 2-3 month's interval and coming out with a steady increase then you can say that you have a long term success in your sport betting.When we talk about success, it should be viewed as a long-term process. Some of us may not see ourselves betting long-term, which makes it hard for them to relate to this concept. If someone is just betting for fun, they likely won’t be well-versed in the terminology of sports betting, as their interest is quite limited. In contrast, those who genuinely want to win will study the sports betting market and seek ways to succeed, even if the chances are slim.
But if you have anything other than that, it then means that you ahve a long way to go and you may likely end up losing and getting fade up, this could result into inconsistent betting which will definitely not make you to be a better bettors on the long run.
If someone is just betting for fun, they likely won’t be well-versed in the terminology of sports betting, as their interest is quite limited. In contrast, those who genuinely want to win will study the sports betting market and seek ways to succeed, even if the chances are slim.
Yes, it's true those who gambles for the fun of the game may just place a bet in favour of their favorite club without proper analysis if they have the potential to either win or lose match, unlike those who gamble for the money, who may likely go deeper into strategic analysis over which club has got high winning potentials, despite the fact sport betting are usually unpredictable due to unstable performance of major football or sporting events. However, lack of patience has been of the reasons why many gamblers don't see gambling as long term, because inasmuch as you are gambling what you can always afford to lose at each moment, you always stand the chance of winning a reasonably good amount in long run, even though it's not a jackpot.
against the public what are you talking about? is it a physical casino? how many are successful from soccer betting gambling? it is difficult to understand there is no control over the match, what we can see is the skill of the club's players
OP, betting against the public is not a guarantee that yo will make profit. Luck is what really matters, because if you are not on your lucky day, or didn't place your bet during your lucky moments, you will loss that bet either you bet against the crowd or not.
I know that long term gamblers are always looking for various strategy in which they can use to make profit, and that shouldn't deceive them that their strategy supercedes their luck, because whatever strategy that you come up with will still depend on your luck for it to work out for you. Gambling should be done for fun and let profit be the last in your mind.
I know that long term gamblers are always looking for various strategy in which they can use to make profit, and that shouldn't deceive them that their strategy supercedes their luck, because whatever strategy that you come up with will still depend on your luck for it to work out for you. Gambling should be done for fun and let profit be the last in your mind.
~snip~
I don't play against the public, as I don't even follow what bets most bettors make. I don't gamble to make money, but just because I like gambling since my youth. I choose to bet on the favourite to minimise risk. Of course winning a bet on the underdog will bring the bettor more money, but the probability of losing is much higher. I try to find the golden mean in everything and gambling is no exception.
When you wants to betting, you should depends on yourself although you can search for what opinion from public. But still you need to have your own decision from analyzing the info that you get before. But if you gamble because of having fun, you don't have to be serious and only betting for the match that you know both team and you also know which team that can win.
A pro gamblers will search for many information from many sources so they can have more data to analyze including public opinion. But they don't just to follow what others said as that can not always right. They will try to analyze based on their skill and the info so they will pick the team that they think the team can win.
that's true, there must be a specific information for us as well before doing that if we really want to bet against the public coz how we can assure that afterwards we will win on it? Even let say it's a game of luck but the fact is the stats of players/team still matter on the game. So i can say mindset is really the most important as well coz its obviously that people who bet against the public are just taking it for fun and they're probably enjoying such way of betting sports , wherein they don't mind what will be the results after the game. So if we cant afford to lose let's bet against the public with a good plan and strategy. . A pro gamblers will search for many information from many sources so they can have more data to analyze including public opinion. But they don't just to follow what others said as that can not always right. They will try to analyze based on their skill and the info so they will pick the team that they think the team can win.
Don't bet against the public mean don't bet on underdog.
Although it's true favorite often win than the underdog, but it's not always correct. Teams like Manchester United, Roma etc who were popular teams, can't perform in this season and they're often suffering lose.
The public are still votes Manchester United and Roma, even though the reality they're often lose, so this time don't bet against the public is wrong.
Although it's true favorite often win than the underdog, but it's not always correct. Teams like Manchester United, Roma etc who were popular teams, can't perform in this season and they're often suffering lose.
The public are still votes Manchester United and Roma, even though the reality they're often lose, so this time don't bet against the public is wrong.
In as much as gamblers are unclear whether to bet against teams like Man U, that means they've not lost all respects and people still assume they could win a match. But, the opposite continuously happen. Going against the public definitely works sometimes, and it all depends on luck. In cases like the example above, where it's boldly sentimental and people gambling due to past glory, it's quite simple to avoid the public.
If someone is just betting for fun, they likely won’t be well-versed in the terminology of sports betting, as their interest is quite limited.
Do you have data or even a study on this one, I don't think that's the case, You can learn all the terminology and still have fun, its recommended that you do that, We must not judge bettors whether they want it for fun or for profitQuote
In contrast, those who genuinely want to win will study the sports betting market and seek ways to succeed, even if the chances are slim.
Whether you want to make profit or enjoy the game, winning should be your main goal, but on making fun, its not a pressured win. It also applies to this; you can learn all the terminology. Whatever your goal is, your goal should not be an hindrance.There are so many strategies bettors use and of which may include betting against odds or outcomes of most fouls committed or other penalties, without many bettors even considering betting on a straight win or loss.
A bettor who wants to win regularly should endeavor to compare their previous bets and improvise with current predictions or analysis before placing a bet, else they would be betting against themselves irrespective of the fact that they are having fun or not.
Don't bet against the public mean don't bet on underdog.
Although it's true favorite often win than the underdog, but it's not always correct. Teams like Manchester United, Roma etc who were popular teams, can't perform in this season and they're often suffering lose.
The public are still votes Manchester United and Roma, even though the reality they're often lose, so this time don't bet against the public is wrong.
Although it's true favorite often win than the underdog, but it's not always correct. Teams like Manchester United, Roma etc who were popular teams, can't perform in this season and they're often suffering lose.
The public are still votes Manchester United and Roma, even though the reality they're often lose, so this time don't bet against the public is wrong.
If someone is just betting for fun, they likely won’t be well-versed in the terminology of sports betting, as their interest is quite limited.
Do you have data or even a study on this one, I don't think that's the case, You can learn all the terminology and still have fun, its recommended that you do that, We must not judge bettors whether they want it for fun or for profitQuote
In contrast, those who genuinely want to win will study the sports betting market and seek ways to succeed, even if the chances are slim.
Whether you want to make profit or enjoy the game, winning should be your main goal, but on making fun, its not a pressured win. It also applies to this; you can learn all the terminology. Whatever your goal is, your goal should not be an hindrance. 
The public here mainly consists of bettors who tend to bet on the favorites, whether it’s point spread or moneyline. Most suggestions we see online emphasize that to be considered a smart bettor, you should bet against the public. But what if we don’t bet against ourselves? Can we still find success in sports betting?
When we talk about success, it should be viewed as a long-term process. Some of us may not see ourselves betting long-term, which makes it hard for them to relate to this concept. If someone is just betting for fun, they likely won’t be well-versed in the terminology of sports betting, as their interest is quite limited. In contrast, those who genuinely want to win will study the sports betting market and seek ways to succeed, even if the chances are slim.
When we talk about success, it should be viewed as a long-term process. Some of us may not see ourselves betting long-term, which makes it hard for them to relate to this concept. If someone is just betting for fun, they likely won’t be well-versed in the terminology of sports betting, as their interest is quite limited. In contrast, those who genuinely want to win will study the sports betting market and seek ways to succeed, even if the chances are slim.
Betting against your arguments and experience is the worst thing a gambler or betting enthusiast can do. We always draw conclusions over time and remember them, and if you bet against your experience, then this is just an unsystematic activity that will sooner or later wipe out the deposit. Even if such bets coincide with the majority. You need to draw conclusions and use them even if they lead to a losing streak. You can't go against yourself.
The public here mainly consists of bettors who tend to bet on the favorites, whether it’s point spread or moneyline. Most suggestions we see online emphasize that to be considered a smart bettor, you should bet against the public. But what if we don’t bet against ourselves? Can we still find success in sports betting?
When we talk about success, it should be viewed as a long-term process. Some of us may not see ourselves betting long-term, which makes it hard for them to relate to this concept. If someone is just betting for fun, they likely won’t be well-versed in the terminology of sports betting, as their interest is quite limited. In contrast, those who genuinely want to win will study the sports betting market and seek ways to succeed, even if the chances are slim.
When we talk about success, it should be viewed as a long-term process. Some of us may not see ourselves betting long-term, which makes it hard for them to relate to this concept. If someone is just betting for fun, they likely won’t be well-versed in the terminology of sports betting, as their interest is quite limited. In contrast, those who genuinely want to win will study the sports betting market and seek ways to succeed, even if the chances are slim.
For most people, betting is really a hobby, but a hobby can sometimes grow into something more, or even bring in very tangible profits. How much a player is ready to delve into the subject of betting will depend only on what profit he is able to receive, but it is one thing to understand the entire line and know thoroughly what you can bet on, and quite another thing to be able to win. And betting on a favorite is often low odds, at which the win will be small, and the probability of losing is also high. Winning in betting is not going against the crowd, it is relying only on yourself.
The public here mainly consists of bettors who tend to bet on the favorites, whether it’s point spread or moneyline. Most suggestions we see online emphasize that to be considered a smart bettor, you should bet against the public. But what if we don’t bet against ourselves? Can we still find success in sports betting?
When we talk about success, it should be viewed as a long-term process. Some of us may not see ourselves betting long-term, which makes it hard for them to relate to this concept. If someone is just betting for fun, they likely won’t be well-versed in the terminology of sports betting, as their interest is quite limited. In contrast, those who genuinely want to win will study the sports betting market and seek ways to succeed, even if the chances are slim.
When we talk about success, it should be viewed as a long-term process. Some of us may not see ourselves betting long-term, which makes it hard for them to relate to this concept. If someone is just betting for fun, they likely won’t be well-versed in the terminology of sports betting, as their interest is quite limited. In contrast, those who genuinely want to win will study the sports betting market and seek ways to succeed, even if the chances are slim.
Of course, as sports bettors, we only bet on the games that we knew from the beginning, maybe in the start we are not that aware that it could really help us to be a good bettor because of the experience that we will get.
But betting against the public or not? Still depends on you, if you see that the public is correct, then maybe it's good that you go with the flow. But there are games that you really used your own analysis and then find out that you will have to go against the public and then see if your hunch is correct or not.
But what if we don’t bet against ourselves? Can we still find success in sports betting?
What do you mean by prohibiting contract betting, indeed public betting beliefs are always seen as biased because this strategy often assesses the favorite team with a high value in certain sports games, which usually happens in sports betting.In my opinion, if you want to bet on a team that is not favored as you said in money line betting, it is generally seen as a loss, but make no mistake, not all public bets can win, but if you are lucky betting on the money line you will be profitable if you win, because the payout is very high, but in this case if you win even though the chances are small but you can try, who knows how you bet taking the opposite side can beat the public's bet, if you succeed you will get a lot of money.
Well, most of the time the favorites are also the winners which is why they are on that side.
But I do believe that we should rely on our own analysis and not because the public tells us so. I like disagreeing with the most bet sometimes because it's either my instincts tell me or I did my own research to decide that the winner will be the underdog.
True, that those who bet for fun might not understand it but the good part about them is they can easily move on even if their bet loses. Those who did deep research and still lose will feel hurt and it will be difficult to let it go so we chase our losses which makes it wrong.
Bet for the favorite if you feel like they will really win, I think that's the answer to that. It's the public's choice and we cannot do anything about it, if we disagree then choose the other way.
But I do believe that we should rely on our own analysis and not because the public tells us so. I like disagreeing with the most bet sometimes because it's either my instincts tell me or I did my own research to decide that the winner will be the underdog.
True, that those who bet for fun might not understand it but the good part about them is they can easily move on even if their bet loses. Those who did deep research and still lose will feel hurt and it will be difficult to let it go so we chase our losses which makes it wrong.
Bet for the favorite if you feel like they will really win, I think that's the answer to that. It's the public's choice and we cannot do anything about it, if we disagree then choose the other way.
Even though I do take the public’s opinion into consideration, I don’t make it to be a deciding factor. I still look at how the teams are performing and who I think are most likely to win based on current state and historical records. Some drama outside of the match may also affect like maybe the team is undergoing managerial changes or some players are leaving.
If there is a popular choice, you need to consider why that may be and whether it is true. Sometimes the popular choice is indeed the right one. It’s popular for a reason so it is up to you to know why and decide whether it’s valid and justified
Exactly the point, the public opinion isn't a good factor to rely on when placing a bet or deciding who win in a football match, what matters is how good a team is at the moment before you decide to select them in your bet slip, who win in a match is not the decision of the public rather what plays out in the football field do and also sometimes events may not happen they way we expect them to be because of unseen circumstances, you have given many point which i see as considerable facts.
Whichever decision we make as regarding to game of soccer is personal but what I know for sure is that many things counts as a fact for considering who wins in a football event. Lets not also forget that the referee can also be a hindrance to the so call public opinion or believe towards the final result of a football match, so anything is possible, though whatever decision we make should satisfy our curiosity but it must be in line with the recent reality of the club not some kind of emotional deceit, biased mindset and public or personal sentiment that has nothing to do with what happens in the peach.
Betting against the crowd is, of course, risky, but the odds will always be high. To understand this, you need good knowledge, which includes careful preparatory analysis, reading the news, and whether there is a fake background. However, people who play against a person often bet on the obvious outcome of a match when a famous team is playing—a grand, without analyzing what form it is in. A good analysis should consist of finding out where so much news noise comes from and whether there is someone who can benefit from this noise. But constantly betting against the crowd is probably not the right strategy, since sometimes the crowd can bet in the right direction, and only your experience and intuition should tell you at what specific moment you need to play against.
What that is very funny to me is that the public are losing while the betting site is making huge amount of money from its customers. If a person decide to go against the public, what that will be noticed is that the person lose more than before. So if go against the public or he bet on what the public choose, there is still always high probability of losing in long term. Also the more the person bet frequently, the higher the rate the person will be losing. Normally betting against the public is riskier and I do not think it is worth it. If someone make analyses, such person will still bet on what the public bet on. 
The public here mainly consists of bettors who tend to bet on the favorites, whether it’s point spread or moneyline. Most suggestions we see online emphasize that to be considered a smart bettor, you should bet against the public. But what if we don’t bet against ourselves? Can we still find success in sports betting?
The words success in betting can be measured from where, is it related to winning or vice versa? In the category you mean I think it depends on how much luck and maybe sports betting is more rational because we bet based on previous analysis so winning or losing is based on someone's level of intelligence in analyzing the match. Although there is no guarantee when you do a betting analysis on a match and it is also not certain that it can be won because gambling sometimes requires luck that is inseparable from it.For the question of luck, it goes back to each individual and how someone's ability is in betting and when hoping for consistent wins, it is impossible for betting to provide the level of success that we want and I don't think about success in any bet.
Jump to: