Let me quote again.
Your assumption is without any valid proof, that's called assumption. That's why, I told you to for DDOS attack to not assume it's from another casino because you don't have valid proof and that's only from your opinion. It's correct right ?
Ok, I accept that
I say that because there have been many cases in the real and online worlds.
But indeed to collect the evidence is not easy.
That is the type of thing that makes it a lot worse for other casinos though. If I had a casino, I would rather see my competition line at all times and doing their best and losing, if there is an attack then it could rally people behind it based on the attack and use it to victimize itself and that could get attention from people.
Maybe I am wrong and these attacks scared off some gamblers, but if Duelbits could talk about the numbers, I am pretty sure that they are getting probably more people now. Mainly from what I am feeling, I do not know if others feel the same way, I just feel like gambling more here because they have been attacked like this.
Apart from that DDOS attack, there will be competition between each casino and only those casinos that can promote well will get a lot of users in their casinos.
By having a capable securities team, the casino will have no trouble resisting the DDOS attack and still be able to run the casino well.
But I feel that if one casino gets attacked, it means that the casino is one of the toughest competitors to the other casinos so the other casinos want to hinder it from progressing.